Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 72
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Public Health Nutr ; 26(7): 1403-1413, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) are implicated in the increasing risk of diabetes in the Caribbean. Few studies have examined associations between SSB consumption and diabetes in the Caribbean. DESIGN: SSB was measured as teaspoon/d using questions from the National Cancer Institute Dietary Screener Questionnaire about intake of soda, juice and coffee/tea during the past month. Diabetes was measured using self-report, HbA1C and use of medication. Logistic regression was used to examine associations. SETTING: Baseline data from the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network Cohort Study (ECS), collected in Barbados, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago and US Virgin Islands, were used for analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n 1701) enrolled in the ECS. RESULTS: Thirty-six percentage of participants were unaware of their diabetes, 33% aware and 31% normoglycaemic. Total mean intake of added sugar from SSB was higher among persons 40-49 (9·4 tsp/d), men (9·2 tsp/d) and persons with low education (7·0 tsp/d). Participants who were unaware (7·4 tsp/d) or did not have diabetes (7·6 tsp/d) had higher mean SSB intake compared to those with known diabetes (5·6 tsp/d). In multivariate analysis, total added sugar from beverages was not significantly associated with diabetes status. Results by beverage type showed consumption of added sugar from soda was associated with greater odds of known (OR = 1·37, 95 % CI (1·03, 1·82)) and unknown diabetes (OR = 1·54, 95 % CI (1·12, 2·13)). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate the need for continued implementation and evaluation of policies and interventions to reduce SSB consumption in the Caribbean.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Bebidas Azucaradas , Masculino , Humanos , Bebidas Azucaradas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Bebidas Gaseosas , Azúcares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología
2.
Compr Psychiatry ; 113: 152293, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34959002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Displacement and conflict exposure are known risk factors for mental health conditions. Here, we examine the mental health of youth in a conflict-affected region of Cameroon. METHODS: Participants were recruited from among beneficiaries of a project conducted by Univers Psy and the United Nations Population Fund in Cameroon's Far North region. Community health workers conducted sensitization campaigns, following which they referred adolescents and young adults who self-identified as having mental health concerns to clinical psychologists. We ultimately conducted chart reviews of 948 of these youth. Univariate analyses using chi-squared tests were used to assess the relationships among demographics, displacement status, and mental health. Logistic regressions were then performed to determine the odds of having a psychiatric disorder based on displacement status. OUTCOME: Sixty-eight percent of evaluated youth met criteria for a psychiatric disorder. Anxiety disorders were most prevalent at 24.3%, followed by trauma- and stressor-related disorders at 17.0%, and mood disorders at 8.0%. Refugees and IDPs had 0.11 (95% CI 0.06, 0.19) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.29, 0.74) odds, respectively, of any diagnosis compared to the host population. Females had 1.71 (95% CI 1.17, 2.50) odds of an anxiety disorder and 2.18 (95% CI 1.16, 4.10) odds of a mood disorder compared to males. INTERPRETATION: In a youth sample in Cameroon self-identified as having mental health concerns, this study found high rates of psychiatric illness, particularly anxiety disorders. We found a higher prevalence among host population individuals than among displaced individuals and especially in the female population.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Refugiados , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adolescente , Camerún/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Violencia , Adulto Joven
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 78(11): 835-840, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34215684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the existence of hearing conservation programmes complying with regulatory standards, noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains one of the most prevalent occupational diseases. Compulsory daily monitoring of noise exposure has been associated with decreased NIHL risk. We report on the experience of a voluntary daily noise monitoring intervention among noise-exposed workers. METHODS: Workers at three locations of a metals manufacturing company voluntarily used an in-ear noise monitoring device that could record and download, on a daily basis, the noise exposure inside of their hearing protection. We compared the hearing loss rates (in decibels hearing level/year) in these volunteers to controls from the same company matched for job title, age, gender, race, plant location, and baseline hearing level. RESULTS: Over the follow-up period, 110 volunteers for whom controls could be identified monitored daily noise exposures an average of 150 times per year. Noise exposures inside of hearing protection were lower than ambient noise levels estimated from company records. While there was no significant difference in hearing loss rates between volunteers and controls, volunteers downloading exposures 150 times per year or had less hearing loss than those who downloaded less frequently. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that voluntary daily noise exposure monitoring by workers is feasible and that greater frequency of downloading is associated with less hearing loss. If further development of noise monitoring technology can improve usability and address barriers to daily use, regular self-monitoring of noise exposure could improve the effectiveness of hearing conservation programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01714375.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Adulto , Audiometría , Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metalurgia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Voluntarios
4.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 399, 2021 02 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33632164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurately defining obesity using anthropometric measures that best capture obesity-related risk is important for identifying high risk groups for intervention. The purpose of this study is to compare the association of different anthropometric measures of obesity with 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in adults in the Eastern Caribbean. METHODS: Data from the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network (ECHORN) Cohort Study (ECS) were analyzed. The ECS is comprised of adults aged 40 and older residing in the US Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Barbados, and Trinidad. 10-year CVD risk was calculated using the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) ASCVD Risk Algorithm and categorized in the following high-risk groups: > 7.5, > 10, and > 20%. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between four anthropometric measures of obesity (BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to height ratio) and 10-year CVD risk. RESULTS: Mean age (SD) of participants (n = 1617) was 56.6 years (±10.2), 64% were women, 74% were overweight/obese, and 24% had an ASCVD risk score above 10%. Elevated body mass index (BMI, > 30 kg/m2) and waist circumference were not associated with CVD risk. Elevated waist-to-hip ratio (WHR, > 0.9 men, > 0.85 women) and elevated waist-to-height ratio (> 0.5) were associated with all three categories of CVD risk. Area under the receiver curve was highest for WHR for each category of CVD risk. Elevated WHR demonstrated odds of 2.39, 2.58, and 3.32 (p < 0.0001) for CVD risk of > 7.5, > 10 and > 20% respectively. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that WHR is a better indicator than BMI of obesity-related CVD risk and should be used to target adults in the Caribbean, and of Caribbean-descent, for interventions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Adulto , Barbados , Índice de Masa Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Puerto Rico , Factores de Riesgo , Trinidad y Tobago , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Relación Cintura-Cadera
5.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(3): 784-791, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823310

