Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: ready for clinical practice?

Radical surgery remains the only treatment with curative potential for patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, despite complete surgical resection, long-term survival is still disappointing with an average 5-year survival rate lower than 60%. Thoracic post-operative radiotherapy trials demonstrated a possible impact in reducing loco-regional recurrence but not overall survival. Moreover, the majority of post-surgical failures are represented by distant metastases, indicating a possible role for adjuvant systemic therapies. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has now been clearly established in many solid tumors and the role of last generation platinum-based chemotherapy has now being considered as standard of care in advanced NSCLC. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected NSCLC remains highly controversial. After the meta-analysis published in 1995, which showed a non-statistically significant 5% improvement in 5-year survival with second generation platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, several randomized clinical trials addressing the role of last generation adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected stage I, II and IIIA NSCLC have been completed with conflicting results. The available scientific evidence is reviewed and strengths/weaknesses of each trial are discussed in this article. Although most of the available evidence points to a possible survival benefit in long-term survival improvement ranging from 4% to 15%, the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy as standard of care in the treatment of resected NSCLC is still a matter of debate. Practical issues and clinical aspects which may help clinicians in the decision making process about prescription of adjuvant treatment are also discussed.

Low-dose aminoglutethimide with and without hydrocortisone replacement as a first-line endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

PURPOSE: A randomized study comparing low-dose aminoglutethimide (AG) with and without hydrocortisone (HC) was performed to investigate whether corticosteroid replacement contributes to the therapeutic effects of the drug administered as a front-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients who had not had prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR) status positive or unknown were eligible. AG was administered at a dose of 250 mg twice a day orally (125 mg twice a day during the first month) with or without HC (20 mg twice a day orally). Seventy-nine and 74 patients were assessable for response on the AG plus HC arm and on the AG arm, respectively. The two treatment groups were well balanced and patients were largely untreated. Approximately 60% had not received any adjuvant treatment, and approximately 75% had not received any medical treatment after relapse. RESULTS: The overall responses (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) were 44% and 41% for the AG plus HC and the AG arm, respectively, showing no significant difference. Time to progression (median, 8.1 and 6.3 months), duration of response (median, 15.8 and 13.7 months), and duration of survival (median, 34.2 and 36.3 months) were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Side effects were infrequent and mild in both arms, with no significant differences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that half of the conventional daily dose of AG has optimal therapeutic activity as a front-line endocrine treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer and that HC does not significantly contribute to the therapeutic effects.

Biological variables in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison between immunocytochemical determination on fine needle aspirates from surgical specimens and immunohistochemical determination on tissue sections.

A number of biological and predictive markers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been sought, but these have so far been mainly evaluated on surgically resected specimens. Given that fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is being increasingly used in the diagnosis of NSCLC, its application could be extended to the immunocytochemical detection of biological parameters at the time of diagnosis before surgery. In order to assess the reliability of estimating biological markers on fine needle aspirates (FNAs) from NSCLC, the aim of this study was to compare Ki67 growth fraction, p53 and bcl-2 protein expression as revealed by the immuncytochemical assessment of FNAs obtained from surgical samples with the immunohistochemical results obtained from the corresponding histological sections. FNAs were performed on surgical specimens obtained from 29 NSCLC patients. Ki67, p53 and bcl-2 were cytologically and histologically evaluable in respectively 25, 27 and 19 cases. Concordance between FNAs and corresponding paraffin sections was 84% for Ki67, 93% for p53 and 95% for bcl-2. All of the specimens whose biological parameters were studied by immunocytohistochemistry also underwent flow cytometric DNA analysis of FNAs taken from fresh surgical specimens. Of the 29 cases, 22 were aneuploid and seven diploid. The S-phase fraction (SPF) was evaluable in 62% of cases. Comparison of SPF results on FNAs with Ki67 values evaluated on the corresponding histologic and cytologic specimens, revealed a significant correlation only with histology. Good reproducibility was also found in relation to the immunocytochemical results obtained on FNAs from different areas of the same tumour, showing that tumour heterogeneity does not affect the method. The concordance between the immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical results suggests that FNAB may be a reliable procedure for the biological characterization of NSCLC. Given its limited invasiveness, FNAB could be used in vivo for the preoperative assessment of biological parameters in patients with operable or metastatic NSCLC.

Bone marrow biopsy in the staging of small cell lung cancer.

From April 1982 to December 1987, 71 patients with small cell lung cancer entered a randomized clinical trial, and underwent bone marrow biopsy (BMB) as part of staging procedures. We identified 8 patients (11%) with bone marrow metastases, 6 with extensive disease independently of BMB, and 2 with extensive disease on the basis of the BMB only. BMB determined a change in the stage in only 3% (2/71) of the cases. No differences were found in the hematological parameters of the patients with or without bone marrow metastases. The median survival of the patients with bone marrow involvement was the same (41 weeks) as those with extensive disease but without bone marrow involvement. We conclude that unilateral BMB without aspiration detects a substantial proportion of bone marrow metastases in patients with extensive disease. This fact does not worsen the prognosis. A small proportion of patients with apparently limited disease has bone marrow involvement. The technique therefore contributes, to a small extent, to the definition of the clinical stage of the disease. However, bone marrow involvement is an important data of natural history, and therefore new methods to better assess this peculiar site of the disease are needed.

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

This phase II study evaluated the response rate and tolerability of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for up to six cycles. From February 2002 to May 2004, 60 patients were enrolled into the study in seven Italian institutions. We observed one complete response (1.7%) and 14 partial responses (23.3%), for an overall response rate of 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 14.7-37.9%). The median duration of response was 5.9 months (range 1.5-17.1 months). With a median follow-up of 6.7 months, median time to progressive disease and overall survival were 2.7 (range 1.9-3.4 months) and 7.3 months (range 7.2-8.6 months), respectively. The main grade 3-4 haematological toxicities were transient neutropenia in 11.7% and thrombocytopenia in 8.3% of the patients. Nausea/vomiting was the main grade 3-4 nonhaematological toxicity, occurring in 10.0% of the patients. Two (3.3%) patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. Our results show that gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, deserving further study, especially for patients not eligible to receive cisplatin.

[Our experience with the diagnostic and prognostic unreliability of pre- and postoperative CEA in human breast cancer]. / Nostra esperienza sulla inattendibilità diagnostica e prognostica del CEA pre- e postoperatorio nel carcinoma mammario umano.

The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were determined in 42 breast cancer patients at I, II, III, IV stages of TNM classification. Plasmatic preoperative CEA levels was under 6 ng/ml in the 94% of patients. The postoperative CEA levels of six patients who developed metastases during the follow-up was elevated in five cases, but the elevation never preceded the clinical and radiological diagnosis of metastases.

Front-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide for patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma, nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, or malignant melanoma: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The conventional treatment of brain metastases not amenable to surgery is most often radiotherapy. Until now, pharmacologic issues related to the blood brain barrier (BBB) prevented a wide evaluation of chemotherapy. The authors previously reported that the combination of cisplatin (P) and etoposide (E) had strikingly high activity in patients with brain metastases from breast carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to assess, in a larger prospective study, the front-line activity of that combination against brain metastases from breast carcinoma (BC), nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and malignant melanoma (MM) in patients previously untreated with radiotherapy. METHODS: From December 1986 to July 1993, 116 patients received P 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 and E 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 3, and 5 or on Days 4, 6, and 8 every 3 weeks. An insignificant change in the E schedule using the same dose on a random basis assured the prospective enrollment and the registration of all cases. Six patients were not eligible and three patients were excluded from the analysis because they were lost to follow-up shortly after the date of registration. One-hundred seven patients were considered for analysis. The distribution according to the primary tumor site was BC in 56 patients (52%), NSCLC in 43 (40%), and MM in 8 (8%). The first evaluation of response was performed after two cycles. In cases of no disease progression, chemotherapy was continued to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Among the 56 patients with BC, 7 achieved complete response (CR) (13%), 14 achieved partial response (PR), 12 had no change (NC), 15 had progressive disease (PD), and 8 had insufficient treatment or response was not assessed. The CR plus rate was 38%. Among the 43 patients with NSCLC, 3 achieved CR (7%), 10 achieved PR, 15 had SD, 7 had PD, and 8 had insufficient treatment or response was not assessed. The CR plus PR rate was 30%. None of the eight patients with MM achieved an objective response. The median survival was 31 weeks for patients with BC (range, 0-287), 32 for patients with NSCLC (0-392+), and 17 for patients with MM (2-48). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of P and E is effective for patients with brain metastases from BC and NSCLC. In this study, the response rate was of the same order as that reported for disseminated disease without central nervous system involvement. The survival figures compare favorably with some others reported in the literature for patients given radiotherapy. A randomized study is warranted to compare this chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone for patients with brain metastases from BC or NSCLC not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery.

The value of bone marrow biopsy in breast cancer at the time of first relapse. A prospective study.

The value of bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in advanced breast cancer at the time of first relapse was studied in a prospective manner. Bone marrow biopsy was performed in 142 consecutive unselected metastatic patients: 129 at the time of first recurrence, and 13 in patients with metastases at the time of first diagnosis. Overall, BMB was positive in 32 patients (23%). In the group with negative bone x-ray, it was positive in two patients of 84 (2%); both of them had doubtful scan. In the group with positive x-ray, BMB resulted positive in 30 of 58 (52%). There was a significant correlation between number of bone segments radiologically involved and BMB positivity rate, ranging from 15% in the patients with only one, to 68% in those with more than three sites involved (P = 0.02). Patients with x-ray evidence of metastases in the pelvis had significantly higher rate of BMB positivity (67% versus 32%; P = 0.02). The median survival time from the first relapse was 153 weeks in BMB-negative cases and 149 in positive ones. Considering only the patients with demonstration of bone invasion obtained with either or both x-ray and BMB, 34/62 patients had positive BMB (55%). In these cases BMB was found more often positive in patients 50 years or younger than in patients older than 50 years (80% versus 47%; P = 0.05); the median survival time was longer, but not significantly, in BMB-positive patients than in negative ones (149 weeks versus 119; P = 0.3). The authors conclude that BMB is not required in common restaging procedure when both bone survey and scan are negative. Bone marrow biopsy results are more often positive in younger patients and survival is not negatively affected by bone marrow invasion as diagnosed by BMB.

The value of bone marrow biopsy in breast cancer at time of diagnosis. A prospective study.

Bone marrow biopsies (BMB) were performed in 173 consecutive unselected breast cancer patients at the time of diagnosis to define the value of this diagnostic tool in the initial staging of mammary carcinoma. In a group of 160 patients with a negative standard staging work-up, BMB was positive in two (1%). Both of them had negative x-ray but bone scan was positive in one and doubtful in the other. Bone marrow biopsy was positive in 31% of 13 additional patients with metastatic disease and in 44% of the nine among them with radiologically involved skeleton. These results exclude that BMB is able to discover micrometastatic foci of neoplastic disease. Its positivity appears strictly correlated with that of bone x-ray and scan. Based on the results of this prospective study, BMB is not required when both bone survey and scan are negative, but could be useful in clarifying diagnostic doubts of skeletal involvement.

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide, cisplatin (GIP) for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and the toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine with ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP) in chemonaive patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eighty chemonaive patients with Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were treated with the combination of gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on Days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 2 g/m(2) on Day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Day 2. Cycles were administered on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was the main side effect; Grade III-IV thrombocytopenia was observed in 54 (67%) patients and Grade III-IV leucopenia in 44 (55%) patients, with 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia and 1 toxic death. Thirteen patients received platelet transfusions and 38 were transfused with packed red cells. All patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 54% (95% confidence interval 43 to 65%) with 1 complete response. In patients with Stage IIIB and IV disease, response rates were 58% and 52%, respectively. Median time to progression was 40 weeks (range 0-114) and median overall survival was 12 months (16.6 months for stage IIIB and 10.4 months for stage IV). Median and minimum follow-up were 19 and 12 months, respectively. The GIP combination shows a response rate and overall survival of clinical interest. Hematologic toxicity was the main toxic effect, especially in patients with low performance status. This regimen will be tested in a Phase III randomized trial.