RESUMEN
In musculoskeletal imaging, CT is used in a wide range of indications, either alone or in a synergistic approach with MRI. While MRI is the preferred modality for the assessment of soft tissues and bone marrow, CT excels in the imaging of high-contrast structures, such as mineralized tissue. Additionally, the introduction of dual-energy CT in clinical practice two decades ago opened the door for spectral imaging applications. Recently, the advent of photon-counting detectors (PCDs) has further advanced the potential of CT, at least in theory. Compared to conventional energy-integrating detectors (EIDs), PCDs provide superior spatial resolution, reduced noise, and intrinsic spectral imaging capabilities. This review briefly describes the technical advantages of PCDs. For each technical feature, the corresponding applications in musculoskeletal imaging will be discussed, including high-spatial resolution imaging for the assessment of bone and crystal deposits, low-dose applications such as whole-body CT, as well as spectral imaging applications including the characterization of crystal deposits and imaging of metal hardware. Finally, we will highlight the potential of PCD-CT in emerging applications, underscoring the need for further preclinical and clinical validation to unleash its full clinical potential.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acceptance testing and quality assurance (QA) of computed tomography (CT) scans are of great importance to ensure the appropriate performance of the systems. However, current standards and guidelines do not include a dedicated QA program for spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT), nor adapted tolerance levels. PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical performance, in terms of image quality and radiation dose, of the first point-of-care SPCCT for the upper extremities (MARS Extremity 5X120, MARS Bioimaging Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand) and to establish a comprehensive QA program. METHODS: The specific dimensions of the scanner with a 125 mm diameter gantry and a small voxel size of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm3 require the use of suitable phantoms and evaluation techniques. Indicators such as CT number accuracy, image noise, uniformity, and slice thickness were assessed to characterize the image quality. The in-plane and longitudinal spatial resolutions were evaluated by means of the modulation transfer function (MTF). Noise power spectra (NPS) were calculated to further evaluate the image noise. Material identification capabilities were assessed using clinically relevant high-Z materials (iodine, gold, gadolinium, and calcium). A 100-mm diameter CTDI-like phantom was used to measure the dose indices. A complete radiation survey was carried out to measure the radiation exposure at different points around the scanner. RESULTS: The proposed QA program is based on international and local recommendations as well as practical experience. It includes standardised CT tests and SPCCT-specific methods. Additional methodologies to further assess the system performance are also presented. Tolerance levels are discussed and revised when appropriate. Both in-plane and longitudinal high spatial resolutions were evidenced by the MTF measurements with 1.8 lp· mm-1 and 5.0 lp· mm-1 at 10%, respectively. The calculated effective slice thickness ranged between 0.15 and 0.16 mm for the five energy bins and for a reconstructed voxel size of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm3 . Reference values of the linear attenuation coefficient of water have been calculated and used to assess the CT number uniformity of water. Evaluation of the CT number accuracy and stability of various clinically relevant materials showed excellent spectral correlation and linearity between HU values and concentrations (r2 > 0.99). The NPS showed less noise correlation between slices than within transverse slice, as well as a systematic increase at low spatial frequencies. The volume CT dose index (CTDI v o l $_{vol}$ ) for a custom-made 100 mm diameter phantom was 9.32 mGy. Radiation measurements around the scanner showed that it is completely shielded except for the access port, and that no additional protective measures are necessary for the patient. CONCLUSIONS: A routine QA framework for SPCCT systems has been proposed. Image quality and radiation dose were assessed using newly designed phantoms, relevant metrics, and automated algorithms. Baseline values were established and tolerance levels discussed for the MARS SPCCT scanner based on collected data and international recommendations.