Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Nephrol ; 73(6): 449-53, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20497758

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Under certain circumstances when patients need peritoneal dialysis (PD) but no physical unit or official staff are available, one has to improvise ways to serve such patients. In this study we describe our experience with such patients without a physical peritoneal dialysis unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 1997 we trained 33 patients, mean age 61.7 +/- 12.8 years old. Catheter implantation was done in another hospital on them as out-patients. We used trained nurses made available by the company that supplies the PD solution. After 2004 the whole training was done at patients' home, after having been accepted by the patients. RESULTS: Catheter implantation was successful in all 33 patients. Catheter was removed from 2 patients (one and 4 years after implantation) because of relapsing peritonitis in the first and fungal infection in the second. The overall peritonitis rate was 0.18 episodes/patient year or one episode every 63.5 patient months. Actuarial patient survival was 90%, at one year, 83% at second year and 55% at third year. First and second year technique survival were 96%, and 90% respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results, should encourage those who want to provide peritoneal dialysis to their patients even when a physical peritoneal dialysis unit is not available.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Catéteres de Permanencia , Femenino , Hernia/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/efectos adversos , Peritonitis/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA