RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Currently, the standard treatment for non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) consists of a systemic neoadjuvant (or perioperative) anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy, delivered either sequentially or concomitantly. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatments for TNBC in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR). Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to 1 November 2023. Randomized clinical trials were used that enrolled adults with stage I-III TNBC and provided data on pCR defined as residual ypT0/TisN0M0. Between-group comparisons were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The primary outcome was the pCR rate. Results: 1129 citations were screened, and 12 randomized clinical trials were included. In Bayesian comparisons, all regimens, except anthracycline/taxanes plus gemcitabine or capecitabine, resulted in a higher pCR than the standard regimen in both direct and indirect comparisons. In particular, immunotherapy-based regimens resulted in more than double the pCR compared to historical regimens (RR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) and ranked as being the optimal regimen with a probability of 97%. Disease-free survival was better for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.36, 95% 1.21-2.09) than for historical regimens. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirmed that incorporating immunotherapy with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the best option to guarantee remarkable pathologic downstaging and improve clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Adulto , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teorema de Bayes , Metaanálisis en Red , Respuesta Patológica Completa , Antraciclinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved and become more personalized during the past several years. For example, depotentiation/reduced duration of systemic therapies has proven to be beneficial in both advanced and early stages of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In particular, recent randomized studies of stage III and high-risk stage II CRC showed that a shorter duration (3 months), when compared to the historical 6-month comparator, provides nearly similar overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the setting of advanced, inoperable CRC, a relatively short induction phase (six to eight cycles) followed by biological agents is the current standard of care in RAS wild-type (wt). versus RAS mutated cases. With regard to potentially operable stage IV disease (with the aim of converting liver metastases to operability), a relatively short number of cycles (four to six cycles) should be offered with re-staging and re-evaluation for surgery as soon as possible in most cases. For inoperable liver metastases, a relatively intensive triplet or doublet plus targeted therapy may attain conversion in some cases and may even result in cure. Rectal cancer treatment continues to be a complex disease in terms of treatment and oncological results. Recent data seem to showcase the benefits of more prolonged sequential strategies (total neoadjuvant therapy, all treatment delivered before surgery, to reduce the risk of distant metastases and local control). In recent years, different strategies regarding treatment intensity have been employed in CRC in adjuvant and metastatic setting. Introduction of triplets as first-line therapy for colon cancer and as induction phase for rectal cancer are now therapeutic options. Conversely in stage II disease or low-risk stage III resected CRC, a reduced chemotherapy length is a new standard of care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundarioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The causative and prognostic roles of human papillomavirus (HPV) in non-oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are uncertain. This umbrella review assessed the strength and quality of evidence and graded the evidence derived from published meta-analyses on this subject. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Meta-analyses of observational studies and randomized trials were included. REVIEW METHODS: Evidence of association was graded according to the established criteria: strong, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant. RESULTS: 15 meta-analyses were evaluated. The association with HPV was highly suggestive of oral (OR = 2.40, [1.87-3.07], P < 0.00001) and nasopharyngeal cancers (OR = 17.82 [11.20-28.35], P < 0.00001). Improved survival emerged only in hypopharyngeal carcinoma and was confirmed in studies in which only p16 + cancers were considered. CONCLUSION: HPV infection may increase the risk of oral cavity and nasopharyngeal cancer. However, the prognosis was not influenced, except in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Boca/patología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , PapillomaviridaeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) harnesses electric pulses to enhance cytotoxic drug delivery into tumors and has entered the armamentarium to treat superficially metastatic melanoma. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess treatment patterns and patient outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were queried for publication from inception to September 2020. Primary outcome measures were overall and complete response rate (ORR and CRR); secondary outcomes included local control rate (LCR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies met the selection criteria for a total of 1161 individuals (mean age 71 years) and 5308 tumors (weighted mean size 14 mm). The majority of patients (n = 1124) underwent bleomycin-ECT. Aggregate ORR was 77.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.0 - 83.2%) and CRR 48% (95% CI 42 - 54%), with no significant difference between the route of bleomycin administration (ORR, 69.2 vs. 81.9% following intravenous or intratumoral bleomycin, p = .37) and tumor size (p = .69). When reported (n = 8 studies), 1- and 2-year LCR ranged from 54 to 89% and 72 to 74%, respectively, and 1-year OS (n = 3 studies) from 67 to 89%. CONCLUSIONS: ECT with either intratumoral or intravenous bleomycin confers a high therapeutic response in cutaneous metastatic melanoma. Moderate evidence supports its low toxicity and durability of local control.HighlightsElectrochemotherapy (ECT) is associated with a 77% overall response rate (ORR).Intravenous and intratumoral bleomycin are equally effective.There are no relevant toxicity concerns.One-year local tumor control rate ranges from 54 to 89%.Current literature has significant variation in reporting.
Asunto(s)
Electroquimioterapia , Melanoma , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a cornerstone for the treatment of many advanced tumors. When 65 is considered as a cut-off age, ICIs are equally effective in younger and older patients. However, the efficacy of ICIs among patients aged ≥ 75 remains uncertain, since those patients were generally under-represented in clinical trials. We performed a pooled analysis of major randomized trials including data of outcome in very older population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials published from the inception of each database to November 22th, 2019. We only included (1) randomized studies comparing ICIs alone or in combinations with no ICIs, (2) studies reporting data of patients older than 75 years, (3) studies for solid tumors, and (4) studies with HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) available for OS based on 75 years as cut-off age. All data were expressed as the combination of HR and 95% CI, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of n = 8 publications for a total of n = 12 randomized studies were aggregated in the quantitative analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed a borderline significant OS benefit for ICIs compared to no ICIs arms (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.7-1; P = 0.05) in particular in first-line trials with HR = 0.77 (95%CI 0.61-0.96; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: We conclude that ICIs may be offered in patients older than 75 years, providing a complete geriatric and clinical evaluation is performed in all subjects before starting therapy.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Neoplasias/patología , Pronóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is usually associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Uncertainty exists about the possible role of hypertension as a poor prognostic factor for cancer-specific mortality (CSM). To assess the association between pre-existing hypertension and the risk of mortality and relapse after a diagnosis of cancer, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched from inception until May 2020, without language restrictions, for observational studies reporting the prognosis of patients with hypertension and cancer. The primary outcome of the study refers to CSM in hypertensive vs nonhypertensive patients, and secondary endpoints were overall mortality (OM) and progression- or relapse-free survival. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Mortality and relapse associated with hypertension in patients with various cancers were evaluated among 1 603 437 participants (n = 66 studies). Overall, diagnosis of cancer and hypertension was associated with an increased independent risk of OM (HR = 1.2 [95% CI, 1.13-1.27], P < .01) and CSM (HR = 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.21], P < .01) but not of relapse (HR = 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98-1.19], P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients, those with pre-existing hypertension have a poorer outcome, probably due to multifactorial reasons. Adequate control of lifestyle, more intensive follow-ups, monitoring for hypertension- and anticancer-related cardiovascular complications, and establishing multidisciplinary cardio-oncology units can be useful measures for reducing mortality and improving care in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Allogenic red blood cell transfusions exert a potential detrimental effect on the survival when delivered to cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusions and risk of death as well as relapse after surgery for localized solid tumors. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2019 for studies reporting the outcome of patients receiving transfusions during radical surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Risk of death and relapse were pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval [hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval {CI})]. Mortality and relapse associated with perioperative transfusion due to cancer surgery were evaluated among participants (n = 123 studies). Overall, RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death [HR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42-1.57), p < 0.01] and relapse [HR = 1.36 (95% CI 1.26-1.46), p < 0.01]. The survival was reduced even in cancer at early stages [HR = 1.45 (1.36-1.55), p < 0.01]. In cancer patients undergoing surgery, red blood cell transfusions reduced the survival and increased the risk of relapse. Transfusions based on patients' blood management policy should be performed by applying a more restrictive policy, and the planned preoperative administration of iron, if necessary, should be pursued.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/mortalidad , Neoplasias/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patología , Atención Perioperativa , Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Is it true that cabozantinib should be the preferred option treating patients with bone metastases? Are there any reliable comparisons between this drug and other standard options in this subgroup? To address the issue, we performed a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized trials with cabozantinib, to assess its effectiveness, in terms of overall survival, according to the presence of bone metastases. We included (a) randomized controlled trials; (b) any solid tumors and therapeutic line; and (c) overall survival data available according to the site of disease. Cabozantinib improved overall survival both for the group with bone metastases, with risk of death decreased by 53% (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.87; P=0.02) and for the group without bone metastases, decreasing the risk of death by 44% (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.79; P=0.001) over the standard of care. The difference was not significantly different between the two groups. Despite cabozantinib can be undoubtedly listed as a good therapeutic option for cancer patients with bone metastases, it seems that its preclinical profile against bone remodeling does not translate into an actual clinical relevance, preventing from considering the presence of bone metastases as principal criterion for the choice of this drug.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Established that the only approved agents in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are trifluoridine/tipiracil and regorafenib, we conducted a systematic review of all the published phase 2-3 trials, with the scope to evaluate the benefit of any later-line regimens in refractory metastatic CRC. METHODS: Phase 2-3 studies that enrolled patients with stage IV disease receiving salvage therapies for refractory CRC were identified using electronic databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library). Clinical outcomes were pooled using a point estimates for the weighted values of median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (ORR), stable disease rate (SD), and 6-month and 1-year OS. RESULTS: Overall, 7556 patients were included from 67 studies (n = 70 arms). Overall, the pooled ORR and SD were 15.4% (95% CI 13-18%) and 36.9% (95% CI 33.5-40.6%). Median PFS, 6-month and 1-year OS, and median OS were 3.2 (95% CI 2.9-3.3) months, 65.4% (95% CI 61.9-68.8%), 36% (95% CI 32.3-39.9%) and 8.8 (95% CI 8.3-9.2) months. Overall survival was different in the monochemotherapy, polychemotherapy, chemotherapy + targeted therapy, and targeted therapy alone arms (7.6, 9.5, 10.3, and 7.9 months, respectively, P for difference = 0.01). Median PFS were respectively 2.3, 3.9, 3.8, and 2.6, respectively (P for difference < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, combination therapy (polychemotherapy with or without targeted agents) is associated with a higher control of disease and better outcome than approved agents. Treatment, if possible, should be personalized according to the patients' conditions, physician preference and molecular profile of disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/secundario , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Recuperativa , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: One year is the standard duration of adjuvant trastuzumab for human epidermal receptor-2 (HER2) positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Indeed, a shorter duration of trastuzumab can reduce cardiotoxicity and the costs involved and could provide the same benefit as a one-year treatment. We evaluated the available evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by comparing 1 year versus a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2+ BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and conference proceedings was carried out in order to identify the RCTs that investigated a standard versus a shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2+ BC patients. Using the fixed and random effects models, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cardiac events. RESULTS: Five RCTs with a total of 11,381 patients were included. Overall, one year of adjuvant trastuzumab improved OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39; P = 0.003) and DFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.3; P < 0.001) compared with a shorter duration (6 months and 9 weeks). In the subgroup analysis, there was a trend towards better DFS with the 1-year duration for patients with high-risk features, and also for concomitant administration of chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Cardiac events were significantly lower with a shorter duration (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.32-0.49; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-year adjuvant trastuzumab is associated with better DFS and OS compared with shorter durations and should still be considered the standard duration. However, selected patients with low-risk HER2+ BC can most likely be spared from an excess of cardiac toxicity with a shorter course.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Cardiotoxicidad/prevención & control , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Trastuzumab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several trials have demonstrated the benefit of anti-CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (BC), in first or subsequent lines of therapy. However, due to the lack of direct/indirect comparisons, there are no data demonstrating the superiority of one drug over the other. We compared the effectiveness of palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in advanced ER + BC via an indirect adjusted analysis. METHODS: We performed electronic searches in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for prospective phase 3 randomized trials evaluating anti-CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine agents. We compared the results with an adjusted indirect analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and G3-4 toxicities occurring in ≥ 5% of patients. RESULTS: Six trials and six treatment arms including a total of 3743 participants, were included. For PFS and ORR analysis, the three agents were similar in both first- and second-line studies. All G3-4 toxicities were similar, with reduced risk of diarrhea for palbociclib versus abemaciclib (relative risk [RR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.92; P = 0.04) and of QTc prolongation for palbociclib versus ribociclib (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.83; P = 0.03). Despite different inclusion criteria and length of follow-up, similar features were noticed among second-line studies with the exception of increased risk of anemia G3-4 and diarrhea G3-4 for abemaciclib. CONCLUSIONS: Based on PFS and ORR results of this indirect meta-analysis, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are equally effective in either first- or second-line therapy for advanced ER + BC. They, however, ported different toxicity profiles.
