RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are three-times more likely to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), and guidelines recommend prophylaxis during all hospitalizations. In this systematic review we sought to assess for the benefits and risks of VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized IBD patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and others up to 2/2022, for studies on IBD inpatients treated with prophylactic anti-coagulation during hospitalization, compared to no prophylaxis. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were any VTE and major bleeding, respectively. Results were pooled using random-effects models, calculating odds-ratios (OR) and 95% confidence-intervals (CI). The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess bias. RESULTS: We extracted data from 18 observational studies, and two randomized-trial subgroups. The studies were highly variable regarding the included populations, interventions, and outcome definitions. Meta-analysis of all studies showed a non-significant effect of prophylaxis on VTEs (OR 0.97[95%CI 0.49-1.95]). An analysis of eight lower-risk-of-bias studies showed a significant reduction in VTEs (OR 0.27[95%CI 0.13-0.55), number needed to treat(NNT) 34.8[95%CI 26.8-49.8]. A significant protective effect persisted in several subgroups. Major-bleeding was reported in three studies and showed a significant increase with prophylaxis (OR 2.02[95%CI 1.11-3.67], number needed to harm(NNH) 113.6[95%CI 40.7-very-large-number]). CONCLUSIONS: In studies with lower-risk-of-bias, a significant reduction in VTEs was shown in patients treated with VTE prophylaxis (NNT=35), which should be carefully considered against an increased major-bleeding risk (NNH=114). However current data is limited and randomized trials dedicated to IBD inpatients would aid in understating whether universal prophylaxis should be recommended.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including rivaroxaban and apixaban are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus apixaban in the treatment of VTE. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search for studies that directly compared treatment with rivaroxaban and apixaban in adult patients with VTE. The relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled using a fixed-effect model unless significant heterogeneity was present (I2 > 40%), then random-effects model was used. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent VTE (rVTE) and major bleeding events, respectively. RESULTS: Nine observational studies were included in our meta-analysis, assessing 24,156 patients for apixaban and 38,847 for rivaroxaban. Pooling of data for our primary efficacy outcome showed a trend towards lower risk of rVTE with apixaban compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.04, I2 = 53%). Analysis of our primary safety outcome showed a significantly lower risk of major bleeding with apixaban compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76, I2 = 0%). Apixaban was associated with significantly decreased risk of net clinical harm, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) and any bleeding, compared to rivaroxaban (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, I2 = 50%; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, I2 = 7%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.70, I2 = 0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE. Given the limitations of the existing evidence, further interventional studies comparing the two drugs are needed.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Hemorragia , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Rivaroxabán , Tromboembolia Venosa , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Humanos , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The GALLIUM study showed a progression-free survival advantage of 7% in favor of obinutuzumab vs. rituximab-based immunochemotherapies as first-line therapy in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Yet, the toxicity appears to be increased with obinutuzumab-based therapy. This is a multicenter retrospective-cohort study including adult FL patients comparing the toxicity of first-line rituximab vs. obinutuzumab-based chemo-immunotherapies (R and O groups, respectively). We compared the best standard-of-care therapy used per time period, before and after obinutuzumab approval. The primary outcome was any infection during induction and 6 months post-induction. Secondary outcomes included rates of febrile neutropenia, severe and fatal infections, other adverse events, and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 156 patients were included in the analysis, 78 patients per group. Most patients received bendamustine (59%) or CHOP (31.4%) as adjacent chemotherapy. Half of the patients received growth-factor prophylaxis. Overall, 69 patients (44.2%) experienced infections, and a total of 106 infectious episodes were recorded. Patients in the R and O groups had similar rates of any infection (44.8% and 43.5%, p = 1), severe infections (43.3% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.844), febrile neutropenia (15% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.606), and treatment discontinuation, as well as similar types of infections. No covariate was associated with infection in multivariable analysis. No statistically significant difference was evident in adverse events of grades 3-5 (76.9% vs. 82%, p = 0.427). To conclude, in this largest real-life study of first-line treated FL patients comparing R- to O-based therapy, we did not observe any difference in toxicity during the induction and 6 months post-induction period.
Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Linfoma Folicular , Adulto , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Inmunoterapia , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of additional chemotherapy before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with relapse/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve partial remission following first salvage therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all adult patients with DLBCL who underwent HCT between 2008 and 2020 and achieved partial response (PR) after the first salvage and were either referred directly to HCT (n = 47) or received additional salvage therapy before HCT (n = 22). RESULTS: Post-HCT CR rate and progression-free survival were comparable between the two groups (66% vs. 68%, p = .86 and median not reached vs. 10.2 months [95% confidence interval, CI 7.1-12.3], p = .27, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) and estimated 3-year OS favored patients who were directly referred to HCT (105.8 [95% CI 63-148] months vs. 14.5 [95% CI 0-44] months, p = .035, and 65% [95% CI 51%-75%] vs. 40% [95% CI 21%-53%], p = .035, respectively). In Cox regression model, while International Prognostic Index and primary refractory versus relapse disease did not impact OS, allocation to a second salvage regimen and older age were both associated with inferior survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.57 95% CI 1.1-5.8, p = .023 and HR = 1.04 95% CI 0.99-1.2, p = .064, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Referring patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease in PR directly to HCT is associated with better OS compared to those receiving additional lines of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma no Hodgkin , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the natural annual trends in the levels of haemoglobin, haematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) in a population of adults, together with the influence of different clinical parameters on these trends. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on data from a large cohort of subjects attending a screening centre in Israel. For each subject, the yearly average change of haemoglobin, haematocrit, and MCV was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed for the whole cohort and for different subgroups. RESULTS: The study included 3,551 subjects. The average annual rates of decline were found to be -0.0550 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0590 g/dL to -0.0503 g/dL) and -0.097% (95% CI -0.112% to -0.083%) for haemoglobin and haematocrit, respectively. An average annual increase in the MCV level by 0.184 fL (95% CI 0.168 fL-0.200 fL) was found. Among men, the rate of decline in haemoglobin was found to be twice as high compared with women -0.06 g/dL versus -0.03 g/dL, respectively (p = 0.0063). In a multivariate analysis, gender remained the only parameter significantly associated with the annual decline of haemoglobin (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: An annual average decrease in the levels of haemoglobin and haematocrit together with an annual increase in MCV was found. These changes were more prominent in men.
Asunto(s)
Índices de Eritrocitos , Hemoglobinas , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hematócrito , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , IsraelRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Influenza virus causes significant global annual morbidity and mortality. Thrombocytopenia is recognized as a poor prognostic factor in sepsis and is associated with mortality, while lymphopenia has been established as a poor prognostic factor in other viral infections. We aimed to assess the incidence of thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia in seasonal influenza and their effect on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included consecutive adult patients, hospitalized in Rabin Medical Center between October 2017 and April 2018, with laboratory-confirmed influenza. Patients were grouped according to blood counts on admission: (1) thrombocytopenia (<150 K/mL), (2) lymphopenia (<0.5 K/mL), and (3) both thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia. Patients without thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were designated as controls. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Risk factors were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses, using logistic regression and reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 625 patients were included, 112 (18%) had thrombocytopenia, 98 (15.6%) had lymphopenia, and 107 (17%) had both. The crude 30-day all-cause mortality was 7.6% (48/625). Mortality rates were 7.1% (8/112) for the thrombocytopenia group, 11.2% (11/98) for the lymphopenia group, and 14.9% (16/107) for patients with both versus 4.2% (13/308) in the control (p = 0.000 for all). In a multivariable regression model, significant thrombocytopenia (<100 K/µL) [OR 5.07 (95% CI 1.5-16.2)], age [OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02-1.11)], time to oseltamivir [OR 1.006 (95% CI 1.002-1.11)], and significant respiratory support [OR 8.85 (3.4-22.6)] were associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients hospitalized with seasonal influenza and thrombocytopenia <100 K/mL on admission, have an increased 30-day all-cause mortality.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Médula Ósea , Gripe Humana , Linfopenia , Orthomyxoviridae , Trombocitopenia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Linfopenia/etiología , Trombocitopenia/complicacionesRESUMEN
Data are needed on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hematological malignancies (HM). Retrospective studies to date lacked a control group and did not focus on patients with VTE. Out aim was to assess the incidence of VTE recurrence and bleeding in HM patients treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or DOACs for acute VTE. This is a retrospective cohort study including patients with active HM and newly-diagnosed VTE, indexed on the first day of anticoagulation and followed for 12 months. The outcome was a composite of recurrent VTE, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Cumulative incidence [95% confidence interval (CI)] was calculated for each anticoagulation group (LMWH, DOAC) and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using cox-proportional hazards model, with death as a competing risk. 143 HM patients treated with LMWH (96) or DOACs (47) for acute VTE were included. The most common HM types were lymphoma in 83 (58%) and plasma cell dyscrasia in 32 (22.3%). The 12-month cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 24.2% (95% CI 15.9-33.5%; n = 22) in the LMWH group and 18.5% (8.5-31.5%; n = 8) in the DOAC group (HR 1.51 [0.695-3.297]). Two recurrent VTE occurred (both in the DOAC group while off-treatment). Nine (9.4%) LMWH-treated patients had major bleeding compared to 1 (2.1%) DOAC-treated patient (HR 4.85 [0.64-36.56]). This study generates the hypothesis that DOACs may be a safe and effective alternative to LMWH for VTE in patients with HM types represented in the study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración OralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated a 'weekend effect' and a 'night effect' of increased mortality among patients admitted during weekends or night shifts, presumably due to understaffing. AIMS: To examine whether death during hospitalisation follows a similar effect regardless of admission time. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study among deceased patients hospitalised in the internal medicine wing of a tertiary medical centre in Israel, between 2019 and 2020. Demographic and medical data were retrieved from electronic medical charts. Causes of death were specifically categorised. We applied statistical models to test for differences in mortality using incidence rate ratio (IRR) according to the day, time and cause of death. RESULTS: One thousand, two hundred and seventy-eight deceased patients were included. All-cause mortality was similar between weekends and weekdays. When sepsis was the cause of death, higher IRR were demonstrated on Fridays in comparison with weekdays (IRR 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.9; P < 0.05). Other causes of death were not consistent with a 'weekend effect'. Mortality during night shifts was higher in comparison with the afternoon (IRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.7) and similar to the morning (IRR 1; 95% CI 0.9-1.2). CONCLUSION: Our study did not find a pattern of 'weekend effect' or 'night effect' on all-cause mortality among hospitalised patients in internal medicine wards. Our findings suggest that perhaps specifically death from sepsis, and not all-cause mortality, can be used as a surrogate for the measurement of understaffing or quality of care in the internal ward.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades Hospitalarias , Medicina Interna , Admisión del Paciente , Humanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Israel/epidemiología , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered an effective treatment for patients with chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD) and demonstrates efficacy in ameliorating GVHD. The mechanism by which ECP acts against cGVHD is not fully understood. Preliminary observations have hinted at the potential involvement of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation in the pathogenesis of cGVHD. We aimed to assess the influence of ECP on the formation of NETs in patients with cGVHD as a potential mechanism in this setting. METHODS: Patients treated with ECP for cGVHD at the Rabin Medical Center were included in this study. Blood samples were obtained at three different time points: before starting an ECP cycle, at the end of the first day of treatment, and 24 h following the initiation of the ECP treatment cycle. Neutrophils were harvested from all blood samples. NET formation was assessed by measurement of NET-bound specific neutrophil elastase activity and by immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: Six patients (two females and four males) with cGVHD were included in the study. We observed a significant increase in NET formation among all six patients following ECP. Net-bound specific neutrophil elastase activity was elevated from a median value of 2.23 mU/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 2.06-2.47 mU/mL) at baseline to a median value of 13.06 mU/mL (IQR 10.27-15.97 mU/mL) immediately after the treatment and to a peak median value of 14.73 mU/mL (IQR 9.6-22.38 mU/mL) 24 h following the initiation of the ECP cycle. A qualitative assessment of NET formation using immunofluorescence staining has demonstrated markedly increased expression of citrullinated histone H3, a marker of NET formation, following ECP treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data indicate that ECP induces NET formation among patients with cGVHD. The contribution of increased NET formation to the therapeutic effect of cGVHD should be further investigated.
RESUMEN
Treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care (SOC) second-line treatment for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, outcomes remain suboptimal. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of SOC versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy as second-line for patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Three trials published in 2021 (involving 865 participants) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. EFS as well as OS were significantly improved with CAR-T therapy as compared to SOC, hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.68) and HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98) respectively. CAR-T therapy was associated with significantly better ORR, relative risk (RR) 1.55 (95% CI 1.12-2.13, p = 0.001). The risk of Grade III/IV adverse event was comparable between the two arms, RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.14). In summary, CAR-T therapy has superior outcomes as compared to SOC in patients with LBCL refractory or relapsing within 12 months, without excess of toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal sequencing of CAR-T therapy in the management of LBCL.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Antígenos CD19 , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/etiología , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T , Nivel de Atención , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
Patients with lymphoma, especially those treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, suffer high COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of lymphoma patients to generate a sufficient humoral response after two injections of BNT162b2 Pfizer vaccine and to identify factors influencing the response. Antibody titers were measured with the SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott ) assay in blood samples drawn from lymphoma patients 4 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. The cutoff for a positive response was set at 50 AU/mL. Positive serological responses were observed in 51% of the 162 patients enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In a multivariate analysis, an interval of <12 months between the last anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody dose and the second vaccine dose (odds ratio=31.3 [95% confidence interval: 8.4-116.9], P<0.001) and presence of active lymphoma (odds ratio=4.2 (95% confidence interval: 2.1- 8.2), P=0.006) were identified as negative response predictors. The rate of seropositivity increased from 3% in patients vaccinated within 45 days after the last monoclonal antibody administration to 80% in patients vaccinated >1 year after this therapy. The latter percentage was equal to that of patients never exposed to monoclonal antibodies. In conclusion, lymphoma patients, especially those recently treated with anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, fail to develop sufficient humoral response to BNT162b2 vaccine. While a serological response is not the only predictor of immunity, its low level could make this population more vulnerable to COVID-19, which implies the need for a different vaccination schedule for such patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Linfoma , Vacunas , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical value of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring treatment response in patients with aggressive lymphoma is well established. Conversely, its role in the assessment and management of marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is less conclusive. We aimed to assess clinical, laboratory, and pathological predictors for FDG uptake in these patients, in an attempt to identify MZL patients whose management will benefit from this imaging modality. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we included all adult patients diagnosed with MZL at the Rabin Medical Center between January 2006 and December 2020 who underwent FDG-PET/CT at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were FDG avidity (defined as a visual assessment of at least moderate intensity), SUVmax, and SUVliver. Variables such as advanced clinical stage, primary disease site, hemoglobin level (Hb), platelet count (Plt), serum albumin, LDH level, ß-2 microglobulin, and Ki 67 index were evaluated univariate and multivariate analysis using logistic and linear regression models. Association between FDG avidity and progression-free and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 207 MZL patients were included in this study, 76 of whom (36.7%) had FDG-avid disease. Baseline patients' characteristics such as age, gender, and comorbid conditions were similar between patients with and without significant FDG uptake. In a multivariate logistic regression model, non-gastric MALT (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.78-10), Ki 67 index ≥ 15% (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.36-9.76), and elevated LDH level (OR 8.6, 95% CI 3.2-22.8) were all associated with positive FDG avidity. In a multivariate linear regression model, a combination of advanced clinical stage, specific disease subtypes, LDH level, and Ki 67 index predicted the value of SUVmax (P value < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 33.8%) and SUVmax/SUVliver (P value < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 27%). Baseline FDG avidity was associated to PFS and OS only in univariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, we present prediction models for positive FDG uptake and SUVmax in MZL patients. These models aim to help clinicians choose patients suitable for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT for staging and monitoring disease and reduce the costs of redundant tests.
Asunto(s)
Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Adulto , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67 , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AML can be associated with autoimmune or inflammatory phenomena (AIP) occurring prior, concomitantly, or after its diagnosis. Trisomy 8 is one of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities associated with AML. We describe three patients with AML, trisomy 8, and associated AIP and review the known literature on this association. All of our patients had major symptomatic relief when treated with leukemia-directed therapy and corticosteroids. AIP in AML may be an underdiagnosed phenomenon, particularly in patients with trisomy 8.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Trisomía , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Cromosomas Humanos Par 8 , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anemia is prevalent following kidney transplantation and is associated with reduced graft survival. The association between temporal changes in hemoglobin (Hb) level at the early post-transplant period and graft survival is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort included consecutive patients included in a single center transplantation registry between January 2002 and December 2016. Temporal changes in Hb values during the first 90 days after the transplantation were evaluated by piecewise linear regression model. Significant Hb increase rate was defined as an increase of .5 gram/deciliter/month. Patients were divided into groups according to the presence of significant Hb increase. The primary outcome was death-censored graft failure. RESULTS: Of 946 patients included in the study cohort, 831 (87.8%) had at least one interval of Hb increase, and 115 (12.2%) had no Hb increase. The absence of Hb increase was associated with an elevated risk of death censored graft failure by univariate (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.88-4.49, P < .001) and multivariate (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.48-4.12, P = .001) analyses. The timing and rate of Hb increase had no association with the main outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of Hb increase during the early post-transplant period is associated with an increased risk of graft loss.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Trasplante de Riñón , Anemia/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has emerged as a global pandemic that threatens thousands around the world. Observational cohort studies have demonstrated that cancer patients have inferior outcomes due to underlying malignancy, treatment-related immunosuppression, or increased comorbidities. We aimed to examine the representation of cancer patients (hematological malignancies and solid tumors) in COVID-19 therapeutic and prophylactic interventional trials. METHODS: In this review, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between December 2019 and August 2021 were included. We included only trials evaluating medications that were recommended by NIH guidelines: steroids, tocilizumab, remdesivir, and REGN-COV2. RESULTS: The search yielded 541 potentially relevant RCTs, 22 of which were considered suitable. All trials included patients with solid cancer and hematological malignancies in the formal reported inclusion criteria. However, only two trials reported the accurate number of cancer patients included. Ten trials excluded neutropenic patients and seven trials excluded thrombocytopenic patients. Eleven trials excluded patients that were treated with any immunosuppression treatment. None of the two trials that included cancer patients reported separate outcomes for this population. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review shows that cancer patients are underrepresented in COVID-19 interventional therapeutic trials, and evidence regarding outcomes are lacking.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab has been proposed as an effective treatment for severe COVID-19. We aimed to investigate whether tocilizumab administration is associated with increased availability of serum iron which may possibly be associated with adverse effects on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective cohort study. We included adults, who were hospitalized in ICU with the diagnosis of severe COVID-19 infection eligible for tocilizumab treatment. Laboratory data including serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels of all patients were collected shortly before and 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after tocilizumab administration. RESULTS: During the study period, 15 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were eligible to receive tocilizumab treatment. Tocilizumab therapy was associated with a prominent increase in serum iron and transferrin saturation levels (26 ± 13 µg/dL and 15 ± 8% before treatment and 79 ± 32 µg/dL and 41 ± 15% 72 h after treatment, respectively, p < 0.001) and decrease in serum ferritin levels (1,921 ± 2,071 ng/mL before and 1,258 ± 1,140 ng/mL 72 h after treatment, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab is associated with a profound increase in serum iron and ferritin saturation levels along with a decrease in ferritin levels. This may represent an undesirable side effect that may potentiate viral replication.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Hierro , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Ferritinas/sangre , Homeostasis , Humanos , Hierro/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transferrinas/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with excessive release of catecholamines, which causes tachycardia and is correlated with poor clinical outcome. ß-Blockers (BBs) may blunt this effect on heart rate (HR). The objective of this study is to assess whether long-term BB therapy is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine wards. METHODS: We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. We included adult patients who were hospitalized in medicine departments due to sepsis. A propensity score model for BB therapy was used to match patients. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause mortality rate. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for an adverse outcome. Patients were stratified according to absolute tachycardia (HR ≥100/min) or relative tachycardia at presentation (tachycardia index above the third quartile, with tachycardia index defined as the ratio of HR to temperature). RESULTS: A total of 1186 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the propensity-matched cohort patients given BB treatment were younger (median age [interquartile range], 74 [62-82] vs 81 [68-87] years; P ≤ .001). BB treatment was associated with reduction in 30-day mortality rates for patients with absolute tachycardia (odds ratio, 0.406; 95% confidence interval, .177-.932). Final model with interaction variable of BB treatment with HR was associated with short-term survival (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, .148-.976). Selective BB therapy had a stronger protective effect than nonselective BB therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term BB therapy was associated with decreased mortality rate in patients hospitalized with sepsis in internal medicine wards exhibiting absolute and relative tachycardia.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Sepsis , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización , Humanos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Rituximab, the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Obinutuzumab was developed to potentiate activity and overcome resistance to rituximab. Clinical data suggest that obinutuzumab is superior to rituximab in follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Yet, it has increased toxicity. This systematic review and meta-analysis compiled all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing obinutuzumab-based regimens with rituximab-based regimens to better assess their toxicity profile. Primary outcome was grade 3-4 infections; secondary outcomes included any adverse events (AE), grade 3-4 AE, drug discontinuation rate, and 3-years mortality. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated and pooled using a fixed-effect model, unless there was significant heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. Our comprehensive search yielded five RCTs conducted between 2009 and 2014, including 4247 patients. The trials included FL patients, CLL and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Monoclonal antibodies were given with different chemotherapy regimens (in four trials) or as monotherapy (in one trial). The point estimate favored increase in both grade 3-4 infections rate (RR 1.17 [95% CI, 1.0-1.36]) and any AE rate (RR 1.05 [95% 1-1.1]) with obinutuzumab, although this was not statistically significant. There was a significantly increased rate of grade 3-4 AE (RR 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.2]), as well as grade 3-4 toxicities including thrombocytopenia (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 1.92-4.06]), infusion related reactions (RR 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.64]) and cardiac events (RR 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11-2.46]). There was no significant difference in grade 3-4 anemia and neutropenia nor in the 3-year mortality rate. The point estimate favored increase in discontinuation rate due to AE with obinutuzumab, although without statistical significance (RR 1.24 [95% CI, 1.0-1.54]). In conclusion, physicians need to weigh the clinical benefits of this agent against higher toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To characterize risk factors for the development of post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE), and its long-term effect on mortality, graft failure, and thrombosis. METHODS: Retrospective study including all kidney transplant recipients in Rabin Medical Center (RMC) during the years 2005-2014. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or graft failure at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included death censored graft loss, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. A matched control group was also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate time-varying Cox model analyses were conducted for outcome evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 1304 patients were included, 169 of whom were diagnosed with PTE (12.9%). PTE was associated with male gender, higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and polycystic kidney disease. PTE was found to be associated with a reduced risk of the primary outcome (HR 0.355, CI 95% 0.151-0.89, P = .027) in a univariate time-varying Cox analysis, but was not associated with the composite outcome in a multivariate analysis. There was no difference in the primary outcome when the PTE group was compared with the matched control. CONCLUSION: PTE was not found to be associated with long-term outcomes of graft failure and poor survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Policitemia/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is standard of care first line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), though outcomes remain suboptimal. METHODS: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP vs. R-CHOP + X (addition of another drug to R-CHOP) as first line treatment for DLBCL. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed and conference proceedings up to September 2020. RESULTS: Our search yielded ten trials including 4206 patients. The added drug was bortezomib or lenalidomide in three trials each, and gemcitabine, bevacizumab and ibrutinib, each drug in one trial. R-CHOP + X was associated with statistically significant improved disease control (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99). The point estimate was in favor of improved overall survival with R-CHOP + X (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.00), although this was not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis revealed improved disease control with the addition of lenalidomide and in patients younger than 60 years. R-CHOP + X was associated with an increase in serious adverse events and grade III/IV hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION: The addition of another drug to frontline R-CHOP treatment for DLBCL did not result in a significant improvement in OS, although we did observe improved disease control compared to R-CHOP, perhaps most evident with the addition of lenalidomide. Yet, RCHOP + X was associated with an increased risk for serious and hematological adverse events. Further studies could reveal subgroups that would benefit most from augmentation of standard R-CHOP.