RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The identification of oncogenic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has led to the development of drugs that target essential survival pathways, but whether targeting multiple survival pathways may be curative in DLBCL is unknown. METHODS: We performed a single-center, phase 1b-2 study of a regimen of venetoclax, ibrutinib, prednisone, obinutuzumab, and lenalidomide (ViPOR) in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. In phase 1b, which included patients with DLBCL and indolent lymphomas, four dose levels of venetoclax were evaluated to identify the recommended phase 2 dose, with fixed doses of the other four drugs. A phase 2 expansion in patients with germinal-center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB DLBCL was performed. ViPOR was administered every 21 days for six cycles. RESULTS: In phase 1b of the study, involving 20 patients (10 with DLBCL), a single dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 intracranial hemorrhage occurred, a result that established venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. Phase 2 included 40 patients with DLBCL. Toxic effects that were observed among all the patients included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (in 24% of the cycles), thrombocytopenia (in 23%), anemia (in 7%), and febrile neutropenia (in 1%). Objective responses occurred in 54% of 48 evaluable patients with DLBCL, and complete responses occurred in 38%; complete responses were exclusively in patients with non-GCB DLBCL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 (or both). Circulating tumor DNA was undetectable in 33% of the patients at the end of ViPOR therapy. With a median follow-up of 40 months, 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 47) and 36% (95% CI, 23 to 49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ViPOR was associated with durable remissions in patients with specific molecular DLBCL subtypes and was associated with mainly reversible adverse events. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03223610.).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Lenalidomida , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Piperidinas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/efectos adversos , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Adenina/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Introduction of fluorine into bioactive molecules has attracted much attention in drug development. For example, tetrafluorination of the phthalimide moiety of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) has a strong beneficial effect on the ability to inhibit angiogenesis. The neomorphic activity of E3 ligase complexes is induced by the binding of IMiDs to cereblon. We investigated that a set of eight thalidomide analogs, comprising non- and tetrafluorinated counterparts, did not induce the degradation of neomorphic substrates (IKZF3, GSPT1, CK1α, SALL4). Hence, the antiangiogenic activity of fluorinated IMiDs was not triggered by neosubstrate degradation features. A fluorine scanning of non-traditional IMiDs of the benzamido glutarimide chemotype was performed. By measuring the endothelial cell tube formation, no angiogenesis inhibitors were identified, confirming the narrow structure-activity window of IMiD-induced antiangiogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Talidomida , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/química , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/síntesis química , Talidomida/farmacología , Talidomida/química , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/síntesis química , Humanos , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Estructura Molecular , Halogenación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana/efectos de los fármacos , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
As we move into the era of precision medicine, the growing relevance of genetic alterations to prostate cancer (PCa) development and treatment demonstrates the importance of characterizing preclinical models at the genomic level. Our study investigated the genomic characterization of eight PCa cell lines to understand which models are clinically relevant. We designed a custom AmpliSeq DNA gene panel that encompassed key molecular pathways targeting AR signaling, apoptosis, DNA damage repair, and PI3K/AKT/PTEN, in addition to tumor suppressor genes. We examined the relationship between cell line genomic alterations and therapeutic response. In addition, using DepMap's Celligner tool, we identified which preclinical models are most representative of specific prostate cancer patient populations on cBioPortal. These data will help investigators understand the genetic differences in preclinical models of PCa and determine which ones are relevant for use in their translational research.
