Exerted running results in altered impact mechanics and footstrike patterns following gait retraining.

Exertion may alter running mechanics and increase injury risk. Effects of exertion following gait-retraining are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine how exertion effects load rates, footstrike, and cadence in runners following a transition to forefoot strike (FFS) or increased cadence (CAD) gait-retraining. METHODS: 33 (9 M, 24 F) healthy rearfoot strike runners were randomized into CAD or FFS groups. All runners received strengthening exercises and gait-retraining. 3D kinetic and kinematic motion analysis with instrumented treadmill at self-selected speed was performed at baseline & 1-week post-intervention, including an exerted run. Exertion was ≥17 on Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion scale or voluntary termination of running. RESULTS: Within group comparisons between fresh and exerted running: Cadence not affected in either group. Foot angle at contact became less plantarflexed in FFS (-2.2°, ±0.4) and was unchanged in CAD. Both groups increased vertical average load rate (FFS +16.9%, CAD +13.6%). CAD increased vertical stiffness (+8.6 kN/m). FFS reduced ankle excursion (1.8°). (p ≤ 0.05 for all values listed). CONCLUSION: Both FFS and CAD exhibited increased load rates with exertion. Variables that may have increased load rates were different for each group. CAD runners had increased vertical stiffness while FFS runners had reduced plantarflexion at contact and reduced ankle dorsiflexion excursion.

The effects of intrinsic foot muscle strengthening on functional mobility in older adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Weakness and disuse of intrinsic foot muscles contributes to dysfunction in foot and toe alignment and sensory input, which may lead to instability and falls in older adults. The aim of this systematic review was to report the effects of intrinsic foot muscle strengthening (IFMS) interventions on functional mobility in adults aged ≥65 years. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with searches from December 2019-February 2021 using MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Rehab and Sports Medicine Source, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Additional sources were sought using reference scanning. Eligible sources analyzed adults aged ≥65 years (n = 1674) who were ambulatory, used a functional mobility outcome measure, and contained foot and ankle interventions that included IFMS. Literature studies regarding neurological, vestibular, cognitive, amputation, or post-surgical conditions were excluded. Studies that did not specify intrinsic foot muscle involvement were excluded. Two authors extracted relevant studies and appraised them using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: A total of 1420 articles were screened for relevance, and 16 were extracted. Five additional sources were obtained through reference scanning. Nine articles were eligible for review. PEDro scores ranged from 3 to 7 (out of 10), indicating "fair" quality of evidence. Heterogeneity of methods and data did not allow for statistical comparison. Themes extracted from sources were types of intrinsic foot strengthening interventions and parameters; outcomes on falls, balance, functional mobility; and subjective reports regarding functional mobility. CONCLUSION: Evidence reviewed was of fair quality. IFMS interventions contributed to improvements in strength, balance, mobility, and possibly reduced fall risk. There was little effect on gait. Subjective reports indicate a possible mechanism for improved mobility may be from increased proprioception and sensation.

Transition to forefoot strike reduces load rates more effectively than altered cadence.

BACKGROUND: Excessive vertical impacts at landing are associated with common running injuries. Two primary gait-retraining interventions aimed at reducing impact forces are transition to forefoot strike and increasing cadence. The objective of this study was to compare the short- and long-term effects of 2 gait-retraining interventions aimed at reducing landing impacts. METHODS: A total of 39 healthy recreational runners using a rearfoot strike and a cadence of ≤170 steps/min were randomized into cadence (CAD) or forefoot strike (FFS) groups. All participants performed 4 weeks of strengthening followed by 8 sessions of gait-retraining using auditory feedback. Vertical average load rates (VALR) and vertical instantaneous load rates (VILR) were calculated from the vertical ground reaction force curve. Both cadence and foot strike angle were measured using 3D motion analysis and an instrumented treadmill at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months post retraining. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that the FFS group had significant reductions in VALR (49.7%) and VILR (41.7%), and changes were maintained long term. Foot strike angle in the FFS group changed from 14.2° dorsiflexion at baseline to 3.4° plantarflexion, with changes maintained long term. The CAD group exhibited significant reduction only in VALR (16%) and only at 6 months. Both groups had significant and similar increases in cadence at all follow-ups (CAD, +7.2% to 173 steps/min; and FFS, +6.1% to 172 steps/min). CONCLUSION: Forefoot strike gait-retraining resulted in significantly greater reductions in VALR and similar increases in cadence compared to cadence gait-retraining in the short and long term. Cadence gait-retraining resulted in small reductions in VALR at only the 6-month follow-up.

Relationships between Habitual Cadence, Footstrike, and Vertical Load Rates in Runners.

Excessive vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) load rates have been linked with running injuries. Increasing cadence (CAD) has been shown to reduce load rates; however, relationships between habitual cadence and load rates across a population of runners have not been examined. PURPOSE: To examine the relationships between habitual running cadence and vertical load rates in healthy and injured runners using habitual footstrike patterns. As CAD increased, we expected vertical load rates would decrease. METHODS: Healthy runners (n = 32, 25 men) and injured runners (n = 93, 45 men) seeking treatment were analyzed. Footstrike classifications were heel at initial contact (rearfoot strike [RFS]) or forefoot at initial contact (forefoot strike [FFS]). Runners were divided into four injury status/footstrike pattern (FSP) subgroups: healthy RFS (n = 19), injured RFS (n = 70), healthy FFS (n = 13), and injured FFS (n = 23). The VGRF and CAD were recorded as participants ran on an instrumented treadmill at self-selected speed (x¯ = 2.6 m·s ±0.12). Healthy runners used laboratory footwear similar to their habitual footwear, and injured runners used habitual footwear. The vertical average load rates and vertical instantaneous load rates of the VGRF of each runner's right leg were calculated and correlated with CAD for four injury status-FSP subgroups and for all runners combined. RESULTS: There were no differences in CAD between all runners or any subgroup (P > 0.05). Vertical average load rates and vertical instantaneous load rates were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) in the injured RFS group compared with all other subgroups. Injured FFS and healthy FFS had similar load rates (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: We found no relationships between habitual running cadence and vertical load rates. The highest load rates were in injured RFS runners, and the lowest load rates were in FFS runners, regardless of injury status. Future studies of gait retraining to increase CAD and reduce load rates should follow runners long term to examine this relationship once CAD has become habituated.