Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on acute type-A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on type-A acute aortic dissection. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with type-A aortic dissection. INTERVENTIONS: Surgeons interviewed regarding how transesophageal echocardiography changed the surgical procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed an ascending aorta intimal flap in 53 (83%) patients and an intramural hematoma in 9 (14%) patients. The aortic valve was bicuspid in 5 (8%) cases and a prior prosthetic valve was present in 4 (6%) patients. Aortic insufficiency was moderate in 12 (19%) cases and severe in 18 (28%) patients. Additionally, transesophageal echocardiography was useful in defining the size of pericardial effusion in 18 (28%) patients, 8 with large effusions and/or tamponade. Altogether, transesophageal echocardiography added data beyond prior imaging in 41 (64%) patients, including moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, right ventricular dysfunction, and atrial septal defects. The findings from intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography led directly to a change in planned surgery in 25 (39%) patients. Transesophageal echocardiography verified suitability of the repair in all cases of interposition graft or valve repair. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography provides incremental information to the original imaging examination in the management of type-A acute aortic dissection in nearly two-thirds of patients, leading to a change in the planned surgery in 39% of patients, thus supporting its role as suggested in recent guidelines.

Clinical, angiographic, and interventional follow-up of patients with aortic-saphenous vein graft connectors.

BACKGROUND: The use of aortic connectors for proximal saphenous vein bypass graft anastomoses eliminates the need for aortic clamping during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and may reduce the incidence of stroke in the elderly and in patients with severe aortic atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 74 consecutive patients who received the Symmetry Bypass System aortic connector at the time of CABG. A total of 131 of 144 proximal vein graft anastomoses were performed with this device. The left internal mammary artery was used in 62 patients, and 61 patients had "off-pump" coronary revascularization. A total of 11 patients were readmitted with chest pain consistent with unstable angina 173+/-39 days after CABG. Five of the 11 patients had previous in-stent restenosis before CABG. At angiography, 20 saphenous vein bypass grafts containing 19 connectors were found to have severe stenosis (n=12) or occlusion (n=6) and were treated with angioplasty and stenting or medical therapy. Seven of 11 patients were readmitted 76+/-11 days later with recurrent chest pain and were found to have severe stenosis at the previously stented connector site. Six patients underwent angioplasty followed by brachytherapy. Three of these patients redeveloped chest pain and were readmitted 151+/-71 days later. Two patients were started on oral Rapamune, and one patient underwent redo-CABG. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven of 74 patients who received aortic connectors at the time of CABG developed symptomatically significant stenosis or occlusion at the connector site shortly after CABG, requiring multiple repeat interventions, including brachytherapy.

Initial experience with proximal anastomoses performed with a mechanical connector.

BACKGROUND: The Symmetry Bypass System Aortic Connector (St Jude Medical, Inc) is a novel device for the construction of sutureless proximal anastomoses. The connector allows attachment of saphenous vein grafts to the aorta without requiring aortic clamping. We report our initial clinical experience with this device. METHODS: In a 2-month period from May to July 2001, a total of 139 consecutive proximal anastomoses were performed in 67 patients using the connector. All procedures were performed on a beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass or any aortic clamping. Intraoperative variables and postoperative results were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of 139 consecutive proximal anastomoses 138 (99.3%) were successfully completed with the device. One anastomosis required suture revision because of misdeployment. Six anastomoses (4.3%) required an additional suture for leak. Predeployment problems included connector loading/preparation malfunction in 10 grafts (7.2%), five because of human error and five technical failure. There was no operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, or stroke. Vessels bypassed included the circumflex system (n = 59), right coronary artery and branches (n = 48), diagonal branch (n = 26), and left anterior descending coronary artery (n = 6). At a mean follow-up of 7 months, survival was 94.1% and survival free of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was 88.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Initial clinical experience with a sutureless proximal saphenous vein graft to aorta anastomosis performed with a mechanical connector demonstrates safety, reliability, and ease of use. Surmounting a brief learning curve improves the subtleties of device loading and deployment. Further benefits will be determined in an ongoing randomized study.

Surgical steps toward complete revascularization in off-pump coronary bypass.

Surgical techniques aimed at complete myocardial revascularization without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass are described. Between January 1998 and June 2000, coronary artery bypass was performed in 3,003 patients; an off-pump technique was used in 676 and cardiopulmonary bypass was employed in 2,327. Patient characteristics, demography, and preoperative risk factors of the two groups were compared retrospectively, and differences in operative variables and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Using a commercially available suction stabilization device and the surgical and anesthetic techniques described herein, off-pump coronary revascularization was accomplished with results comparable to the on-pump approach.