Asunto(s)
Genómica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Genómica/métodos , Transducción de Señal , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/genética , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Reparación del ADNRESUMEN
The hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl-hydroxylases (human PHD1-3) catalyze prolyl hydroxylation in oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domains of HIFα isoforms, modifications that signal for HIFα proteasomal degradation in an oxygen-dependent manner. PHD inhibitors are used for treatment of anemia in kidney disease. Increased erythropoietin (EPO) in patients with familial/idiopathic erythrocytosis and pulmonary hypertension is associated with mutations in EGLN1 (PHD2) and EPAS1 (HIF2α); a drug inhibiting HIF2α activity is used for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) treatment. We report crystal structures of PHD2 complexed with the C-terminal HIF2α-ODD in the presence of its 2-oxoglutarate cosubstrate or N-oxalylglycine inhibitor. Combined with the reported PHD2.HIFα-ODD structures and biochemical studies, the results inform on the different PHD.HIFα-ODD binding modes and the potential effects of clinically observed mutations in HIFα and PHD2 genes. They may help enable new therapeutic avenues, including PHD isoform-selective inhibitors and sequestration of HIF2α by the PHDs for ccRCC treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Hipoxia/metabolismo , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/química , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/metabolismo , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Procolágeno-Prolina Dioxigenasa/química , Procolágeno-Prolina Dioxigenasa/genética , Procolágeno-Prolina Dioxigenasa/metabolismo , Prolil Hidroxilasas , Isoformas de ProteínasRESUMEN
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for the treatment of a variety of cancer types. The doses of these drugs, though approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have never been optimised, likely leading to significantly higher doses than required for optimal efficacy. Dose optimisation would hypothetically decrease the risk, severity, and duration of immune-related adverse events, as well as provide an opportunity to reduce costs through interventional pharmacoeconomic strategies such as off-label dose reductions or less frequent dosing. We summarise existing evidence for ICI dose optimisation to advocate for the role of interventional pharmacoeconomics.
Asunto(s)
Economía Farmacéutica , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Patients experience interindividual variation in response to analgesics, which may be partially explained by genetics. This commentary discusses a recently published trial on COMT genotype and opioid dose requirements and describes the potential role for COMT and other genes (eg, CYP2D6) on opioid therapy and the current evidence for germline pharmacogenetics and resources for opioid pharmacogenetics.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor , Farmacogenética , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor en Cáncer/genética , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/genética , Catecol O-Metiltransferasa/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Genotipo , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a mainstay of prostate cancer treatment for decades. Relugolix was FDA-approved in 2020 and is currently the only ADT option via an oral route. While the opportunity to use an oral medication for this indication has some advantages, a balanced discussion is required to understand in what clinical settings this agent truly has benefit over long-acting injectable formulations of ADT. Furthermore, patient preference, compliance, financial toxicity, and perhaps most importantly, pharmacologic characteristics must be considered.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Before 2018, there was no standard of care for non-metastatic (M0) castration resistant prostate cancer nmCRPC. Androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs) were commonly used sequentially nmCRPC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing the ARA flutamide+/-PROSTVAC, a pox viral vaccine targeting PSA that includes T-cell co-stimulatory molecules. Eligible men had negative CT and Tc99 bone scans, and rising PSA on ADT. Previous treatment with ARA was a stratification factor. Patients were also evaluated for antigen-specific immune responses using intracellular cytokine staining. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients randomized to flutamide and 31 to flutamide+vaccine. The median age was 71.8 and 69.8 years, respectively. The median time to treatment failure after a median potential follow-up of 46.7 months was, 4.5 months (range 2-70) for flutamide alone vs. 6.9 months (2.5-40; P = .38) with flutamide+vaccine. Seven patients in each arm had a >50% PSA response. Antigen-specific responses were similar in both arms (58% of patients in flutamide alone and 56% in flutamide+vaccine). The treatments were well tolerated. The most common side effect > grade 2 was injection site reaction seen in 29/31 vaccine patients which were self-limiting. CONCLUSION: The combination of flutamide+PROSTVAC did not improve outcomes in men with nmCRPC compared with flutamide alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00450463).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Flutamida/uso terapéutico , Flutamida/efectos adversos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , CastraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: No approved therapies exist for inoperable plexiform neurofibromas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, phase 2 trial of selumetinib to determine the objective response rate among patients with plexiform neurofibromas and to assess clinical benefit. Children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and symptomatic inoperable plexiform neurofibromas received oral selumetinib twice daily at a dose of 25 mg per square meter of body-surface area on a continuous dosing schedule (28-day cycles). Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcome assessments (pain, quality of life, disfigurement, and function) were performed at least every four cycles. Children rated tumor pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). RESULTS: A total of 50 children (median age, 10.2 years; range, 3.5 to 17.4) were enrolled from August 2015 through August 2016. The most frequent neurofibroma-related symptoms were disfigurement (44 patients), motor dysfunction (33), and pain (26). A total of 35 patients (70%) had a confirmed partial response as of March 29, 2019, and 28 of these patients had a durable response (lasting ≥1 year). After 1 year of treatment, the mean decrease in child-reported tumor pain-intensity scores was 2 points, considered a clinically meaningful improvement. In addition, clinically meaningful improvements were seen in child-reported and parent-reported interference of pain in daily functioning (38% and 50%, respectively) and overall health-related quality of life (48% and 58%, respectively) as well as in functional outcomes of strength (56% of patients) and range of motion (38% of patients). Five patients discontinued treatment because of toxic effects possibly related to selumetinib, and 6 patients had disease progression. The most frequent toxic effects were nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea; an asymptomatic increase in the creatine phosphokinase level; acneiform rash; and paronychia. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, most children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and inoperable plexiform neurofibromas had durable tumor shrinkage and clinical benefit from selumetinib. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01362803.).
