Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: The comparative effectiveness of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer is not well understood. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether transperineal biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 840 men randomized, 93% were White, 44% had a previous biopsy, with a median age of 66 years and median PSA density of 0.14. Of these, 384 underwent transrectal and 398 underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. Prebiopsy prostate MRI was performed in 96% of men. Grade Group ≥ 2 prostate cancer was classified as clinically significant. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to evaluate the effect of biopsy procedures on cancer detection rates. RESULTS: The detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer were 47.1% and 43.2% (odds ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88-1.55) for transrectal and transperineal biopsy, respectively. Age, PSA density, clinical stage and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score were associated with the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer, whereas history of previous biopsy, anterior tumors, and biopsy procedure (transrectal or transperineal) were not. Clinically significant cancer detection rates in biopsy-naïve men undergoing MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsy were 59% and 62%, respectively. The overall cancer detection rates following transrectal and transperineal biopsy were 72.1% and 70.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference noted in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer following transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy. Urologists may utilize either biopsy procedure that best suits their patients' needs and practice setting.

Complications Following Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Results of the ProBE-PC Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Transrectal prostate biopsy has come under scrutiny due to potential for postbiopsy infections and transperineal prostate biopsy is being offered as the safer alternative. However, there is a lack of randomized comparative studies. Our goal was to directly evaluate infectious and noninfectious complications following the 2 biopsy procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, pragmatic, randomized clinical study in men undergoing prostate biopsy. The participants underwent either transrectal or transperineal prostate biopsy in the office under local anesthesia. The primary outcome was a 30-day composite infectious complication rate, comprising of 1 or more components including fever, genitourinary infection, antibiotic prescriptions, office or emergency visits, hospitalization, or sepsis. Secondary outcomes included 30-day composite noninfectious complications (urinary or hemorrhagic). RESULTS: Of the 763 randomized participants, 718 underwent either transrectal (351) or transperineal (367) prostate biopsy. A composite infectious complication event occurred in 9 participants (2.6%) in the transrectal and 10 participants (2.7%) in the transperineal group (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.43 to 2.65; P = .99). None of the participants developed sepsis in either group. There were no between-group differences in any of the individual component infectious events. A composite noninfectious complication occurred in 6 (1.7%) and 8 (2.2%) participants in the transrectal and transperineal groups, respectively (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.44 to 3.73; P = .79). No participants required hospitalization or other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Among men undergoing transperineal or transrectal prostate biopsy, we could not demonstrate any difference in the infectious or noninfectious complications. Both biopsy approaches remain clinically viable and safe.

Implementation and Assessment of No Opioid Prescription Strategy at Discharge After Major Urologic Cancer Surgery.

Importance: Postoperative opioid prescriptions are associated with delayed recovery, perioperative complications, opioid use disorder, and diversion of overprescribed opioids, which places the community at risk of opioid misuse or addiction. Objective: To assess a protocol for eliminating postdischarge opioid prescriptions after major urologic cancer surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of the no opioid prescriptions at discharge after surgery (NOPIOIDS) protocol was conducted between May 2017 and June 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Patients undergoing open or minimally invasive radical cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, and radical prostatectomy were sorted into the control group (usual opioids), the lead-in group (reduced opioids), and the NOPIOIDS group (no opioid prescriptions). Interventions: The NOPIOIDS group received a preadmission educational handout, postdischarge instructions for using nonopioid analgesics, and no routine opioid prescriptions. The lead-in group received a postdischarge instruction sheet and reduced opioid prescriptions at prescribers' discretion. The control group received opioid prescriptions at prescribers' discretion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures included rate and dose of opioid prescriptions at discharge and for 30 days postdischarge. Additional outcome measures included patient-reported pain and satisfaction level, unplanned health care utilization, and postoperative complications. Results: Of 647 opioid-naive patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.0] years; 478 [73.9%] male; 586 [90.6%] White), the rate of opioid prescriptions at discharge for the control, the lead-in, and the NOPIOIDS groups was 80.9% (157 of 194), 57.9% (55 of 95), and 2.2% (8 of 358) (Kruskal-Wallis test of medians: P < .001), and the overall median (IQR) tablets prescribed was 14 (10-20), 4 (0-5.3), and 0 (0-0) per patient in the control, lead-in, and NOPIOIDS groups, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test of medians: P < .001). In the NOPIOIDS group, median and mean opioid dose was 0 tablets for all procedure types, with the exception of kidney procedures (mean [SD], 0.5 [1.7] tablets). Patient-reported pain surveys were received from 358 patients (72.6%) in the NOPIOIDS group, demonstrating low pain scores (mean [SD], 2.5 [0.86]) and high satisfaction scores (mean [SD], 86.6 [3.8]). There was no increase in postoperative complications in the group with no opioid prescriptions. Conclusions and Relevance: This perioperative protocol, with emphasis on nonopioid alternatives and patient instructions, may be safe and effective in nearly eliminating the need for opioid prescriptions after major abdominopelvic cancer surgery without adversely affecting pain control, complications, or recovery.

Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).

BACKGROUND: Rrisk of infection and hospitalization after transrectal prostate biopsy (TRBx) has been increasing worldwide. Several modified antibiotic regimens have met with variable success in preventing such infections. Transperineal prostate biopsy (TPBx) is increasingly recommended as the preferred alternative due to a potentially lower risk of post-biopsy infections. Aim of this review is to define the magnitude of post-biopsy complications and the effectiveness of preventive strategies, including TPBx approach. METHODS: We performed a focused review of literature on infectious complications after TRBx and detailed the use of various preventive measures. We summarized the effectiveness of several preventive measures, including TPBx, and outlined the inconsistencies in reported outcomes. We identified potential barriers to the uptake of TPBx, including the gap in knowledge such as lack of high-quality evidence. RESULTS: Several antibiotic prophylaxis protocols, including targeted and augmented, have been utilized for TRBx without demonstrating a clearly superior regimen. Of the non-antibiotic preventive measure, povidone-iodine rectal prep appears to be most effective strategy. Several single-arm cohort studies have reported very low rates of infections after TPBx and demonstrated the feasibility of an office-based procedure. However, barriers to the adoption of TPBx exist including retrospective data, and conflicting results showing minimal reduction in complications with increased burden of resource utilization. Presently, there are no randomized studies comparing the infectious complications after TRBx and TPBx. We discuss the rationale and protocol for a randomized controlled trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of biopsy techniques. CONCLUSIONS: TPBx approach has the potential to lower the rate of post-biopsy infections and hospitalizations. However, there are several barriers to widespread adoption of this approach including inconsistencies in reported outcomes and lack of Level-1 evidence. Randomized controlled studies are required to directly compare the infectious complications associated with each biopsy procedure.

Tissue-marking scheme for a cost-effective extended prostate biopsy protocol.

OBJECTIVES: Extended biopsy schemes are now the standard of care for detection of prostate cancer. Submitting biopsy cores individually raises the cost of pathologic evaluation significantly while important prognostic information is lost when the samples are bundled into fewer containers. We devised a protocol for bundling biopsy cores to reduce the cost while maintaining our ability to identify important biopsy features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifty-two consecutive men underwent a prostate biopsy using our prospectively designed protocol. The lateral peripheral cores were marked with India ink and combined with cores from the corresponding sextant site into one container (maximum containers = 6). Prognostic information from each core was recorded. Cost analysis was based on the reimbursement rates for variable number of containers. RESULTS: Tissue-labeling protocol did not increase the procedure time or introduce any tissue artifacts. Cancer was detected in 177 (39%) men with mean Gleason score of 7. A single core with cancer was noted in 28%, and cancer in < or =25% of the core was found in 41%. Thirteen of 64 (20%) men undergoing radical prostatectomy had extracapsular extension (ECE) and 10 (15%) had a positive surgical margin. The location of ECE on prostatectomy specimen correlated with a positive biopsy site in 9 (70%) patients. The cost of histopathologic evaluation is based on number of individually labeled specimen containers. By reducing the number of specimen containers from 12 to 6, the potential savings may be in hundreds of million per year. CONCLUSIONS: This simple tissue-labeling protocol facilitates extended prostate biopsies in a cost-effective manner, while maintaining our ability to glean important prognostic information from each core.

