Family cord blood banking for sickle cell disease: a twenty-year experience in two dedicated public cord blood banks.

Efforts to implement family cord blood banking have been developed in the past decades for siblings requiring stem cell transplantation for conditions such as sickle cell disease. However, public banks are faced with challenging decisions about the units to be stored, discarded, or used for other endeavors. We report here 20 years of experience in family cord blood banking for sickle cell disease in two dedicated public banks. Participants were pregnant women who had a previous child diagnosed with homozygous sickle cell disease. Participation was voluntary and free of charge. All mothers underwent mandatory serological screening. Cord blood units were collected in different hospitals, but processed and stored in two public banks. A total of 338 units were stored for 302 families. Median recipient age was six years (11 months-15 years). Median collected volume and total nucleated cell count were 91 mL (range 23-230) and 8.6×108 (range 0.7-75×108), respectively. Microbial contamination was observed in 3.5% (n=12), positive hepatitis B serology in 25% (n=84), and homozygous sickle cell disease in 11% (n=37) of the collections. Forty-four units were HLA-identical to the intended recipient, and 28 units were released for transplantation either alone (n=23) or in combination with the bone marrow from the same donor (n=5), reflecting a utilization rate of 8%. Engraftment rate was 96% with 100% survival. Family cord blood banking yields good quality units for sibling transplantation. More comprehensive banking based on close collaboration among banks, clinical and transplant teams is recommended to optimize the use of these units.

Neonatal Screening for Hyperthyroidism Proof of Concept.

CONTEXT: Early treatment is essential to avoid the cardiac complication of neonatal hyperthyroidism (NH). Our results have direct implications for clinical care. OBJECTIVE: NH can cause potentially fatal neonatal thyrotoxicosis. Here, we have evaluated the feasibility of neonatal hyperthyroidism screening using the thyroid-stimulating hormone value in dried blood collected routinely on filter paper on the third postnatal day of life for congenital hypothyroidism screening. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. Cases were identified using data from our previously published study of 280 000 infants born in 10 maternity units in France in 2007-2014. Controls were identified among the 1 362 564 infants born in the Ile-de-France region during the same period. RESULTS: A screening thyroid-stimulating hormone level below 0.18 mIU/L on the third postnatal day had 71% (95% CI 44-90%) sensitivity, 99% (95% CI 99-100%) specificity, 81% (95% CI 74-86%) positive predictive value, and 98% (95% CI 97-99%) negative predictive value for detecting severe NH. By univariate regression analysis, the screening thyroid-stimulating hormone value was the strongest predictor of NH (P < .00001), with an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.0). Expected frequencies were not significantly different from observed frequencies (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = .99). CONCLUSION: The screening thyroid-stimulating hormone test can be used to detect severe NH, the optimal cut-off being 0.18 mIU/L. The additional cost compared with screening for congenital hypothyroidism would be small. Infants with neonatal hyperthyroidism would benefit from an earlier diagnosis with treatment initiation at the presymptomatic stage in many cases, ensuring optimal outcomes.

An Evaluation of Three Ways of Communicating Carrier Status Results to the Parents of Children in a Neonatal Sickle Cell Screening Programme.

Aim: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most frequent monogenic disease worldwide; ~5-7% of the world population carry a hemoglobin disorder trait. In the US, one in every 1,941 newborns has SCD, whereas one in every 3,000 newborns in France is affected - resulting in 385 new cases and 5,883 newly identified carriers per year. The objective of the present study was to evaluate three different ways of providing information to parents at risk of having a child with SCD, with a view to increasing the parental screening rate and decreasing the number of new cases per year in France. Method: In a randomized study, we contacted 300 couples of parents after their child had been identified as a SCD carrier in the French national newborn screening programme: 100 couples received an information letter (the standard procedure in France: arm A), 100 couples received a letter and then a follow-up phone call (arm B), and 100 received a letter and then three follow-up text messages at 5-day intervals (arm C). The primary endpoint was the number of parents in each arm screened in the 120 days after the letter had been sent. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the screening rate was 17% in arm A, 35% in arm B, and 30% in arm C. Results: Telephone and text message follow-ups were associated with higher screening rates, compared with no follow-up. After being informed of their child's carrier status, some parents had consulted a healthcare professional but had not been referred for screening (16% in arm A, 19% in arm B, and 13% in arm C). Conclusion: A letter followed by a phone call or three text messages is more effective than a letter alone for informing parents at risk of having a child with SCD. The effective implementation of this follow-up programme probably requires better training of all the healthcare professionals involved.

Sickle SCAN™ (BioMedomics) fulfills analytical conditions for neonatal screening of sickle cell disease.

Sickle SCAN™ is a rapid, qualitative, point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay for the identification of AS, AC, SS/Sß0thal, SC and CC/Cß0thal phenotype. We evaluated this test under the conditions encountered in the French newborn screening (NBS) program for sickle cell disease: a total of 104 dried blood spots (DBSs) were tested with an HPLC reference method and then with the Sickle SCAN™ device. Sickle SCAN™ identified the hemoglobin (Hb) phenotype correctly on 96% of cases. In the four non-concordant cases, the antibody anti-HbS cross-reacted with HbE (n=2), HbD (n=1) or HbX (n=1). There were no false negative. In order to test Sickle SCAN™'s sensitivity to low levels of HbA and HbS in the presence of high HbF levels, we selected another 21 DBS cards with low percentages of HbA (0.6-4.2%) and HbS (2.0-6.9%). HbA and HbS were always detected when present at levels of more than 1% and 2%, respectively. Sickle SCAN™ appears to be an accurate point-of-care method for the identification of newborns with SCD trait. The device meets the criteria for sickle cell disease NBS programs in endemic countries with poor access to laboratory equipment.