Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 62
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Age Ageing ; 52(11)2023 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035797

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Older patients may be less likely to receive cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for the management of heart failure. We aimed to describe the differences in clinical response, complications, and subsequent outcomes following CRT implantation compared to younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of unselected, consecutive patients implanted with CRT devices between March 2008 and July 2017. We recorded complications, symptomatic and echocardiographic response, hospitalisation for heart failure, and all-cause mortality comparing patients aged <70, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-four patients (median age 76 years [interquartile range 68-81], 73.3% male) received CRT. At baseline, patients aged ≥80 years had worse symptoms, were more likely to have co-morbidities, and less likely to be receiving comprehensive medical therapy, although left ventricular function was similar. Older patients were less likely to receive CRT-defibrillators compared to CRT-pacemakers. Complications were infrequent and not more common in older patients. Age was not a predictor of symptomatic or echocardiographic response to CRT (67.2%, 71.2% and 62.6% responders in patients aged <70, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years, respectively; P = 0.43), and time to first heart failure hospitalisation was similar across age groups (P = 0.28). Ten-year survival was lower for older patients (49.9%, 23.9% and 6.8% in patients aged <70, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of CRT on symptoms and left ventricular function were not different in older patients despite a greater burden of co-morbidities and less optimal medical therapy. These findings support the use of CRT in an ageing population.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda
2.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 37(6): 589-594, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34321430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for the benefits of ß-blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) suggests that higher doses are associated with better outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the proportion of patients receiving optimized doses of ß-blockers, outcomes, and factors associated with suboptimal dosing. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 390 patients with HFrEF undergoing clinical and echocardiography assessment at baseline and at 1 year. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients (61%) were receiving optimized doses (≥5-mg/d bisoprolol equivalent), 72 (18%) could not be up-titrated (because of heart rate < 60 beats/min or systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg), and the remaining 81 (21%) should have been. Survival was similarly reduced in those who could not and should have been receiving 5 mg/d or greater, and patient factors did not explain the failure to attain optimized dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with HFrEF are not receiving optimal dosing of ß-blockers, and in around half, there was no clear contraindication in terms of heart rate or blood pressure.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Bisoprolol/uso terapéutico , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica
3.
Circulation ; 141(21): 1693-1703, 2020 05 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32299222

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by blunting of the positive relationship between heart rate and left ventricular (LV) contractility known as the force-frequency relationship (FFR). We have previously described that tailoring the rate-response programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with HFrEF on the basis of individual noninvasive FFR data acutely improves exercise capacity. We aimed to examine whether using FFR data to tailor heart rate response in patients with HFrEF with cardiac implantable electronic devices favorably influences exercise capacity and LV function 6 months later. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial in patients with stable symptomatic HFrEF taking optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and with a cardiac implantable electronic device (cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator). Participants were randomized on a 1:1 basis between tailored rate-response programming on the basis of individual FFR data and conventional age-guided rate-response programming. The primary outcome measure was change in walk time on a treadmill walk test. Secondary outcomes included changes in LV systolic function, peak oxygen consumption, and quality of life. RESULTS: We randomized 83 patients with a mean±SD age 74.6±8.7 years and LV ejection fraction 35.2±10.5. Mean change in exercise time at 6 months was 75.4 (95% CI, 23.4 to 127.5) seconds for FFR-guided rate-adaptive pacing and 3.1 (95% CI, -44.1 to 50.3) seconds for conventional settings (analysis of covariance; P=0.044 between groups) despite lower peak mean±SD heart rates (98.6±19.4 versus 112.0±20.3 beats per minute). FFR-guided heart rate settings had no adverse effect on LV structure or function, whereas conventional settings were associated with a reduction in LV ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase II study, FFR-guided rate-response programming determined using a reproducible, noninvasive method appears to improve exercise time and limit changes to LV function in people with HFrEF and cardiac implantable electronic devices. Work is ongoing to confirm our findings in a multicenter setting and on longer-term clinical outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02964650.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Inglaterra , Femenino , Estado Funcional , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prueba de Paso
4.
Heart Fail Rev ; 26(2): 217-226, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32852661

RESUMEN

There has been a progressive evolution in the management of patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in those that fulfil pre-defined criteria. However, there exists a significant proportion with refractory symptoms in whom CRT devices are not clinically indicated or ineffective. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel therapy that incorporates administration of non-excitatory electrical impulses to the interventricular septum during the absolute refractory period. Implantation is analogous to a traditional transvenous pacemaker system, but with the use of two right ventricular leads. Mechanistic studies have shown augmentation of left ventricular contractility and beneficial global effects on reverse remodeling, primarily through alterations in calcium handling. This appears to occur without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. Data from clinical trials have shown translational improvements in functional capacity and quality of life, though long-term outcome data are lacking. This review explores the rationale, evidence base and limitations of this nascent technology.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Contracción Miocárdica , Calidad de Vida , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 22(2): 271-276, 2021 06 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34258895

