Genomic and clinical characterization of a familial GIST kindred intolerant to imatinib.

Familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare. We present a kindred with multiple family members affected with multifocal GIST who underwent whole genome sequencing of the germline and tumor. Affected individuals with GIST harbored a germline variant found within exon 13 of the KIT gene (c.1965T>G; p.Asn655Lys, p.N655K) and a variant in the MSR1 gene (c.877 C > T; p.Arg293*, pR293X). Multifocal GISTs in the proband and her mother were treated with preoperative imatinib, which resulted in severe intolerance. The clinical features of multifocal GIST, cutaneous mastocytosis, allergies, and gut motility disorders seen in the affected individuals may represent manifestations of the multifunctional roles of KIT in interstitial cells of Cajal or mast cells and/or may be suggestive of additional molecular pathways which can contribute to tumorigenesis.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an ultra-rare cancer: a consensus paper from the community of experts.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultra-rare, translocated, vascular sarcoma. EHE clinical behavior is variable, ranging from that of a low-grade malignancy to that of a high-grade sarcoma and it is marked by a high propensity for systemic involvement. No active systemic agents are currently approved specifically for EHE, which is typically refractory to the antitumor drugs used in sarcomas. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy for EHE patients and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of the disease make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for many EHE patients. To address the shortcoming, a global consensus meeting was organized in December 2020 under the umbrella of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) involving >80 experts from several disciplines from Europe, North America and Asia, together with a patient representative from the EHE Group, a global, disease-specific patient advocacy group, and Sarcoma Patient EuroNet (SPAEN). The meeting was aimed at defining, by consensus, evidence-based best practices for the optimal approach to primary and metastatic EHE. The consensus achieved during that meeting is the subject of the present publication.

Glove and instrument changing to prevent tumour seeding in cancer surgery: a survey of surgeons' beliefs and practices.

Background: Some surgeons change gloves and instruments after the extirpative phase of cancer surgery with the intent of reducing the risk of local and wound recurrence. Although this practice is conceptually appealing, the evidence that gloves or instruments act as vectors of cancer-cell seeding in the clinical setting is weak. To determine the potential effect of further investigation of this question, we surveyed the practices and beliefs of a broad spectrum of surgeons who operate on cancer patients. Methods: Using a modified Dillman approach, a survey was mailed to all 945 general surgeons listed in the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario public registry. The survey consisted of multiple-choice and free-text response questions. Responses were tabulated and grouped into themes, including specific intraoperative events and surgeon training. Predictive variables were analyzed by chi-square test. Results: Of 459 surveys returned (adjusted response rate: 46%), 351 met the inclusion criteria for retention. Of those respondents, 52% reported that they change gloves during cancer resections with the intent of decreasing the risk of tumour seeding, and 40%, that they change instruments for that purpose. The proportion of respondents indicating that they take measures to protect the wound was 73% for laparoscopic cancer resections and 31% for open resections. Training and years in practice predicted some of the foregoing behaviours. The most commonly cited basis for adopting specific strategies to prevent tumour seeding was "gut feeling," followed by clinical training. Most respondents believe that it is possible or probable that surgical gloves or instruments harbour malignant cells, but that a cancer recurrence proceeding from that situation is unlikely. Conclusions: There is no consensus on how gloves and instruments should be handled in cancer operations. Further investigation is warranted.

Clinical features and outcomes of 20 patients with abdominopelvic desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare mesenchymal malignancy. We describe our experience with treating DSRCT at a large sarcoma referral center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on DSRCT patients referred to our institution (1998-2014). Pathology specimens were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis. Clinical and imaging were extracted and summarized with descriptive statistics. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate the association between patient, tumor, and treatment variables and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In this study cohort of 20 patients, median age at presentation was 29 y (range 18-43) and 90% were male. Fifty-five percent presented with metastasis. Patients underwent chemotherapy (n = 20), radiation therapy (n = 3), and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (n = 5). Median OS was 22 m (interquartile range: 12-28 m). Five-year OS rate was 20%. Extra-abdominal metastasis was associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) of mortality (HR: 3.1, 95% C.I. 1.0-9.4, p = 0.04), while CRS improved OS (HR: 0.1, 95% C.I. 0.03-0.7, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite aggressive treatment, less than half of the patients were dead of DSRCT within 2 years of presentation. Although a select group of patients who underwent CRS had improved OS, novel treatments are urgently needed.

Candida infection in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

A retrospective review of 100 liver transplantations in 98 children was performed to determine the incidence of infection caused by Candida organism in these patients and to identify risk factors that may predispose to serious fungal infection. Thirty-one infections caused by Candida organisms developed during the initial 28 days posttransplantation: 19 were definite invasive infections (one deep site or one positive blood culture), 2 were probable invasive infections (three superficial sites), and 10 were urinary tract infections. Eleven of 19 patients had fungemia or a disseminated infection (two noncontiguous deep organs involved and/or positive blood cultures) and 8 of 19 had peritoneal candidiasis. Infection caused by Candida organisms was a contributing factor to mortality in 7 of 21 patients (case fatality rate of 33%) with invasive infection. Risk factors that were predictive for invasive infection by univariate analysis included the following: pretransplantation antibiotic therapy, length of transplant operation, transfusion requirement, number of days in the intensive care unit, number of days intubated, number of concurrent bacterial infections, number of antibiotics administered, number of laparotomies performed posttransplantation, retransplantation, hepatic artery thrombosis, bile leaks, and renal and respiratory failure. By logistic regression analysis, bile leak, hepatic artery thrombosis, preoperative steroid use, transfusion requirement, and the number of days intubated were identified as independent risk factors for invasive infection caused by Candida organisms. The use of prophylactic antifungal agents in high-risk patients may be important in reducing the serious morbidity and mortality associated with sepsis caused by Candida organisms in pediatric liver transplant recipients.