RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterizes myocardial disease and predicts an adverse cardiovascular (CV) prognosis. Myocardial abnormalities, are present in early chronic kidney disease (CKD). To date there are no data defining prevalence, pattern and clinical implications of LGE-CMR in CKD. METHODS: Patients with pre-dialysis CKD (stage 2-5) attending specialist renal clinics at University Hospital Birmingham (UK) who underwent gadolinium enhanced CMR (1.5 T) between 2005 and 2017 were included. The patterns and presence (LGEpos) / absence (LGEneg) of LGE were assessed by two blinded observers. Association between LGE and CV outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 159 patients received gadolinium (male 61%, mean age 55 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 69%, left ventricular hypertrophy 5%) with a median follow up period of 3.8 years [1.04-11.59]. LGEpos was present in 55 (34%) subjects; the patterns were: right ventricular insertion point n = 28 (51%), mid wall n = 18 (33%), sub-endocardial n = 5 (9%) and sub-epicardial n = 4 (7%). There were no differences in left ventricular structural or functional parameters with LGEpos. There were 12 adverse CV outcomes over follow up; 7 of 55 with LGEpos and 5 of 104 LGEneg. LGEpos was not predicted by age, gender, glomerular filtration rate or electrocardiographic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In a selected cohort of subjects with moderate CKD but low CV risk, LGE was present in approximately a third of patients. LGE was not associated with adverse CV outcomes. Further studies in high risk CKD cohorts are required to assess the role of LGE with multiplicative risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Fibrosis , Gadolinio DTPA/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Remodelación VentricularRESUMEN
Transthoracic echocardiography is an essential and widely available diagnostic tool for assessing individuals reporting cardiovascular symptoms, monitoring those with established cardiac conditions and for preparticipation screening of athletes. While its use is well-defined in hospital and clinic settings, echocardiography is increasingly being utilised in the community, including in the rapidly expanding sub-speciality of sports cardiology. There is, however, a knowledge and practical gap in the challenging area of the assessment of coronary artery anomalies, which is an important cause of sudden cardiac death, often in asymptomatic athletic individuals. To address this, we present a step-by-step guide to facilitate the recognition and assessment of anomalous coronary arteries using transthoracic echocardiography at the bedside; whilst recognising the importance of performing dedicated cross-sectional imaging, specifically coronary computed tomography (CTCA) where clinically indicated on a case-by-case basis. This guide is intended to be useful for echocardiographers and physicians in their routine clinical practice whilst recognising that echocardiography remains a highly skill-dependent technique that relies on expertise at the bedside.
RESUMEN
The physiologic cardiac adaptations caused by intensive exercise and the pathophysiologic changes caused by significant regurgitant valvular lesions can be challenging to differentiate. We describe the clinical course of an asymptomatic 31-year-old elite triathlete with a moderately regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve and severe left ventricular and aortic dilatation. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The efficacy of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 infection 12-lead ECGs for identifying athletes with myopericarditis has never been reported. We aimed to assess the prevalence and significance of de-novo ECG changes following COVID-19 infection. METHODS: In this multicentre observational study, between March 2020 and May 2022, we evaluated consecutive athletes with COVID-19 infection. Athletes exhibiting de-novo ECG changes underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scans. One club mandated CMR scans for all players (n=30) following COVID-19 infection, despite the absence of cardiac symptoms or de-novo ECG changes. RESULTS: 511 soccer players (median age 21 years, IQR 18-26 years) were included. 17 (3%) athletes demonstrated de-novo ECG changes, which included reduction in T-wave amplitude in the inferior and lateral leads (n=5), inferior leads (n=4) and lateral leads (n=4); inferior T-wave inversion (n=7); and ST-segment depression (n=2). 15 (88%) athletes with de-novo ECG changes revealed evidence of inflammatory cardiac sequelae. All 30 athletes who underwent a mandatory CMR scan had normal findings. Athletes revealing de-novo ECG changes had a higher prevalence of cardiac symptoms (71% vs 12%, p<0.0001) and longer median symptom duration (5 days, IQR 3-10) compared with athletes without de-novo ECG changes (2 days, IQR 1-3, p<0.001). Among athletes without cardiac symptoms, the additional yield of de-novo ECG changes to detect cardiac inflammation was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: 3% of athletes demonstrated de-novo ECG changes post COVID-19 infection, of which 88% were diagnosed with cardiac inflammation. Most affected athletes exhibited cardiac symptoms; however, de-novo ECG changes contributed to a diagnosis of cardiac inflammation in 20% of athletes without cardiac symptoms.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fútbol , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Prevalencia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Electrocardiografía , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Atletas , Inflamación , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
Regular exercise confers health benefits with cardiovascular mortality risk reduction through a variety of mechanisms. At a population level, evidence suggests that undertaking more exercise has greater benefits. In the modern era of sport, there has been an exponential rise in professional and amateur athletes participating in endurance events, with a progressively better understanding of the associated cardiac adaptations, collectively termed 'athletes heart'. However, emerging data raise questions regarding the risk of potential harm from endurance exercise, with an increased risk of arrhythmia from adverse cardiac remodelling. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that athletes may exhibit a higher burden of AF, conduction tissue disease, ventricular arrhythmias, a cardiomyopathy-like phenotype and coronary artery disease. In an attempt to separate myth from reality, this review reports on the evidence supporting the notion of 'too much exercise', the purported mechanisms of exercise-induced cardiac arrhythmia and complex interplay with sporting discipline, demographics, genetics and acquired factors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines (CG95) recommend patients with new stable chest pain be investigated with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). An updated guideline (MTG32) recommended using CT fractional flow reserve (CTFFR) as a gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for patients with coronary stenosis on CTCA. Subsequently, NHS England negotiated a UK-wide contract with HeartFlow, the provider of CTFFR. We describe our experience with CTFFR and consider the impact of the recent ISCHEMIA trial on these guidelines. METHODS: We prospectively collected ICA and revascularisation data on all patients undergoing CTFFR from January 2019 to March 2020. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-five of 140 patients completed CTFFR analysis. Eighty-one patients had CTCA stenosis >50%. Thirty-six had positive CTFFR; 29 underwent ICA with 22 (75.9%) revascularised. Forty-five had negative CTFFR; 14 underwent ICA and four (28.6%) were revascularised. The average cost of investigation per patient (PP) was £971.95. Had these patients undergone ICA directly with no functional test after CTCA, the average cost would be £932.51 PP. CONCLUSION: Our revascularisation rates suggest that CTFFR can potentially be a gatekeeper to ICA but does not necessarily yield cost savings.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Inglaterra , Humanos , Isquemia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medicina Estatal , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its guidelines on stable chest pain in 2016 and recommended computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as first line investigation for all patients with new onset symptoms. We implemented the guideline and audited downstream testing. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective search of the local radiology database from January 2017 to May 2018. RESULTS: Six-hundred and fifty-two patients underwent CTCA (mean age of 55 years, 330 were male). Thirty-four patients were found to have severe coronary artery disease (CAD), with 30 undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) which confirmed severe CAD in 22, a yield of 73%.Fifty-eight patients were found to have moderate CAD on CTCA with 36 referred for ICA, of which, 33 attended and 18 were found to have severe CAD. Eighteen were referred for imaging stress tests and one was positive. The total yield of severe CAD at ICA was 55%. The majority of patients had normal coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: CTCA was an effective rule-out test for most patients. In patients that went on to have ICA, the overall yield of severe CAD was relatively high. This compares well with our previous audit applying the NICE 2010 guidelines which recommended ICA for all high probability patients wherein the yield of severe CAD was 30%.