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Caribbean region. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the concept of a health network, relationships focused on health-related matters, and examined associations with CVD risk factors in the Eastern Caribbean. DESIGN: The Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network Cohort Study is an ongoing longitudinal cohort being conducted in the US Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago, and Barbados. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 1989) were English or Spanish-speaking adults 40 years and older, who were residents of the island for at least 10 years, and who intended to live on-island for the next 5 years. MAIN MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to examine associations between health network characteristics and CVD risk factors: physical activity, hypertension, and smoking. A baseline survey asked questions about health networks using name generator questions that assessed who participants spoke to about health matters, whose opinions on healthcare mattered, and who they would trust to make healthcare decisions on their behalf. KEY RESULTS: Health networks were mainly comprised of family members and friends. Healthcare professionals comprised 7% of networks, mean network size was four, and 74% of health network contacts were perceived to be in "good" to "excellent" health. Persons with larger health networks had greater odds of being physically active compared with those with smaller networks (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.01-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Health networks may be useful to intervention efforts for CVD risk factor reduction. More studies are needed to examine health networks in Caribbean contexts and explore associations with other CVD risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Región del Caribe , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Ear Hear ; 40(3): 680-689, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30157082

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study utilized personal noise measurements and fit-testing to evaluate the association between noise exposures and personal attenuation rating (PAR) values among participating workers, and second, to compare the attenuated exposure levels received by the workers and the British Standards Institute's recommended noise exposure range of 70 to 80 dBA. DESIGN: We measured hearing protection device (HPD) attenuation among a sample of 91 workers at 2 US metal manufacturing facilities, through performance of personal noise dosimetry measurements and HPD fit-testing over multiple work shifts. We compared this testing with participant questionnaires and annual audiometric hearing threshold results. RESULTS: The average 8-hr time-weighted average noise exposures for study participants was 79.8 dBA (SD = 7.0 dBA), and the average PAR from fit-testing was 20.1 dB (±6.7 dB). While differences existed between sites, 84% of the 251 PAR measurements resulted in effective protection levels below the recommended 70 dBA (indicating overprotection), while workers were underprotected (i.e., effective exposures >80 dBA) during <1% of monitored shifts. Our results also demonstrated a significant positive relationship between measured noise exposure and PAR among non-custom-molded plug users (p = 0.04). Non-custom-molded plug wearers also showed a significant increase in PAR by sequential fit-test interaction (p = 0.01), where on average, subsequent fit-testing resulted in increasingly higher HPD attenuation. Workers at site 1 showed higher PARs. PARs were significantly related to race, even when adjusting for site location. While age, hearing threshold level, task, and self-reported tinnitus showed no significant effect on individual PAR in an unadjusted model, site, race, and sand- or water-blasting activities were significant predictors in adjusted models. Within-worker variability in time-weighted averages and PARs across repeated measurements was substantially lower than variability between workers. CONCLUSIONS: Careful selection of HPDs is necessary to minimize instances of overprotection to workers in low and moderate occupational noise environments. The use of fit-testing in hearing conservation programs to evaluate PAR is recommended to avoid overprotection from noise exposure while also minimizing instances of under-attenuation.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Industria Manufacturera , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 146(5): 4044, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795687

RESUMEN

Variations in individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss have been observed among workers exposed to similar ambient noise levels but the reasons for this observation are poorly understood. Many workers are exposed to hazardous levels of occupational noise throughout their entire careers. Therefore, a mechanism to identify workers at risk for accelerated hearing loss early in their career may offer a time-sensitive window for targeted intervention. Using available longitudinal data for an occupationally noise-exposed cohort of manufacturing workers, this study aims to examine whether change in an individual's high frequency hearing level during the initial years of occupational noise exposure can predict subsequent high frequency hearing loss. General linear mixed modeling was used to model later hearing slope in the worse ear for the combined frequencies of 3, 4, and 6 kHz as a function of early hearing slope in the worse ear, age at baseline, sex, race/ethnicity, mean ambient workplace noise exposure, and self-reported non-occupational noise exposure. Those with accelerated early hearing loss were more likely to experience a greater rate of subsequent hearing loss, thus offering a potentially important opportunity for meaningful intervention among those at greatest risk of future hearing loss.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Audición , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Adulto , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pruebas Auditivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Industria Manufacturera/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico
8.
Int J Audiol ; 57(sup1): S3-S11, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216778

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study characterised overall and specific costs associated with hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) at US metal manufacturing sites, and examined the association between these costs and several noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) outcomes. DESIGN: We interviewed personnel and reviewed records at participating facilities. We also measured noise for comparison to the ten-year average of measurements made by each facility. NIHL outcomes assessed included rates of standard threshold shifts (STS) and high-frequency hearing loss, as well as prevalence of hearing impairment, for each participating facility. We used linear regression to identify per-person HCP costs that best predicted the NIHL outcomes. STUDY SAMPLE: We evaluated 14 US metal manufacturing facilities operated by a single company. RESULTS: Annual HCP costs ranged from roughly $67,000 to $397,000 (average $308 ± 80 per worker). Our full-shift noise measurements (mean 83.1 dBA) showed good agreement with the facilities' measurements (mean 82.6 dBA). Hearing impairment prevalence was about 15% overall. Higher expenditures for training and hearing protector fit-testing were significantly associated with reduced STS prevalence. Higher training expenditures were also related to lower hearing impairment prevalence and high-frequency hearing loss rates. CONCLUSIONS: HCP costs were substantial and variable. Increased workplace spending on training and fit-testing may help minimise NIHL.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/economía , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Instalaciones Industriales y de Fabricación/economía , Metalurgia/economía , Ruido/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral/economía , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/economía , Audiometría/economía , Percepción Auditiva , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos/economía , Gastos en Salud , Audición , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/fisiopatología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores Protectores , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
N Engl J Med ; 370(4): 341-51, 2014 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24450892

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Changes in adverse-event rates among Medicare patients with common medical conditions and conditions requiring surgery remain largely unknown. METHODS: We used Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System data abstracted from medical records on 21 adverse events in patients hospitalized in the United States between 2005 and 2011 for acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, or conditions requiring surgery. We estimated trends in the rate of occurrence of adverse events for which patients were at risk, the proportion of patients with one or more adverse events, and the number of adverse events per 1000 hospitalizations. RESULTS: The study included 61,523 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (19%), congestive heart failure (25%), pneumonia (30%), and conditions requiring surgery (27%). From 2005 through 2011, among patients with acute myocardial infarction, the rate of occurrence of adverse events declined from 5.0% to 3.7% (difference, 1.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 1.9), the proportion of patients with one or more adverse events declined from 26.0% to 19.4% (difference, 6.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.3 to 10.2), and the number of adverse events per 1000 hospitalizations declined from 401.9 to 262.2 (difference, 139.7; 95% CI, 90.6 to 189.0). Among patients with congestive heart failure, the rate of occurrence of adverse events declined from 3.7% to 2.7% (difference, 1.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.4), the proportion of patients with one or more adverse events declined from 17.5% to 14.2% (difference, 3.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.5), and the number of adverse events per 1000 hospitalizations declined from 235.2 to 166.9 (difference, 68.3; 95% CI, 39.9 to 96.7). Patients with pneumonia and those with conditions requiring surgery had no significant declines in adverse-event rates. CONCLUSIONS: From 2005 through 2011, adverse-event rates declined substantially among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure but not among those hospitalized for pneumonia or conditions requiring surgery. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and others.).


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Algoritmos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Distribución de Poisson , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(12): 1031-1038, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28940215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community noise exposure has been shown to increase the risk of hypertension; however, the relationship between occupational noise exposure and hypertension is less clear. METHODS: Using an inception cohort of workers in a specialty metals manufacturing company, we retrospectively assessed occupational noise exposure, hearing acuity, and incident hypertension diagnoses using administrative datasets. Time-weighted average noise exposure levels were assigned to employees based on their job histories. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to determine the association of noise exposure with risk of incident hypertension. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of incident hypertension did not significantly differ between groups by cumulative continuous or categorized noise exposure metric. CONCLUSION: We found no increased risk of incident hypertension with exposure to occupational noise among workers. Further assessment examining workers' use of hearing protection devices is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/etiología , Metalurgia , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 73(4): 229-36, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26163544

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between workplace injury and musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk and expert ratings of job-level psychosocial demand and job control, adjusting for job-level physical demand. METHODS: Among a cohort of 9260 aluminium manufacturing workers in jobs for which expert ratings of job-level physical and psychological demand and control were obtained during the 2 years following rating obtainment, multivariate mixed effects models were used to estimate relative risk (RR) of minor injury and minor MSD, serious injury and MSD, minor MSD only and serious MSD only by tertile of demand and control, adjusting for physical demand as well as other recognised risk factors. RESULTS: Compared with workers in jobs rated as having low psychological demand, workers in jobs with high psychological demand had 49% greater risk of serious injury and serious MSD requiring medical treatment, work restrictions or lost work time (RR=1.49; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.01). Workers in jobs rated as having low control displayed increased risk for minor injury and minor MSD (RR=1.45; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.87) compared with those in jobs rated as having high control. CONCLUSIONS: Using expert ratings of job-level exposures, this study provides evidence that psychological job demand and job control contribute independently to injury and MSD risk in a blue-collar manufacturing cohort, and emphasises the importance of monitoring psychosocial workplace exposures in addition to physical workplace exposures to promote worker health and safety.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Poder Psicológico , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Industria Manufacturera , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Ocupaciones , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
12.
Int J Audiol ; 55(12): 782-786, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27609310

