Biological and clinical implications of BIRC3 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

BIRC3 is a recurrently mutated gene in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but the functional implications of BIRC3 mutations are largely unexplored. Furthermore, little is known about the prognostic impact of BIRC3 mutations in CLL cohorts homogeneously treated with first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). By immunoblotting analysis, we showed that the non-canonical nuclear factor-κB pathway is active in BIRC3-mutated cell lines and in primary CLL samples, as documented by the stabilization of MAP3K14 and by the nuclear localization of p52. In addition, BIRC3-mutated primary CLL cells are less sensitive to flu-darabine. In order to confirm in patients that BIRC3 mutations confer resistance to fludarabine-based chemoimmunotherapy, a retrospective multicenter cohort of 287 untreated patients receiving first-line FCR was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing of 24 recurrently mutated genes in CLL. By univariate analysis adjusted for multiple comparisons BIRC3 mutations identify a poor prognostic subgroup of patients in whom FCR treatment fails (median progression-free survival: 2.2 years, P<0.001) similar to cases harboring TP53 mutations (median progression-free survival: 2.6 years, P<0.0001). BIRC3 mutations maintained an independent association with an increased risk of progression with a hazard ratio of 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.4-5.6, P=0.004) in multivariate analysis adjusted for TP53 mutation, 17p deletion and IGHV mutation status. If validated, BIRC3 mutations may be used as a new molecular predictor to select high-risk patients for novel frontline therapeutic approaches.

Does MRD have a role in the management of iNHL?

Among indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs), the analysis of measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) has been extensively applied to follicular lymphoma (FL). Treatment combinations have deeply changed over the years, as well as the techniques to measure MRD, which is currently evaluated only in the setting of clinical trials. Here, we discuss the evidence on the role of molecular monitoring in the management of FL. Mature data support the quantification of molecular tumor burden at diagnosis as a tool to stratify patients in risk categories and of MRD evaluation at the end of treatment to predict progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, MRD deserves further studies as a tool to refine the clinical/metabolic response and to modulate treatment intensity/duration. Patients with a higher relapse probability can be identified, but the relevance of continuous molecular follow-up should be clarified by kinetic models of MRD analysis. Being the BCL2/heavy chain immunoglobulin gene hybrid rearrangement detectable in about 50% to 60% of advanced FL and in 30% of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-staged localized FL, technical advancements such as next-generation sequencing/target locus amplification may allow broadening the FL population carrying a molecular marker. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction can better quantify MRD at low levels, and novel sources of DNA, such as cell-free DNA, may represent a noninvasive tool to monitor MRD. Finally, MRD in other iNHLs, such as lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia and marginal zone lymphoma, is beginning to be explored.