Surfing injuries: A US epidemiological study from 2009-2020.

BACKGROUND: The sport of surfing has grown exponentially. Early studies of surfing injuries are outdated as newer and more accessible surf technology has become available. This study's goal was to describe surfing injury patterns, incidence, and disposition of pediatric and adult surfers. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of surfing injuries from 2009 to 2020 of adult (>18 years of age) and pediatric (<18 years of age) patients was performed using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database. The consumer product code 1261 (Surfing) was used to identify injury patterns. Chi-squared test was performed on all categorical variables. Logistic regression was used on significant variables from the frequency tables. All analysis was performed with R-statistical programming software. RESULTS: There was an overall decreasing trend of surfing injuries over time. Injuries for both adult and pediatric patients tended to occur most within the summer season (p<0.001). The odds of an adult surfing injury victim being male is 2.89 (95% CI 1.87-4.44). The head/neck/face were the most injured body part in both groups. The pediatric group had a significantly higher rate of concussions at 6.5% compared to the adult group at 3.2%. Overall, the most common injury type was to the skin (p<0.001). Disposition between groups were similar with most patients being discharged home. Mortality was rare with three reported fatalities in the adult group and none in the pediatric group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of surfing injuries is continuing to decline despite more people surfing, revealing the improved safety of the sport over the last decade. Head/neck/face injuries are common injury locations, and pediatric surfers are particularly at increased risk of concussions. Continued education, usage of safety equipment such as protective headgear, and awareness of injury patterns, could further lessen potential injuries.

Rib Fractures With Concomitant Spinal Fractures May Benefit From Surgical Stabilization.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures has demonstrated benefits in patients with complex thoracic injuries. Limited information exists regarding patients with thoracic injuries and concomitant spinal injuries. We hypothesized that patients who suffer both thoracic cage and spinal fractures and undergo surgical fixation (FIX) will have improved outcomes compared to non-fixation (NFIX) patients. In our retrospective review, adult patients with rib injuries from 2015 to 2019 were pooled from the National Trauma Data Bank. Mortality with FIX rib fractures with spinal fractures decreased by 6.1% vs the NFIX group. Mortality of FIX of rib fractures without spinal fractures decreased by 2.2% vs the NFIX group. Patients with rib fractures with concomitant spinal fracture (RFWSF) are more likely to receive rib FIX than those with rib fractures without spinal fractures. Rib FIX in patients with RFWSF vs those with RFWO facilitates less ventilators days and shorter ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) as well as decreases mortality.

Inter-facility transfers for burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries.

Burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries suffer increased morbidity and mortality. Complex care coordination is necessary for these patients, and the prevalence of resulting inter-facility transfers has not yet been quantified by literature. This study examined the outcomes for traumatically injured burn patients to identify the occurrence of trauma system transfers in this group. The National Trauma Data Bank was reviewed from the years 2007-2016 for 6,565,577 patients with traumatic, burn, and concomitant burn & traumatic injuries. There were 5068 patients with both traumatic and burn injuries, 145,890 patients with burn injuries, and 6,414,619 patients with traumatic injuries. Trauma/burn patients were more often admitted to the ICU from the ED at a rate of 35.5% compared to 27.1% for burn and 19.4% for trauma (P < 0.001). For disposition when discharged from the hospital, trauma/burn patients required more inter-facility transfers at a rate of 2.5% compared to 1.7% for burn and 1.3% for trauma (P < 0.001). For level I trauma centers, 5.5% of trauma/burn, 7.1% of burn, and 0.5% of trauma patients required inter-facility transfers. For level II trauma centers, 29.1% of trauma/burn, 47.0% of burn, and 2.8% of trauma patients required inter-facility transfers. Among level I and level II trauma centers, patients with only burns and burn patients with concomitant traumatic injuries required more inter-facility transfers, and level II trauma centers required more inter-facility transfers for all patients. Quantifying these findings is the first step toward improving triage decisions and allocation of health care resources while expediting appropriate care.

The Trauma Activation Review Committee: Response to Undertriage During a Period of Rapid Growth at a Level II Trauma Center.

Trauma triage criteria are constantly being refined for improved identification of severely injured patients. When errors occur, they should be tracked, and triage criteria adjusted to minimize these events. Two time periods of trauma registry data at a single rural level II trauma center were retrospectively compared to evaluate demographics, injuries, and outcomes to identify triage errors. In 300 activated trauma patients during 2011, overtriage was 23% and undertriage was 3.7%. In 1035 activated trauma patients during 2019, overtriage was 20.5% and undertriage was 2.2%. Mortality decreased over time overall. In 2019, Trauma I patients were older, spent more time on the ventilator, and in the ICU (all P < .001). Trauma II patients were also older, had lower ISS, hospital days, and ventilator days (all P < .001). During rapid growth, evaluation of overtriage and undertriage can provide useful feedback for hospital staff to refine triage choices and improve patient outcomes.

Age-Related Differences in Injury Patterns and Outcome From Falls From Tree Stands.

From 2009 to 2019 there were 77 youth and 1046 adults injured in tree stand-related emergency department visits. There was no statistically significant different in sex or gender. Injury types were similar among groups and were categorized by body part. Despite the above-mentioned insignificant differences between the groups, we did identify several statistically significant findings. Adults that were not Caucasian or African-American were more likely to sustain injuries related to tree stands when compared to their youth counterparts (P-value 0.029). Adult patients were also more likely to sustain trauma to their torso (P-value 0.017). Lastly, adult patients were found to be more likely to require hospitalization in comparison to the youth population (P-value 0.018). Improved education and safety guidelines in the use of tree stands, particularly in individuals in ages 18 and up, would likely lessen the discrepancies between age groups identified in this study.

Traumatic Cardiac Arrest in Pediatric Patients: An Analysis of the National Trauma Database 2007-2016.

The purpose of this study was to identify the population of pediatric patients who arrive without signs of life and describe outcomes using a national database.Patients eighteen and younger with no signs of life were pulled from the National Trauma Database (NTDB) from the years 2007-2016. A total of N = 7503 patients were separated into two cohorts for comparison. Subset analysis was also conducted for patients undergoing a thoracotomy. Statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Over the 9-year period most patients died in the ED or hospital (95.7%), very few patients were discharged home (1.3%), and ED thoracotomies were performed rarely (9%) with most patients dying (97%).Arrival to the trauma bay without signs of life is associated with a dismal prognosis. Clinical judgment must be carefully applied to choose the small number of patients who would benefit from an aggressive approach.