RESUMEN

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an unprecedented challenge. Meeting this has resulted in changes to working practices and the impact on the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective, observational study contrasting patients diagnosed with HFrEF attending specialist heart failure clinics at a UK hospital, whose subsequent period of optimisation of medical therapy was during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients diagnosed the previous year. The primary outcome was the change in equivalent dosing of ramipril and bisoprolol at 6-months. Secondary outcomes were the number and type of follow-up consultations, hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause mortality. In total, 60 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF between 1 December 2019 and 30 April 2020, compared to 54 during the same period of the previous year. The absolute number of consultations was higher (390 vs 270; p = 0.69), driven by increases in telephone consultations, with a reduction in appointments with hospital nurse specialists. After 6-months, we observed lower equivalent dosing of ramipril (3.1 ± 3.0 mg vs 4.4 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.035) and similar dosing of bisoprolol (4.1 ± 0.5 mg vs 4.9 ± 0.5 mg; p = 0.27), which persisted for ramipril (mean difference 1.0 mg, 95% CI 0.018-2.09; p = 0.046) and bisoprolol (mean difference 0.52 mg, 95% CI -0.23-1.28; p = 0.17) after adjustment for baseline dosing. We observed no differences in the proportion of patients who died (5.0% vs 7.4%; p = 0.59) or were hospitalised with heart failure (13.3% vs 9.3%; p = 0.49). Our study suggests the transition to telephone appointments and re-deployment of heart failure nurse specialists was associated with less successful optimisation of medical therapy, especially renin-angiotensin inhibitors, compared with usual care.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Bisoprolol/administración & dosificación , COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Ramipril/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/efectos adversos , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Bisoprolol/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Ramipril/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMC Palliat Care ; 20(1): 10, 2021 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33430850

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Observational studies investigating risk factors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not considered the confounding effects of advanced care planning, such that a valid picture of risk for elderly, frail and multi-morbid patients is unknown. We aimed to report ceiling of care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions and their association with demographic and clinical characteristics as well as outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study conducted between 5th March and 7th May 2020 of all hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Ceiling of care and CPR decisions were documented using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process. Unadjusted and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with ceiling of care decisions and death during hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients were included, of whom 409 (84·3%) had a documented ceiling of care; level one for 208 (50·9%), level two for 75 (18·3%) and level three for 126 (30·8%). CPR decisions were documented for 451 (93·0%) of whom 336 (74·5%) were 'not for resuscitation'. Advanced age, frailty, White-European ethnicity, a diagnosis of any co-morbidity and receipt of cardiovascular medications were associated with ceiling of care decisions. In a multivariable model only advanced age (odds 0·89, 0·86-0·93 p < 0·001), frailty (odds 0·48, 0·38-0·60, p < 0·001) and the cumulative number of co-morbidities (odds 0·72, 0·52-1·0, p = 0·048) were independently associated. Death during hospitalisation was independently associated with age, frailty and requirement for level two or three care. CONCLUSION: Ceiling of care decisions were made for the majority of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, broadly in line with known predictors of poor outcomes in COVID-19, but with a focus on co-morbidities suggesting ICU admission might not be a reliable end-point for observational studies where advanced care planning is routine.


Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , COVID-19/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(12): 1501-1507, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779204

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) confers symptomatic and survival benefits in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). There remains a paucity of data on long-term performance of left ventricular (LV) leads, particularly with newer quadripolar lead designs. METHODS: This single-centre study utilised an electronic, outpatient HFrEF database to identify CRT recipients (2008-2014). The primary endpoint was temporal trend in LV pacing thresholds during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were complications relating to acute or chronic lead failure and device-related infections. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were included, with mean (±SD) age of 74.2 years (±9.0) and median follow-up of 7.6 years (interquartile range 4-9). Mean LV threshold was 1.37 V (±0.73) at implant and remained stable over the study period. No differences were observed based upon lead manufacturer. Compared to non-quadripolar leads (n = 216), those of quadripolar designs (n = 64) had a lower threshold at 6 months (1.20 vs 1.37 V; P = .04) and at the end of the study period (1.32 vs 1.46 V; P = .04). Patients with HFrEF of ischaemic aetiology had higher thresholds at implant (1.46 vs 1.34 V; P = .05), and this persisted until the end of follow-up (1.49 vs 1.34 V; P = .03). There was low incidence of acute (0.71%; 2/280) and chronic lead failure (1.79%; 5/280), with four cases (1.43%) of device infection. CONCLUSIONS: LV leads in the context of CRT have excellent chronic stability and low rates of adverse events. Those with newer quadripolar lead designs have lower thresholds at initial follow-up and in the longer term.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Anciano , Electrodos Implantados , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico
8.
Europace ; 21(4): 554-562, 2019 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608530