PSA-related markers in the detection of prostate cancer and high-grade disease in the contemporary era with extended biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of total PSA (tPSA), percent free PSA (%fPSA), and complexed PSA (cPSA) with prostate cancer detection and the diagnosis of poorly-differentiated cancers in the contemporary era. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 292 men who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) tPSA 2.5 to 10 ng/ml; (2) initial biopsy only; (3) extended biopsy scheme (>or=10 peripheral zone cores); (4) no previous prostate surgeries. The ability of PSA-related markers to detect cancer was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (AUC-ROC). Various clinically relevant % fPSA cutoffs and cPSA ranges were analyzed to determine the association with poorly-differentiated cancers. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 126 (43%) men, with mean Gleason score of 7. The cancer detection rates for various cutoffs of tPSA, cPSA and % fPSA were very similar. On ROC analysis for cancer diagnosis, the AUCs for tPSA, % fPSA, and cPSA were 0.53, 0.54, and 0.52, respectively. Men with % fPSA <15 were more likely to have poorly-differentiated cancer than those with % fPSA >or=15 (66% vs. 41%, P < 0.005). Similarly, cPSA ranges (2-4, 4.1-6, and >6) were associated with the detection of poorly-differentiated cancers (37%, 57%, and 80% P < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: With the use of extended prostate sampling in the contemporary screening population, the addition of cPSA and % fPSA does not enhance the diagnostic performance of tPSA. However, the significant association between cPSA and poorly-differentiated cancers suggests that this may be a more useful initial test for prostate cancer screening.

Loss of claudins-1 and -7 and expression of claudins-3 and -4 correlate with prognostic variables in prostatic adenocarcinomas.

Claudins, members of a large family of adherent junction proteins, regulate the integrity and function of tight junctions and influence tumorigenesis. Recent studies have shown that altered levels of the different claudins may be related to invasion and progression of carcinoma cells in several primary neoplasms. However, there is no reported study documenting the pattern of claudin expression in prostatic adenocarcinomas (PACs). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections from 141 PACs were immunostained by manual and automated methods on the Xmatrx (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) using antihuman claudin-1, -3, -4, -5, and -7 antibodies (Zymed, San Francisco, CA). Membranous immunoreactivity for each protein was semiquantitatively scored in both the tumor and adjacent benign epithelium in each case. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic variables. Variable membranous positivity was noted in the adjacent benign glands for all 5 proteins in all cases. PACs showed variable membranous positivity ranging from decreased, similar to, and increased in relation to the adjacent benign epithelium for all claudins. Decreased expression of claudin-1 correlated with high tumor grade (P = .001) and biochemical disease recurrence (P = .01), whereas decreased claudin-7 correlated with high tumor grade (P < .0001). In contrast, expression of claudin-3 correlated with advanced stage tumors (P = .03) and recurrence (P = .02), and expression of claudin-4 correlated with advanced stage (P = .02). On multivariate analysis, advanced stage (P = .026) and decreased claudin-1 protein expression (P = .005) independently predicted disease recurrence. Immunohistochemical expression and prognostic significance of claudins are variable in PACs, with decreased expression of claudin-1 emerging as an independent prognostic variable warranting further study.

Smad4 protein expression correlates with grade, stage, and DNA ploidy in prostatic adenocarcinomas.

The tumor suppressor gene Smad4 (DPC4) has been localized to chromosome 18q21.1 and is a member of the Smad family that mediates the transforming growth factor beta signaling pathway suppressing epithelial cell growth. However, variable expression of this protein has been reported, with a loss in some cancers and increased expression in others. Given both the variability and lack of consensus reported regarding Smad4 expression in prostate cancer, we assessed Smad4 immunoreactivity in prostatic adenocarcinomas (PACs). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 133 PACs were immunostained by a manual method using indirect biotin streptavidin horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine detection using a monoclonal mouse antihuman Smad4 antibody (sc-7966; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif). Nuclear immunoreactivity and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity were each semiquantitatively scored based on intensity and percentage of positive cells. Deoxyribonucelic acid ploidy was determined on Feulgen-stained tissue sections by static image analysis. Results were correlated with morphological and prognostic variables. Variable nuclear and cytoplasmic Smad4 positivity was noted in the adjacent benign glands in all cases. Of 133 PACs, 64 (48%) featured increased nuclear and 68 (51%) featured increased cytoplasmic protein expression. Nuclear Smad4 overexpression correlated with tumor grade (P = .02), stage (P = .04), and DNA ploidy (P = .04). Cytoplasmic overexpression correlated with tumor grade (P = .04) and DNA ploidy (P = .04) while showing a trend for correlation with tumor stage (P = .08). Neither nuclear nor cytoplasmic Smad4 overexpression correlated with postsurgical biochemical disease recurrence. Smad4 protein expression persists in PACs compared with benign glands, with both nuclear and cytoplasmic overexpression correlating with prognostic variables indicative of aggressive tumor behavior. Given the significant reported variability of Smad4 in several different cancers, further studies in prostate and other tumors are warranted to elucidate its role in tumorigenesis.

Expression of nuclear factor-kappa B and I kappa B alpha proteins in prostatic adenocarcinomas: correlation of nuclear factor-kappa B immunoreactivity with disease recurrence.

PURPOSE: The nuclear transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF kappa B) and its inhibitor, I kappa B, regulate the transcription of various genes involved in cell proliferation, adhesion, and survival. The NF kappa B transcription factor complex plays a role in cancer development and progression through its influence on apoptosis. More recently, NF kappa B has been shown to be activated in human and androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the prognostic significance of NF kappa B immunoreactivity in prostate adenocarcinomas (PACs). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using prostatectomy specimens, we performed immunohistochemical staining for NF kappa B and I kappa B alpha (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections obtained from 136 patients with PAC. Cytoplasmic and nuclear immunoreactivity was scored for intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, tumor grade, stage, DNA ploidy (Feulgen spectroscopy), and biochemical disease recurrence. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of PACs overexpressed cytoplasmic NF kappa B, and 63% showed decreased I kappa B expression. Cytoplasmic NF kappa B overexpression correlated with advanced tumor stage (P = 0.048), aneuploidy (P = 0.022), and biochemical disease recurrence (P = 0.001). When we compared the means for the NF kappa B-positive and -negative subgroups, NF kappa B overexpression correlated with preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.04) and DNA index (P = 0.05). Fifteen percent of PACs expressed nuclear NF kappa B, which correlated with high tumor grade (P = 0.001) and advanced stage (P = 0.05). Decreased I kappa B alpha expression correlated with high tumor grade (P = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, tumor stage (P = 0.043) and NF kappa B overexpression (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSION: These results support a role for NF kappa B pathway proteins in the tumorigenesis of PACs. The findings are also consistent with reported experimental studies suggesting a new strategy of combined chemotherapy and specific NF kappa B blockade in decreasing the rate of disease relapse.

Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The restricted expression of the surface glycoprotein prostrate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to normal prostate tissue, primary and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), and the neovasculature of various nonprostatic epithelial malignancies has enabled targeting strategies for PCa treatment using anti-PSMA antibodies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using prostatectomy specimens, immunohistochemical staining for PSMA (7E11 antibody) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of 136 cases of PCa. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was scored for intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with tumor grade, pathological stage, DNA ploidy status (Feulgen spectroscopy), and disease recurrence. PSMA mRNA expression in selected primary tumors and metastatic lesions was also detected using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. RESULTS: Generally, PCa cells expressed relatively increased levels of PSMA as compared with benign elements. Among the PCa cases, increased (high) PSMA expression correlated with tumor grade (P = 0.030), pathological stage (P = 0.029), aneuploidy (P = 0.010), and biochemical recurrence (P = 0.001). The mean serum prostate-specific antigen level of 18.28 ng/ml at the time of diagnosis for the PSMA-overexpressing tumors was significantly greater than the mean serum prostate-specific antigen of 9.10 ng/ml for the non-PMSA-overexpressing group (P = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (P = 0.018) and PSMA expression (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. PSMA protein overexpression in high-grade primary PCa tumors and metastatic lesions also correlated with increased PSMA mRNA expression levels using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that overexpression of PSMA in primary PCa correlates with other adverse traditional prognostic factors and independently predicts disease outcome.

Prognostic markers in prostate cancer.

In this review, a series of relatively well-documented ancillary biomarkers and emerging molecular assays are evaluated for their relative ability to predict prognosis in prostate cancer. Prognostic factors that have achieved widespread use and classified as Category I by the College of American Pathologists Solid Tumor Prognostic Factor Consensus Conference are compared with newer tests that are beginning to be used in clinical practice (Category II) and emerging molecular-based assays that have yet to be widely validated in the published literature or clinical trials (Category III).

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer.

The ability of traditional and newer molecular-based prognostic factors to predict the outcome of prostate cancer is of considerable interest to urologists, pathologists, and patients. In this review, a series of traditional and newer molecular-based prognostic factors are considered, including those that have achieved widespread use, newer tests that are beginning to be used in clinical practice, and emerging molecular markers that have yet to be widely validated in the published literature or clinical trials.

Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether improved prostate sampling by the extended biopsy scheme also improves the accuracy of the biopsy Gleason score (bGS). Because most prostate cancer cases are now detected at an early stage with a low prostate-specific antigen level, the bGS may be the most important factor in therapeutic decision-making. Sextant biopsy schemes had poor correlation with prostatectomy Gleason scores. Extended prostate biopsies have replaced the sextant scheme because of the former's greater cancer detection rate. METHODS: We identified 426 patients whose biopsy and prostatectomy specimens were reviewed at our center. To minimize the effect of stage migration, all patients before 1997 were excluded. Of the 426 included patients, 221 men had undergone sextant biopsy and 205 men extended biopsy before prostatectomy. The rate of grading concordance and the effect of different variables on the concordance rate was determined. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of the extended and sextant schemes was 68% and 48% (P <0.001), respectively. Upgrading of the bGS was significantly less likely with the extended scheme (17% versus 41%, P <0.001). The sextant biopsy was more likely to be upgraded for a bGS of 6 or less (44% versus 25%, P <0.002) and a bGS of 7 (14% versus 3%, P <0.02). On multivariate analysis, the biopsy scheme was the only independent predictor of accurate Gleason scoring (P <0.001) and age, prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination findings, prostate size, clinical stage, and number of positive cores were not. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an extended prostate biopsy scheme significantly improves the correlation between the bGS and prostatectomy Gleason score and reduces the risk of upgrading to a worse Gleason group at prostatectomy.

Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era.

PURPOSE: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in the sextant biopsy had been associated with a high risk of prostate cancer. We determined whether the extended biopsy schemes used in the contemporary era have altered the prognostic value of these lesions at repeat biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2003, 105 of 1,188 men had at least 1 repeat extended biopsy due to the presence of HGPIN (33 men) or ASAP (72 men) in a previous extended biopsy. Median biopsy interval for HGPIN and ASAP was 15 and 10 weeks (p <0.05), respectively. Differences in cancer detection rates were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: In the HGPIN group only 1 of 22 (4.5%) men had cancer on 1st repeat biopsy and 0 of 11 men had cancer on 2nd repeat biopsy. In men with ASAP 19 of 53 (36%, p <0.005) had cancer on 1st repeat biopsy, and 3 of 19 (16%) had cancer on 2nd repeat biopsy. Cancer was confined to a single core in 16 of 22 (73%) men. Median Gleason score was 6. Patient age, digital rectal examination status, prostate specific antigen, free prostate specific antigen, number of cores and biopsy interval were not independent predictors of cancer in men with ASAP. CONCLUSIONS: HGPIN found in the contemporary extended biopsy does not warrant repeat biopsy. ASAP continues to be associated with a high risk of cancer and requires at least 1 repeat biopsy using the extended biopsy scheme.

Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: We developed a neural network to identify patients with bladder cancer more effectively than hematuria and cytology. The algorithm is based on combined urine levels of nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded study of voided urine from 253 patients undergoing outpatient cystoscopy was performed. Of the patients 27 had bladder cancer on biopsy and 5 had muscle invasion. Urine tumor markers were measured using sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Urine from patients with bladder cancer on cystoscopy was compared to urine from controls with negative cystoscopy results. An algorithm was created with 3 sets of cutoff values modeled to be 100% sensitive for superficial bladder cancer, 100% specific for superficial cancer and 100% specific for muscle invasive cancer, respectively. We compared our model to hematuria and cytology. RESULTS: For the hematuria dipstick test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%, 51.8%, 18.7% and 98.2%, respectively. For atypical cytology sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 66.7%, 81%, 29.5% and 95.3%, respectively. For the sensitive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 75.7%, 32.9% and 100%, respectively. For the specific model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 22.2%, 100%, 100% and 91.5%, respectively. For the muscle invasive model set sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 80%, 100%, 100% and 99.6%, respectively. The standard bladder tumor evaluation of 253 patients costs 61,054 US dollars but 36,450 US dollars using our model. CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm is superior to conventional screening tests for bladder cancer. The model identifies patients who require cystoscopy, those with bladder cancer and those with muscle invasive disease. It provides possible savings over current screening methods. The potential loss of other information by not performing cystoscopy was not evaluated in our study.

Survivin and Bcl-2 expression in prostatic adenocarcinomas.

CONTEXT: Dysregulated cell proliferation caused by inhibitors of programmed cell death (apoptosis) contributes to tumor progression and spread. Aberrant expression of Bcl-2, the most notable inhibitor of apoptosis, has been well characterized in several human malignancies. Recent studies have described a novel apoptosis inhibitor, survivin, in human carcinomas, although its exact role remains to be characterized. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of Bcl-2 and survivin proteins in prostate cancer and to correlate the results with clinicopathologic variables. DESIGN: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 138 cases of prostatic adenocarcinomas (PACs) were immunostained by an automated method using specific antibodies against survivin and Bcl-2. Staining was semiquantitatively scored based on both intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with morphologic and prognostic variables. RESULTS: Of the 138 PACs tested, 113 (82%) expressed survivin. We found no correlation between survivin expression and prognostic variables, including grade, stage, DNA content (ploidy), and recurrence. Bcl-2 expression was positive in 95 (69%) of these 138 cases and correlated with nondiploid DNA content. Fourteen (50%) of 28 nondiploid PACs expressed Bcl-2, compared to 17 (25%) of 68 diploid tumors (P =.02). A trend for association of Bcl-2 expression with tumor stage was noted as follows: 21 (39%) of 54 advanced-stage PACs expressed Bcl-2, in comparison with 20 (24%) of 84 low-stage tumors (P =.07). On univariate analysis, 25 (48%) of the 52 PACs that recurred expressed Bcl-2, as compared with 16 (19%) of the 86 nonrecurrent PACs (P <.001). No correlation was noted between survivin and Bcl-2 expression. CONCLUSION: Survivin is expressed in a majority of PACs and is not a prognosis-related marker, but may be a potential target for apoptosis-based therapy. Overexpression of Bcl-2 correlates with other prognostic variables and predicts disease recurrence of PACs. These data also suggest that survivin and Bcl-2 may regulate cell proliferation and cell death through different mechanisms.

Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 expression in prostate cancer.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are proteolytic enzymes capable of degrading the structural support network for normal and malignant cells, promoting neoplastic cell invasion and metastasis. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) maintain connective tissue integrity by modulating MMP activity. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 138 prostatic adenocarcinomas (PACs) were immunostained by a combined automated/manual method using monoclonal antibodies against MMP2 and TIMP2. Immunoreactivity was semiquantitatively scored based on stain intensity and distribution, and results were correlated with Gleason grade, pathologic stage, ploidy status, and disease recurrence. One hundred five of 138 (76%) and 113/138 (82%) PACs expressed MMP2 and TIMP2, respectively. Co-expression was observed in 94/138 (68%) of PACs (P =.01), correlated with advanced tumor stage (P =.05), and tended to be associated with disease recurrent cases (P =.07). TIMP2 expression individually correlated with advanced tumor stage (P =.04) and reached near significance with disease recurrence (P =.06). MMP2 expression was also more frequent in recurrent PACs, although this value did not reach statistical significance (P =.07). However, on multivariate analysis, only pathologic stage (P =.009) and ploidy status (P =.03) independently predicted disease recurrence. In conclusion, MMP2 and TIMP2 are co-expressed in a majority of PACs and correlate with prognostic variables. Interestingly, contrary to the previously documented anti-tumor effects of TIMPs, TIMP2 expression appears to have a tumor-promoting role in PACs and warrants further investigation.