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/tratamiento farmacológico , Neurofibromatosis 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/complicaciones , Neurofibroma Plexiforme/patología , Neurofibromatosis 1/complicaciones , Neurofibromatosis 1/patología , Dolor/etiología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Carga Tumoral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a therapeutic challenge. Sclerotic skin manifestations are especially difficult to treat. We conducted a randomized phase 2 clinical trial (#NCT01688466) to determine the safety, efficacy, and preferred dose of pomalidomide in persons with moderate to severe cGVHD unresponsive to corticosteroids and/or subsequent lines of therapy. Thirty-four subjects were randomized to receive pomalidomide 0.5 mg per day orally (n = 17; low-dose cohort) or 2 mg per day at a starting dose of 0.5 mg per day increasing to 2 mg per day over 6 weeks (n = 17; high-dose cohort). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at 6 months according to the 2005 National Institutes of Health cGVHD Response Criteria. Thirty-two patients had severe sclerotic skin and received a median of 5 (range, 2-10) previous systemic therapies. ORR was 47% (95% confidence interval, 30-65) in the intention-to-treat analyses. All were partial responses, with no difference in ORR between the cohorts. ORR was 67% (45%-84%) in the 24 evaluable subjects at 6 months. Nine had improvement in National Institutes of Health joint/fascia scores (P = .018). Median change from the baseline in body surface area involvement of skin cGVHD was -7.5% (-10% to 35%; P = .002). The most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, infection, and fatigue. Eight subjects in the high-dose cohort had dose decreases because of adverse events. There was 1 death in the low-dose cohort from bacterial pneumonia. Our data indicate antifibrotic effects of pomalidomide and possible association with increases in concentrations of blood regulatory T-cell and interleukin-2. Pomalidomide 0.5 mg per day is a safe and effective therapy for advanced corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/patología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Infecciones , Articulaciones/patología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuento de Linfocitos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/efectos de los fármacos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/inmunología , Linfopenia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Piel/patología , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/farmacocinética , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical efficacy of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer, therapeutic resistance and disease progression are inevitable. We proposed a study to evaluate NLG207, a nanoparticle-drug conjugate (NDC) of the potent topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, in combination with enzalutamide, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following progression on enzalutamide. METHODS: This was a single-arm, optimal two-stage, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC who received prior enzalutamide. A lead-in dose escalation evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide. Patients received NLG207 via IV infusion every 2 weeks and enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily. RESULTS: Between March 2019 and June 2021, four patients were accrued to the lead-in dose escalation. Two of the four patients were evaluable and both experienced DLTs at the NLG207 12 mg/m2 dose level; one DLT was related to a dose delay for noninfective cystitis and myelosuppression, the other a grade 3 noninfective cystitis. Further evaluation of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide was halted and the study was ultimately terminated. PSA declines from baseline were observed in two patients. CONCLUSION: NLG207 12 mg/m2 in combination with enzalutamide was not well tolerated in patients with mCRPC following several lines of the standard of care therapy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03531827.
