Coronary artery disease progression in patients without significant stenosis on coronary computed tomographic angiography.

BACKGROUND: Patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be safely discharged home after a coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) with a negative result. However, the duration of time for which a negative coronary CTA scan result can be used to inform decision making when patients have recurrent symptoms is not known. OBJECTIVE: We examined patients who received more than 1 coronary CTA for evaluation of ACS to determine whether they had disease progression. Our main outcome was whether any patient had a maximal stenosis cross the threshold from noncritical (<50% maximal stenosis) to potentially critical disease. METHODS: We performed a structured comprehensive record search of all coronary CTAs performed from 2005 to 2010 at a tertiary care health system. Low-to-intermediate risk ED patients who received 2 or more coronary CTAs, at least 1 from an ED evaluation for potential ACS, were identified. Patients who were revascularized between scans were excluded. We collected demographic data, clinical course, time between scans, and number of ED visits between scans. Record review was structured and done by trained abstractors. Our main outcome was progression of coronary stenosis between scans, specifically crossing the threshold from noncritical to potentially critical disease. RESULTS: Overall, 32 patients who received repeat imaging were identified (median age, 45 years; interquartile range, 37.5-48; 56% female; 88% black). The median time between studies was 27.3 months (interquartile range, 18.2-33.2). Twenty-two patients did not have stenosis in any vessel on either coronary CTA, 2 studies showed increasing stenosis of less than 20%, and the rest showed "improvement" due to better imaging quality. No patient initially below the 50% threshold subsequently exceeded it (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0-11.0%). No patient had acute myocardial infarction or revascularization either between scans or within a year after the repeated imaging. CONCLUSION: Repeated imaging potentially may not be warranted within 2 years of a negative coronary CTA result. The low rate of progression from subcritical to critical disease is consistent with observations in patients who have had prior negative cardiac catheterizations.

Lack of sex disparity in cardiovascular testing after coronary computerized tomographic angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed whether there was a sex disparity in testing of patients after coronary computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) was performed for emergency department (ED) patients with potential acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In theory, once coronary anatomy has been determined, any disparity in subsequent workup should not be the result of differences in presentation. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients who presented with potential ACS and received coronary CTAs at a university hospital. Demographics, history, cardiac risk factors, follow-up testing, and procedures were recorded. Follow-up at 30 days was obtained by structured record review and telephone contact. Patients were stratified by sex and coronary CTA results (max stenosis: none, 1% to 24%, 25% to 49%, 50% to 69%, and ≥70%). Main outcome was the relative risk (RR) of a male receiving a stress test or catheterization within 30 days, stratified by categories of percent maximal stenosis. RESULTS: A total of 1,144 patients received coronary CTAs (mean ± SD age = 47.8 ± 8.7 years), 55% were female, and 64% were black or African American. Overall, 161 patients received follow-up testing within 30 days, 113 during their index visit. Men were more likely to receive further testing (RR = 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 to 1.99) compared to women. However, when stratified by percentage of stenosis, men were not more likely to receive further testing within 30 days after coronary CTA compared to women (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.91). In multivariable modeling for risk of further testing, stenosis remained significant (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.91), while male sex, age, race, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score were not. CONCLUSIONS: Male patients with potential ACS who receive a coronary CTA as a part of their ED evaluation were no more likely than female patients to receive further testing within 30 days.