Efficacy and Toxicity of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Egyptian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We therefore tested the efficacy and toxicity of MC in pretreated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective phase II study included 50 patients with heavily pretreated MBC who received MC in the form of continuous oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg/day and oral methotrexate 2.5 mg twice per day on days 1 and 2 every week. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary end points were response rate, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were assessed. One patient achieved complete response and 10 patients had partial response, whereas 19 patients had stable disease. The median PFS was 5 months, whereas the median OS was 7 months. Patients with negative progesterone receptors, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 1, achieving response, and those who developed leucopenia, neutropenia, and anemia had significant prolonged PFS, whereas patients with early stage at presentation, receiving < 5 previous treatment lines, achieving response, and experiencing anemia with MC had significant superior OS. In multivariate analysis, achieving response, PS 1, a longer time interval from initial diagnosis until starting MC, and anemia were independent prognostic factors for longer PFS. Initial stage at presentation, number of previous treatment lines, and response were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: MC is an attractive treatment approach that is effective and less toxic. There are certain groups of patients who seem to benefit more, especially those who experienced toxicity with treatment. Larger trials are warranted to assess this approach early in the course of the disease and with other more active agents.

Magnitude of the benefit of progression-free survival as a potential surrogate marker in phase 3 trials assessing targeted agents in molecularly selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In evaluation of the clinical benefit of a new targeted agent in a phase 3 trial enrolling molecularly selected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overall survival (OS) as an endpoint seems to be of limited use because of a high level of treatment crossover for ethical reasons. A more efficient and useful indicator for assessing efficacy is needed. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We identified 18 phase 3 trials in the literature investigating EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) or ALK-TKIs, now approved for use to treat NSCLC, compared with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy (eight trials were performed in molecularly selected patients and ten using an "all-comer" design). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to identify the best threshold by which to divide the groups. Although trials enrolling molecularly selected patients and all-comer trials had similar OS-hazard ratios (OS-HRs) (0.99 vs. 1.04), the former exhibited greater progression-free survival-hazard ratios (PFS-HR) (mean, 0.40 vs. 1.01; P<0.01). A PFS-HR of 0.60 successfully distinguished between the two types of trials (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%). The odds ratio for overall response was higher in trials with molecularly selected patients than in all-comer trials (mean: 6.10 vs. 1.64; P<0.01). An odds ratio of 3.40 for response afforded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 90%. CONCLUSION: The notably enhanced PFS benefit was quite specific to trials with molecularly selected patients. A PFS-HR cutoff of ∼0.6 may help detect clinical benefit of molecular targeted agents in which OS is of limited use, although desired threshold might differ in an individual trial.

Carcinoma of the superior pulmonary sulcus: Results of multidisciplinary treatment.

BACKGROUND: Superior sulcus tumors are a complex subset of tumors accounting for less than 5% of lung tumors. METHODS: Twenty-three patients admitted between 2001 and 2007 were included in the study,. Computed tomography scan of the chest was considered the primary diagnostic and staging investigation for all patients. Radiation therapy was given preoperatively to 20 patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 13 patients. RESULTS: There were 22 men and one woman in the study. The mean age was 53 years. Lobectomy was performed in 20 patients and wedge resection was done for three patients. Three to five ribs were resected in all patients. Extended resections were performed in eight patients. Positive mediastinal lymph nodes were found six patients. The staging was: Stage IIB (11 patients); Stage IIIA (four patients), Stage IIIB (six patients) and Stage IV (two patients). Negative resection margin was achieved in 18 patients. Postoperative complications developed in nine patients, there was one operation related mortality. Tumor recurrence developed in 16 patients. The mean survival time was 2.8 years and the overall 5-years survival was 26%. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment gives satisfactory results with low morbidity and mortality rates and acceptable survival.

Modification and implementation of NCCN guidelines on non-small cell lung cancer in the Middle East and North Africa region.

A lung cancer committee from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region was established to modify the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to create a platform for standard care in the region. The committee comprised different experts in thoracic oncology from the region, including the disciplines of medical and clinical oncology, radiation oncology, thoracic surgery, pulmonary medicine, radiology, and pathology. The committee reviewed version 2 of the 2009 NCCN Guidelines on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and identified recommendations requiring modification for the region using published evidence and relevant experience. These suggested modifications were discussed among the group and with a United States-based NCCN expert for approval. The recommended modifications, with justification and references, were categorized based on the NCCN Guidelines flow. This article describes these recommended modifications. The process of adapting the first NCCN-based guidelines in the region is a step toward helping to improve lung cancer care in the region and encouraging networking and collaboration.