RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Dysphagia is a common debilitating clinical feature of IBM. However, the impact of dysphagia in IBM has been historically overlooked. This study aimed to identify, evaluate and summarize the evidence regarding the assessment and management of dysphagia in persons with IBM undergoing treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using a multiengine search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies had to employ an intervention for persons with IBM, report a swallowing outcome and be published in English. Quality assessments of the eligible studies were performed. RESULTS: Of 239 studies found, 19 met the inclusion criteria. One study was rated as 'fair' and the rest as 'poor' quality, particularly due to the lack of published and validated swallowing assessment procedures and outcome measures. Cricopharyngeal (CP) dysfunction (12/19) was the most commonly reported swallowing abnormality. Interventions for disease management included pharmacological agents (10/19), followed by surgical (3/19), behavioral (1/19) and combined approaches (5/19). Interventions with immunosuppressants, botulinum toxin injection, balloon dilation and/or CP myotomy led to mixed and transient benefits. Few studies examining statins or behavioral therapies (primarily focused on respiratory function) showed no effects for dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Various interventions have been reported to temporarily improve dysphagia in persons with IBM. However, these findings are based on limited and overall low-quality evidence. This study cautions against the generalization of these findings and emphasizes the need for further systematic research to improve the diagnosis and management of dysphagia in IBM.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión , Humanos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/complicaciones , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/diagnóstico , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/terapia , Músculos Faríngeos/cirugía , EndoscopíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a debilitating idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) which affects hand function, ambulation, and swallowing. There is no approved pharmacological therapy for IBM, and there is a lack of suitable outcome measure to assess the effect of an intervention. The IBM scientific interest group under IMACS reviewed the previously used outcome measures in IBM clinical studies to lay the path for developing a core set of outcome measures in IBM. METHODS: In this systematised review, we have extracted all outcome measures reported in IBM clinical studies to determine what measures were being used and to assess the need for optimising outcome measures in IBM. RESULTS: We found 13 observational studies, 17 open-label clinical trials, and 15 randomised control trials (RCTs) in IBM. Six-minute walk distance, IBM-functional rating scale (IBM-FRS), quantitative muscle testing, manual muscle testing, maximal voluntary isometric contraction testing, and thigh muscle volume measured by MRI were used as primary outcome measures. Twelve different outcome measures of motor function were used in IBM clinical trials. IBM-FRS was the most used measure of functionality. Swallowing function was reported as a secondary outcome measure in only 3 RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: There are inconsistencies in using outcome measures in clinical studies in IBM. The core set measures developed by the IMACS group for other IIMs are not directly applicable to IBM. As a result, there is an unmet need for an IBM-specific core set of measures to facilitate the evaluation of new potential therapeutics for IBM.
Asunto(s)
Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión , Miositis , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético , Miositis/complicaciones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , CaminataRESUMEN
Frailty is a complex and multidimensional condition wherein declines in physiologic reserve and function place individuals in a state of heightened vulnerability and decreased resiliency. There has been growing interest in both research and clinical settings to understand how to best define, assess and characterise frailty in older adults. To this end, various models and clinical assessment tools have been used to define and measure frailty. While differences exist among these models and tools, a common unifying theme is a focus on physical function and activity. Notably absent across many available conceptual models and clinical tools are items directly related to oral and swallowing function. This is an important oversight as widespread changes to both oral and swallowing function are evident in older adults. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests many of the functional domains affected in frail older adults, such as nutrition and sarcopenia, have cyclical relationships with impairments in oral (oral hypofunction) and swallowing function (dysphagia) as well. The increasing appreciation for the interrelationships among oral hypofunction, dysphagia and frailty provides an opportunity for refinement of frailty assessment and characterisation in older adults to incorporate metrics specific to oral and swallowing function.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Fragilidad , Humanos , Anciano , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Deglución , Salud Bucal , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Anciano FrágilRESUMEN
Little is known about the physiology of a common fluid ingestion pattern-sequential swallowing. This study investigated sequential swallowing biomechanics in healthy adults. Archival normative videofluoroscopic swallow studies were analyzed for hyolaryngeal complex (HLC) patterning and biomechanical measures from the first 2 swallows of a 90-mL thin liquid sequential swallow task. The effects of age, sex, HLC type, and swallow order were explored. Eighty-eight participants were included in the primary analyses as they performed sequential swallows. HLC Type I (airway opens, epiglottis approaches baseline) and Type II (airway remains closed, epiglottis remains inverted) most commonly occurred (47% each), followed by Type III (mixed, 6%). Age was significantly associated with Type II and longer hypopharyngeal transit, total pharyngeal transit (TPT), swallow reaction time (SRT), and duration to maximum hyoid elevation. Males demonstrated significantly greater maximum hyoid displacement (Hmax) and longer duration of maximum hyoid displacement. Significantly larger maximum hyoid-to-larynx approximation was linked to the first swallow, while the subsequent swallow had significantly longer oropharyngeal transit, TPT, and SRT. Secondary analyses included an additional 91 participants who performed a series of discrete swallows for the same swallow task. Type II had significantly greater Hmax than Type I and series of discrete swallows. Sequential swallowing biomechanics differ from discrete swallows, and normal variance exists among healthy adults. In vulnerable populations, sequential swallowing may challenge swallow coordination and airway protection. Normative data allow comparison to dysphagic populations. Systematic efforts are needed to further standardize a definition for sequential swallowing.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Laringe , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Deglución/fisiología , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico por imagen , Laringe/fisiología , EpiglotisRESUMEN
Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is a heterogeneous progressive inflammatory muscle disease impacting skeletal muscles in the head, neck, and limbs. Use of valid, reliable, sensitive, and standardised clinical and paraclinical outcome assessments (COA) are critical to inform both proactive clinical care and clinical trial design. Here we review clinical and imaging methods used to quantify muscle strength, size, or function in sIBM, and discuss their application to clinical practice and use in clinical trials. Considerations for future work to validate measures in this population are also discussed.
Asunto(s)
Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Humanos , Fuerza Muscular , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/diagnóstico por imagen , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder characterised by repeated narrowing and closure of the upper airway during sleep. Despite growing evidence that dysphagia is a frequent sequela of OSA, the role of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in managing OSA remains unclear. The aim of this international study was to evaluate SLPs knowledge, attitudes, and experience of OSA. METHODS: A validated questionnaire, OSA Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA), was distributed to SLPs internationally via an online survey. Additional information on demographics, educational history, and clinical practices was ascertained. RESULTS: From a total of 1647 respondents, 822 clinicians from twenty-four countries were included in the final analysis. Knowledge of OSA among SLPs was limited; the mean (SD) rate of correct answers was 55% (22%). Over half of SLPs reported patients with OSA on their caseload, with the majority of patients referred for dysphagia services. Yet, only half of SLPs reported confidence in their ability to assess or manage dysphagia in patients with OSA. SLPs' experience of OSA had an effect on their knowledge and attitudes [F (2, 817) = 17.279, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: SLPs are involved in the management of patients with OSA but are practising with limited knowledge and confidence. The findings highlight the need to increase OSA education and training for SLPs. In addition, there is a need for targeted research to increase the evidence base for development of clinical practice guidelines for dysphagia management in patients with OSA.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Patología del Habla y Lenguaje , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Patólogos , Habla , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the application of event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate neural processes of swallowing functions in adults with and without dysphagia. Computerized literature searches were performed from three search engines. Studies were screened using Covidence (Cochrane tool) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA-2009). A total of 759 studies were initially retrieved, of which 12 studies met inclusion criteria. Electrophysiological measures assessing swallowing functions were identified in two major ERP categories: (1) sensory potentials and (2) pre-motor potentials. Approximately 80% of eligible studies demonstrated strong methodological quality, although most employed a case series or case-control study design. Pharyngeal sensory-evoked potentials (PSEPs) were used to assess pharyngeal afferent cortical processing. The temporal sequence of the PSEP waveforms varied based on the sensory stimuli. PSEPs were delayed with localized scalp maps in patients with dysphagia as compared to healthy controls. The pre-motor ERPs assessed the cortical substrates involved in motor planning for swallowing, with the following major neural substrates identified: pre-motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and primary sensorimotor cortex. The pre-motor ERPs differed in amplitude for the swallow task (saliva versus liquid swallow), and the neural networks differed for cued versus non-cued task of swallowing suggesting differences in cognitive processes. This systematic review describes the application of electrophysiological measures to assess swallowing function and the promising application for furthering understanding of the neural substrates of swallowing. Standardization of protocols for use of electrophysiological measures to examine swallowing would allow for aggregation of study data to inform clinical practice for dysphagia rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Corteza Motora , Adulto , Humanos , Deglución/fisiología , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Corteza Motora/fisiología , Faringe/fisiologíaRESUMEN
