"What pressure ulcers mean to me?" Representations of pressure ulcer in persons with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Explore the perceptions and beliefs related to pressure ulcers (PU), their prevention and treatment strategies, in order to discuss potential learning objectives for PU-related therapeutic education in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Qualitative study, using grounded theory for the analysis of data collected via a questionnaire. SETTING: Nine SCI referral centers, inpatient care. PARTICIPANTS: 131 persons with SCI were included. 76% were male, and 65% presented with paraplegia. The median age was 48 years (33.5; 58) and median time since injury was 11 years (3; 24.5). 70% had experience with PU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collection via an open-ended questionnaire on the representation of PU, its prevention and life experience of having a PU. RESULTS: Six categories were identified: (1) identifying what might become problematic, (2) daily preventive actions, (3) detecting the early signs, (4) managing the early signs, (5) need for care, (6) experience with PU and being bedridden. Pressure ulcers have dramatic consequences on psychosocial health. Prevention and treatment require self-management skills, such as self-risk assessment abilities, self-detection skills and problem-solving strategies, to optimise daily PU prevention in persons with SCI. CONCLUSION: PU prevention tackled by persons with SCI bears some specificities that the physician must take into account in the construction of a self-management program in this high-risk population.

Validity and internal consistency of the French version of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist in people with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional psychometrics study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the construct validity and internal consistency of the revised Skin Management Needs Assessment Checklist (revised SMnac). SETTING: Six spinal cord rehabilitation centers. METHODS: One-hundred and thirty-two community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) were included. Construct validity was assessed by a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and several questionnaires: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Braden scale; or clinical variables: educational level, presence of a pressure ulcer (PU), history of multiple PUs, time since injury, and pain. RESULTS: The study evidenced construct validity with a fair to moderate correlation coefficient between the revised SMnac and Rosenberg scale (rs = 0.25; p = 0.03), active coping (rs = 0.29; p = 0.001), HADS (rs = -0.43; p < 0.0001), and time since injury (rs = 0.49; p < 0.0001). The presence of PU and history of multiple PUs were strongly correlated with the revised SMnac score (respectively, p = 0.01 and 0.001). Internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.907). CONCLUSION: These results show that the revised SMnac is a valid tool to assess PU self-management in individuals with SCI. Further studies are needed to assess the revised SMnac's responsiveness to change.

French cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Moorong Self-Efficacy scale: the MSES-FR, a measure of Self-Efficacy for French people with spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To adapt the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES) in the French language and determine its psychometric proprieties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a back-translation process, an expert committee was solicited to develop the French Self Efficacy Scale, thanks to a Delphi method, regarding theoretical framework and concepts explored. A total of 201 patients with SCI were included to explore internal consistency, internal and external structure validity assessed with the General Self-Efficacy scale, MOS Health Survey Short-Form, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Way of Coping Check-list, Perceived Stress Scale, Social Support Questionnaire, Self-Esteem questionnaire, and Satisfaction With Life Scale. The retest was performed 4 days later with a randomized version of the MSES-Fr. RESULTS: The 16 items are distributed in 3 different dimensions: Interpersonal Self-Efficacy (4 items), Instrumental Self-Efficacy (4 items) and Participation Self-Efficacy (6 items). The internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach α = .87). Results evidenced significant correlations with the MSES-Fr and other related psychological constructs (self-esteem, mood, quality of life). Reproducibility was good for the total score of the MSES-Fr (ICC = .74) and for the 3 dimensions of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The MSES-Fr is a valid and reliable tool to assess self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury.Implications for rehabilitationThe Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES) is commonly used in persons with SCI for evaluating the level of perceived effectiveness in living with a disability.Validity and reliability studies of the MSES-Fr show good psychometrics properties in people with SCI.The French version of the MSES has been cross-culturally translated and is ready to be used clinically.

Braun's flexor tendons transfer in disabled hands by central nervous system lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Since Braun's article, the nonfunctional hand of brain-injured patients has not been the subject of many publications. The objective of surgical treatment is to open the hand for hygiene and cosmetic reasons. The technique consists in lengthening the extrinsic flexor tendons group. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this work is to assess eventual functional benefits from superficialis-to-profundus tendon transfer according to Braun. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series comprised 15 patients aged a mean 55 years, operated using the Braun procedure for a nonfunctional hand (19 hands). Additional procedures were performed as required by the local condition (neurotomy of the deep branch of the ulnar nerve, wrist fusion, tenotomy of the flexors of the wrist and flexor pollicis longus, tenodesis of the extensors of the wrist). The results were assessed by the analysis of finger opening ability and by a specific scoring system (Mini Hand Score; MHS) rated from 6 (no discomfort) at 20 (major discomfort). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6 months. We observed imperfect results: thumb opening incapacity, spasticity of the intrinsic flexors, and hyperextension of the wrist. The preoperative MHS was a mean 13.87 out of 20 and the postoperative MHS was 9.67 out of 20, with a very substantial difference. DISCUSSION: Our easy-to-use system for evaluating the nonfunctional hand (MHS) was shown to be very effective in demonstrating the improvement of the postoperative result. The originality of our series was to show that Braun's original operation goals were only exceptionally and remotely achieved and that an additional technical procedure must be nearly systematically considered. All the patients in our series were followed up in multidisciplinary team visits where the patient's family and caretakers were encouraged to give their point of view. Level of evidence Level IV. Retrospective study.