Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Mitral-valve repair can be accomplished with an investigational procedure that involves the percutaneous implantation of a clip that grasps and approximates the edges of the mitral leaflets at the origin of the regurgitant jet. METHODS: We randomly assigned 279 patients with moderately severe or severe (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation in a 2:1 ratio to undergo either percutaneous repair or conventional surgery for repair or replacement of the mitral valve. The primary composite end point for efficacy was freedom from death, from surgery for mitral-valve dysfunction, and from grade 3+ or 4+ mitral regurgitation at 12 months. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rates of the primary end point for efficacy were 55% in the percutaneous-repair group and 73% in the surgery group (P=0.007). The respective rates of the components of the primary end point were as follows: death, 6% in each group; surgery for mitral-valve dysfunction, 20% versus 2%; and grade 3+ or 4+ mitral regurgitation, 21% versus 20%. Major adverse events occurred in 15% of patients in the percutaneous-repair group and 48% of patients in the surgery group at 30 days (P<0.001). At 12 months, both groups had improved left ventricular size, New York Heart Association functional class, and quality-of-life measures, as compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Although percutaneous repair was less effective at reducing mitral regurgitation than conventional surgery, the procedure was associated with superior safety and similar improvements in clinical outcomes. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; EVEREST II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00209274.).

Transmyocardial revascularization: 5-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: In prospective randomized trials at 1 year, transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) provided superior relief of angina, decreased rehospitalizations, and improved exercise times. We evaluated 5-year mortality and angina class in "no-option" patients with diffuse coronary artery disease randomized to TMR or continued medical management. METHODS: Two hundred twelve patients with refractory class IV angina who were not candidates for conventional therapy were randomized to receive holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet TMR (n = 100) or continued medical management (n = 112) at nine centers. Follow-up included all-cause mortality along with angina class assessment by blinded evaluators. Mean follow-up was 5.7 +/- 0.8 years. RESULTS: Mean angina scores for TMR patients were 4.0 +/- 0.0 at baseline, 1.5 +/- 1.4 at 1 year, and 1.2 +/- 1.1 at a mean of 5 years (p < 0.001). After an average of 5 years, a significantly greater proportion of TMR than medical management patients experienced two or more class improvement in angina (88% versus 44%; p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier intention-to-treat survival at 5 years was 65% versus 52% (TMR versus medical management; p = 0.05). Cumulative hazard curves demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of late death for TMR patients; average annual mortality beyond 1 year was 8% versus 13% (TMR versus medical management; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized, no-option class IV angina patients demonstrated significantly increased Kaplan-Meier survival in patients randomized to TMR. The significant angina relief observed 12 months after sole therapy TMR was sustained long term and continued to be superior to that observed for patients maintained on continued medical management alone.

Adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization: five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: In a prospective, randomized trial involving 263 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone, CABG plus transmyocardial revascularization (CABG/TMR) provided an early mortality benefit with similar angina relief compared with CABG alone at 1 year. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients randomized to CABG/TMR or CABG alone. METHODS: Thirteen centers that enrolled 83% (218/263) of the patients in the original trial participated in this longitudinal study. Between 1996 and 1998, these centers randomized 218 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone because of diffusely diseased target vessels to either holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (holmium:YAG) CABG/TMR (n = 110) or CABG alone (n = 108). Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between groups. Follow-up (mean 5.0 +/- 1.7 years) included survival and blinded angina class assessment. RESULTS: At this 5-year follow-up both groups experienced significant angina improvement from baseline, however, the CABG/TMR group had a lower mean angina score (0.4 +/- 0.7 vs 0.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.05), a significantly lower proportion of patients with severe angina (class III/IV: 0% [0/68] vs 10% [6/60], p = 0.009), and a trend towards greater number of angina-free patients (78% [53/68] vs 63% [38/60], p = 0.08), compared with CABG alone patients. Kaplan-Meier survival at 6 years was similar between CABG/TMR and CABG alone patients (76% vs 80%, p = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized patients who would be incompletely revascularized because of diffuse coronary artery disease indicates that the addition of TMR to conventional CABG provides superior angina relief compared to CABG alone.