A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.

AIM: To implement shared decision-making (SDM) through a patient decision aid (PtDA) for the initiation of palliative care (PC) in end-of-life (EOL) cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: A comprehensive Scoping Review was conducted on SDM in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycInfo. An evidence-based implementation of PtDAs was created using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, which followed rigorous pillars: (1) context, (2) facilitation and (3) evaluation. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified and categorised into (1) Implementation characteristics and (2) Strategies for implementing SDM in terminally ill cancer patients. SDM should consider the decision-making location, optimal timing, participants and decision type. Strategies include professional training, PtDAs and implementation programmes. A PtDA implementation protocol in video format for deciding to initiate PC is proposed, following International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). CONCLUSIONS: SDM implementation should be guided by evidence-based methodological models justifying and structuring its execution, especially in complex and interdisciplinary contexts. National or international frameworks facilitate the adoption of health innovations, such as PtDAs, benefiting patients and improving their usage. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: SDM is not just a concept but an important approach to the Care of cancer patients at EOL, enhancing patient satisfaction and improving care quality. The success and sustainability of SDM hinge on the fundamental aspects of staff training, interdisciplinary collaboration and ongoing evaluation. The lack of specific aid in Spanish underscores the immediate need for local development. Further research is needed in this area, as most reviewed studies did not measure SDM effectiveness in diverse hospital settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This proposal was developed based on the experience and input of the nursing staff from the healthcare service where it is intended to be implemented.

Usefulness of dual imaging stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the main factor limiting long-term survival after cardiac transplantation. Dual imaging stress echocardiography with wall motion and Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve (CRF) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is a state-of-the-art methodology during dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DiSE). This study involving 74 heart transplanted patients has the purpose to assess the diagnostic value of dipyridamole stress echocardiography with evaluation of wall motion (WM) and Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve for the diagnosis of coronary allograft vasculopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients underwent DiSE and coronary angiography. Moderate-severe CAV was defined according to International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) recommended nomenclature for CAV, and CFR < 2 was considered to be impaired. Moderate-severe CAV was present in 11 patients. WM analysis revealed four patients (5%) with rest WM abnormalities. CFR analysis revealed that 40 (54%) individuals had an abnormal result. The combined evaluation of WM analysis and CFR resulted in a sensitivity of 72.7% (95% CI: 39.3 to 92.6%), a specificity of 49.2% (95% CI: 36.5 to 61.9%), a positive predictive value of 20% (95% CI: 9.6 to 36.1%), and negative predictive value of 91.1% (95% CI: 75.1 to 97.6%) for the diagnosis of CAV. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the inclusion of DiSE performance in Heart transplant follow up protocol. The addition of CFR evaluation offers valuable information to the angiography findings in the detection of CAV and could be helpful in selected patients to adjust the time and indications of coronary angiography.

Significance of the treadmill scores and high-risk criteria for exercise testing in non-high-risk patients with unstable angina and an intermediate Duke treadmill score.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of patients with an intermediate Duke treadmill score (DTS) is not well established.The aim of this study is to compare several treadmill indexes (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) High-Risk Criteria for exercise testing,Veterans Affairs and West Virginia Prognostic Score, ST/Heart Rate Index, Failure to attain 85% of age-predicted maximum Heart Rate) with ST-segment depression in detecting significant or severe coronary artery disease as determined by coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate DTS. METHODS: 144 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital for unstable angina were studied. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the ACC/AHA High-Risk Criteria and West Virginia Prognostic Score were greater than 95% for the detection of significant coronary artery disease and 96.67% for the detection of severe coronary artery disease. The sensitivity of I mm ST depression for the detection of significant and severe coronary disease was 74.74% and 86.67%, respectively. The combined evaluation of ST-segment depression > or =1 mm and exercise-induced angina could efficiently identify a population with a high prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (specificity of 95.92%, positive predictive value of 94.29%). CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA High-Risk Criteria was West Virginia Prognostic Score provided relevant diagnostic information in patients with an intermediate DTS. A coronary angiography is to be recommended in patients with an intermediate DTS who also present ST-segment depression > or =1 mm and exercise-induced angina.