Asunto(s)
Cistitis , Nanopartículas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Ciclodextrinas , Humanos , Masculino , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II study of the combination of pembrolizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) to assess response rate and clinical efficacy. Exploratory objectives included correlative studies of immune marker expression, tumor evolution, and immune infiltration in response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically confirmed BTC were enrolled and received oxaliplatin and pembrolizumab on day 1 of cycles 1-6. Capecitabine was administered orally twice daily as intermittent treatment, with the first dose on day 1 and the last dose on day 14 of cycles 1-6. Starting on cycle 7, pembrolizumab monotherapy was continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, tolerability, feasibility, and response rate. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1 and immune infiltrates was analyzed in paired tumor biopsies, as well as bulk transcriptome and exome profiling for five patients and single-cell RNA sequencing for one partial responder. RESULTS: Eleven patients enrolled, three of whom had received no prior systemic therapy. Treatment was well tolerated, and the most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphocytopenia, anemia, and decreased platelet count. Three patients (27.3%) achieved a partial response, and six (54%) had stable disease. The disease control rate was 81.8%. The median PFS was 4.1 months with a 6-month PFS rate of 45.5%. Molecular profiling suggests qualitative differences in immune infiltration and clonal evolution based on response. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with pembrolizumab is tolerable and a potentially effective treatment for refractory advanced BTC. This study highlights a design framework for the precise characterization of individual BTC tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03111732).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Sistema Biliar , Carcinoma , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , OxaliplatinoRESUMEN
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved two poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib, for treatment of biomarker-positive metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. The benefits of PARP inhibition have been well characterized in patients who have BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in several forms of cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 occupy key roles in DNA damage repair, which is comprised of several different pathways with numerous participants. Patients with mutations in other key genes within the DNA damage repair pathway may also respond to treatment with PARP inhibitors, and identification of these alterations could significantly increase the percentage of patients that may benefit from PARP inhibition. This review focuses on the potential for synthetically lethal interactions between PARP inhibitors and non-BRCA DNA damage repair genes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The treatment potential of PARP inhibition has been well characterized in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, but there is compelling evidence for expanding the use of PARP inhibitors to mutations of other non-BRCA DNA damage repair (DDR) genes. This could increase the percentage of patients that may benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors alone or in combination with other therapies. Understanding the significance of PARP inhibitor-sensitizing alterations in other common non-BRCA DDR genes will help guide clinical decisions to provide targeted treatment options to a wider population of patients.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Reparación del ADN/genética , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genéticaRESUMEN
LESSONS LEARNED: Limited evidence suggests an acceptable pharmacokinetic profile when enzalutamide is administered via a liquid formulation extracted from the commercially available liquid-filled soft-gelatin capsules. Tolerability may limit use in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Enzalutamide is an established standard-of-care treatment for advanced prostate cancer with a commercially available formulation that may be inconvenient for some patients. We proposed a study to evaluate the bioequivalence of a liquid formulation to provide an alternative method of administration. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover pilot bioequivalence study to compare two oral formulations of enzalutamide: four enzalutamide 40 mg liquid-filled soft-gelatin capsules (commercially available) administered whole versus enzalutamide 160 mg liquid (extracted from capsules) administered via oral syringe. To assess bioequivalence, patients were randomized to receive a single dose of one formulation, then cross over to receive the alternative formulation following a 42-day washout period; serial plasma samples were collected over the course of 24 hours, followed by collections at 3, 8, and 42 days after the dose for both formulations. Bioequivalence of the formulations was assessed via comparisons of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) calculations per U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. The study also assessed the safety and tolerability of the formulations. RESULTS: The study failed to meet proposed accrual, with only one patient enrolled, thus limiting the bioequivalence evaluation. Based on the data from a single patient, the drug exposure (measured by AUC) of enzalutamide and N-desmethyl enzalutamide (primary active metabolite) for the liquid formulation was 112% and 117%, respectively, compared with the capsule formulation. Although both formulations appeared well tolerated with no adverse events reported, the tolerability assessment questionnaire revealed an unpleasant taste of the liquid formulation. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence suggests a similar pharmacokinetic profile when administering liquid extracted from enzalutamide soft-gelatin capsules compared with intact capsules in patients with prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Ayuno , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Administración Oral , Área Bajo la Curva , Benzamidas , Disponibilidad Biológica , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Masculino , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