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the reliability of a hearing risk factor screening survey used by hearing conservation programmes for noise-exposed workers. DESIGN: We compared workers' answers from the screening survey to their answers to a confidential research questionnaire regarding hearing loss risk factors. We calculated kappa statistics to test the correlation between yes/no questions in the research questionnaire compared to answers from 1 and 5 years of screening surveys. STUDY SAMPLE: We compared the screening survey and research questionnaire answers of 274 aluminum plant workers. RESULTS: Most of the questions in the in-company screening survey showed fair to moderate agreement with the research questionnaire (kappa range: -0.02, 0.57). Workers' answers to the screening survey had better correlation with the research questionnaire when we compared 5 years of screening answers. For nearly all questions, workers were more likely to respond affirmatively on the research questionnaire than the screening survey. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing conservation programmes should be aware that workers may underreport hearing loss risk factors and functional hearing status on an audiometric screening survey. Validating company screening tools could help provide more accurate information on hearing loss and risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Audiometría de Tonos Puros/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Metalurgia , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Aluminio , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Home Health Care Manag Pract ; 28(4): 201-208, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27974869

RESUMEN

We evaluated whether community-level home health agencies and nursing home performance is associated with community-level hospital 30-day all-cause risk-standardized readmission rates for Medicare patients used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service from 2010 to 2012. Our final sample included 2,855 communities that covered 4,140 hospitals with 6,751,713 patients, 13,060 nursing homes with 1,250,648 residents, and 7,613 home health agencies providing services to 35,660 zipcodes. Based on a mixed effect model, we found that increasing nursing home performance by one star for all of its 4 measures and home health performance by 10 points for all of its 6 measures is associated with decreases of 0.25% (95% CI 0.17-0.34) and 0.60% (95% CI 0.33-0.83), respectively, in community-level risk-standardized readmission rates.

14.
Int J Audiol ; 54 Suppl 1: S30-6, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25549168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contributions of tinnitus, asymmetrical hearing loss, low frequency hearing loss (pure tone average of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 kHz; PTA.5123), or high frequency hearing loss (pure tone average of 4, 6 kHz; PTA46), to acute injury risk among a cohort of production and maintenance workers at six aluminum manufacturing plants, adjusting for ambient noise exposure and other recognized predictors of injury risk. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. STUDY SAMPLE: The study considered 9920 workers employed during 2003 to 2008. The cohort consisted of 8818 workers (89%) whose complete records were available. RESULTS: Adjusting for noise exposure and other recognized injury predictors, a 25% increased acute injury risk was observed among workers with a history of tinnitus in conjunction with high-frequency hearing loss (PTA46). Low frequency hearing loss may be associated with minor, yet less serious, injury risk. We did not find evidence that asymmetry contributes to injury risk. CONCLUSION: These results provide evidence that tinnitus, combined with high-frequency hearing loss, may pose an important safety threat to workers, especially those who work in high-noise exposed environments. These at risk workers may require careful examination of their communication and hearing protection needs.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Acúfeno/complicaciones , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Hum Reprod ; 29(7): 1567-74, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24838701

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between semen parameters and mortality in men evaluated for infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among men undergoing an infertility evaluation, those with abnormal semen parameters have a higher risk of death, suggesting a possible common etiology between infertility and mortality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Conflicting data exist that suggest either an inverse relationship or no relationship between semen quality and mortality. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A study cohort was identified from two centers, each specializing in infertility care. In California, we identified men with data from 1994 to 2011 in the Stanford Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility semen database. In Texas, we identified men with data from 1989 to 2009 contained in the andrology database at the Baylor College of Medicine Special Procedures Laboratory who were evaluated for infertility. Mortality was determined by data linkage to the National Death Index or Social Security Death Index. Comorbidity was estimated based on calculation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index or Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-Hierarchical Condition Categories Model. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In all, 11,935 men were evaluated for infertility from 1989 to 2011. During 92 104 person years of follow-up, 69 of 11,935 men died (0.58%). The mean age at infertility evaluation was 36.6 years with a mean follow-up of 7.7 years. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with the general population, men evaluated for infertility had a lower risk of death with 69 deaths observed compared with 176.7 expected (Standardized mortality rate 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). When stratified by semen parameters, however, men with impaired semen parameters (i.e. male factor infertility) had significantly higher mortality rates compared with men with normal parameters (i.e. no male factor infertility). Low semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm motility, total sperm count and total motile sperm count were all associated with higher risk of death. In contrast, abnormal sperm morphology was not associated with mortality. While adjusting for current health status attenuated the association between semen parameters and mortality, men with two or more abnormal semen parameters still had a 2.3-fold higher risk of death compared with men with normal semen (95% CI 1.12-4.65). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our cohort represents infertile men, which may limit generalizability. As comorbidity relied on administrative data, granular information on each man regarding infertility diagnosis and lifestyle factors was unavailable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Men with impaired semen parameters have an increased mortality rate in the years following an infertility evaluation suggesting semen quality may provide a marker of health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study is supported in part by P01HD36289 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (to D.J.L. and L.I.L.). The project was also partially supported by an NIH CTSA award number UL1 RR025744. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Masculina/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , California , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Muerte , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Riesgo , Semen , Recuento de Espermatozoides , Motilidad Espermática , Texas , Adulto Joven
16.
Occup Environ Med ; 71(9): 605-10, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24924313

