Minimal-trauma fracture in women with breast cancer surviving for at least 5 years from diagnosis.

SUMMARY: Minimal-trauma fracture is an important issue in breast cancer survivors, especially rib fracture. The likelihood of fracture is affected by menopausal status and a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to breast cancer. Most women reported at least one assessment of bone mineral density. INTRODUCTION: We have investigated the self-reported frequency and pattern of minimal-trauma fracture (MTF) in breast cancer (BC) survivors at least 5 years from diagnosis, along with the use of bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. METHODS: This study was carried out within the Bupa Health Foundation Health and Wellbeing After Breast Cancer Study which is a questionnaire-based prospective cohort study of 1683 women diagnosed with their first invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2006 and followed for at least 5 years. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and five women, who remained free of recurrence or new breast cancer, completed the fifth annual follow-up. One hundred sixty-four (13.6%) reported at least one MTF. Rib fracture was the most common (52 fractures in 46 women). Compared with women who remained pre-/peri-menopausal, either being postmenopausal at diagnosis (OR 3.53, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.09-11.44, p=0.036) or changing from pre- to postmenopausal during follow-up (OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.21-13.10, p=0.023) was associated with a higher likelihood of fracture, as was having a diagnosis of osteoporosis at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.00-2.99, p=0.047). Most women (64.9%) reported at least one BMD assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall MTF is a problem for breast cancer survivors, with rib fracture a particular issue for women in our study. Both pre-existing osteoporosis and being postmenopausal are risk factors for subsequent MTF in women treated for breast cancer. Clinicians need to be mindful of fracture prevention medication in these groups.

Vasomotor symptoms and urogenital atrophy in older women: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to systematically review published articles for the prevalence of persistent estrogen depletion symptoms among women aged 65+ years. METHODS: A systematic literature search of English-language publications was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Twenty-three studies that included information on the prevalence of vasomotor and/or urogenital atrophy symptoms among older women (65 + years) met our inclusion criteria. Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using a risk-of-bias tool explicitly designed for the systematic review of prevalence studies. RESULTS: The available data suggest that vasomotor symptoms are experienced by a considerable proportion of older women, that symptoms of urogenital atrophy including urinary incontinence are widespread, and that women remain sexually active well into later life. A high degree of variability was observed for the prevalence of estrogen deficiency symptoms for women age 65+ years. Discrepancies in modes of recruitment, sampling procedures, time frames over which symptoms were assessed and use of different and non-validated assessment tools contributed to the inconsistencies across the published studies. CONCLUSION: Larger and appropriately sampled studies, employing validated questionnaires, are still needed to establish the prevalence of persistent estrogen depletion symptoms in women aged 65+ years.

Prevalence of menopausal symptoms in Asian midlife women: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published articles for the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in Asian women. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Google scholar in June 2013 to retrieve all English-language studies that included information on the prevalence of menopausal symptoms in women living in Asian countries. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using a risk-of-bias tool explicitly designed for the systematic review of prevalence studies. RESULTS: Twenty-three independent studies met our inclusion criteria. Physical symptoms were the most prevalent symptoms compared to psychological, vasomotor and sexual symptoms. There was a wide variation in the prevalence of all symptoms across the menopausal stages due to the differences in modes of recruitment, study design, sampling procedures, the time frame over which symptoms were assessed and use of different diagnostic or screening tools. A high level of bias was observed for both external and internal validity for most studies. CONCLUSION: Although there is a wide variation in the reported prevalence of menopausal symptoms, physical symptoms predominate, followed by psychological symptoms, vasomotor symptoms and sexual symptoms. Further studies of representative samples are necessary to understand whether the variations in prevalence reporting are a function of methodological issues or due to ethnic, cultural or other socioeconomic differences.

Intended follow up of women with breast cancer at low risk of recurrence and at least 5 years from diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence that minimal surveillance is compatible with an optimal outcome in women after early stage breast cancer, little is known of the surveillance that these women receive. AIMS: To describe the intended clinical follow up and patterns of use of imaging modalities in low-risk breast cancer survivors who are at least 5 years from diagnosis. METHODS: Participants in the Bupa Health Foundation Health and Wellbeing After Breast Cancer Study with stage 1 invasive breast cancer at diagnosis, who had survived free of recurrence or new primary breast cancer for at least 5 years, provided information for this analysis. RESULTS: The most common choice of physician follow up was with one doctor only (54%). Within this group, the most frequent choice was a general practitioner (GP) (63%) followed by medical oncologist (23%). Thirty-five per cent of women said that they intended to consult two doctors and within this group, the most common combination was a GP and a medical oncologist (45%). This was despite two out of three women reporting being advised that there was no need to consult a medical oncologist. Over 90% of women reported having a mammogram with, or without, breast ultrasound in the previous 12 months. There was a low rate of use of other imaging tests in the absence of clear indications. CONCLUSIONS: Minimising unnecessary medical consultations by women with breast cancer at low risk of recurrence 5 years from diagnosis will require education about the benefits of a minimal surveillance strategy.

Cosmetic surgery prior to diagnosis of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic breast surgery is amongst the top five most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedures. With breast cancer being the most common non-skin malignancy in women, the likelihood that a woman undergoing cosmetic breast surgery may have an occult breast cancer needs to be considered. Most of the available data pertaining to breast cancer diagnosis in the setting of cosmetic surgery are from studies of cosmetic breast surgery populations. We report on the prevalence of breast cancer as an incidental finding during cosmetic breast surgery in the context of women subsequently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. METHODS: The Bupa Health Foundation Health and Wellbeing after Breast Cancer Study is a prospective cohort study of 1684 women recruited within 12 months of their first diagnosis with invasive breast cancer. Participants completed an enrolment questionnaire and annual follow-up questionnaires for 5 years. RESULTS: At the second follow-up, 1.5% of women reported having undergone cosmetic breast surgery prior to being diagnosed with breast cancer, 16 had undergone breast reduction and seven had augmentations. Invasive breast cancer was diagnosed at the time of a cosmetic breast procedure in two women, in both an augmentation and a reduction procedure, which is 8.7% (95% confidence interval 23.5% to +20.9%) of the women in our study reporting a cosmetic breast procedure prior to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although prior cosmetic breast surgery was reported by few women, breast cancer was diagnosed in two women during the procedure. Surgeons performing elective breast surgery need to understand and apply consistent, reliable breast cancer screening practices.

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy for invasive breast cancer is strongly influenced by demographic factors in women in Victoria, Australia.

This study explored factors associated with the likelihood of reconstruction after unilateral mastectomy and the wellbeing of women after reconstruction. Data were from a questionnaire completed on average 1.8 years after diagnosis by 1429 women in the BUPA Health and Wellbeing After Breast Cancer Study. Logistic regression was used to model factors associated with reconstruction. The Psychological General Wellbeing Questionnaire was used to assess wellbeing. A total of 25.4% of 366 women who had a unilateral mastectomy had undergone a reconstruction nearly two years after diagnosis. Being younger (p<0.001), educated beyond school (p<0.04), living in the metropolitan area (p<0.001), having private health insurance (p=0.003), not having dependent children (p=0.004) and not having radiotherapy (p<0.001) explained just over 40% of the variation in reconstruction status. There was a modest difference between women who did and did not have a reconstruction in terms of wellbeing. Demographic factors strongly influence the likelihood of reconstruction after mastectomy.