Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Acta Oncol ; 58(9): 1238-1245, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155998

RESUMEN

Background and purpose: Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has limited curative treatment options. Reirradiation is the only potential definitive treatment in advanced stages at a cost of substantial severe and often life-threatening toxicity. Proton therapy (PT) reduces irradiated volume compared with X-ray radiotherapy and could be advantageous in terms of safety and efficacy in a population of heavily pretreated patients. We report the retrospective results of PT reirradiation in recurrent NPC patients treated at our Institution Methods: All recurrent NPC patients treated since the beginning of clinical activity entered the present analysis. Clinical target volume consisted of Gross Tumor volume plus a patient-specific margin depending on disease behavior, tumor location, proximity of organs at risk, previous radiation dose. No elective nodal irradiation was performed. Active scanning technique with the use of Single Field Optimization (SFO) or Multifield Optimization (MFO) was adopted. Cumulative X-ray -PT doses were calculated for all patients using a dose accumulation tool since 2016. Treatment toxicity was retrospectively collected. Results: Between February 2015, and October 2018, 17 recurrent NPC patients were treated. Median follow-up (FUP) was 10 months (range 2-41). Median PT reirradiation dose was 60 Gy RBE (range 30.6-66). The majority of patients (53%) underwent concomitant chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was low with no ≥ G3 adverse events. Late events ≥ G3 occurred in 23.5% of patients. Most frequent late toxicity was hearing impairment (17,6%). G2 soft tissue necrosis occurred in two patients. Fatal bleeding of uncertain cause (either tumor recurrence or G5 carotid blowout) occurred in one patient. Kaplan-Meier 18 months Overall Survival (OS) and Local control (LC) rates were 54.4% and 66.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Our initial results with the use of modern PT for reirradiation of recurrent NPC patients are encouraging. Favorable LC and OS rates were obtained at the cost of acceptable severe late toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/radioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Reirradiación/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Audición/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Nasofaríngeo/patología , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Órganos en Riesgo , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga Tumoral
2.
Clin Radiol ; 72(10): 899.e9-899.e14, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28610889

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings in liver transplant patients diagnosed with pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HRCT findings from 19 patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis infection after liver transplantation were reviewed. The patients included were 12 men and seven women, age range 23-65 years; mean age 57 years. The diagnosis was established with Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, or biopsy. HRCT images were reviewed independently by two observers who reached a consensus decision. The HRCT findings were classified as (1) miliary nodules; (2) cavitation and centrilobular tree-in-bud nodules; (3) ground-glass attenuation and consolidation; and (4) mediastinal lymph node enlargement. RESULTS: The time between the transplantation and the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis ranged from 7 to 153 days with an average of 79 days. The main HRCT pattern was cavitation and centrilobular tree-in-bud nodules (79%) followed by mediastinal lymph node enlargement (10.4%), ground-glass attenuation or consolidation (5.2%) and miliary nodules (5.2%). None of the patients presented pleural effusion. The cavitation and centrilobular tree-in-bud nodules pattern had upper lobe predominance, and ground-glass attenuation and consolidation pattern had middle lobe/lingular segment predominance. CONCLUSION: The main HRCT pattern of pulmonary tuberculosis in liver transplant patients was cavitation and centrilobular tree-in-bud nodules.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 165: 103432, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352361

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) currently represents the standard RT approach for all prostate cancer (PCa) risk categories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature, focusing on acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) of moderate hypofractionation for localized PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed and two independent reviewers selected the records according to the following Population (P) Intervention (I) Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) (PICO) question: "In patients affected by localized PCa (P), moderately hypofractionated RT (defined as a treatment schedule providing a single dose per fraction of 3-4.5 Gy) (I) can be considered equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT (C) in terms of G > 2 GI and GU acute and late adverse events (O)?". Bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias. RESULTS: Thirteen records were identified and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of acute GI and GU > 2 adverse events in the moderately hypofractionated arm was increased by 9.8 % (95 %CI 4.8 %-14.7 %; I2 = 57 %) and 1.5 % (95 % CI -1.5 %-4.4 %; I2 = 0%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Overall, majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation. Pooled analysis showed a trend to increased GI toxicity after hypofractionated treatment, but this might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación
4.
Oral Oncol ; 98: 35-47, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31536844

RESUMEN

Re-irradiation is becoming an established treatment option for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer(HNC). However, acute and long-term RT-related toxicities could dramatically impact patients' quality of life. Due to the sparse literature regarding HNC re-irradiation, data on tolerance doses for various organs at risk (OARs) are scarce. Our aim was to systematically review the clinical literature regarding HNC re-irradiation, focusing on treatment toxicity, OARs tolerance, and dose limit recommendations. Thirty-nine studies (three randomized, five prospective, 31 retrospective) including 3766 patients were selected. The median interval time between the first course and re-irradiation was 28  months (range, 6-90). In 1043 (27.6%) patients, postoperative re-irradiation was performed. Re-irradiation doses ranged from 30 Gy in 3 fractions using stereotactic technique to 72 Gy in conventional fractionation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Pooled acute and late toxicityrates ≥G3 were 32% and 29.3%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were radionecrosis, dysphagia requiring feeding tube placement and trismus. In 156 (4.1%) patients, carotid blowout was reported. Recommendations for limiting toxicity included the time interval between radiation treatments, the fractionation schedules, and the re-irradiation treatment volumes. Cumulative dose limit suggestions were found and discussed for the carotid arteries, temporal lobes, and mandible.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Órganos en Riesgo , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Reirradiación , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Reirradiación/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA