[Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: Time matters]. / Impacto de los días transcurridos desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hospitalización en la mortalidad hospitalaria por COVID-19: el tiempo importa.

Background: COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. Theeffect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospital-ization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsedinto account. Methods: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online datacapture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the generalcohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an earlypresenting (EP; < 5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. Results: 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in theLP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortalityin the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS incrementaccounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93---0.98). Regarding variationsin other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index onlyremained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. Conclusion: When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be consideredas their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognosticfactors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease.

[Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19]. / Derivación y validación de una puntuación de riesgo de ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos para pacientes con COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: This work aims to identify and validate a risk scale for admission to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We created a derivation rule and a validation rule for ICU admission using data from a national registry of a cohort of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted between March and August 2020 (n = 16,298). We analyzed the available demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables recorded at hospital admission. We evaluated the performance of the risk score by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Using the ß coefficients of the regression model, we developed a score (0 to 100 points) associated with ICU admission. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years; 57% were men. A total of 1,420 (8.7%) patients were admitted to the ICU. The variables independently associated with ICU admission were age, dyspnea, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presence of diffuse infiltrates on a chest X-ray. The model showed an AUROC of 0.780 (CI: 0.763-0.797) in the derivation cohort and an AUROC of 0.734 (CI: 0.708-0.761) in the validation cohort. A score of greater than 75 points was associated with a more than 30% probability of ICU admission while a score of less than 50 points reduced the likelihood of ICU admission to 15%. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction score was a useful tool for forecasting the probability of ICU admission with a high degree of precision.

Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: time matters.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. The effect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19 prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospitalization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsed into account. METHODS: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online data capture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the general cohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an early presenting (EP; <5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. RESULTS: 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in the LP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS increment accounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Regarding variations in other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index only remained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. CONCLUSION: When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be considered as their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognostic factors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease.

Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: This work aims to identify and validate a risk scale for admission to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We created a derivation rule and a validation rule for ICU admission using data from a national registry of a cohort of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted between March and August 2020 (N = 16,298). We analyzed the available demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables recorded at hospital admission. We evaluated the performance of the risk score by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Using the ß coefficients of the regression model, we developed a score (0-100 points) associated with ICU admission. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years; 57% were men. A total of 1420 (8.7%) patients were admitted to the ICU. The variables independently associated with ICU admission were age, dyspnea, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presence of diffuse infiltrates on a chest X-ray. The model showed an AUROC of 0.780 (CI: 0.763-0.797) in the derivation cohort and an AUROC of 0.734 (CI: 0.708-0.761) in the validation cohort. A score of greater than 75 points was associated with a more than 30% probability of ICU admission while a score of less than 50 points reduced the likelihood of ICU admission to 15%. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction score was a useful tool for forecasting the probability of ICU admission with a high degree of precision.

A descriptive study of transthyretin amyloidosis in a tertiary hospital without a referral unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a rare disease that is part of systemic amyloidosis and is life-threatening. It can affect all organs and systems, the most frequent being neurological and cardiac involvement. This study aims to detect possible ATTR cases and carry out a descriptive study of them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive single-centre study carried out in a tertiary hospital, which included patients with suspected ATTR between September 2016 and January 2020. RESULTS: A total of 190 suspected ATTR patients were detected. The study includes 100 of these patients, as well as 10 relatives of patients in whom ATTR was detected in its genetic variant (ATTRv). In total, ATTRv was detected in 7 individuals (3 with a presymptomatic mutation of the disease), 16 patients with age-related ATTR and 31 individuals with unknown cardiac amyloidosis with the tests performed, which confirms the presence of this disease in non-endemic areas. CONCLUSIONS: ATTR is a disease that must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of patients with heart failure with preserved LVEF, especially if associated with neurological symptoms.

Atypical presentation of transthyretin amyloidosis in a non-endemic area. / Presentación atípica de amiloidosis por transtiretina en un área no endémica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are 2 types of amyloidosis caused by transthyretin deposits: the wild type (wt-ATTR) and the mutant type (m-ATTR), transmitted by autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetrance, manifesting with neurological and/or cardiac symptoms. We report on 3 families affected by m-ATTR diagnosed in a nonendemic area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 63 patients with a high suspicion of ATTR. The diagnosis was subsequently performed by magnification through polymerase chain reaction of DNA. For the positive cases, we studied the first-degree relatives. RESULTS: We detected 7 positive cases of m-ATTR, distributed among 3 families (Glu74Gln, Val142Ile in heterozygosity and Val142Ile in homozygosity), and 3 cases of nonpathogenic variants. CONCLUSIONS: Hereditary ATTR is a rare disease but is present in nonendemic areas and should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with polyneuropathy and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

[Hypertensive urgencies: Description of clinical characteristics, management, variables associated with re-entry and short-term prognosis]. / Urgencias hipertensivas: descripción de características clínicas, manejo, variables asociadas a reconsulta y pronóstico a corto plazo.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of hypertensive urgencies at the emergency department, as well as the variables associated with early re-admission (<7 days) and re-admission at one month (<30 days). METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department of a third level hospital during 2013. Subsequently, a case-control analysis was performed to analyze the group of patients with readmission. RESULTS: A total of 398 hypertensive urgencies were collected (32.4% men, mean age 67.75 years), which led to an incidence of 3.28/1000 visits. Eighty point nine percent had a previous history of hypertension, and the mean Charlson Index was 2.23. Headache was the most frequent symptom (49.1%), followed by dizziness/instability (29.5%) and nausea/vomiting (17.1%). Eighty point seven percent of the patients were prescribed pharmacological treatment. The rates of cardiovascular events or mortality at one month were low (2.26% and 0.25% respectively). Despite this, 7.53% and 11.31% of patients were readmitted in under 7 days or 30 days, respectively. The variables associated with readmission in the multivariate analysis were elevated systolic blood pressure in the first determination, previous hypertension and the presence of palpitations. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive emergencies are high-incidence conditions in the Emergency Department. In our study, patients with a prior diagnosis of hypertension and elevated systolic blood pressure at the first determination had a higher risk of re-entry and would be candidates for closer follow-up on discharge.

[Bilateral bronchopneumonia due to Rothia mucilaginosa]. / Bronconeumonia bilateral por Rothia mucilaginosa.

Rothia mucilaginosa (R. mucilaginosa), formerly named Stomatococcus mucilaginosus, is a facultatively anaerobic, encapsulated gram-positive coccus, which forms part of the normal oropharyngeal and is rarely considered to be a pathogen in immunocompetent patients, although it can produce, on rare occasions, serious infections like bacteremia, endocarditis and respiratory infections; such as pneumonia, pleural empyema or superinfection of bronchiectasis. We present the case of a 74-year-old male diagnosed with right basal pneumonia of torpid evolution with a poor initial response to different antibiotics, with clinical and radiological worsening and the appearance of bilateral bronchopneumonia with pseudonodular images. R. mucilaginosa in pure culture was isolated in three sputum cultures and in bronchial suction. The patient was finally treated with Linezolid with a good clinical response and normalisation of the thorax radiography, confirming the disappearance of R. mucilaginosa in subsequent sputum cultures. As there are few documented cases of pneumonia due to R. mucilaginosa, we believe that presenting this case will be of interest.