RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of myocarditis by CMR requires the use of T2 and T1 weighted imaging, ideally incorporating parametric mapping. Current 2D mapping sequences are acquired sequentially and involve multiple breath-holds resulting in prolonged scan times and anisotropic image resolution. We developed an isotropic free-breathing 3D whole-heart sequence which allows simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping and validated it in patients with suspected acute myocarditis. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers and 28 patients with suspected myocarditis underwent conventional 2D T1 and T2 mapping with whole heart coverage and 3D joint T1/T2 mapping on a 1.5T scanner. Acquisition time, image quality, and diagnostic performance were compared. Qualitative analysis was performed using a 4-point Likert scale. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the quantitative agreement between 2D and 3D sequences. RESULTS: The 3D T1/T2 sequence was acquired in 8mins 26s under free breathing, whereas 2D T1 and T2 sequences were acquired with breath holds in 11mins 44s (p=0.0001). All 2D images were diagnostic. For 3D images, 89% of T1 and 96% of T2 images were diagnostic with no significant difference in the proportion of diagnostic images for the 3D and 2D T1 (p=0.2482) and T2 maps (p=1.0000). Systematic bias in T1 was noted with biases of 102ms, 115ms, and 152ms for basal-apical segments, with a larger bias for higher T1 values. Good agreement between T2 values for 3D and 2D techniques was found (bias of 1.8ms, 3.9ms, and 3.6ms for basal-apical segments). The sensitivity and specificity of the 3D sequence for diagnosing acute myocarditis was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49-91%) and 83% (36-100%) respectively, with an estimated c-statistic (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.79-0.91) and no statistically significant difference between the 2D and 3D sequences for the detection of acute myocarditis for T1 (p=0.2207) or T2 (p=1.0000). CONCLUSION: Free-breathing whole heart 3D joint T1/T2 mapping was comparable to 2D mapping sequences with respect to diagnostic performance, but with the added advantages of free-breathing, and shorter scan times. Further work is required to address the bias noted at high T1 values, but this did not significantly impact on diagnostic accuracy.