RESUMEN
A significant proportion of the global burden of disease can be attributed to mental illness. Despite important advances in identifying risk factors for mental health conditions, the biological processing underlying causal pathways to disease onset remain poorly understood. This represents a limitation to implement effective prevention and the development of novel pharmacological treatments. Epigenetic mechanisms have emerged as mediators of environmental and genetic risk factors which might play a role in disease onset, including childhood adversity (CA) and cannabis use (CU). Particularly, human research exploring DNA methylation has provided new and promising insights into the role of biological pathways implicated in the aetio-pathogenesis of psychiatric conditions, including: monoaminergic (Serotonin and Dopamine), GABAergic, glutamatergic, neurogenesis, inflammatory and immune response and oxidative stress. While these epigenetic changes have been often studied as disease-specific, similarly to the investigation of environmental risk factors, they are often transdiagnostic. Therefore, we aim to review the existing literature on DNA methylation from human studies of psychiatric diseases (i) to identify epigenetic modifications mapping onto biological pathways either transdiagnostically or specifically related to psychiatric diseases such as Eating Disorders, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Bipolar and Psychotic Disorder, Depression, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Anxiety Disorder, and (ii) to investigate a convergence between some of these epigenetic modifications and the exposure to known risk factors for psychiatric disorders such as CA and CU, as well as to other epigenetic confounders in psychiatry research.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Psicóticos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/genética , Metilación de ADN/genética , Epigénesis Genética , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Trastornos Psicóticos/genética , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: First episode psychosis (FEP) patients who use cannabis experience more frequent psychotic and euphoric intoxication experiences compared to controls. It is not clear whether this is consequent to patients being more vulnerable to the effects of cannabis use or to their heavier pattern of use. We aimed to determine whether extent of use predicted psychotic-like and euphoric intoxication experiences in patients and controls and whether this differs between groups. METHODS: We analysed data on patients who had ever used cannabis (n = 655) and controls who had ever used cannabis (n = 654) across 15 sites from six countries in the EU-GEI study (2010-2015). We used multiple regression to model predictors of cannabis-induced experiences and to determine if there was an interaction between caseness and extent of use. RESULTS: Caseness, frequency of cannabis use and money spent on cannabis predicted psychotic-like and euphoric experiences (p ⩽ 0.001). For psychotic-like experiences (PEs) there was a significant interaction for caseness × frequency of use (p < 0.001) and caseness × money spent on cannabis (p = 0.001) such that FEP patients had increased experiences at increased levels of use compared to controls. There was no significant interaction for euphoric experiences (p > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: FEP patients are particularly sensitive to increased psychotic-like, but not euphoric experiences, at higher levels of cannabis use compared to controls. This suggests a specific psychotomimetic response in FEP patients related to heavy cannabis use. Clinicians should enquire regarding cannabis related PEs and advise that lower levels of cannabis use are associated with less frequent PEs.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Alucinógenos , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Cannabis/efectos adversos , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Agonistas de Receptores de CannabinoidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The first episode of psychosis is a critical period in the emergence of cardiometabolic risk. AIMS: We set out to explore the influence of individual and lifestyle factors on cardiometabolic outcomes in early psychosis. METHOD: This was a prospective cohort study of 293 UK adults presenting with first-episode psychosis investigating the influence of sociodemographics, lifestyle (physical activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, substance use) and medication on cardiometabolic outcomes over the following 12 months. RESULTS: Rates of obesity and glucose dysregulation rose from 17.8% and 12%, respectively, at baseline to 23.7% and 23.7% at 1 year. Little change was seen over time in the 76.8% tobacco smoking rate or the quarter who were sedentary for over 10 h daily. We found no association between lifestyle at baseline or type of antipsychotic medication prescribed with either baseline or 1-year cardiometabolic outcomes. Median haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) rose by 3.3 mmol/mol in participants from Black and minority ethnic (BME) groups, with little change observed in their White counterparts. At 12 months, one-third of those with BME heritage exceeded the threshold for prediabetes (HbA1c >39 mmol/mol). CONCLUSIONS: Unhealthy lifestyle choices are prevalent in early psychosis and cardiometabolic risk worsens over the next year, creating an important window for prevention. We found no evidence, however, that preventative strategies should be preferentially directed based on lifestyle habits. Further work is needed to determine whether clinical strategies should allow for differential patterns of emergence of cardiometabolic risk in people of different ethnicities.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Estilo de Vida , Obesidad/prevención & control , Estado Prediabético/prevención & control , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Etnicidad , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/etnología , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/etnología , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etnología , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Reino Unido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Individuals with schizophrenia frequently experience co-occurring substance use, including tobacco smoking and heavy cannabis use, and substance use disorders. There is interest in understanding the extent to which these relationships are causal, and to what extent shared genetic factors play a role. We explored the relationships between schizophrenia (Scz), cannabis use disorder (CanUD), and ever-regular tobacco smoking (Smk) using the largest available genome-wide studies of these phenotypes in individuals of African and European ancestries. All three phenotypes were positively genetically correlated (rgs = 0.17 - 0.62). Causal inference analyses suggested the presence of horizontal pleiotropy, but evidence for bidirectional causal relationships was also found between all three phenotypes even after correcting for horizontal pleiotropy. We identified 439 pleiotropic loci in the European ancestry data, 150 of which were novel (i.e., not genome-wide significant in the original studies). Of these pleiotropic loci, 202 had lead variants which showed convergent effects (i.e., same direction of effect) on Scz, CanUD, and Smk. Genetic variants convergent across all three phenotypes showed strong genetic correlations with risk-taking, executive function, and several mental health conditions. Our results suggest that both horizontal pleiotropy and causal mechanisms may play a role in the relationship between CanUD, Smk, and Scz, but longitudinal, prospective studies are needed to confirm a causal relationship.
RESUMEN
Background: The association between inflammation and major depressive disorder (MDD) remains poorly understood, given the heterogeneity of patients with MDD. Aims: We investigated inflammatory markers, such as interleukin (IL)-6, high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in melancholic, atypical and anxious depression and explored whether baseline inflammatory protein levels could indicate prognosis. Methods: The sample consisted of participants (aged 18-55 years) from a previously reported multicentre randomised controlled trial with a parallel-group design registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, including melancholic (n=44), atypical (n=37) and anxious (n=44) patients with depression and healthy controls (HCs) (n=33). Subtypes of MDD were classified according to the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated Version and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Blood levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and hsCRP were assessed using antibody array analysis. Results: Patients with MDD, classified according to melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes, and HCs did not differ significantly in baseline TNF-α, IL-6 and hsCRP levels after adjustment. In patients with anxious depression, hsCRP levels increased significantly if they experienced no pain (adjusted (adj.) p=0.010) or mild to moderate pain (adj. p=0.038) compared with those with severe pain. However, the patients with anxious depression and severe pain showed a lower trend in hsCRP levels than patients with atypical depression who experienced severe pain (p=0.022; adj. p=0.155). Baseline TNF-α (adj. p=0.038) and IL-6 (adj. p=0.006) levels in patients in remission were significantly lower than those in patients with no remission among the participants with the atypical depression subtype at the eighth-week follow-up. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of differences in inflammatory proteins in patients with varied symptoms among melancholic, atypical and anxious depression subtypes. Further studies on the immunoinflammatory mechanism underlying different subtypes of depression are expected for improved individualised therapy. Trial registration number: NCT03219008.
RESUMEN
Cannabis use is associated with an unfavourable course of illness in schizophrenia, although several factors may confound this association. In this longitudinal study, we explored the influence of cannabis use on baseline symptom severity and treatment outcomes in 98 patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with a long acting injectable antipsychotic over 24 months. Using mixed models for repeated measures, we compared visit-wise changes in psychopathology, social and occupational functioning and quality of life between recent/current cannabis users (n=45) and non-users (n=53). There were no significant group by time interactions for any of our outcomes, and with the exception of poorer functionality in cannabis users at baseline, no significant differences in these domains at baseline or month 24. Also, remission rates were similar. However, more cannabis users met our operationally defined relapse criteria compared to non-users, and more frequent cannabis use over the course of treatment, as assessed by positive urine toxicology testing, predicted relapse. Our results suggest that cannabis users do not have poorer treatment response than non-users in terms of symptom reduction over the 24 months of treatment. However, dose-related risk of relapse remains with ongoing cannabis use, possibly by directly reducing the threshold for psychotic breakthrough.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Evidence suggests there are two treatment-resistant schizophrenia subtypes (i.e. early treatment resistant (E-TR) and late-treatment resistant (L-TR)). We aimed to develop prediction models for estimating individual risk for these outcomes by employing advanced statistical shrinkage methods. 239 first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients were followed-up for approximately 5 years after first presentation to psychiatric services; of these, n=56 (25.2%) were defined as E-TR and n=24 (12.6%) were defined as L-TR. Using known risk factors for poor schizophrenia outcomes, we developed prediction models for E-TR and L-TR using LASSO and RIDGE logistic regression models. Models' internal validation was performed employing Harrell's optimism-correction with repeated cross-validation; their predictive accuracy was assessed through discrimination and calibration. Both LASSO and RIDGE models had high discrimination, good calibration. While LASSO had moderate sensitivity for estimating an individual risk for E-TR and L-TR, sensitivity estimated for RIDGE model for these outcomes was extremely low, which was due to having a very large estimated optimism. Although it was possible to discriminate with sufficient accuracy who would meet criteria for E-TR and L-TR during the 5-year follow-up after first contact with mental health services for schizophrenia, further work is necessary to improve sensitivity for these models.
Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Little is known about the impact of different forms of childhood adversity on outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients beyond the first year of treatment. We investigated associations between different types of childhood adversity and outcomes of FEP patients over the 5 years following their first contact with mental health services for psychosis. 237 FEP cases aged 18-65 years were followed on average for 5 years after first presentation to psychiatric services in South London, UK. Childhood adversity prior to 17 years of age was assessed at baseline using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q). The results showed that exposure to at least one type of childhood adversity was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of achieving symptomatic remission, longer inpatient stays, and compulsory admission over the 5-year follow-up. There was no evidence though of a dose-response effect. Some specificity was evident. Childhood parental separation was associated with significantly greater likelihood of non-compliance with antipsychotic medications, compulsory admission, and substance dependence. Institutional care was significantly associated with longer total length of inpatient stays; and parental death was significantly associated with compulsory admissions. Clinicians should screen FEP patients for childhood adversity and tailor interventions accordingly to improve outcomes.