LESSONS LEARNED: Despite the initial optimism for using immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of multiple myeloma, subsequent clinical studies have been disappointing. Preclinical studies have suggested that priming the immune system with various modalities in addition to checkpoint inhibition may overcome the relative T-cell exhaustion or senescence; however, in this small data set, radiotherapy with checkpoint inhibition did not appear to activate the antitumor immune response. BACKGROUND: Extramedullary disease (EMD) is recognized as an aggressive subentity of multiple myeloma (MM) with a need for novel therapeutic approaches. We therefore designed a proof-of-principle pilot study to evaluate the synergy between the combination of the anti-PD-L1, avelumab, and concomitant hypofractionated radiotherapy. METHODS: This was a single-arm phase II Simon two-stage single center study that was prematurely terminated because of the COVID-19 pandemic after enrolling four patients. Key eligibility included patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had exhausted or were not candidates for standard therapy and had at least one lesion amenable to radiotherapy. Patients received avelumab until progression or intolerable toxicity and hypofractionated radiotherapy to a focal lesion in cycle 2. Radiotherapy was delayed until cycle 2 to allow the avelumab to reach a study state, given the important observation from previous studies that concomitant therapy is needed for the abscopal effect. RESULTS: At a median potential follow-up of 10.5 months, there were no objective responses, one minimal response, and two stable disease as best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-7.1 months), and no deaths occurred. There were no grade ≥3 and five grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Avelumab in combination with radiotherapy for patients with RRMM and EMD was associated with very modest systemic clinical benefit; however, patients did benefit as usual from local radiotherapy. Furthermore, the combination was very well tolerated compared with historical RRMM treatment regimens.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/radioterapia , Pandemias , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
Cereblon (CRBN), the substrate receptor of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, is a target of thalidomide and thalidomide-derived immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The binding of these IMiDs to CRBN alters the substrate specificity of the ligase, thereby mediating multiple effects that are exploited in cancer therapy. However, to date, it is not clear which other possible targets might be involved in the efficacy of IMiDs. One especially prominent effect of a number of thalidomide analogs is their ability to inhibit angiogenesis, which is typically enhanced in fluorinated analogs. So far, the involvement of CRBN in antiangiogenic effects is under debate. Here, starting from a systematic set of thalidomide analogs and employing a quantitative in vitro CRBN-binding assay, we study the correlation of fluorination, CRBN binding and antiangiogenic effects. We clearly identify fluorination to correlate both with CRBN binding affinity and with antiangiogenic effects, but do not find a correlation between the latter two phenomena, indicating that the main target for the antiangiogenic effects of thalidomide analogs still remains to be identified.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Factores Inmunológicos/metabolismo , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/metabolismo , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/química , Animales , Aorta/efectos de los fármacos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Halogenación , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/química , Masculino , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Talidomida/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
Cereblon (CRBN) is a substrate recruiter element of the E3 cullin 4-RING ubiquitin ligase complex, and a binding target of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs). CRBN is responsible for the pleiotropic effects of IMiDs, yet its function in angiogenesis and in mediating the antiangiogenic effects of IMiDs remains unclear. We investigated the role of CRBN in the angiogenic process and in propagating the antiangiogenic effects of IMiDs in vitro. siRNA-mediated CRBN knock down in human endothelial cells (HUVEC and HMVEC-L), did not affect endothelial cell proliferation, migration, or tube formation. Using CRBN-deficient mice, we further demonstrated that microvessal formation can occur independently of cereblon in the ex vivo mouse aortic ring model. The cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex can recruit endothelial cell-specific factors, AGO2 (associated with angiogenesis), and SALL4 (associated with embryogenesis/angiogenesis), for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Knockdown of CRBN caused a corresponding increase in AGO2 and SALL4 protein expression and IMiD treatment was able to rescue the siCRBN effect to increase the CRBN expression. These findings suggest one potential mechanism of action that likely involves a tightly coordinated regulation of CRBN with endothelial cell targets and highlight the need to further elucidate the mechanism(s), which could include cereblon-independent pathways, through which IMiDs exert their antiangiogenic effects.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana/metabolismo , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/metabolismo , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Animales , Proteínas Argonautas/genética , Proteínas Argonautas/metabolismo , Movimiento Celular/genética , Proliferación Celular/genética , Células Cultivadas , Células Endoteliales de la Vena Umbilical Humana/citología , Humanos , Lenalidomida/farmacología , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Neovascularización Fisiológica/efectos de los fármacos , Neovascularización Fisiológica/genética , Interferencia de ARN , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cabozantinib combined with docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase 1/2 multicentre study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with daily prednisone 10 mg) was combined with escalating doses of daily cabozantinib (20, 40 and 60 mg). Based on the results of the phase 1 study, the investigation was expanded into a randomized study of docetaxel with prednisone (hereafter 'docetaxel/prednisone') plus the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib compared with docetaxel/prednisone alone. RESULTS: A total of 44 men with mCRPC were enrolled in this phase 1/2 trial. An MTD of 40 mg cabozantinib plus docetaxel/prednisone was determined. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenic fever and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and there was one death attributable to a thromboembolic event. In addition, grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, hypophosphataemia and neuropathy were seen in three or more patients. In the phase 1 study, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) time were 13.6 and 16.3 months, respectively. In the phase 2 study, which was terminated early because of poor accrual, the median TTP and OS favoured the combination (n = 13) compared to docetaxel/prednisone alone (n = 12; 21.0 vs 6.6 months; P = 0.035 and 23.8 vs 15.6 months; P = 0.072, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of patients in this study, preliminary data suggest that cabozantinib can be safely added to docetaxel/prednisone with possible enhanced efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sorafenib,an orally bioavailable, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, have demonstrated activity in pediatric and adult malignancies. We evaluated the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacogenomic (PGX) profile of sorafenib with irinotecan in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors and assessed the feasibility of incorporating patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures as an adjunct to traditional endpoints. METHODS: Sorafenib, continuous oral twice daily dosing, was administered with irinotecan, orally, once daily days 1-5, repeated every 21 days (NCT01518413). Based on tolerability, escalation of sorafenib followed by escalation of irinotecan was planned. Three patients were initially enrolled at each dose level. Sorafenib and irinotecan PK analyses were performed during cycle 1. PRO measurements were collected during cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were evaluable. Two of three patients at dose level 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), grade 3 diarrhea, and grade 3 hyponatremia. Therefore, dose level 1 was expanded to 12 patients and two patients had DLT, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 elevated lipase. Nine of 15 (60%) patients had a best response of stable disease with four patients receiving ≥6 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for pediatric patients was sorafenib 150 mg/m2 /dose twice daily with irinotecan 70 mg/m2 /dose daily × 5 days every 21 days. This oral outpatient regimen was well tolerated and resulted in prolonged disease stabilization. There were no significant alterations in the PK profile of either agent when administered in combination. Patients were willing and able to report their subjective experiences with this regimen.
Asunto(s)
Irinotecán , Neoplasias , Sorafenib , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Irinotecán/efectos adversos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Sorafenib/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor of MET, VEGFR, AXL, and RET, which also has an effect on the tumour immune microenvironment by decreasing regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. In this study, we examined the activity of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma. METHODS: This study was an open-label, single-arm, three-cohort phase 2 trial done at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma or rare genitourinary tract histologies, Karnofsky performance scale index of 60% or higher, and documented disease progression after at least one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-refractory). Cohort one included patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with measurable disease as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Two additional cohorts that enrolled in parallel (patients with bone-only urothelial carcinoma metastases and patients with rare histologies of the genitourinary tract) were exploratory. Patients received cabozantinib 60 mg orally once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate by RECIST in cohort one. Response was assessed in all patients who met the eligibility criteria and who received at least 8 weeks of therapy. All patients who received at least one dose of cabozantinib were included in the safety analysis. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01688999. FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2012, and Oct, 20, 2015, 68 patients were enrolled on the study (49 in cohort one, six in cohort two, and 13 in cohort three). All patients received at least one dose of cabozantinib. The median follow-up was 61·2 months (IQR 53·8-70·0) for the 57 patients evaluable for response. In the 42 evaluable patients in cohort one, there was one complete response and seven partial responses (objective response rate 19%, 95% CI 9-34). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (six [9%] patients), hypertension (five [7%]), proteinuria (four [6%]), and hypophosphataemia (four [6%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Cabozantinib has single-agent clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated, platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma with measurable disease and bone metastases and is generally well tolerated. Cabozantinib has innate and adaptive immunomodulatory properties providing a rationale for combining cabozantinib with immunotherapeutic strategies. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute Intramural Program and the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.