RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how changes in patient-rated health and disability from baseline to after rehabilitation were associated with communication and relationships in rehabilitation teams and patient-rated continuity of care. METHODS: Linear models were used to assess the associations between relational coordination [RC] and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire-Norwegian version [NCQ-N] with changes in the World Health Association Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS 2.0] and EuroQol EQ-VAS [EQ-VAS]. To express change in WHODAS 2.0 and EQ-VAS, the model was adjusted for WHODAS 2.0 and EQ-VAS baseline scores. Analyses for possible slopes for the various diagnosis groups were performed. RESULTS: A sample of 701 patients were included in the patient cohort, followed from before rehabilitation to 1 year after a rehabilitation stay involving treatment by 15 different interprofessional teams. The analyses revealed associations between continuity of care and changes in patient-rated health, measured with EQ-VAS (all p values < 0.01). RC communication was associated with more improvement in functioning in neoplasms patient group, compared to improvement of health among included patient groups. The results revealed no associations between NCQ-N and WHODAS 2.0 global score, or between RC in the rehabilitation teams treating the patients and changes in WHODAS 2.0 global score. CONCLUSION: The current results revealed that better personal, team and cross-boundary continuity of rehabilitation care was associated with better patient health after rehabilitation at 1-year follow-up. Measures of patient experiences with different types of continuity of care may provide a promising indicator of the quality of rehabilitation care.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: Psychological problems are increasing among adolescents, but little is known about the role of GPs in this area. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the frequency of GP consultations with a psychological diagnosis in adolescence and predictors for such help seeking. Methods: Nationwide longitudinal register-based study investigating GP consultations among adolescents aged 13-17 years (N = 123 516) in Norway. First, all GP consultations within the study population were identified from the national GP claims register for 2006-11. Second, adolescents with a first-time consultation with a psychological diagnosis at age 15-16 years were identified, and prior GP consultations, prior somatic diagnoses, parental education and GP and GP-practice characteristics were assessed as possible predictors for seeking help. Results: From age 13 to 17 years, 15.3% of girls and 13.0% of boys had ≥1 GP consultation with a psychological diagnosis. In total, 6.8% of girls and 4.8% of boys consulted a GP for the first time with a psychological problem at age 15-16 years. For both sexes, number of prior GP consultations and a prior diagnosis of headache and abdominal pain predicted consulting with an internalizing problem (depression, anxiety and stress). A prior headache diagnosis predicted consulting for behavioural problems. Psychological diagnoses were more often found among adolescents with lower parental education. There were only minor associations with GP characteristics. Conclusions: Norwegian adolescents often consult a GP and one in seven had a GP-diagnosed psychological problem at age 13-17. Policies to improve mental health care for adolescents should include strengthening of GP services.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Psicología del Adolescente , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study relations between sense of coherence (SOC), disability, and mental and physical components of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among rehabilitation patients. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Rehabilitation centers in secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=975) from the Western Norway Health Region consented to participate and had valid data of the main outcome measures. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SOC was measured with the sense of coherence questionnaire (13-item SOC scale [SOC-13]), disability with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), and HRQOL with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: Mean scores ± SD were 62.9±12.3 for SOC-13, 30.8±16.2 for WHODAS 2.0, 32.8±9.6 for SF-36 physical component score, and 43.6±11.8 for SF-36 mental component score. Linear regression analysis showed that increased SOC score was associated with reduced disability scores in the following domains with estimated regression coefficients (95% confidence interval) cognition -0.20 (-0.32 to -0.08), getting along -0.36 (-0.52 to -0.25), and participation -0.23 (-0.36 to -0.11). The fit of 2 structural models with the association from SOC to HRQOL and disability or with disability as a mediator was better for the mental versus the physical component of HRQOL. High SOC increased the mental component of HRQOL, consistent for all diagnostic groups. For both models, good fit was reported for circulatory and less good fit for musculoskeletal diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that higher SOC decreases disability in mental domains. The effect of SOC on disability and HRQOL might vary between diagnostic groups. SOC could be a target in rehabilitation, especially among patients with circulatory diseases, but prospective studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Sentido de Coherencia , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Centros de Rehabilitación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation services depend on competent professionals who collaborate effectively. Well-functioning interprofessional teams are expected to positively impact continuity of care. Key factors in continuity of care are communication and collaboration among health care professionals in a team and their patients. This study assessed the associations between team functioning and patient-reported benefits and continuity of care in somatic rehabilitation centres. METHODS: This prospective cohort study uses survey data from 984 patients and from health care professionals in 15 teams in seven somatic rehabilitation centres in Western Norway. Linear mixed effect models were used to investigate associations between the interprofessional team communication and relationship scores (measured by the Relational Coordination [RC] Survey and patient-reported benefit and personal-, team- and cross-boundary continuity of care. Patient-reported continuity of care was measured using the Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean communication score for healthcare teams was 3.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.78, 4.00), and the mean relationship score was 4.1 (SD = 0.56, 95% CI = 3.97, 4.18). Communication scores in rehabilitation teams varied from 3.4-4.3 and relationship scores from 3.6-4.5. Patients treated by teams with higher relationship scores experienced better continuity between health care professionals in the team at the rehabilitation centre (b = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.68; p = 0.024). There was a positive association between RC communication in the team the patient was treated by and patient-reported activities of daily living benefit score; all other associations between RC scores and rehabilitation benefit scores were not significant. CONCLUSION: Team function is associated with better patient-reported continuity of care and higher ADL-benefit scores among patients after rehabilitation. These findings indicate that interprofessional teams' RC scores may predict rehabilitation outcomes, but further studies are needed before RC scores can be used as a quality indicator in somatic rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Centros de Rehabilitación , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Assessing patients' experience with primary care complements measures of clinical health outcomes in evaluating service performance. Measuring patients' experience and satisfaction are among Malawi's health sector strategic goals. The purpose of this study was to investigate patients' experience with primary care and to identify associated patients' sociodemographic, healthcare and health characteristics. METHODS: This was a cross sectional survey using questionnaires administered in public primary care facilities in Neno district, Malawi. Data on patients' primary care experience and their sociodemographic, healthcare and health characteristics were collected through face to face interviews using a validated Malawian version of the primary care assessment tool (PCAT-Mw). Mean scores were derived for the following dimensions: first contact access, continuity of care, comprehensiveness, community orientation and total primary care. Linear regression models were used to assess association between primary care dimension scores and patients' characteristics. RESULTS: From 631 completed questionnaires, first contact access, relational continuity and comprehensiveness of services available scored below the defined minimum. Sex, geographical location, self-rated health status, duration of contact with facility and facility affiliation were associated with patients' experience with primary care. These factors explained 10.9% of the variance in total primary care scores; 25.2% in comprehensiveness of services available and 29.4% in first contact access. CONCLUSION: This paper presents results from the first use of the validated PCAT-Mw. The study provides a baseline indicating areas that need improvement. The results can also be used alongside clinical outcome studies to provide comprehensive evaluation of primary care performance in Malawi.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Exactitud de los Datos , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Malaui , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malawi does not have validated tools for assessing primary care performance from patients' experience. The aim of this study was to develop a Malawian version of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT-Mw) and to evaluate its reliability and validity in the assessment of the core primary care dimensions from adult patients' perspective in Malawi. METHODS: A team of experts assessed the South African version of the primary care assessment tool (ZA-PCAT) for face and content validity. The adapted questionnaire underwent forward and backward translation and a pilot study. The tool was then used in an interviewer administered cross-sectional survey in Neno district, Malawi, to test validity and reliability. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on a random half of the sample to evaluate internal consistency, reliability and construct validity of items and scales. The identified constructs were then tested with confirmatory factor analysis. Likert scale assumption testing and descriptive statistics were done on the final factor structure. The PCAT-Mw was further tested for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: From the responses of 631 patients, a 29-item PCAT-Mw was constructed comprising seven multi-item scales, representing five primary care dimensions (first contact, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination and community orientation). All the seven scales achieved good internal consistency, item-total correlations and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.91. A satisfactory goodness of fit model was achieved (GFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.05, PCLOSE = 0.65). The full range of possible scores was observed for all scales. Scaling assumptions tests were achieved for all except the two comprehensiveness scales. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.90 (n = 44, 95% CI 0.81-0.94, p < 0.001) for intra-rater reliability and 0.84 (n = 42, 95% CI 0.71-0.96, p < 0.001) for inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive metric analyses supported the reliability and validity of PCAT-Mw in assessing the core concepts of primary care from adult patients' experience. This tool could be used for health service research in primary care in Malawi.
Asunto(s)
Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Malaui , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pesos y MedidasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is a generic instrument to assess disability covering six domains. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of the instrument for monitoring disability in specialized somatic rehabilitation by testing reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of WHODAS 2.0, Norwegian version, among patients with various health conditions. METHODS: For taxonomy, terminology and definitions, the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments were followed. Reproducibility was investigated by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a randomly selected sample. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form, and fit of the hypothesized structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was evaluated in another randomly selected sample by testing a priori formulated hypotheses. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy patients were included in the study. Reproducibility and responsiveness were evaluated in 53 and 104 patients, respectively. The ICC for the WHODAS 2.0 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 and was 0.87 for total score. Cronbach's alpha for domains ranged from 0.75 to 0.94 and was 0.93 for total score. For construct validity, 6 of 12 expected correlations were confirmed and CFA did not achieve satisfactory fit indices. For responsiveness, 3 of 8 hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of WHODAS 2.0 showed moderate to satisfactory reliability and moderate validity in rehabilitation patients. However, the present study indicated possible limitations in terms of responsiveness.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Rehabilitación/métodos , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continuity of care is regarded as a core quality element in healthcare. Continuity can be related to one or more specific caregivers but also applies to collaboration within a team or across boundaries of healthcare. Measuring continuity is important to identify problems and evaluate quality improvement of interventions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ). METHODS: The NCQ was developed in The Netherlands. It measures patients' experienced continuity of care across multiple care settings and as a multidimensional concept regardless of morbidity. The NCQ comprises 28 items categorised into three subscales; two personal continuity scales, "care giver knows me" and "shows commitment", asked regarding the patient's general practitioner (GP) and the most important specialist; and one "team/cross boundary continuity" scale, asked regarding primary care, specialised care and cooperation between GP and specialist, with a total of seven factors. The NCQ was translated and adapted to Norwegian (NCQ-N) and distributed among patients referred to somatic rehabilitation (N = 984, response rate 34.5%). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess psychometric properties. RESULTS: All patients (N = 375) who had responded to all parts of the NCQ-N were included in CFA. The CFA fit indices (CFI 0.941, RMSEA 0.064 (95% CI 0.059-0.070), SRMR 0.041) support a seven-factor structure in the NCQ-N based on the three subscales of the original NCQ. Cronbach's alpha showed internal consistency (0.84-0.97), and was highest for the team/cross-boundary subscales. The NCQ-N showed overall high reliability with ICC 0.84-91 for personal continuity factors and 0.67-0.91 for team factors, with the lowest score for team continuity within primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Psychometric assessment of the NCQ-N supports that this instrument, based on the three subscales of the original Dutch NCQ, captures the concept of "continuity of care" among adult patients with a variety of longstanding medical conditions who use healthcare on a regular basis. However, its usefulness among varied patient groups, including younger people, patients with acute disorders and individuals with mental health problems, should be further evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Psicometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Atención a la Salud , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Noruega , Atención Primaria de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TraduccionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Challenges related to work are in focus when employed people with common mental disorders (CMDs) consult their GPs. Many become sickness certified and remain on sick leave over time. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of new CMD episodes among employed patients in Norwegian general practice and subsequent sickness certification. METHODS: Using a national claims register, employed persons with a new episode of CMD were included. Sickness certification, sick leave over 16 days and length of absences were identified. Patient- and GP-related predictors for the different outcomes were assessed by means of logistic regression. RESULTS: During 1 year 2.6% of employed men and 4.2% of employed women consulted their GP with a new episode of CMD. Forty-five percent were sickness certified, and 24 percent were absent over 16 days. Thirty-eight percent had depression and 19% acute stress reaction, which carried the highest risk for initial sickness certification, 75%, though not for prolonged absence. Men and older patients had lower risk for sickness certification, but higher risk for long-term absence. CONCLUSION: Better knowledge of factors at the workplace detrimental to mental health, and better treatment for depression and stress reactions might contribute to timely return of sickness absentees.
Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Elegibilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reform of health services has given primary care facilities increased responsibility for patients with serious mental disorders (SMD). There has also been a growing awareness of the high somatic morbidity among SMD patients, an obvious challenge for general practitioners (GPs). The aim of this study was to assess the utilisation of GP services by patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: The Norwegian list patient system is based on fee-for-service (FFS). For each contact, the GPs send a claim to National Health Insurance detailing the diagnosis, the type of contact, procedures performed, and the personal identifier of the patient. In this study complete GP claims data from 2009 for schizophrenia patients aged 25-60 years were used to assess their utilisation of GP services. Regression models were used to measure the association between patient, GP and practice characteristics, with FFS per patient used as a measure of service utilisation. Data on patients with diabetes (DM) and population means were used for comparison. RESULTS: The mean annual consultation rate was 5.0 and mean FFS was 2,807 Norwegian Kroner (NOK) for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Only 17% had no GP consultation, 26.2% had one or two, 25.3% had three to five, and 16.1% more than five consultations. GPs participated in multidisciplinary meetings for 25.7% of these patients. In schizophrenia patients, co-morbid DM increased the FFS by NOK 1400, obstructive lung disease by NOK 1699, and cardiovascular disease by NOK 863. The FFS for schizophrenia patients who belonged to a GP practice with a high proportion of mental health-related consultations increased by NOK 115 per percent point increase in proportion of consultations. Patients with schizophrenia living in municipalities with < 10,000 inhabitants had a mean increase in FFS of NOK 1048 compared with patients living in municipalities with > 50,000 inhabitants. Diagnostic tests were equally or more frequent used among patients with schizophrenia and comorbid somatic conditions than among similar patients without a SMD. CONCLUSION: This study showed that most patients diagnosed with schizophrenia had regular contact with their GP, providing opportunities for the GP to care for both mental and somatic health problems.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Análisis de RegresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Norwegian primary health care is maintained on the regular general practitioners (RGPs), GP's contracted to the municipalities in a list patient system, working at daytime and at out-of-hours services (OOH services). Respiratory disease is most prevalent during OOH services, and in more than 50 % of the consultations, a CRP test is performed. Children in particular have a high consultation rate, and the CRP test is frequently conducted, but the contributing factors behind its frequent use are not known. This study compares the RGPs rate of CRP use at daytime and OOH in consultations with children and how this rate is influenced by characteristics of the RGPs. METHODS: A cross-sectional register study was conducted based on all (N = 2,552,600) electronic compensation claims from consultations with children ≤ 5 year during the period 2009-2011 from primary health care. Consultation rates and CRP use were estimated and analysed using descriptive methods. Being among the 20% of RGPs with the highest rate of CRP use at daytime or OOH was an outcome measure in regression analyses using RGP-, and RGP list characteristics as explanatory variables. RESULTS: One third of all RGPs work regularly in OOH services, and they use CRP 1.42 times more frequently in consultations with children in OOH services than in daytime services even when the distribution of diagnosis according to ICPC-2 chapters is similar. Not being approved specialist, have a large number at their patient-lists but relatively few children on their list and a large number of consultations with children were significantly associated with frequent use of CRP in daytime services. The predictors for frequent CRP use in OOH services were being a young doctor, having many consultations with children during OOH and a frequent use of CRP in daytime services. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the frequency of CRP test use from daytime to OOH occurs in general for RGPs and for all most used diagnoses. The RGPs who use the CRP test most frequently in their daytime practice have the highest rate of CRP in OOH services.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Médicos Generales/normas , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Atención Posterior/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Undertaking research on the role of regular GPs with regard to rates of sickness absence is methodologically challenging, and existing results show a wide divergence. We investigated how long-term sickness absence is affected by the characteristics of doctors and their patient lists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study encompassed all those vocationally active residents of Oslo and Bergen in 2005-2006 who had the same regular GP throughout 2006 (N = 298,039). Encrypted data on sickness absence for each individual in 2006, as well their age, gender and level of education were merged with data on the regular GPs (N = 568) and their patient lists, and subsequently analysed with the aid of logistic regression. The outcome variable was at least one period of sickness absence which had been paid for by the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NLWA). The explanatory variables included the age, gender, list length and list status (open/closed) of the regular GPs, as well as variables that characterised the composition of the patient lists. The analyses were stratified by gender and controlled for individual age and education. RESULTS: The age, gender and list length of the regular GPs were not associated with sickness absence paid for by the NLWA. The odds ratio for sickness absence > 16 days was reduced for both women and men when the list contained many highly educated patients, a high proportion of elderly people and few disability pensioners. Men on lists with a high proportion of men and lists with a high proportion of vocationally active patients also had lower odds rates for sickness absence > 16 days. Among women, the rate of sickness absence was lower for those on open lists than for those on closed lists. INTERPRETATION: In addition to well-known individual factors, the study shows that the likelihood of sickness absence is affected by the socio-demographic composition of the patient list to which one belongs.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Escolaridad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Sexuales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women's higher risk of disability pension compared with men is found in countries with high female work participation and universal welfare schemes. The aim of the study was to examine the extent to which self-perceived health, family situation and work factors explain women's higher risk of disability pension. We also explored how these factors influenced the gender difference across educational strata. METHODS: The population-based Hordaland Health Study (HUSK) was conducted in 1997-99 and included inhabitants born in 1953-57 in Hordaland County, Norway. The current study included 5,959 men and 6,306 women in paid work with valid information on education and self-perceived health. Follow-up data on disability pension, for a period of 5-7 years, was obtained by linking the health survey to a national registry of disability pension. Cox regression analyses were employed. RESULTS: During the follow-up period 99 (1.7%) men and 230 (3.6%) women were awarded disability pension, giving a twofold risk of disability pension for women compared with men. Except for a moderate impact of self-perceived health, adjustment for family situation and work factors did not influence the gender difference in risk. Repeating the analyses in strata of education, the gender difference in risk of disability pension among the highly educated was fully explained by self-perceived health and work factors. In the lower strata of education there remained a substantial unexplained gender difference in risk. CONCLUSIONS: In a Norwegian cohort of middle-aged men and women, self-perceived health, family situation and work factors could not explain women's higher likelihood of disability pension. However, analyses stratified by educational level indicate that mechanisms behind the gender gap in disability pension differ by educational levels. Recognizing the heterogeneity within gender may contribute to a deeper understanding of women's higher risk of disability pension.
Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Familia , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Escolaridad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In most countries with sickness insurance systems, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the sickness-absence process. Previous studies have indicated that GPs experience several tasks and situations related to sickness certification consultations as problematic. The fact that the organization of primary health care and social insurance systems differ between countries may influence both GPs' experiences and certification. The aim of the present study was to gain more knowledge of GPs' experiences of sickness certification, by comparing data from Sweden and Norway, regarding frequencies and aspects of sickness certification found to be problematic. METHODS: Statistical analyses of cross-sectional survey data of sickness certification by GPs in Sweden and Norway. In Sweden, all GPs were included, with 3949 (60.6%) responding. In Norway, a representative sample of GPs was included, with 221 (66.5%) responding. RESULTS: Most GPs reported having consultations involving sickness certification at least once a week; 95% of the GPs in Sweden and 99% of the GPs in Norway. A majority found such tasks problematic; 60% of the GPs in Sweden and 53% in Norway. In a logistic regression, having a higher frequency of sickness certification consultations was associated with a higher risk of experiencing them as problematic, in both countries. A higher rate of GPs in Sweden than in Norway reported meeting patients wanting a sickness certification without a medical reason. GPs in Sweden found it more problematic to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of sick leave with patients and to issue a prolongation of a sick-leave period initiated by another physician. GPs in Norway more often worried that patients would go to another physician if they did not issue a certificate, and a higher proportion of Norwegian GPs found it problematic to handle situations where they and their patient disagreed on the need for sick leave. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms that many GPs experience sickness absence consultations as problematic. However, there were differences between the two countries in GPs' experiences, which may be linked to differences in social security regulations and the organization of GP services. Possible causes and consequences of national differences should be addressed in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Familia/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Absentismo , Adulto , Certificación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/tendencias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Personal continuity is regarded as a core value in general practice. The aim of this study was to determine the level of personal continuity in Norwegian general practice. An investigation was made of the associations between high levels of personal continuity and patient, general practitioner (GP), and list characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional register-based study. SETTING: Norwegian general practice in 2009. SUBJECTS: 3220 GPs and 3 725 998 patients on the GP lists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Usual Provider Continuity Index (UPC), which measures the proportion of consultations made by the usual GP, was estimated for patients and aggregated to the GP list level. GPs were grouped into quartiles based on the UPC. Being a GP with a UPC in the two highest quartiles (UPC ≥ 0.80) was the outcome in the statistical analyses. STATISTICS: Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RR). RESULTS: The overall UPC was 0.78, increasing gradually from 0.68 in patients < 15 years of age to 0.86 for patients ≥ 60 years of age, and from 0.75 to 0.83 for patients with < 3 annual consultations compared with patients with > 10 consultations. A UPC > 0.80 was associated with longer patient lists and high GP consultation rates. Working in municipalities with < 10 000 residents was negatively associated with a high UPC. The UPC level for GPs was associated with total utilization of GP consultations in the list populations. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Norwegian goal of a personal GP has been achieved; however, there are substantial variations between GPs and lower UPCs among young patients and in smaller municipalities.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gender differences in the prevalence and occupational consequences of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are consistently found in epidemiological studies. The study investigated whether gender differences also exist with respect to chronicity, measured as the rate of transition from sickness absence into permanent disability pension (DP). METHODS: Prospective national cohort study in Norway including all cases with a spell of sickness absence > eight weeks during 1997 certified with a MSD, 37,942 women and 26,307 men. The cohort was followed-up for five years with chronicity measured as granting of DP as the endpoint. The effect of gender was estimated in the full sample adjusting for sociodemographic factors and diagnostic distribution. Gender specific analyses were performed with the same explanatory variables. Finally, the gender difference was estimated for nine diagnostic subgroups. RESULTS: The crude rate of DP was 22% for women and 18% for men. After adjusting for all sociodemographic variables, a slightly higher female risk of DP remained. However, additional adjustment for diagnostic distribution removed the gender difference completely. Having children and working full time decreased the DP risk for both genders, whereas low socioeconomic status increased the risk similarly. There was a different age effect as more women obtained a DP below the age of 50. Increased female risk of chronicity remained for myalgia/fibromyalgia, back disorders and "other/unspecified" after