Outcomes related to antiplatelet or anticoagulation use in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: The number of cases involving patients undergoing vascular procedures who are prescribed clopidogrel or warfarin as treatment options continues to rise. Our aim was to examine outcomes related to antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A retrospective review of 260 consecutive patients undergoing CEA. Data including patient demographics, operative details, perioperative use of aspirin (ASA), clopidogrel, or warfarin, and early and/or late outcome(s) were collected. Endpoints included postoperative morbidity and/or mortality rate(s) and bleeding complications. RESULTS: The study included 152 men and 108 women (mean age = 69.3 years), with a mean follow-up of 406 days. In all, 46% of endarterectomies were for a symptomatic disease. The technique of eversion endarterectomy was applied in 126 (48.5%), Dacron-patch in 112 (43.1%), and bovine pericardial-patch in 14 (5.4%) of the cases. Among the patients, 171 were taking ASA, 50 were taking clopidogrel ± ASA, and 10 were taking warfarin (mean INR = 1.62; range, 1.2-2.1); the remaining 29 were not on any antiplatelet therapy. All patients who were on warfarin therapy underwent an eversion endarterectomy. Overall, there were 19 (7.3%) complications (12 major and seven minor). The 30-day stroke rate and stroke death rate was 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively. Patients taking clopidogrel developed more number of neck hematomas (16% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.0004) compared with patients who were on ASA alone. For patients taking clopidogrel, Dacron-patch repair resulted in more hematomas than eversion endarterectomy (35% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.012). There was no difference in the incidence of neck hematoma on the basis of endarterectomy technique in patients who were on ASA alone. The patients taking warfarin neither had a perioperative complication nor developed a neck hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, clopidogrel use during CEA resulted in a significant risk for developing a neck hematoma, particularly when using a Dacron-patch. The risk of a neck hematoma in patients who were on clopidogrel was much less when an eversion endarterectomy was performed.

Acute tibial compartment syndrome following spine surgery.

This article presents a case of a patient with popliteal artery occlusion following anterior and posterior instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine. No previous study has reported acute anterior tibial compartment syndrome due to popliteal artery occlusion and restricted venous return following spine surgery. A 53-year old female, with a twice failed fusion of L5-S1, underwent L3-S1 anterior interbody and posterior L3-S1 instrumented fusion. Due to postoperative continuous analgesia, the patient was sleepy and confused on postoperative day 1. On the postoperative day 2, the right calf and anterolateral tibia manifested clinical signs of compartment syndrome and both thighs exhibited pressure ecchymoses from the antiembolism stockings. Fasciotomies of the right tibial compartments were undertaken and necrosis of the anterior compartment muscles was found. Intraoperative arteriogram revealed occlusion of the right popliteal artery and thrombectomy was performed. Lupus anticoagulant was found to be responsible for patient's coagulopathy. During postoperative year 1, the patient still had weakness and recurrent edema of the right foot. Unrecognized limb ischemia and possibly restricted venous return were the causes of the compartment syndrome. Surgeons should be aware of this devastating complication of spine surgery.