Asunto(s)
Aminopiridinas/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Purinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the last few years only one large randomized phase III study has tried to prospectively assess the safety of cetuximab and panitumumab in a head-to-head comparison. Despite the similar overall toxicity profile, cetuximab and panitumumab retain peculiar safety characteristics that deserve to be deeply investigated. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review for randomized trials in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and EMBASE using the terms ("cetuximab" or "panitumumab") AND ("colorectal cancer" OR "colorectal carcinoma"). Data of adverse events were aggregated to obtain pooled incidence rates of prespecified adverse events. Incidence of skin toxicities was the primary outcome. A χ2 test was used for comparisons of proportions and an odds ratio (OR) was calculated for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were included for analysis. Cetuximab was associated with fewer G3-4 skin toxicities (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.62; p < 0.001), slightly more frequent G3-4 acne-like rash (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48; p = 0.04), and paronychia (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), but fewer cases of skin fissures (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93; p = 0.02) and pruritus (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58; p < 0.001) than PANI. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows that cetuximab- and panitumumab-based chemotherapy have different toxicity profiles in terms of the rate of severe adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Acné Vulgar/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Humanos , Panitumumab , Paroniquia/inducido químicamente , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Mitomycin-C (MMC) combined with fluoropyrimidines has historically been used for pretreated patients with some activity in this setting, in particular, as third-line chemotherapy (CT) or beyond. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMC-based therapy as a further line of CT in advanced colorectal cancer. Prospective or retrospective studies of MMC-based CT were included in the pooled analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library database and CINAHL were searched systematically. The outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate and grades 3-4 drug-related adverse events. Seventeen trials involving 681 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, the pooled average weighted progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.1] and 7.47 (95% CI 6-8.9) months, respectively. The corresponding pooled overall response rate was 7.2% (95% CI 5.2-9.9%) and the pooled disease control rate was 38.7% (95% CI 31.7-46.3%). The G3-4 neutropenia and anaemia were the most frequent haematological toxicities (range 0-20%). Nonhaematological G3-4 toxicities were compatible with the associated agent. MMC with fluoropyrimidines represents a viable and active combination for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. It is thus an option when other agents have failed, or are unavailable or not indicated.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Mitomicina/administración & dosificación , Mitomicina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Cíclicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Somatostatina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Raltitrexed is a thymidylate synthase inhibitor belonging to the antimetabolite class of cytotoxic drugs. It is also effective in colorectal cancer (CRC) both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs, in particular in those patients with cardiologic risk factors or previous cardiotoxicity. The efficacy of first-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin (TOMOX) and irinotecan (TOMIRI) was investigated in this systematic review. Studies that enrolled advanced CRC patients for first-line therapy with TOMOX/TOMIRI combinations were identified using electronic databases (Pubmed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). A systematic analysis was carried out using Comprehensive Meta Analysis (version 2.2.064) software to calculate the pooled response rate and 95% confidence limits. The median pooled overall survival and progression-free survival were also calculated. Results for TOMOX and TOMIRI studies were compared using the two-sided Student's t-test. We tested for significant heterogeneity using Cochran's χ-test and I index. Twelve studies published between 2001 and 2012 were eligible for this analysis and a total of 735 patients were enrolled in these studies. The overall response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval 34-46%): 43.9% for TOMOX and 34.1% for TOMIRI arms. The weighted median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 14.6 and 6.7 months, respectively. Neutropenia and liver toxicity were more frequent with TOMOX, whereas neutropenia and diarrhea were more frequent with TOMIRI. However, compared with historical FOLFOX and FOLFIRI trials, raltitrexed-based doublets are associated with less neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity and uncommon cardiotoxicity. TOMOX and TOMIRI doublets are active as first-line chemotherapy for advanced CRC and seem useful in particular when the use of 5-fluorouracil is contraindicated for cardiac comorbidity.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Irinotecán , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Hígado/enzimología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC), induction combination chemotherapy doublets (CT) with an anti-EGFR agent are considered the primary treatment. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different maintenance treatments for advanced RAS wild-type CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane, from database inception until December 2021 were used. Randomized clinical trials enrolling adults with advanced RAS wild-type CRC and providing overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) data PRISMA guidelines for NMA were followed. Between-group comparisons were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). Agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized phase 2 trials were included (for a total of 1286 patients). Compared to depotentiation treatments, continuous CT + anti-EGFR was not significantly superior to other maintenance regimens for OS and was ranked as the best option for NMA (SUCRA p-score=0.69). Conversely, in the PFS analysis, single-agent fluoropyrimidines + anti-EGFR was ranked as the best treatment (SUCRA p-score=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining chemotherapy doublet + anti-EGFR until progression appears to be the best first-line strategy in terms of OS for advanced unresectable RAS wild-type mCRC treatment. However, fluoropyrimidines single-agent + cetuximab or panitumumab represent a reasonable choice regarding PFS.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adulto , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Panitumumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate in the medical community about the association between the laterality of breast cancer (BC: whether it arises in the left or right breast) and its outcome. This study aims to assess the disparities in overall survival (OS), cardiac mortality, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between BC affecting the left side and BC affecting the right side. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a thorough search of databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, starting from their inception up until December 1, 2023. The primary outcome was OS. Additional endpoints included cardiac mortality and CSS. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 50 publications (nâ¯=â¯7,527,156 patients) with similar rates of left and right BCs. Patients with left-sided BC showed a marginally decreased OS (HRâ¯=â¯1.03, 95â¯%CI 1.01-1.04; Pâ¯<â¯.01) and a 10% increase in cardiac mortality (HRâ¯=â¯1.1, 95â¯%CI 1.04-1.16; Pâ¯<â¯.01). Cancer-specific survival was similar for both groups (HRâ¯=â¯1.01, 95â¯%CI 0.98-1.03; Pâ¯=â¯.32). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, there is a slight increase in mortality and a 10â¯% rise in cardiac-related deaths associated with left-sided breast cancer compared to right-sided breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales , Femenino , Humanos , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the immune system's capacity to detect and destroy cancer cells. ICIs used in cancer immunotherapy are primarily categorized into two groups: anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. The application of combination ICI therapy (ICI doublets) in older patients prompts questions about their relative efficacy compared to standard therapies, particularly in comparison to younger patient cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved an extensive review of literature from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Our primary aim was to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of older patients, specifically those aged 65 and above, undergoing treatment for advanced cancers. The treatment modalities considered included ICI doublets, ICI monotherapy (alone or in combination with non-ICI drugs), and non-ICI therapies. The study aimed to compare the OS outcomes across these different therapeutic approaches. RESULTS: The analysis incorporated data from 18 trials, indicating that patients treated with ICI doublets exhibited a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96; P < 0.01). The addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors did not show significant advantages over anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02; P = 0.13). When compared to non-ICI therapies, such as chemotherapy alone, ICI doublets demonstrated improved OS outcomes (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that ICI doublets may offer a modest improvement in the outcomes of older cancer patients compared to non-ICI-based treatments. Consequently, the use of ICI doublets in older patients should be considered on an individual basis, prioritizing cases where there are clear advantages over conventional therapy. This study underscores the importance of developing personalized treatment strategies for older patients, necessitating a cautious and individualized approach in medication selection.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Anciano , Humanos , Factores de Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno CTLA-4/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D3, which originates from cholesterol, exerts its influence on immune cells and potentially cancer cells via the metabolite 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25(OH)2D3), impacting their proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. An umbrella review was conducted to evaluate the potential protective effect of vitamin D3 intake and serum levels on the incidence and mortality of cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases from their inception to October 1, 2023. We included meta-analyses of observational or randomized clinical trials that compared interventions (vitamin D3 intake) or blood levels in a healthy population, with cancer incidence or mortality as outcomes. The grading of evidence certainty followed established criteria, including strong, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant. RESULTS: A total of 71 systematic reviews were included. Strong evidence indicated that vitamin D3 supplementation reduced total cancer mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.9 [95% CI, 0.87-0.92]; P < 0.01). In the context of site-specific cancers, there exists highly suggestive evidence pointing towards the potential prevention of head and neck, breast, colorectal, lung, and renal cell cancers through the intake of vitamin D3. Furthermore, strong evidence suggests that maintaining sufficient levels of vitamin D3 may effectively lower the risk of renal cell and thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76 [95%CI 0.64-0.88]). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant evidence that vitamin D3 intake may reduce the incidence of some cancers. Routine assessments to ensure sufficient levels of vitamin D3 and administering supplements to address deficiencies may serve as crucial preventive measures for healthcare systems.