Plasma insulin and C-peptide after subcutaneous and intravenous administration of human insulin (recombinant DNA) and purified porcine insulin in healthy men.

We have compared the plasma profiles of C-peptide, human insulin (recombinant DNA), and purified porcine insulin of pancreatic origin (PPI) in six nondiabetic men after low-dose (4.8 U) or high-dose (9.6 U) subcutaneous injection and low-rate (1.0 U/h) or high-rate (1.7 U/h) intravenous infusion. There was no significant difference in plasma C-peptide or glucose levels when human insulin was compared with PPI at either dose level for subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion. Thus, there was equal suppression of endogenous insulin by the two species of exogenous insulin. For low-dose subcutaneous injection there was no significant difference between plasma insulin levels of the two species at single time points or when areas were compared. For high-dose subcutaneous injection mean plasma insulin levels were higher after human insulin than after PPI (20-300 min); this serial difference reached conventional statistical significance at 50 min (P less than 0.05) and 90 min (P less than 0.01). For the area under plasma insulin profiles between 0 and 90 min after high-dose s.c. injection, human insulin was higher than PPI (P = 0.06). There was no significant difference between insulin concentrations after human insulin and PPI given by either low- or high-dose intravenous infusion, except that high-dose PPI values (55-110 min) were slightly but significantly higher after high-dose intravenous infusion. Further comparisons of the pharmacokinetics of human and other species of insulin are, therefore, justified in larger numbers of subjects and particularly in diabetic individuals.

Biosynthetic human insulin: effect in healthy men on plasma glucose and non-esterified fatty acids in comparison with highly purified pork insulin.

Biosynthetic human insulin (BHI) produced by recombinant DNA technology was administered subcutaneously and intravenously at two dose levels to two groups, each consisting of six normal men. Responses were compared with those for purified pork insulin (PPI) given by the same routes at the same dose levels to the same two groups. The glycemic response to the insulins was similar with a suggestion (seen both with intravenous and subcutaneous administration) that the glycemic depression with BHI was slightly greater at low dose and less at high dose. No significant difference between insulin types was found in the depression of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations, although significant differences between types with low-dose subcutaneous injection emerged during the later phases of the experiment. After termination of high-rate infusion with both insulins, NEFA concentrations rose more rapidly with some overshoot, suggesting that the rate and depth of blood glucose fall in these experiments might have triggered a brisker counterregulatory response. The small differences found between human and pork insulins, although in some cases significant, are unlikely to be of clinical importance.

A comparative study of benoxaprofen and ibuprofen in osteoarthritis in general practice.

A total of 120 general practice patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip received either benoxaprofen 600 mg mane or ibuprofen 400 mg tid for 4 months in a double-blind, parallel trial. No patients withdrew because of lack of efficacy. Statistically significant differences in favor of benoxaprofen were found for knee flexion and pain relief. A small number of patients withdrew because of gastrointestinal reactions (7 taking benoxaprofen and 6 taking ibuprofen). Skin reactions were commoner with benoxaprofen, which provoked sun sensitivity in 5 patients, none of whom withdrew. Significantly more patients on benoxaprofen (67%) wished to continue therapy than those on ibuprofen (32%).

The pharmacokinetics and acceptability of benoxaprofen following rectal administration.

The bioavailability of a single 300 mg dose of benoxaprofen was compared after rectal and oral administration in 5 subjects. The total absorption rectally from a suppository was 83% of that achieved orally from a capsule. Six further subjects took a 300 mg benoxaprofen suppository twice daily for 12 d. Steady state plasma levels (mean level 94 microgram/ml) were reached at about 120 h, while the elimination half-life for benoxaprofen was approximately 38 h in this study. The suppositories were well tolerated. The plasma levels obtained compared very favorably with theoretically expected levels and levels obtained after comparable oral doses.

Human insulin produced by recombinant DNA technology: safety and hypoglycaemic potency in healthy men.

Human insulin synthesised by recombinant DNA technology was compared with highly purified porcine insulin in healthy men. Intracutaneous injection over a wide range of concentrations of both insulins into five subjects gave rise to no local reactions over a 48 h period. The glycaemic response to standard subcutaneous injection at high and low dose levels was measured with both insulins in each of six men. Plasma glucose decrement with the two insulins was similar but human insulin was perhaps slightly more potent than porcine insulin at the low dose, and slightly less so at the high. The glycaemic response to the isulins, each infused intravenously at high and low concentrations for 1 h in a further six subjects, showed a similar trend. Depression of glycaemia with human insulin slightly exceeded that with porcine insulin at the low concentration infusion and fell slightly short of it at the high. Genetically synthesised human insulin seems to be safe and effective in man. Its dose-response relationship may differ from that of porcine insulin.

Biosynthetic human insulin in the treatment of diabetes. A double-blind crossover trial in established diabetic patients.

94 diabetic patients established on treatment with porcine (n = 47) or bovine (n = 47) insulin took part in a double-blind crossover trial, in which 6-week periods of treatment with the appropriate animal insulin were compared with periods of treatment with biosynthetic human insulin (BHI). 6 patients withdrew during the trial, in 3 cases because of hypoglycaemia while taking BHI. In bovine-insulin-treated patients, the mean glucose level (mean of seven capillary-blood samples over 1 day), the modified M index, and total daily insulin requirement were the same on BHI and bovine-insulin treatment. For porcine-insulin-treated patients, mean glucose level and the modified M index were slightly higher on BHI than on porcine-insulin treatment (9.7 vs 9.0 mmol/l and 79.6 vs 65.0, respectively), despite an average increase of 2.3 units/day of BHI after 6 weeks of such treatment. Hypoglycaemic episodes were not significantly more or less frequent on BHI in either group of patients. In both groups fasting blood glucose was higher during BHI treatment than during animal-insulin treatment (14.2 vs 12.8 mmol/l [bovine group]; 12.1 vs 9.6 mmol/l [porcine group]). In bovine-insulin-treated patients blood glucose before the evening insulin injection was higher on BHI than on bovine insulin (11.6 vs 10.0 mmol/l). BHI appears to be a safe alternative to porcine or bovine insulin. Differences in the pharmacokinetics of BHI may account for the observed differences in blood-glucose responses.