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study expands previous research comparing injury risk for women and men in a cohort of 24,000 US aluminium manufacturing workers in 15 facilities from 2001 to 2010. METHODS: We compared injury rates (all injury, first aid, medical treatment, restricted work and lost work time) by sex and by job and sex. Using a mixed effect modelling approach, we calculated ORs and 95% CIs adjusting for age, job tenure, ethnicity and year as fixed effects and person, job and plant as random effects. Additionally, we modelled the data stratified by plant type to examine potential differences in injury risk between smelter (generally recognised as more hazardous) and fabrication production environments. RESULTS: Risk of injury was higher for women in four out of the five injury outcomes: all injuries combined (OR: 1.58, CI 1.48 to 1.67), injuries requiring first aid (OR: 1.61, CI 1.54 to 1.70), injuries requiring medical treatment (OR: 1.18, CI 1.03 to 1.36) and injuries requiring restricted work (OR: 1.65, CI 1.46 to 1.87). No difference in the risk of lost time injury by sex was found in this cohort. Analyses stratified by plant type showed similarly elevated injury risk for women, although the risk estimates were higher in smelters than fabrication plants. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest single-firm study examining injury risk by sex with sufficient data to appropriately adjust for job. We show a consistently higher injury risk for women compared with men in the smelting and fabrication environments.


Asunto(s)
Industria Manufacturera , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Occup Environ Med ; 71(9): 624-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To look for an association between acoustic neuroma (AN) and participation in a hearing conservation programme (HCP) and also for an association between AN and possible occupational risk factors in the aluminium industry. METHODS: We conducted a case-control analysis of a population of US aluminium production workers in 8 smelters and 43 other plants. Using insurance claims data, 97 cases of AN were identified between 1996 and 2009. Each was matched with four controls. Covariates included participation in a HCP, working in an aluminium smelter, working in an electrical job and hearing loss. RESULTS: In the bivariate analyses, covariates associated with AN were participation in the HCP (OR=1.72; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.69) and smelter work (OR=1.88; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.36). Electrical work was not significant (OR=1.60; 95% CI 0.65 to 3.94). Owing to high participation in the HCP in smelters, multivariate subanalyses were required. In the multivariate analyses, participation in the HCP was the only statistically significant risk factor for AN. In the multivariate analysis restricted to employees not working in a smelter, the OR was 1.81 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.17). Hearing loss, an indirect measure of in-ear noise dose, was not predictive of AN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the incidental detection of previously undiagnosed tumours in workers who participated in the company-sponsored HCP. The increased medical surveillance among this population of workers most likely introduced detection bias, leading to the identification of AN cases that would have otherwise remained undetected.


Asunto(s)
Aluminio/toxicidad , Industria Manufacturera , Neuroma Acústico/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
18.
Occup Environ Med ; 71(3): 159-66, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24142977

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: An 'information gap' has been identified regarding the effects of chronic disease on occupational injury risk. We investigated the association of ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, depression and asthma with acute occupational injury in a cohort of manufacturing workers from 1 January 1997 through 31 December 2007. METHODS: We used administrative data on real-time injury, medical claims, workplace characteristics and demographics to examine this association. We employed a piecewise exponential model within an Andersen-Gill framework with a frailty term at the employee level to account for inclusion of multiple injuries for each employee, random effects at the employee level due to correlation among jobs held by an employee, and experience on the job as a covariate. RESULTS: One-third of employees had at least one of the diseases during the study period. After adjusting for potential confounders, presence of these diseases was associated with increased hazard of injury: heart disease (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.36), diabetes (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27), depression (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.38) and asthma (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.287). Hypertension was not significantly associated with hazard of injury. Associations of chronic disease with injury risk were less evident for more serious reportable injuries; only depression and a summary health metric derived from claims remained significantly positive in this subset. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that chronic heart disease, diabetes and depression confer an increased risk for acute occupational injury.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo , Enfermedad Crónica , Estado de Salud , Industrias , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/etiología , Trabajo , Accidentes de Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Asma/complicaciones , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/psicología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Lugar de Trabajo
19.
Addict Behav ; 153: 108001, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use is pervasive in the Caribbean; however, the prevalence and correlates of alcohol use and drinking problems in the elderly have not been extensively studied. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network (ECHORN) Cohort Study, a cohort study of Caribbean people from Puerto Rico, Barbados, Trinidad, and Tobago, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, collected between 2013 and 2018 (baseline study sample, ages 60+, n = 811). Descriptive statistics were used to compare the differences in drinking status (current vs. former vs. never), alcohol problems (Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-opener (CAGE) scale score ≥2 vs. <2), and binge drinking days (0 days vs. 1-2 days vs. ≥3 days) across sample characteristics. Logistic regression analyses estimated the association of these alcohol measures with sociodemographic (e.g., sex), psychological (depression), and cultural (e.g., religion) correlates. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent were 70 + years of age, 64 % were female, and 41 % had less than a high school education. Alcohol problems (≥2 CAGE score) was 21 %. Binge drinking ≥3 days was 30.6 %. Never attending religious services (vs. attending once a week or more) was associated with almost three times higher odds of alcohol problems (adjusted Odds Ratio: OR = 2.88, 95 % CI = 1.02, 8.15) four times higher odds of increasing binge drinking days (aOR = 4.04, 95 % CI = 1.11, 14.96). College education was protective against both the outcomes. CONCLUSION: We provide current estimates of alcohol problems among elderly Eastern Caribbean people. Among the sociodemographic, psychological, and cultural correlates examined, religious attendance was significant. Replicate longitudinal studies using DSM-5 alcohol dependence are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol , Alcoholismo , Consumo Excesivo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Consumo Excesivo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Consumo Excesivo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevalencia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/epidemiología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología
20.
Occup Environ Med ; 70(10): 716-21, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23825197

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Current understanding of the dose-response relationship between occupational noise and hearing loss is based on cross-sectional studies prior to the widespread use of hearing protection, and with limited data regarding noise exposures below 85 dBA. We report on the hearing loss experience of a unique cohort of industrial workers, with daily monitoring of noise inside of hearing protection devices. METHODS: At an industrial facility, workers exhibiting accelerated hearing loss were enrolled in a mandatory programme to monitor daily noise exposures inside of hearing protection. We compared these noise measurements (as time-weighted LAVG) to interval rates of high-frequency hearing loss over a 6-year period using a mixed-effects model, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Workers' high-frequency hearing levels at study inception averaged more than 40 dB Hearing threshold level (HTL). Most noise exposures were less than 85 dBA (mean LAVG 76 dBA, IQR 74-80 dBA). We found no statistical relationship between LAvg and high-frequency hearing loss (p=0.53). Using a metric for monthly maximum noise exposure did not improve model fit. CONCLUSIONS: At-ear noise exposures below 85 dBA did not show an association with risk of high-frequency hearing loss among workers with substantial past noise exposure and hearing loss at baseline. Therefore, effective noise control to below 85 dBA may lead to significant reduction in occupational hearing loss risk in such individuals. Further research is needed on the dose-response relationship of noise and hearing loss in individuals with normal hearing and little prior noise exposure.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos , Oído , Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Industrias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ocupaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA