Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Nesiritide is approved in the United States for early relief of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure. Previous meta-analyses have raised questions regarding renal toxicity and the mortality associated with this agent. METHODS: We randomly assigned 7141 patients who were hospitalized with acute heart failure to receive either nesiritide or placebo for 24 to 168 hours in addition to standard care. Coprimary end points were the change in dyspnea at 6 and 24 hours, as measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and the composite end point of rehospitalization for heart failure or death within 30 days. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to nesiritide, as compared with those assigned to placebo, more frequently reported markedly or moderately improved dyspnea at 6 hours (44.5% vs. 42.1%, P=0.03) and 24 hours (68.2% vs. 66.1%, P=0.007), but the prespecified level for significance (P≤0.005 for both assessments or P≤0.0025 for either) was not met. The rate of rehospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause within 30 days was 9.4% in the nesiritide group versus 10.1% in the placebo group (absolute difference, -0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.7; P=0.31). There were no significant differences in rates of death from any cause at 30 days (3.6% with nesiritide vs. 4.0% with placebo; absolute difference, -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.5) or rates of worsening renal function, defined by more than a 25% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.4% vs. 29.5%; odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.21; P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Nesiritide was not associated with an increase or a decrease in the rate of death and rehospitalization and had a small, nonsignificant effect on dyspnea when used in combination with other therapies. It was not associated with a worsening of renal function, but it was associated with an increase in rates of hypotension. On the basis of these results, nesiritide cannot be recommended for routine use in the broad population of patients with acute heart failure. (Funded by Scios; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00475852.).

Quality of life and psychological status of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

INTRODUCTION: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective at reducing mortality in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) but can cause psychological distress and reduce quality of life (QOL). The full benefits of ICDs can only be achieved when the patient's QOL and psychological status are maintained. We examined psychological status and QOL post ICD implantation; the relationship of psychological status to QOL; the relationship of time since implantation to psychological status and QOL; and the relationship of time since ICD implantation and age of patient to these variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cross-sectional self-administered assessment of QOL, depression, anxiety, demographic characteristics and cardiovascular health history of patients (n = 48) who had received ICDs within the past 10 years at an urban hospital. Patients who had ICDs for longer experienced worse depression and QOL. Patients who were younger had worse depression, anxiety, and QOL. The combination of anxiety, depression, age, and time since ICD implant significantly predicted overall QOL and the psychosocial and physical dimensions of QOL explaining 55.5, 54, and 34.9% of the variance, respectively. CONCLUSION: Younger ICD patients are at highest risk for psychological distress and poor QOL. Longitudinal research would facilitate determination of the trajectory of changes in psychological status and QOL over the duration of the ICD experience.

Acute endothelin A receptor blockade causes selective pulmonary vasodilation in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels in patients with chronic heart failure correlate with pulmonary artery pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance. ET(A) receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells mediate pulmonary vascular contraction and hypertrophy. We determined the acute hemodynamic effects of sitaxsentan, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic stable heart failure receiving conventional therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 48 patients with chronic New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 21+/-1%) treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Patients with a baseline pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >/=15 mm Hg and a cardiac index

Acute hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan in patients with severe heart failure. Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: We determined the short-term hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan, a novel calcium-sensitizing agent, in patients with decompensated heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 21+/-1%) who had a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >/=15 mm Hg and a cardiac index

Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective study assessed the initial hemodynamic effects and long-term clinical benefits of dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular (AV) delay in patients with chronic heart failure who had no traditional indication for pacemaker implantation. BACKGROUND: Dual-chamber pacing with a short AV delay has been proposed as a nonpharmacologic treatment for drug-refractory heart failure. Both initial and long-term hemodynamic as well as functional benefits have been reported. All previous studies have used an AV delay of 100 ms. Despite encouraging results, these previous studies have been anecdotal and uncontrolled. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, crossover trial included 12 subjects with chronic congestive heart failure despite optimal medical therapy. Patients were required to be in sinus rhythm with no evidence of significant bradyarrhythmias. On the day after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker, invasive hemodynamic measurements were made at varying AV delays between 100 and 200 ms. Patients were then randomized to either dual-chamber pacing with a 100-ms AV delay or backup mode (VVI at 40 beats/min). After 4 to 6 weeks, crossover to the other pacing mode was programmed. RESULTS: Hemodynamic measurements on the day after pacemaker implantation demonstrated no benefit of pacing with any AV delay compared with intrinsic conduction. At the optimal AV interval for each patient, neither cardiac output (4.5 +/- 1.5 vs 4.7 +/- 1.6 liters/min [mean +/- SD]) nor wedge pressure (16 +/- 10 vs 17 +/- 8 mm Hg) improved significantly from baseline measurements during intrinsic conduction. The long-term pacing protocol was completed in nine patients. Ejection fraction was 16 +/- 6% with dual-chamber (VDD mode) pacing and 18 +/- 4% in backup mode (p = NS). No patient had an increase in ejection fraction by > or = 5% with VDD pacing, nor did any patient improve in New York Heart Association functional class with short AV delay dual-chamber pacing. Also, there were no significant reductions in body weight or diuretic requirements during this pacing period. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-chamber pacing with a short AV delay does not improve hemodynamic and clinical status or ejection fraction measured on the day after pacemaker implantation in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Routine use of pacemaker therapy with a short AV delay aas a primary treatment of heart failure in patients without standard arrhythmic indications is unwarranted.

Prognostic importance of atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure.

Several circulating neurohormones have been shown to have prognostic significance in patients with chronic heart failure, but the relation between plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide and mortality in this disorder remains unknown. Plasma levels of immunoreactive atrial natriuretic peptide were measured in 102 patients in whom left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular arrhythmias on ambulatory electrocardiographic recording and plasma levels of norepinephrine, renin activity, aldosterone and arginine vasopressin were also measured. Compared with patients with atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations below the median value of 125 pg/ml, patients with higher levels of the peptide had a higher plasma renin activity (8.9 +/- 1.8 versus 2.6 +/- 0.4 ng/ml per h) and plasma norepinephrine (858 +/- 116 versus 538 +/- 45 pg/ml), more frequent premature ventricular depolarizations (4,485 +/- 715 versus 2,004 +/- 495/day) and more advanced hemodynamic abnormalities (all p less than 0.05). During the subsequent 13 to 25 months of follow-up, patients with high levels of atrial natriuretic peptide had a significantly lower rate of survival than did those whose initial circulating peptide concentrations were normal or mildly increased (p = 0.01). These data indicate that, in patients with chronic heart failure, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide provides important prognostic information. This may relate to the ability of the hormone to reflect the interplay of several pathophysiologic factors that contribute to mortality in this disease.

Prognostic importance of the serum magnesium concentration in patients with congestive heart failure.

Magnesium abnormalities are common in patients with congestive heart failure but the clinical and prognostic significance of an abnormal serum magnesium concentration in this disorder has not been investigated. Therefore, the relation between serum magnesium concentration and the clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of 199 patients with chronic heart failure was evaluated. The serum magnesium concentration was less than 1.6 mEq/liter in 38 patients (19%), within the normal range in 134 patients (67%) and greater than 2.1 mEq/liter in 27 patients (14%). Patients with hypomagnesemia had more frequent ventricular premature complexes and episodes of ventricular tachycardia than did patients with a normal serum magnesium concentration (p less than 0.05). Even though the two groups were similar with respect to severity of heart failure and neurohormonal variables, patients with a low serum magnesium concentration had a significantly worse prognosis during long-term follow-up (45% versus 71% 1 year survival, p less than 0.05). Patients with hypermagnesemia had more severe symptoms, greater neurohormonal activation and worse renal function than did patients with a normal serum magnesium concentration but tended to have fewer ventricular arrhythmias. Hypermagnesemic patients had a worse prognosis than did those with a normal magnesium concentration (37% versus 71% 1 year survival, p less than 0.05). In conclusion, the measurement of serum magnesium concentration provides important clinical and prognostic information in patients with chronic heart failure.

Identification of hyponatremia as a risk factor for the development of functional renal insufficiency during converting enzyme inhibition in severe chronic heart failure.

To identify patients with severe chronic heart failure who are at greatest risk of developing functional renal insufficiency during converting enzyme inhibition, creatinine clearance was measured in 59 patients before and after long-term therapy with captopril (39 patients) or enalapril (20 patients), while digitalis and diuretic therapy was kept constant. Creatinine clearance increased or remained constant in 33 of the 59 patients (Group I), but declined in the remaining 26 patients (Group II). The two groups were similar with respect to the cause of heart failure, pretreatment renal function and all pretreatment hemodynamic variables. Patients in Group II, however, had lower values for serum sodium concentration (134.8 +/- 1.0 versus 137.0 +/- 0.6 mmol/liter) and higher values for plasma renin activity (10.6 +/- 3.4 versus 3.0 +/- 0.5 ng/ml per hour), received larger doses of furosemide (108 +/- 11 versus 84 +/- 6 mg/day), were more frequently diabetic (42 versus 15%) and were more frequently treated with enalapril (50 versus 21%) than were patients in Group I (all p less than 0.05). By stepwise logistic analysis, only hyponatremia (or an elevated plasma renin activity) and enalapril therapy independently predicted the decline in creatinine clearance during converting enzyme inhibition. These observations could not be explained by changes in systemic blood pressure. In patients with a normal serum sodium concentration (greater than or equal to 137 mmol/liter), creatinine clearance increased with captopril (+21%, p less than 0.05), but not with enalapril (-6%, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of BG9719 (CVT-124), an A1-adenosine receptor antagonist, and furosemide on glomerular filtration rate and natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of furosemide and the selective A1 adenosine receptor BG9719 on renal function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that adenosine may affect renal function by various mechanisms, but the effects of blockade of this system in humans is unknown. In addition, the effects of a therapeutic dose of furosemide on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) in heart failure patients are controversial. METHODS: On different days, 12 patients received placebo, BG9719 and furosemide. Glomerular filtration rate, RPF and sodium and water excretion were assessed immediately following drug administration. RESULTS: Glomerular filtration rate was 84 +/- 23 ml/min/1.73m2 after receiving placebo, 82 +/- 24 following BG9719 administration and a decreased (p < 0.005) 63 +/- 18 following furosemide. Renal plasma flow was unchanged at 293 +/- 124 ml/min/1.73m2 on placebo, 334 +/- 155 after receiving BG9719 and 374 +/- 231 after receiving furosemide. Sodium excretion increased from 8 +/- 8 mEq following placebo administration to 37 +/- 26 mEq following BG9719 administration. In the six patients in whom it was measured, sodium excretion was 104 +/- 78 mEq following furosemide administration. CONCLUSIONS: Natriuresis is effectively induced by both furosemide and the adenosine A1 antagonist BG9719 in patients with CHF. Doses of the two drugs used in this study did not cause equivalent sodium and water excretion but only furosemide decreased GFR. These data suggest that adenosine is an important determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure.

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous sematilide in patients with congestive heart failure: a class III antiarrhythmic agent without cardiodepressant effects.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of intravenous sematilide hydrochloride, a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent, in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Class I antiarrhythmic agents, which primarily slow conduction, can depress ventricular function, particularly in patients with heart failure. In contrast, pure class III agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, do not adversely affect hemodynamic variables in animal models, but there are no data evaluating their hemodynamic effects in humans. METHODS: In 39 patients with congestive heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic measurements were obtained at baseline, after a loading dose and during a maintenance infusion of intravenous sematilide using either a low (0.75 then 0.3 mg/min) or high dose (1.5 then 0.6 mg/min) regimen. The study had an 80% power to detect clinically meaningful differences in hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: Both low (n = 20) and high (n = 19) dose sematilide infusions produced dose-dependent increases in QT interval (5 +/- 8% [mean +/- SD] and 18 +/- 10%, respectively) and corrected QT interval (4 +/- 8% and 14 +/- 10%), and high dose sematilide decreased heart rate by 7 +/- 10% (all p < 0.025 vs. baseline). Neither dose regimen had a statistically significant effect on any other hemodynamic variable, including mean arterial, right atrial, pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures; cardiac index, stroke volume, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances; and left ventricular stroke work index. Sematilide showed no adverse hemodynamic effects in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 25% or > 25% and in patients with cardiac index < 2 or > or = 2 liters/min per m2. Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 1) and excessive QT prolongation (n = 4) were seen during the high dose. CONCLUSIONS: Sematilide, in the doses administered, prolonged repolarization but did not alter hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure. These data suggest that class III antiarrhythmic agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, are not cardiodepressant but may be proarrhythmic in humans, especially at high doses.

High dose oral amiodarone loading exerts important hemodynamic actions in patients with congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use invasive monitoring to analyze the hemodynamic effects of both a large single dose and a 48-h loading regimen of amiodarone in patients with severe heart failure. BACKGROUND: Amiodarone is frequently used as an antiarrhythmic agent in patients with congestive heart failure, but the impact of this agent on cardiac function remains controversial. Recent successful experience with a rapid oral load of amiodarone makes invasive testing of the hemodynamic effects of oral amiodarone in such patients now feasible. METHODS: After baseline hemodynamic assessment (using balloon-tipped pulmonary artery catheters) and electrocardiographic measurements, 16 patients received 12.5 mg/kg body weight of amiodarone orally. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained hourly for 4 h. Patients then received this dose an additional seven times over the next 2 days. Hemodynamic variables and QRS, QT and PR intervals were measured after 48 h of treatment. RESULTS: Vasodilation was seen between 1 and 3 h after drug administration. Systemic vascular resistance decreased 326 +/- 135 dynes.s.cm-5, cardiac index increased 0.24 +/- 0.08 liters/min per m2 and mean arterial pressure decreased 6 +/- 3 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM, all p < 0.05). After 48 h of amiodarone administration, heart rate decreased 23 +/- 3 beats/min (p < 0.005), stroke volume increased 9 +/- 3 ml (p < 0.005), cardiac index decreased 0.23 +/- 0.09 ml/min per m2 (p < 0.05), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased 4 +/- 1 mm Hg (p < 0.01), right atrial pressure increased 3 +/- 1 mm Hg (p < 0.005) and QT and PR intervals were markedly prolonged (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although the first dose caused vasodilation, a complete loading regimen of amiodarone produced a decreased heart rate with elevated filling pressures and decreased cardiac index.

Beneficial effects of metoprolol in heart failure associated with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: This clinical trial was performed to determine the safety and clinical impact of titrated metoprolol therapy in patients with heart failure, documented coronary artery disease and a low ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Despite known cardiodepressant effects, long-term use of beta-adrenergic antagonists appears to be beneficial in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. However, this therapy has not been critically evaluated in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease. METHODS: In 50 patients with heart failure, known coronary artery disease and an ejection fraction < or = 0.40, we examined the impact of metoprolol therapy in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, assessing the frequency of heart failure exacerbations and changes in symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class), ejection fraction and exercise duration. Placebo-treated patients who completed 6-month follow-up studies then underwent a trial with metoprolol therapy (crossover group). RESULTS: Metoprolol was titrated to a mean maximal dose of 87 mg/day (range 25 to 100) without serious adverse reactions. During double-blind therapy, use of a beta-blocker was associated with a significant reduction in the number of hospital admissions (4% vs. 32%, p < 0.05), overall improved functional class (p = 0.02), increased ejection fraction (4 +/- 7% [mean +/- SD] compared with 0 +/- 6%, p < 0.05) and a greater increase in exercise duration (193 +/- 276 vs. 38 +/- 213 s with placebo, p < 0.01). Crossover outcome paralleled the favorable impact seen during randomized metoprolol therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cautious use of titrated metoprolol appears to be safe and beneficial when added to standard heart failure therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy associated with coronary artery disease.

Sustained hemodynamic response to flosequinan in patients with heart failure receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the short- and long-term effects of flosequinan in 47 patients with severe heart failure despite ongoing captopril treatment. BACKGROUND: There have been no previous evaluations of the long-term hemodynamic effects of any direct-acting vasodilator in patients with heart failure receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Flosequinan is an arterial and venous vasodilator with actions similar to those of the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate combination. METHODS: After baseline hemodynamic measurements using balloon-tipped pulmonary artery and radial arterial catheters, patients were randomized to receive 50, 100 or 150 mg of flosequinan daily. Hemodynamic variables were measured immediately before and after short-term flosequinan administration and after 8 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: With short-term flosequinan administration, mean arterial, right atrial and left ventricular filling pressures decreased by 6.4 +/- 1.1, 3.8 +/- 0.5 and 7.3 +/- 0.7 mm Hg, respectively (all p < 0.001). Cardiac index increased by 0.5 +/- 0.1 liters/min per m2, systemic vascular resistance decreased by 616 +/- 105 dynes.s.cm-5 and heart rate increased by 4 +/- 1 beats/min (all p < 0.001). After 8 weeks of long-term flosequinan administration, the vasodilator effect of a dose of flosequinan persisted. Compared with pretreatment baseline values, mean arterial, right atrial and left ventricular filling pressures at the peak effect of flosequinan were decreased by 3.5 +/- 1.3, 2.8 +/- 0.7 and 5.1 +/- 1.3 mm Hg, respectively (all p < 0.01). Systemic vascular resistance had decreased by 585 +/- 95 dynes.s.cm-5, cardiac index had increased by 0.5 +/- 0.1 liters/min per m2 and heart rate had increased by 10 +/- 2 beats/min (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The arterial and venous vasodilator flosequinan exerts both short- and long-term sustained hemodynamic effects in patients with heart failure receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

The hemodynamic actions of the antiarrhythmic agent ipazilide fumarate in patients with congestive heart failure.

Ipazilide fumarate is an investigational antiarrhythmic agent with Vaughan Williams class I and III actions, including prolongation of both ventricular refractoriness and action potential duration. Because of the frequent use of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with heart failure, we investigated the hemodynamic effects of oral administration of 400, 200, and 100 mg of ipazilide fumarate in 15 patients with congestive heart failure. There was a marked hemodynamic response to ipazilide, with the peak effect noted 2 hours after drug administration. In patients who received 400 mg ipazilide, the mean cardiac index was decreased by 0.5 L/min/m2 at 2 hours (p < 0.05). After 200 and 100 mg ipazilide, the decreases were a more modest 0.3 and 0.1 L/min/m2, respectively. The mean arterial pressure also decreased in a dose- and time-dependent manner, although this did not reach statistical significance for any of the doses. Left ventricular filling pressure, right atrial pressure, and heart rate were not altered by ipazilide. Plasma concentrations of ipazilide peaked 90 minutes after administration of 100 or 200 of the drug, but peak concentrations were noted 3 hours after administration of 400 mg. The hemodynamic response correlated with the plasma concentration of ipazilide determined contemporaneously. We conclude that, as with most antiarrhythmic agents, single-dose administration of ipazilide fumarate can cause clinically significant hemodynamic deterioration.

Immediate and long-term pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the genesis of sudden cardiac death in patients with congestive heart failure.

Congestive heart failure is the most important predisposing factor to the occurrence of sudden death in patients with cardiovascular disease. As left ventricular dysfunction deteriorates and symptoms of heart failure become evident, ambulatory ventricular arrhythmias become increasingly frequent and complex, and sudden cardiac death becomes an increasingly common occurrence. When the left ventricular ejection fraction has declined to less than 30 percent and symptoms of heart failure become refractory to treatment with digitalis and diuretics, 35 to 50 percent of patients will die of a lethal cardiac arrhythmia within three years. A number of factors interact to determine the occurrence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure. Myocardial fibrosis and enhanced left ventricular wall stress may alter the electrophysiologic properties of the myocardium, but these factors may not be sufficient to explain the development of lethal rhythm disturbances. Neurohormonal activation may exacerbate the frequency and complexity of ambulatory arrhythmias in these patients, but such activation can persist for long periods without fatal electrophysiologic sequelae. Recent investigations suggest that electrolyte depletion may provide an important immediate precipitating cause for the occurrence of fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction whose susceptibility is markedly heightened by preexisting structural, hemodynamic, or neurohormonal factors. Further work is needed to determine if prophylactic therapy directed at preventing electrolyte depletion can favorably modify the long-term outcome of these severely ill patients.

Hormone-electrolyte interactions in the pathogenesis of lethal cardiac arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure. Basis of a new physiologic approach to control of arrhythmia.

Congestive heart failure is the most arrhythmogenic disorder in cardiovascular medicine. As left ventricular performance deteriorates and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue become progressively more severe, nearly all patients with heart failure experience frequent and complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias and nearly half die suddenly during long-term follow-up. This imminent risk of sudden death appears to be present for all patients with congestive heart failure; ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and programmed electrical stimulation are not useful in distinguishing patient subsets that are particularly predisposed to fatal arrhythmic events. Although conventional antiarrhythmic agents are widely prescribed as a nonspecific approach to prevent sudden death in these patients, there is little evidence to indicate that these drugs possess clinically important antiarrhythmic activity in patients with congestive heart failure, and these agents frequently serve to exacerbate the heart failure state and the underlying ventricular tachyarrhythmia. A useful approach to the prevention of sudden death in patients with congestive heart failure addresses the reversible causes of lethal ventricular arrhythmias in these individuals. Both experimental and clinical evidence indicates that circulating neurohormones and electrolyte deficits (particularly of potassium and magnesium) interact to provoke malignant ventricular ectopic rhythms and that the prevention of electrolyte depletion and the use of neurohormonal antagonists may exert clinically important antiarrhythmic actions. This physiologic approach may prove to be a more effective means of ameliorating the problem of sudden death than the empiric administration of conventional antiarrhythmic drugs.

The effects of diuresis on the pharmacokinetics of the loop diuretics furosemide and torsemide in patients with heart failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of furosemide and torsemide before and after diuresis in patients presenting with marked fluid overload. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 44 patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, ejection fraction < or =40%, and an estimated excess fluid body weight > or =6.8 kg. Oral furosemide or torsemide was administered before and after diuresis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed before and after diuresis. RESULTS: Following diuresis, maximum plasma concentration increased from 11.0+/-5.0 microg/mL to 13.9+/-6.8 with torsemide (P <0.05) and from 3.1< or =1.5 to 3.9+/-1.9 with furosemide (P=0.16). Maximum concentration increased by more than 30% in only one third of the patients. Total absorption (by area under the curve method) increased 6% among patients on torsemide (P=0.38) and 7% among patients on furosemide (P=0.63) and increased >30% in only 1 torsemide and 2 furosemide patients. The time to maximum concentration decreased from 1.40+/-.82 h to 0.81+/-0.36 with torsemide (P <0.01). There were no differences between furosemide and torsemide in the effects of edema on absorption. CONCLUSION: Marked diuresis altered the pharmacokinetics of both furosemide and torsemide in only a small percentage of patients. The use of adequate doses of oral diuretics in edematous patients may be successful, thereby permitting home treatment with oral diuretics and avoiding the cost of hospitalizations or home intravenous administration services.

Influence of diabetes mellitus on changes in left ventricular performance and renal function produced by converting enzyme inhibition in patients with severe chronic heart failure.

Diabetes mellitus is frequently accompanied by specific abnormalities of the renin-angiotensin system, but it is not known whether these alterations modify the response to converting enzyme inhibition. To evaluate this possibility, 129 patients with severe chronic heart failure were treated with captopril or enalapril for one to three months, while doses of digoxin and diuretics were kept constant; 35 patients had diabetes mellitus. Prior to therapy, diabetic patients had lower plasma renin activity (3.4 +/- 0.5 versus 7.0 +/- 1.1 ng/ml/hour) than did nondiabetic control subjects (p less than 0.05); yet the initial hemodynamic response to captopril was similar in both groups. Plasma renin activity predicted the hypotensive response to the first dose of captopril in nondiabetic control subjects (r = 0.70, p less than 0.001) but not in diabetic patients (r = 0.29). During long-term treatment with captopril or enalapril, both diabetic and nondiabetic patients had similar increases in cardiac index and decreases in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Diabetic patients, however, showed larger reductions in left ventricular filling pressure (-13.8 versus -9.1 mm Hg, p less than 0.02) and mean right atrial pressure (-6.2 versus -3.9 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) than did nondiabetic subjects; this was accompanied by a notable decline in body weight in diabetic patients only. Renal function remained unaltered during converting enzyme inhibition in nondiabetic patients, but deteriorated significantly in diabetic patients, as reflected by a marked increase in serum creatinine concentration (1.7 +/- 0.1 to 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg/dl, p less than 0.001). In conclusion, despite lower pretreatment plasma renin activity, diabetic patients with severe chronic heart failure demonstrated improvement during long-term converting enzyme inhibition to a degree similar to (if not greater than) that seen in nondiabetic control subjects, but were more susceptible to the development of functional renal insufficiency than their nondiabetic counterparts. These differences are explicable by abnormalities of renin/aldosterone synthesis and angiotensin-mediated vasoregulation that are known to be present in the diabetic state.

Importance of magnesium in congestive heart failure.

There are many reasons to expect magnesium deficiency in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Medical therapy, neurohormonal activation and decreased dietary intake could all contribute to low concentrations of serum and muscle magnesium. Although the ideal serum level of this electrolyte is not known, multiple studies have documented lower magnesium concentrations in patients with heart failure than in normal persons. Magnesium deficiency could theoretically produce hemodynamic deterioration and ventricular arrhythmias. These complications have been observed in animals and in patients without heart failure, and magnesium repletion has reversed the adverse effects of hypomagnesemia in some patients. However, the consequences of chronic depletion of the electrolyte have not been adequately evaluated. Because of the high incidence of sudden death in patients with severe congestive heart failure, well designed investigations to determine the importance of magnesium are needed.

Comparative effects of three beta blockers (atenolol, metoprolol, and propranolol) on survival after acute myocardial infarction.

The beneficial impact of beta blockade after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is clear, but beta-adrenergic blockers differ in multiple characteristics, including lipophilicity and selectivity. The impact of these factors on the effects of beta blockade is unknown. We therefore compared the effects of different beta blockers on mortality after AMI. Charts of 201,752 patients with AMI were abstracted by the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a quality assurance program sponsored by the Health Care Financing Administration. Of the 69,338 patients prescribed beta blockers, we compared mortality of patients receiving different beta-adrenergic blockers using the Cox proportional-hazards model accounting for multiple factors that might influence survival. The mortality rates of the 2 selective agents, metoprolol and atenolol, were virtually identical (13.5% and 13.4% 2-year mortality, respectively). Compared with metoprolol, patients discharged on propranolol had a slightly increased mortality (15.9% 2-year mortality), which may be related to undetected differences at baseline. Survival with all of the drugs was superior to the 23.9% 2-year mortality seen in patients not receiving beta blockers. Beta blockade overall was associated with a 40% improvement in survival. Although the use of beta blockade after AMI has major prognostic importance, the present study suggests that the specific beta blocker chosen will have little influence on mortality.