RESUMEN

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended in international guidelines for patients with heart failure due to important left ventricular systolic dysfunction (or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) and ventricular conduction tissue disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) represents the most powerful imaging tool for dynamic assessment of the volumes and function of cardiac chambers but is rarely utilized in patients with CRT due to limitations on the device, programming and scanning. In this review, we explore the known utility of CMR in this cohort with discussion of the risks and potential benefits of scanning whilst CRT is active, including a practical strategy for conducting high quality scans safely. Our contention is that imaging in patients with CRT could be improved further by keeping resynchronization therapy active with resultant benefits on research and also patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Medición de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen
9.
Eur J Nutr ; 58(6): 2535-2543, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121806

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations have been associated with adverse outcomes in selected populations with established chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it remains unclear whether 25[OH]D deficiency is associated with mortality and hospitalisation in unselected patients receiving contemporary medical and device therapy for CHF. METHODS: We prospectively examined the prevalence and correlates of 25[OH]D deficiency in 1802 ambulatory patients with CHF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%) attending heart failure clinics in the north of England. RESULTS: 73% of patients were deficient in 25[OH]D (< 50 nmol/L). 25[OH]D deficiency was associated with male sex, diabetes, lower serum sodium, higher heart rate, and greater diuretic requirement. During a mean follow-up period of 4 years, each 2.72-fold increment in 25[OH]D concentration (for example from 32 to 87 nmol/L) is associated with 14% lower all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval (CI) 1, 26%; p = 0.04), after accounting for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency is associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Whether vitamin D supplementation will improve outcomes is, as yet, unproven.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/mortalidad , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre
10.
Br Med Bull ; 125(1): 91-102, 2018 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342243

RESUMEN

Introduction/background: Implantable cardiac devices are widely used in chronic heart failure (CHF) therapy. This review covers current CHF treatment with electronic cardiac devices, areas of discussion and emerging technologies. Sources of data: A comprehensive search of available literature resources including Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. National and international guidelines were accessed. Areas of agreement: Excessive right ventricular pacing is detrimental to cardiac function. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in specific individuals with CHF. Areas of controversy: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators might not benefit all. Optimizing CRT delivery. Remote monitoring seems not to be of benefit in CHF. Growing points: Device-based optimization. Areas timely for developing research: Personalization of device therapy. Focussing implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. What to do at implantable cardioverter defibrillator box change?


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/normas , Desfibriladores Implantables/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925876

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Surprise Question, 'Would you be surprised if this person died within the next year?' is a simple tool that can be used by clinicians to identify people within the last year of life. This review aimed to determine the accuracy of this assessment, across different healthcare settings, specialties, follow-up periods and respondents. METHODS: Searches were conducted of Medline, Embase, AMED, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until 01 January 2024. Studies were included if they reported original data on the ability of the Surprise Question to predict survival. For each study (including subgroups), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were determined. RESULTS: Our dataset comprised 56 distinct cohorts, including 68 829 patients. In a pooled analysis, the sensitivity of the Surprise Question was 0.69 ((0.64 to 0.74) I2=97.2%), specificity 0.69 ((0.63 to 0.74) I2=99.7%), positive predictive value 0.40 ((0.35 to 0.45) I2=99.4%), negative predictive value 0.89 ((0.87 to 0.91) I2=99.7%) and accuracy 0.71 ((0.68 to 0.75) I2=99.3%). The prompt performed best in populations with high event rates, shorter timeframes and when posed to more experienced respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The Surprise Question demonstrated modest accuracy with considerable heterogeneity across the population to which it was applied and to whom it was posed. Prospective studies should test whether the prompt can facilitate timely access to palliative care services, as originally envisioned. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD32022298236.

16.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 21(7): 613-623, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913600

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: While supported by robust evidence and decades of clinical experience, right ventricular apical pacing for bradycardia is associated with a risk of progressive left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction can result in limited electrical resynchronization due to anatomical constraints and epicardial stimulation. In both settings, directly stimulating the conduction system below the atrio-ventricular node (either the bundle of His or the left bundle branch area) has potential to overcome these limitations. Conduction system pacing has met with considerable enthusiasm in view of the more physiological electrical conduction pattern, is rapidly becoming the preferred option of pacing for bradycardia, and is gaining momentum as an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a review of the current efficacy and safety data for both people requiring treatment for bradycardia and the management of heart failure with conduction delay and discusses the possible future roles for conduction system pacing in routine clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION: Conduction system pacing might be the holy grail of pacemaker therapy without the disadvantages of current approaches. However, hypothesis and enthusiasm are no match for robust data, demonstrating at least equivalent efficacy and safety to standard approaches.


Asunto(s)
Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Bradicardia/terapia , Bradicardia/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos
17.
Br J Cardiol ; 31(1): 003, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39323954

RESUMEN

We aimed to describe the safety and tolerability of initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) during hospitalisation with heart failure, and the frequency of, and reasons for, subsequent discontinuation. In total, 934 patients who were not already prescribed a SGLT2i were hospitalised with heart failure, 77 (8%) were initiated on a SGLT2i a median of five (3-8.5) days after admission and two (0.5-5) days prior to discharge. During a median follow-up of 182 (124-250) days, SGLT2i were discontinued for 10 (13%) patients, most frequently due to deteriorating renal function. We observed reductions in body weight (mean difference 2.0 ± 0.48 kg, p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (mean difference 9.5 ± 1.9 kg, p<0.001) and small, non-significant reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR mean difference 2.0 ± 1.5 ml/min/1.73 m2, p=0.19) prior to initiation, with further modest reductions in weight (mean difference 1.2 ± 0.4 kg, p=0.006) but not systolic blood pressure (2.4 ± 1.5 mmHg, p=0.13) or eGFR following initiation of SGLT2i. At discharge the proportion prescribed a beta blocker (44% to 92%), angiotensin-receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (6% to 44%) and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist (35% to 85%) had increased. In conclusion, inpatient initiation of SGLT2i was safe and well tolerated in a real-world cohort of patients hospitalised with worsening HF. We observed a 13% frequency of discontinuation or serious side effects.

18.
Heart ; 2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39299762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) is recommended for the ongoing management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Despite its benefits, RM adoption has increased the workload for cardiac rhythm management teams. This study used a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus on optimal RM management for adult patients with a CIED in the UK. METHODS: A national steering committee comprising cardiac physiologists, cardiologists, specialist nurses, support professionals and a patient representative developed 114 statements on best RM practices, covering capacity, support, service delivery, coordination and clinical escalation. An online questionnaire was used to gather input from UK specialists, with consensus defined as ≥75% agreement. RESULTS: Between 16 October 2023 and 4 December 2023, 115 responses were received. Of the statements, 79 (69%) achieved high agreement (≥90%), 20 (18%) showed moderate agreement (75%-89%) and 15 (13%) did not achieve consensus. The highest agreement focused on patient education and support, while the lowest concerned workload distribution. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong agreement on best practices for RM of CIEDs among UK healthcare professionals. Key recommendations include ensuring patient access, providing adequate resources, adopting new working methods, enhancing patient education, establishing clear clinical escalation pathways and standardising national policies. Implementing these best practices, tailored to local capabilities, is essential for effective and equitable RM services across the UK.

19.
Diab Vasc Dis Res ; 21(2): 14791641231224241, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623877

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes is a common and adverse prognostic co-morbidity for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The effect of diabetes on long-term outcomes for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less established. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients referred to a regional HF clinic with newly diagnosed with HFrEF and HFpEF according to the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The association between diabetes, all-cause mortality and hospitalisation was quantified using Kaplan-Meier or Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Between 1st May 2012 and 1st May 2013, of 960 unselected consecutive patients referred with suspected HF, 464 and 314 patients met the criteria for HFpEF and HFrEF respectively. Within HFpEF and HFrEF groups, patients with diabetes were more frequently male and in both groups patients with diabetes were more likely to be treated with ß-adrenoceptor antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. After adjustment for age, sex, medical therapy and co-morbidities, diabetes was associated with increased mortality in individuals with HFrEF (HR 1.46 95% CI: 1.05-2.02; p = .023), but not in those with HFpEF (HR 1.26 95% CI 0.92-1.72; p = .146). CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with newly diagnosed HF, diabetes is not an adverse prognostic marker in patients with HFpEF, but is in HFrEF.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Pronóstico , Hospitalización
20.
Nat Med ; 2024 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39300290

RESUMEN

Individuals with pacemakers are at increased risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Whether screening for and optimizing the medical management of LVSD in these individuals can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. In the present study, in a multicenter controlled trial (OPT-PACE), we randomized 1,201 patients (717 men) with a pacemaker to echocardiography screening or usual care. In the screening arm, LVSD was detected in 201 of 600 (34%) patients, who then received management in either primary care or a specialist heart failure (HF) and devices clinic. The primary outcome of the trial was the difference in a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or death. Over 31 months (interquartile range = 30-40 months), the primary outcome occurred in 106 of 600 (18%) patients receiving echocardiography screening, which was not significantly different compared with the occurrence of the primary outcome in 115 of 601 (19%) patients receiving the usual care (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.69, 1.17). In a prespecified, nonrandomized, exploratory analysis, patients with LVSD managed by the specialist clinic experienced the primary outcome event less frequently than those managed in primary care. The results of this trial indicate that echocardiography screening commonly identifies LVSD in individuals with pacemakers but alone does not alter outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01819662 .

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA