Latissimus dorsi seroma prevention with running quilting suture using barbed suture.

Dorsal seroma is a common complication of autologous latissimus dorsi flap (ALDF) in breast reconstruction, and has limited the use of this technique, despite its aesthetic success. It is important to find a right technique to limit the incidence of seroma formation after ALDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of a dorsal quilting technique called "running quilting" using barbed resorbable suture in seroma prevention. Three hundred patients who underwent ALDF breast reconstruction in the period between 2004 and 2014 were included in this study. The population was divided in 3 groups; without quilting, with simple quilting suture, and with running quilting using barbed suture. The incidence of small seromas (requiring 1 or 2 aspirations during routine postoperative visits without adding additional appointments to the follow-up routine) was not significantly decreased: it was 54% in the non-quilted group, 47% in group 2 Quilting, and 34% in group 3 running quilting. However, quilting reduced the duration of drainage, and the rate of late seromas (from 8% to 0%), and chronic sero-hematomas completely disappeared in our experience. Running quilting using barbed suture is highly effective in preventing late and refractory donor-site seromas. Its effectiveness is expected to increase the use of ALDF in breast reconstruction, which we consider currently as one of the best autologous reconstruction techniques.

[Breast restoration by the lipomodeling technique after breast sequelae following complications of reduction mammoplasty]. / Rattrapage des séquelles esthétiques de réduction mammaire par la technique du lipomodelage.

BACKGROUND: Complications of reduction mammoplasty can lead to aesthetic sequelae, which are known to be difficult and delicate to treat, and only a few articles deal with this subject. PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to present and analyze our experience of lipomodeling for the secondary management of aesthetic sequelae occurring after a complication of reduction mammoplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An uniform and consecutive series of 22 female patients, operated with the lipomodeling technique from December 2003 to March 2019 by the last author, to correct aesthetic sequelae after secondary complications of reduction mammoplasty was studied analyzing the efficiency and the tolerance of this technique. RESULTS: The results showed 86.4% of very good results and 13.6% of good results. Seventeen patients (77.3%) were highly satisfied with the postoperative outcome, and 5 patients were satisfied (22.7%). The number of procedures varied from 1 to 3: 15 patients (68.2%) underwent only one session of lipomodeling, 5 patients (22.7%) underwent two sessions, and 2 patients (9.1%) underwent three sessions. The mean time between two interventions was 4 months (3-12). No patient of this series initiates any medico-legal proceeding towards the first surgeon. CONCLUSION: After this study, lipomodeling, in association with ancillary procedures, seems to be an effective and safe solution to correct aesthetic sequelae following secondary complications of reduction mammoplasty. It should have a key role for the correction of these sequelae. An effective and appropriate care of these patients leads to good results and patients' final satisfaction, and manages to avoid any medico-legal proceeding, always badly lived as much for the patient as for the first surgeon.

[How to manage late periprosthetic fluid collections (seromas) in patients with breast implants?] / Conduite à tenir devant un sérome tardif péri-prothétique.

The widespread use of silicone implants in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery led to an increase in the incidence of breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, BIA-ALCL, mainly associated with the use of macro-textured breast implants. BIA-ALCL is a serious complication presenting clinically as a late onset periprosthetic seroma. Thus, its occurrence became an alarming sign feared by most plastic surgeons. Therefore, a good knowledge with respect to early diagnosis, subsequent workup, and treatment is crucial in the management of periprosthetic seroma. The diagnosis of late onset seroma is clinically evident. Although idiopathic seroma is the most common cause, BIA-ALCL should be always eliminated. A complete workup is usually necessary. An ultrasound performed by a radiologist specialized in breast imaging followed by an ultrasound guided puncture is imperative. Consequently, the cytological and the bacteriological analysis will orient us toward the etiology (infectious, neoplastic or mechanical). A standardized management of late periprosthetic seroma does not exist, with various factors are to be taken into consideration. These include the surgeon's experience, the diagnosis, and the medical institution facilities. Although idiopathic seroma is managed by a simple puncture and drainage, other causes may require a surgical procedure with implant removal, capsulotomies, and/or total capsulectomies.

[Poland's syndrome]. / Syndrome de Poland.

Breast and thoracic deformities of Poland syndrome is a rare malformation known to be difficult to treat. Numerous descriptions of surgical corrections have been published but none achieved to correct severe cases before description of lipomodeling technique. The aim of this article is to present thoraco-mammary deformity of Poland syndrome, corrections techniques already available and therapeutical indications in primary and secondary cases. Constant anomaly of Poland syndrome is agenesis of sterno-costal part of pectoralis major muscle but other muscular anomalies can be associated. Skin and glandular anomalies present with a fine skin and an absent or hypoplasic subcutaneous fat with a glandular hypoplasia of various degree. Osteo-cartilaginous anomalies can be associated in very severe cases. Clinical sign of Poland syndrome is forced adduction manoeuvre highlighting pectoralis major agenesis. Functional impact of the deformity is low but psychological and psychosocial implications can be very important, supporting an early surgical correction. Therapeutic means are various and accurate descriptions are given in this article: thoracic bony reconstruction, thoracic implant made of silicone elastomer, breast implant, skin expansion, latissimus dorsi pedicled flap, free flaps, breast lipomodeling, Breast-pectoralis flap. Principles of each technique are described and balanced with their actual use in this malformation. Indications have been completely modified these last years due to lipomodeling contribution which represented a huge step in this deformity treatment. In our practice, if autologous reconstruction with lipomodeling is possible, we choose this solution at first. In case of severe thoracic deformity, a silicone elastomer implant made with the help of computed assisted conception can be an important adjunct, mainly by thin young man. In secondary cases, if implant is well tolerated, we found logical to stay in the same reconstruction path and do one or two sessions of lipomodeling in order to improve reconstruction. If implant tolerance is low and skin very thin at risk of exposure, we do recommend a conversion of implant reconstruction to autologous reconstruction. In conclusion, thoraco-mammary deformities of Poland syndrome are rare and hard to treat and should be managed by well trained and experimented surgeons. Breast lipomodeling is a huge step in the treatment of these deformities and should be regarded, in our opinion, as first line treatment if fat deposits are sufficient. In case of low fat provisions or in the thin young man, composite techniques should be used with silicone elastomer implant.

The role of reconstructive surgery after soft tissue sarcoma resection.

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors with pejorative prognosis. They require a multidisciplinary approach in a specialized hospital belonging to the NetSarc network in France. In all cases treated with curative intent, the objective of excision surgery is to achieve wide, microscopically negative margins (R0 according to the UICC classification). When growing on a limb, sarcomas may threaten functionally relevant structures and even lead to amputation. Nowadays, when combined with radiation therapy, wide exeresis limb-sparing surgery is achievable in 90 to 95% of the cases, of which 25% will nevertheless require reconstructive surgery to preserve the limb, to limit postoperative complications and to manage possible sequelae. Progress in reparative surgery, particularly in microsurgery, has helped not only to improve limb salvage rates but also to create wider margins without altering oncologic goals of curative resection. After determining the range of resection, reconstructive surgery should be tailored to address the tissue defect. The converse is to be strongly discouraged. The extent of resection must not be compromised or reduced in order to facilitate reconstructive surgery. A plastic surgeon must master all the flap techniques, including microsurgery, while taking into account the impact of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy on previously irradiated tissues or on wounds requiring adjuvant therapy. Recent developments, especially as regards perforator flaps, have helped to enhanced the quality of reconstruction procedure while reducing donor site morbidity. In our experience, perforator flaps are a workhorse in reconstructive surgeries subsequent to soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. On a parallel track, lipofilling (otherwise known as fat grafting or fat transfer) has become the first-line treatment for patients with post-surgical functional or cosmetic sequalae. It is performed after long-term follow-up during disease-free survival. Strict clinical examination and MRI are mandatory prior to programming any local procedure. Usually, three to four sessions of fat grafting are needed to enhance local trophicity or the cosmetic aspect. Sequalae treatments are of great interest in terms of psychological as well as functional outcome.

The trapezius perforator flap: Versatility for locoregional reconstruction.

Only a few surgical choices are available for cervical and thoracic spine coverage. The trapezius perforator flap is relatively unknown and only a few authors have published on this subject. In this article, we report on four clinical cases where a trapezius perforator flap was used either as a propeller flap, as a tunnelized island flap, or as a supercharged flap for cervical spine, thoracic spine and anterior cervical defects. Harvesting this flap is quite simple and enables high quality reconstruction with low donor-site morbidity in complex situations.

[Breast reconstruction with the autologous latissimus dorsi flap]. / Reconstruction mammaire par lambeau de grand dorsal autologue.

Amongst various techniques of breast reconstruction, Autologous Latissimus Dorsi (ALD) flap without breast implant is the newest technique that took advantage of recent improvement during the last decade. Surgical procedure is well standardized, and allows to harvest various fat areas attached to the muscle, to obtain an autologous reconstruction. Thoracodorsal pedicle is steady and makes ALD the most reliable flap that can be used in several indications, especially when DIEP or TRAM flap are inappropriate. Lipomodeling of the cleavage is performed during the first surgery. Additionnal lipomodeling is performed in the whole reconstructed breast area at 2 months to get the expected volume. In some cases, two lipomodelings may be required. Advantages of ALD flap are numerous such as its reliability, its trophicity, and a very low complications rate. After a learning curve, drawbacks are well controlled, since quilting suture of the donor site helped to reduce drastically seroma rate. Finally, ALD flap became the best technique, and the most used in our team for autologous breast reconstruction, and surpassed abdominal flaps such as TRAM flap or DIEP flap.

Efficacy of the postoperative management after microsurgical free tissue transfer.

INTRODUCTION: The physical and medical postoperative measures after free flap reconstruction vary substantially between surgical units. The objective of this review was to identify the postoperative measures which proved a significant positive effect on free flap survival. METHOD: A review was conducted in the MEDLINE database on the English and French literature. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-eight articles were retained. A meta-analysis of 4984 patients who were given antithrombotics (viz. antiplatelets and anticoagulants) postoperatively found that these treatments were of no significant benefit to free flap survival and increased the risk of postoperative hematoma. Postoperative transfusions did not favor free flap survival and were associated with a higher incidence of medical complications. Preoperative anemia was a risk factor for free flap failure. Blood pressure control, vasodilators, antioxidants, corticotherapy, oxygen therapy, and prolonged immobilization were of no proven benefit. CONCLUSION: No postoperative therapy, whether drug-based or not, has been shown to have a significant positive effect on free flap survival.