IFN-γ-driven intratumoral microenvironment exhibits superior prognostic effect compared with an IFN-α-driven microenvironment in patients with colon carcinoma.

Interferon (IFN)-α and IFN-γ are cytokines with potent immunomodulating and anti-tumor activities. It is unknown which of the two IFNs may be more potent in the regulation of an anti-tumorigenic response in colorectal carcinoma or whether both cytokines cooperate. We, therefore, established human myxovirus resistance protein A and human guanylate-binding protein-1 as markers for the differential detection of IFN-α- and IFN-γ-driven tumor micromilieus, respectively. In vitro studies with different cultures of tumor cells from colorectal carcinoma and stroma cells showed that the expression of myxovirus resistance protein A was exclusively induced by IFN-α, whereas guanylate-binding protein-1 was strongly induced by IFN-γ and only weakly by IFN-α. This expression pattern was used to distinguish cell activation caused by the two cytokines in a clinical cohort of patients with colon carcinoma (n = 378). Patients with primary tumors expressing only guanylate-binding protein-1 exhibited the highest cancer-specific 5-year survival (94.0%, P = 0.006) compared with those expressing both factors (90.3%, P = 0.006), myxovirus resistance protein A alone (83.5%, P = 0.096), or none (72.8%). Our study describes a successful proof-of-principle approach that complex cytokine interaction networks can be dissected in human tissues and demonstrates that an IFN-γ-driven tumor microenvironment exhibits a superior prognostic effect compared with an IFN-α-driven tumor microenvironment in colon carcinoma.

Expression and localization of axin 2 in colorectal carcinoma and its clinical implication.

PURPOSE: Aberrant activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway plays a major role in the development of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Axin 2 is a key protein of this pathway and is upregulated in CRC. Here, we investigated RNA- and protein expression of axin 2 in CRC tissues at the single cell level. Moreover, the association of axin 2 with prognosis and survival was investigated in a large cohort of CRC patients (n = 280). METHODS: Localization and expression of axin 2 and ß-catenin was investigated using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical staining. The quantitative expression levels of axin 2 were determined using RT-qPCR. The association of axin 2 expression with prognosis and survival of the patients was determined by statistical analysis (logrank test, Kaplan-Meier). RESULTS: Our results confirmed the upregulation of axin 2 in CRC and showed that it is broadly expressed in the cytoplasm of the tumor epithelial cells both, in the tumor center and at the invasion front. Axin 2 was rarely expressed by tumor stromal cells and only weakly by normal colonic epithelial cells. Staining of ß-catenin and axin 2 in consecutive CRC tissue sections revealed that nuclear translocation of ß-catenin in the tumor front was not associated with changes in the cytoplasmic localization of axin 2. Axin 2 did not show any association with proven prognostic factors or survival of the CRC patients. CONCLUSION: The generally increased expression of axin 2 in all tumor stages as compared to normal tissue suggests an initiating pathogenic function in the development of CRC.