relevant adjustments, whereas men with neck disorders were at higher risk of chronicity. CONCLUSIONS: Women with MSDs had a moderately increased risk of chronicity compared to men, when including MSDs with a traumatic background. Possible explanations are lower income, a higher proportion belonging to diagnostic subgroups with poor prognosis, and a younger age of chronicity among women. When all sociodemographic and diagnostic variables were adjusted for, no gender difference remained, except for some diagnostic subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Internationally, there has been a call to improve the youth-friendliness of health services. In surveys, 60-90% of young people report having contact with a GP at least once a year. Regular contact with the GP can be assumed to be an indicator of a youth-friendly health service. The aim of the current study was to identify associations between a high consultation rate with young people (15-24 years) on the one hand and GP characteristics, patient list characteristics and practice profiling factors on the other. METHODS: A cross-sectional national register-based study from 2002-04 in Norwegian general practice. Data on 1717 GPs, their practice populations and a sample of 316 773 consultations with young people were used to estimate differences between GPs, using one-way analysis of variance and logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean annual consultation rate with young people was 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.4-1.5) and 2.2 (2.1-2.2) for the age groups 15-19 and 20-24, respectively. List characteristics indicating free capacity-a shorter patient list, a growing patient list and a high access for persons not on the patient list-were associated with a high youth consultation rate. Young age of the GP, low educational level among the list population and a high rate of interdisciplinary activity by the GP were also associated with a high youth consultation rate. CONCLUSIONS: GPs seem to assign especially low priority to young people when workload is high or free capacity low. Increased awareness of these mechanisms and greater interdisciplinary cooperation could increase the youth-friendliness of general practice.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos de Familia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients with chronic disorders and a more complex health service demand greater interdisciplinary collaboration in Primary Health Care. The aim of this study was therefore to identify factors related to general practitioners (GPs), their list populations and practice municipalities associated with a high rate of GP participation in multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs). METHODS: A national cross-sectional register-based study of Norwegian general practice was conducted, including data on all GPs in the Regular GP Scheme in 2007 (N = 3179). GPs were grouped into quartiles based on the annual number of MDMs per patient on their list, and the groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse associations between high rates of participation and characteristics of the GP, their list population and practice municipality. RESULTS: On average, GPs attended 30 MDMs per year. The majority of the meetings concerned patients in the age groups 20-59 years. Psychological disorders were the motivation for 53% of the meetings. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the following characteristics predicted a high rate of MDM attendance: younger age of the GP, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.1) for GPs < 45 years, a short patient list, with an OR of 4.9 (3.2-7.5) for list sizes below 800 compared to lists ≥ 1600, higher proportion of psychological diagnosis in consultations (OR3.4 (2.6-4.4)) and a high MDM proportion with elderly patients (OR 4.1 (3.3-5.4)). Practising in municipalities with less than 10,000 inhabitants (OR 3.7 (2.8-4.9)) and a high proportion of disability pensioners (OR 1.6 (1.2-2.2)) or patients receiving social assistance (OR 2.2 (1.7-2.8)) also predicted high rates of meetings. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological problems including substance addiction gave grounds for the majority of MDMs. GPs with a high proportion of consultations with such problems also participated more frequently in MDMs. List size was negatively associated with the rate of MDMs, while a more disadvantaged list population was positively associated. Working in smaller organisational units seemed to facilitate cooperation between different professionals. There may be a generation shift towards more frequent participation in interdisciplinary work among younger GPs.
Asunto(s)
Medicina General/normas , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Medicina General/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Oportunidad Relativa , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Mortalidad , Autoinforme , Clase Social , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Sickness absence due to psychiatric problems is on the increase. Many sickness absentees do not recover and end up on a permanent disability pension (DP). A prospective cohort study of 12,283 women and 7099 men with a spell of sickness absence longer than 8 weeks, certified with a psychiatric diagnosis, was carried out. Diagnoses and socioeconomic data for each case were obtained from a national insurance research database. Socio-demographic data characterising each of Norway's 19 counties were obtained from Statistics Norway, and a deprivation index was constructed. Cox regression models with county-level variables only and combinations of variables at individual and county level were estimated separately for each gender as predictors of DP. Men had the highest risk of disability. Several individual-level variables predicted permanent disability. Contextual factors had a marginal effect among women also, after adjustment for individual-level variables. No such effect was present among the men.