Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

This study aims to apply the evidence-based practice (EBP) process to determine the factors that influence patients' understanding of, participation in, and satisfaction with clinical trials, the informed consent process, and treatment decisions and to make recommendations for improving clinical trials education. Beginning with evidence retrieval, the authors identified key search terms and searched MEDLINE--Ovid, MEDLINE--PubMed, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to identify articles published between July 2001 and July 2006 that highlighted clinical trials education. The articles were reviewed for clinical trials patient education information, clinician methods of communicating clinical trial information to patients, and patient satisfaction with the clinical trials process, including the informed consent process. As a result, practice changes were recommended for the patient/family, staff/community, and institution. From the literature review, 81 articles were identified. Recurring themes included decision-making, patient education, staff education, and pediatrics. Most articles focused on methods and strategies aimed at improving education at the patient/family, staff/community, and institutional levels. The issues surrounding clinical trial education are complex due to multiple variables interfering with poor patient understanding of, participation in, and satisfaction with clinical trial treatment decisions. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that clinicians involved in educating patients, families, staff, and communities about clinical trials have an awareness of and understanding for very complex issues.

Phase I study of prolonged-infusion gemcitabine combined with cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast: tolerability of an optimal dose schedule.

BACKGROUND: A phase I study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of prolonged-infusion gemcitabine combined with cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). METHODS: Patients with MBC were treated with gemcitabine infusion at 10 mg/m2/min and cyclophosphamide by intravenous piggyback injection, 4 h after initiation of the infusion. We treated 3-6 patients at a particular dose level until the MTD was determined. RESULTS: Overall, 44 patients received a total of 197 courses of therapy. Both drugs were given on days 1, 8 and 15 to 14 patients (68 courses). Delayed white blood cell recovery necessitated first protocol amendment to drop cyclophosphamide on days 8 and 15 in 9 patients (43 cycles). A second amendment was needed to drop gemcitabine on day 15 because of thrombocytopenia in 21 patients (86 courses). The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. The MTD of an optimal dose schedule was 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine infused at a rate of 10 mg/m2/min on days 1 and 8, and 400 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, by intravenous piggyback injection, on day 1, 4 h after initiation of the gemcitabine infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD can be given safely every 4 weeks to patients with MBC. Phase II studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical activity of this therapy.

Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting could increase pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with HER2-positive disease with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to either four cycles of paclitaxel followed by four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide or to the same chemotherapy with simultaneous weekly trastuzumab for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate a 20% improvement in pCR (assumed 21% to 41%) with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy. The planned sample size was 164 patients. RESULTS: Prognostic factors were similar in the two groups. After 34 patients had completed therapy, the trial's Data Monitoring Committee stopped the trial because of superiority of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. pCR rates were 25% and 66.7% for chemotherapy (n = 16) and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (n = 18), respectively (P = .02). The decision was based on the calculation that, if study continued to 164 patients, there was a 95% probability that trastuzumab plus chemotherapy would be superior. Of the 42 randomized patients, 26% in the chemotherapy arm achieved pCR compared with 65.2% in the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy arm (P = .016). The safety of this approach is not established, although no clinical congestive heart failure was observed. A more than 10% decrease in the cardiac ejection fraction was observed in five and seven patients in the chemotherapy and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size, these data indicate that adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy, as used in this trial, significantly increased pCR without clinical congestive heart failure.

The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of an alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with a poor pathologic response to a preoperative doxorubicin-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer received three cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VACP) every 21 days followed by surgery. Patients with less than 1 cm(3) residual tumor at mastectomy received an additional five cycles of VACP. Those with more than 1 cm(3) residual tumor were randomly assigned to receive an additional five cycles of VACP or five cycles of vinblastine, methotrexate with calcium leucovorin rescue, and fluorouracil (VbMF). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were evaluable. Overall clinical response was seen in 83.4% after three cycles of VACP, whereas the pathologic complete response was 12.2%. One hundred six patients were randomly assigned to VACP or VbMF. Those receiving VbMF achieved higher relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those who received additional VACP, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Initial stage of tumor, clinical complete response, and pathologic complete response were all associated with statistically superior survival rates. CONCLUSION: Clinical and pathologic response to preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy predicted for improved survival in women with operable breast cancer. For those with a poor response to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy, treatment with VbMF was associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS compared with those continuing with the doxorubicin regimen.

Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in patients with metastaticbreast cancer who have been previously treated with or exposed to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. In this prospective randomized trial, the role of paclitaxel was evaluated in an adjuvant setting to determine its impact on reducing the risk of recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Five hundred twenty-four patients were randomized to be treated either with 4 cycles of paclitaxel followed by 4 cycles of combination therapy with 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (Pac/FAC) or with 8 cycles of FAC alone. Patients with intact primary breast cancer received the initial 4 cycles of paclitaxel or 4 cycles of FAC in a neoadjuvant setting. Planned duration of therapy was the same in all patients. After completion of 8 cycles of chemotherapy, those patients who were > or =50 years and whose tumors were positive for estrogen receptors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients have had a recurrence after a median follow-up of 60 months with a range of 5-89 months. Estimated disease-free survival at 48 months was 0.83 for FAC and 0.86 for Pac/FAC group. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). The overall estimated hazard ratio for Pac/FAC compared with FAC derived by fitting the Cox regression model and incorporating terms for prognostic factors was 0.66. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to a FAC regimen of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy may further reduce the risk of disease recurrence; however, differences were not statistically significant. At the time of this analysis, there have been 47 deaths. The survival data are too preliminary to permit meaningful evaluation of the impact of paclitaxel on mortality.