This pilot study explored agreement on swallowing-related quality-of-life scores reported by individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their caregivers. Thirty-six patient-caregiver pairs completed the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using an online survey format. Additional background and clinical information was ascertained. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was completed to compare the means of scores between individuals with PD and caregivers. Factors potentially influencing SWAL-QOL scores (age, employment status, sex, ethnicity, race, previous history of swallowing evaluation or treatment, caregiver concern about patient cognition, caregiver burden, and time since onset of disease) were explored using Spearman Coefficient Correlation tests. The Holm-Bonferroni method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results did not reveal significant differences in SWAL-QOL scores between individuals with PD and caregiver pairs. There was a moderate degree of reliability and agreement between paired patient and caregiver scores, with the average ICC measures being 0.598 (95% CI [358, 0.748]) (F(71, 72) = 2.451, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, caregiver burden was found to be the only significant factor associated with caregivers' reported scores. No significant influential factor on reported scores by individuals with PD was found. These pilot results suggest individuals with PD and their caregivers may report similar swallowing-related quality-of-life scores. Further, caregiver burden appears to be an influential factor for caregiver-reported scores. Future studies should investigate the clinical benefits of including caregiver SWAL-QOL ratings in assessments, either as a supplement to patient scores to identify discrepancies across the dyad or in place of patient scores if needed. Further, caregiver burden and its influence on dysphagia identification and management should be explored, with targeted interventions to manage caregiver burden.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Calidad de Vida , Cuidadores , Deglución , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Quantitative analysis of modified barium swallow (MBS) imaging is useful to determine the impact of various disease states on pharyngeal swallowing mechanics. In this retrospective proof of concept study, kinematic analysis and computational analysis of swallowing mechanics (CASM) were used to demonstrate how these methods differentiate swallowing dysfunction by dysphagia etiology. Ten subjects were randomly selected from four cohorts of dysphagic patients including COPD, head and neck cancer (HNC), motor neuron disease, and stroke. Each subject was age- and gender-matched with healthy, non-dysphagic controls. MBS videos of 5 ml thin and 5 ml thick bolus trials from each subject were used. A MATLAB tracker tool was adapted and updated to collect and compile data for each video (n = 160). For kinematic measurements, a MANOVA was performed with post-hoc analyses to determine group differences. For CASM measurements, a morphometric canonical variate analysis with post hoc analysis was performed to determine group differences. Kinematic analyses indicated statistically significant differences between HNC cohort and controls in distance measurements for hyolaryngeal approximation (p = .001), laryngeal elevation (p = 0.0001), pharyngeal shortening (p = 0.0002), and stage transition duration timing (p = 0.002). Timing differences were noted between the stroke cohort and controls for pharyngeal transit time (p = 0.007). Multivariate morphometric canonical variate analysis showed significant differences between etiology groups (p < 0.0001) with eigenvectors indicating differing patterns of swallowing mechanics. This study demonstrated that swallowing mechanics among cohorts of dysphagic patients can be differentiated using kinematics and CASM, providing different but complementary quantitative methods for investigating the impact of various disease states on swallowing function.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Deglución , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Humanos , Faringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
At the time of writing this paper, there are over 11 million reported cases of COVID-19 worldwide. Health professionals involved in dysphagia care are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in their day-to-day practices. Otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, rehabilitation specialists, and speech-language pathologists are subject to virus exposure due to their proximity to the aerodigestive tract and reliance on aerosol-generating procedures in swallow assessments and interventions. Across the globe, professional societies and specialty associations are issuing recommendations about which procedures to use, when to use them, and how to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission during their use. Balancing safety for self, patients, and the public while maintaining adequate evidence-based dysphagia practices has become a significant challenge. This paper provides current evidence on COVID-19 transmission during commonly used dysphagia practices and provides recommendations for protection while conducting these procedures. The paper summarizes current understanding of dysphagia in patients with COVID-19 and draws on evidence for dysphagia interventions that can be provided without in-person consults and close proximity procedures including dysphagia screening and telehealth.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , COVID-19/transmisión , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and qualitatively analyze published evidence elucidating the prevalence of dysphagia and detail alterations in swallowing function in patients with OSAS. METHODS: Computerized literature searches were performed from four search engines. The studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were screened using Covidence (Cochrane tool) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA-2009). A total 2645 studies were initially retrieved, of which a total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers, blinded to each other, evaluated level and strength of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and QualSyst, respectively. RESULTS: Dysphagia prevalence ranged from 16 to 78% among the eligible studies. Studies varied in operational definitions defining swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) and method used to assess swallowing function. Approximately 70% of eligible studies demonstrated strong methodological quality. The majority of studies (n = 11; 65%) reported pharyngeal swallowing impairments in patients with OSAS, including delayed initiation of pharyngeal swallow and penetration/aspiration. CONCLUSION: This systematic review describes swallowing function in patients with OSAS. However, due to the variability in defining OSAS and dysphagia, in the assessment method used to determine dysphagia, and heterogeneity of study designs, true prevalence is difficult to determine. Clinicians involved in the management of OSAS patients should employ validated assessment measures to determine if swallow dysfunction is present.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Deglución/fisiología , Orofaringe/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Universally established comprehensive clinical bulbar scales objectively assessing disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are currently lacking. The goal of this working group project is to design a best practice set of provisional bulbar ALS guidelines, available for immediate implementation within all ALS clinics. METHODS: ALS specialists across multiple related disciplines participated in a series of clinical bulbar symposia, intending to identify and summarize the currently accepted best practices for the assessment and management of bulbar dysfunction in ALS Results: Summary group recommendations for individual speech, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), and swallowing sections were achieved, focusing on the optimal proposed level of care within each domain. DISCUSSION: We have identified specific clinical recommendations for each of the 3 domains of bulbar functioning, available for incorporation within all ALS clinics. Future directions will be to establish a formal set of bulbar guidelines through a methodological and evidence-based approach. Muscle Nerve 59:531-531, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/rehabilitación , Trastornos de Deglución/rehabilitación , Trastornos del Habla/rehabilitación , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/complicaciones , Equipos de Comunicación para Personas con Discapacidad , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Derivación y Consulta , Trastornos del Habla/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Habla/etiología , LogopediaAsunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Deglución , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility for quantifying changes in oropharyngeal swallowing impairment in response to alteration in bolus viscosity using a reliable and valid method of observational measurement-the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP). METHOD: This retrospective analysis included a heterogeneous cohort of 119 patients with suspected dysphagia that underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study as part of clinical care. Using consensus scoring, two expert clinicians assigned MBSImP scores to components related to oropharyngeal swallowing function between two bolus viscosities (thin liquid and pudding): epiglottic movement, laryngeal elevation, anterior hyoid excursion, tongue base retraction, pharyngeal stripping wave, and pharyngoesophageal segment opening (PESO). Comparisons between the two bolus viscosities were investigated for each component. RESULTS: Higher (worse) scores were observed in the thin-liquid trial compared with the pudding trial for the following MBSImP components: anterior hyoid excursion (p = .03), epiglottic movement (p < .001), pharyngeal stripping wave (p < .001), and PESO (p = .002). Lower (better) scores were observed in the liquid trial compared with the pudding trial for one component-tongue base retraction (Component 15) only (p < .001). CONCLUSION: These findings provide further evidence for positive influences of viscosity on the swallow mechanism, including influences of sensory feedback on the sensorimotor swallow program.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Humanos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Deglución/fisiología , Viscosidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Faringe , Fluoroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cricopharyngeal dysfunction is a common potential cause of pharyngoesophageal dysphagia. Contextual factors (i.e., personal demographics and bolus properties) appear to impact upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function but have yet to be assessed collectively in a large-scale study using psychometrically sound swallow task procedures. Using a standardized and validated videofluoroscopic approach, we investigated the collective effects of age, sex, and swallow task on UES opening duration (UESOdur) and UES maximum distension (UESmax) in a large sample of healthy adults. METHODS: UESOdur and UESmax data were analyzed from existing videofluoroscopic images of 195 healthy adults (21-89 years old) across seven swallow tasks (thin liquid to viscous liquids, puree, and a solid). Generalized estimating equation modeling captured the effects of the aforementioned contextual factors (α = 0.05). RESULTS: UESOdur significantly increased with age, while UESmax had an inverse relationship. Females had significantly wider UESmax. UESOdur of 5 mL thin liquid was significantly shorter than all other liquid swallow tasks, while solid had an inverse effect. Compared to 5 mL thin liquid, all other swallow tasks resulted in significantly wider UESmax. Mildly and moderately thick liquid significantly increased UESOdur when isolating viscosity. UESmax was significantly wider with mildly and moderately thick liquid and puree than thin liquid. When isolating volume, cup sip thin liquid increased both measures significantly relative to 5 mL. CONCLUSION: Age, sex, and swallow task can influence the normal timing and extent of UES movement. These collective effects contribute to normal variability in UES function and should be considered for clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2306-2315, 2024.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Laringoscopios , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esfínter Esofágico Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Deglución , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Cinerradiografía , Laringoscopios/efectos adversos , ManometríaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: When considering original research articles, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest level of research evidence. Given this, RCTS are often used by clinicians performing evidence-based practice to determine the most effective intervention for a specific patient or patient population. Although RCTs represent a high level of research evidence, it is important for clinicians to critically appraise RCTs to determine the validity of the study methods deployed, the statistical and clinical significance of treatment effects, and whether or not the results generalize to a particular patient, patient population, and/or clinical setting. Therefore, this tutorial will provide clinicians with an overview of what an RCT is, the various types of RCTs, when RCTs are appropriate to conduct and/or use to inform clinical practice, and the advantages and limitations of RCTs. Additionally, this tutorial will provide clinicians with practical tools to employ when reading an RCT, including checklists with questions, definitions of important terminology frequently used in RCTs, and demonstrations of how to critically appraise RCTs using literature examples from the speech-language pathology literature. CONCLUSIONS: Learning how to interpret and apply the results from RCTs to inform clinical practice for purposes of improving patient care is a critical evidence-based practice skill for clinicians to develop. This tutorial will assist clinicians in the field of speech-language pathology by furthering their fundamental knowledge of RCTs and by providing them with pragmatic tools to critically appraise RCTs to inform their clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Patología del Habla y Lenguaje , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , AprendizajeRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dysphagia is a common symptom of sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM), affecting disease trajectory and patient quality-of-life. Despite this, it is considerably understudied. The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence related to the evaluation and management of dysphagia in IBM. We highlight a patient case involving a multidisciplinary management approach, and we encourage continued exploration of exercises for delaying progression and improving impairments in patients with IBM and dysphagia. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent investigations confirm that dysphagia in IBM is a debilitating and complex symptom that warrants timely evaluation and management. Further, they highlight the lack of validation of standardized swallowing-related metrics specifically for IBM and the limited evidence supporting a consensus of management approaches. Small scale research and clinical anecdotal data support a multidisciplinary and multipronged patient-centered approach, including rehabilitative exercise protocols, for dysphagia management in IBM. SUMMARY: A paucity exists in the literature to effectively guide clinical decision-making for patients with IBM and dysphagia. Given this, it is our belief that a careful multidisciplinary and multipronged patient-centered approach is critical for dysphagia management in IBM. Prospective, longitudinal research on the underlying mechanisms of swallowing dysfunction using advanced and validated swallowing-related outcome measures is urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión , Humanos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/complicaciones , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/diagnóstico , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , DegluciónRESUMEN
Objective: To systematically evaluate post-exercise outcomes related to function and quality of life in people with ALS. Methods: PRISMA guidelines were used for identifying and extracting articles. Levels of evidence and quality of articles were judged based on The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and the QualSyst. Outcomes were analyzed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2 software, random effects models, and Hedge's G. Effects were examined at 0-4 months, up to 6 months, and > 6 months. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed for 1) controlled trials vs. all studies and 2) ALSFRS-R bulbar, respiratory, and motor subscales. Heterogeneity of pooled outcomes was computed with the I2 statistic. Results: 16 studies and seven functional outcomes met inclusion for the meta-analysis. Of the outcomes explored, the ALSFRS-R demonstrated a favorable summary effect size and had acceptable heterogeneity and dispersion. While FIM scores demonstrated a favorable summary effect size, heterogeneity limited interpretations. Other outcomes did not demonstrate a favorable summary effect size and/or could not be reported due to few studies reporting outcomes. Conclusions: This study provides inconclusive guidance regarding exercise regimens to maintain function and quality of life in people with ALS due to study limitations (e.g., small sample size, high attrition rate, heterogeneity in methods and participants, etc.). Future research is warranted to determine optimal treatment regimens and dosage parameters in this patient population.