Comparison of the within-reader and inter-vendor agreement of left ventricular circumferential strains and volume indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Volume indices and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are routinely used to assess cardiac function. Ventricular strain values may provide additional diagnostic information, but their reproducibility is unclear. This study therefore compares the repeatability and reproducibility of volumes, volume fraction, and regional ventricular strains, derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, across three software packages and between readers. METHODS: Seven readers analysed 16 short-axis CMR stacks of a porcine heart. Endocardial contours were manually drawn using OsiriX and Simpleware ScanIP and repeated in both softwares. The images were also contoured automatically in Circle CVI42. Endocardial global, apical, mid-ventricular, and basal circumferential strains, as well as end-diastolic and end-systolic volume and LVEF were compared. RESULTS: Bland-Altman analysis found systematic biases in contour length between software packages. Compared to OsiriX, contour lengths were shorter in both ScanIP (-1.9 cm) and CVI42 (-0.6 cm), causing statistically significant differences in end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, and apical circumferential strain (all p<0.006). No differences were found for mid-ventricular, basal or global strains, or left ventricular ejection fraction (all p<0.007). All CVI42 results lay within the ranges of the OsiriX results. Intra-software differences were found to be lower than inter-software differences. CONCLUSION: OsiriX and CVI42 gave consistent results for all strain and volume metrics, with no statistical differences found between OsiriX and ScanIP for mid-ventricular, global or basal strains, or left ventricular ejection fraction. However, volumes were influenced by the choice of contouring software, suggesting care should be taken when comparing volumes across different software.

The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position.

BACKGROUND: A simple suture technique in transosseous meniscal root repair can provide equivalent resistance to cyclic load and is less technically demanding to perform compared with more complex suture configurations, yet maximum yield loads are lower. Various suture materials have been investigated for repair, but it is currently not clear which material is optimal in terms of repair strength. Meniscal root anatomy is also complex; consisting of the ligamentous mid-substance (root ligament), the transition zone between the meniscal body and root ligament; the relationship between suture location and maximum failure load has not been investigated in a simulated surgical repair. HYPOTHESES: (A) Using a knottable, 2-mm-wide, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) braided tape for transosseous meniscal root repair with a simple suture technique will give rise to a higher maximum failure load than a repair made using No. 2 UHMWPE standard suture material for simple suture repair. (B) Suture position is an important factor in determining the maximum failure load. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: In part A, the posterior root attachment of the medial meniscus was divided in 19 porcine knees. The tibias were potted, and repair of the medial meniscus posterior root was performed. A suture-passing device was used to place 2 simple sutures into the posterior root of the medial meniscus during a repair procedure that closely replicated single-tunnel, transosseous surgical repair commonly used in clinical practice. Ten tibias were randomized to repair with No. 2 suture (Suture group) and 9 tibias to repair with 2-mm-wide knottable braided tape (Tape group). The repair strength was assessed by maximum failure load measured by use of a materials testing machine. Micro-computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to assess suture positions within the meniscus. The wide range of maximum failure load appeared related to suture position. In part B, 10 additional porcine knees were prepared. Five knees were randomized to the Suture group and 5 to the Tape group. All repairs were standardized for location, and the repair was placed in the body of the meniscus. A custom image registration routine was created to coregister all 29 menisci, which allowed the distribution of maximum failure load versus repair location to be visualized with a heat map. RESULTS: In part A, higher maximum failure load was found for the Tape group (mean, 86.7 N; 95% CI, 63.9-109.6 N) compared with the Suture group (mean, 57.2 N; 95% CI, 30.5-83.9 N). The 3D micro-CT analysis of suture position showed that the mean maximum failure load for repairs placed in the meniscus body (mean, 104 N; 95% CI, 81.2-128.0 N) was higher than for those placed in the root ligament (mean, 35.1 N; 95% CI, 15.7-54.5 N). In part B, the mean maximum failure load was significantly greater for the Tape group, 298.5 N ( P = .016, Mann-Whitney U; 95% CI, 183.9-413.1 N), compared with that for the Suture group, 146.8 N (95% CI, 82.4-211.6 N). Visualization with the heat map revealed that small variations in repair location on the meniscus were associated with large differences in maximum failure load; moving the repair entry point by 3 mm could reduce the failure load by 50%. CONCLUSION: The use of 2-mm braided tape provided higher maximum failure load than the use of a No. 2 suture. The position of the repair in the meniscus was also a highly significant factor in the properties of the constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results provide insight into material and location for optimal repair strength.