Advances in breast cancer treatment: the emerging role of ixabepilone.

Although taxanes and anthracyclines have dramatically improved the treatment of breast cancer, resistance to these agents upon continued exposure is almost inevitable. The epothilone ixabepilone was US FDA approved in 2007 based on its demonstrated activity in metastatic breast cancer that is resistant to other approved agents, including taxanes and anthracyclines. Over 2000 patients have now received this agent in clinical trials, clarifying that ixabepilone has efficacy in minimally and heavily pretreated patients and can overcome chemotherapy-induced drug resistance, while maintaining a manageable safety profile. These clinical trials identified a progression-free survival advantage with ixabepilone/capecitabine combination therapy over capecitabine monotherapy. Moreover, certain hard-to-treat subgroups of patients may derive additional benefit from ixabepilone therapy. The objective of this report is to review the updated body of ixabepilone clinical data in breast cancer, as well as key considerations for ixabepilone administration and side-effect management.

Capecitabine-based combination therapy for breast cancer: implications for nurses.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review available data and implications for nurses of combination regimens containing capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed publications or abstracts from major oncology conferences and reviews of capecitabine focusing on nursing implications. DATA SYNTHESIS: Capecitabine has proven efficacy in combination with docetaxel and is under evaluation in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings in combination with several oral and IV chemotherapeutic and biologic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine-containing regimens demonstrate high activity in a range of settings but typically have more complex safety profiles, dose-modification schemes, and scheduling requirements than monotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Patients need to be aware of a wider range of likely side effects and should understand that they have been prescribed combination therapy rather than more simple, single-agent treatments because of its potential to improve outcome.

Clinical course of breast cancer patients with metastases limited to the liver treated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to describe the clinical course of patients with breast cancer with liver metastases alone who were treated on doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or taxane-containing chemotherapy protocols at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,193 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated on prospective clinical protocols at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer between 1973 and 2003. Among those, 132 were identified as having the liver as the first site of metastatic disease. The following information was obtained from the medical records: gender, age, race, performance status, menopausal status, hormonal receptor status, laboratory data, primary treatment, prior systemic treatment, disease-free interval, extent of metastatic disease, response to chemotherapy, site of progression, time to tumor progression, overall survival, and cause of death. RESULTS: Of the patients 62% received anthracycline-based regimens and 38% received anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens on various clinical protocols as the initial therapy for metastatic disease. The median follow-up of the patients was 52 months. The overall objective response rate was 66.4%; 16.4% of the patients achieved complete responses. The median time to progression was 14 months. Progression-free survival rates were 56% and 30% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 25 months. Sixteen patients (12.1%) survived longer than 60 months. There was a statistically inverse relation between a high lactate dehydrogenase level and achieving a complete response (P < 0.05). Age > or =50 years, extent of liver metastases, performance status, and lactate dehydrogenase and albumin levels are significantly related to progression-free survival (P < 0.05). Year of liver metastases diagnosis, extent of liver metastases, performance status, and albumin level are significantly related to overall survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis demonstrated that patients with liver metastases only had high objective response rates and encouraging results for median survival obtained with currently available cytotoxic agents.

Phase I study of eniluracil and oral 5-fluorouracil in combination with docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The authors conducted a single-institution Phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses and to define the toxic effects of oral eniluracil and oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were eligible if they had disease progression after anthracycline-based therapy and had never been exposed to taxanes. The starting doses of oral eniluracil and oral 5-FU were 11.5 mg/m(2) and 1.15 mg/m(2), respectively, twice daily on Days 1-14. Docetaxel was given intravenously at a starting dose of 50 mg/m(2) on Day 1 only. The dose of docetaxel was escalated among cohorts until a maximum tolerated dose was reached. Courses were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: The authors treated 19 patients with Stage IV breast carcinoma, of whom 5 had received prior chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Fifty-three percent had a performance status of 1, and 53% had bone or soft tissue involvement as the dominant site of disease. All patients had received prior therapy with doxorubicin. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. No episodes of sepsis were observed. Significant antitumor activity was observed with a total of two complete and nine partial responses. The recommended doses for Phase II studies are 72 mg/m(2) docetaxel on Day 1 and 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for a total of 14 days, with courses being repeated every 21 days. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral eniluracil/5-FU and intravenous docetaxel is a safe and well tolerated regimen. Significant antitumor activity is associated with this combination.