Connections of Anterior Thalamic Visual Centers in the Leopard Frog, Rana pipiens.

The amphibian retina projects to two discrete regions of neuropil in the anterior thalamus: the neuropil of Bellonci and the corpus geniculatum. These retinorecipient areas are encompassed within a larger zone of surrounding neuropil we call the NCZ (for neuropil of Bellonci/corpus geniculatum zone). The NCZ is characterized electrophysiologically by a distinctive tonic oscillatory response to blue light; it appears to be a visual module involved in processing the stationary visual environment. Using horseradish peroxidase (HRP), we mapped the connections of the NCZ. Retrogradely labeled cell bodies are found in: (1) the contralateral anterior thalamus; (2) both retinas; and (3) the posterior medial dorsal thalamus (PMDT). Anterogradely labeled fibers are found in: (1) the contralateral anterior thalamus; (2) the ipsilateral PMDT; (3) the ipsilateral neuropil lateral to the posterior tuberculum in the ventrolateral posterior thalamus; and (4) the ipsilateral anterior medulla. There are no direct connections between the NCZ and the telencephalon, the tectum, or the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Applying HRP to the PMDT, we found that its inputs are limited to the contralateral and ipsilateral NCZ and the contralateral PMDT. Thus, PMDT appears to be a satellite of the NCZ. Blue light elicits tonic oscillatory electrical responses in the PMDT quite similar to the responses to blue light in the NCZ. We discuss how the leopard frog NCZ and the mammalian ventral lateral geniculate nucleus share anatomical and physiological properties.

Electrophysiological properties of isthmic neurons in frogs revealed by in vitro and in vivo studies.

The frog nucleus isthmi (parabigeminal nucleus in mammals) is a visually responsive, cholinergic and anatomically well-defined group of neurons in the midbrain. It shares reciprocal topographic projections with the ipsilateral optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) and strongly influences visual processing. Anatomical and biochemical information indicates the existence of distinct neural populations within the frog nucleus isthmi, which raises the question: are there electrophysiological distinctions between neurons that are putatively classified by their anatomical and biochemical properties? To address this question, we measured frog nucleus isthmi neuron cellular properties in vitro and visual response properties in vivo. No evidence for distinct electrophysiological classes of neurons was found. We thus conclude that, despite the anatomical and biochemical differences, the cells of the frog nucleus isthmi respond homogeneously to both current injections and simple visual stimuli.

A visual lamina in the medulla oblongata of the frog, Rana pipiens.

We have discovered a lamina of visually responsive units in the medulla oblongata of the frog. It spans the entire medial aspect of the rostrocaudal length of the medulla and extends dorsoventrally from the cell-dense dorsal zone into the cell-sparse ventral zone. Most visual units within this lamina have large receptive fields, with the majority extending bilaterally in the frontal visual field. Most of these neurons are binocular, have no apparent directional preference, respond equally well to stimuli of a variety of shapes and sizes, and exhibit strong habituation. More medial locations in the visual lamina represent ipsilateral visual space while more lateral locations within the lamina represent contralateral visual space. Many units in the caudal aspect of the visual lamina are bimodal, responding to both visual and somatosensory stimuli. HRP tracing reveals inputs to the lamina from many primary and secondary visual areas in the midbrain and diencephalon. There is no area-by-area segregation of the projections to the visual lamina. For example, most parts of the tectum project across the visual lamina. The only spatial order in the visual lamina is that at more medial sites there tends to be more input from contralateral tectum; and at more lateral sites there tends to be more input from ipsilateral tectum. There is bilateral input to the visual lamina from tectum, tegmentum, posterior nucleus of the thalamus, posterior tuberculum, and ventromedial thalamic nucleus. There is ipsilateral input to the visual lamina from torus semicircularis, pretectum, nucleus of Bellonci, and ventrolateral thalamic nucleus. There is contralateral input to the visual lamina from basal optic complex. Collectively, these results show the presence of visual influences in regions of the medulla that likely represent an important step in sensorimotor transformation.

Combining visual information from the two eyes: the relationship between isthmotectal cells that project to ipsilateral and to contralateral optic tectum using fluorescent retrograde labels in the frog, Rana pipiens.

The frog nucleus isthmi (homolog of the mammalian parabigeminal nucleus) is a visually responsive tegmental structure that is reciprocally connected with the ipsilateral optic tectum; cells in nucleus isthmi also project to the contralateral optic tectum. We investigated the location of the isthmotectal cells that project ipsilaterally and contralaterally using three retrograde fluorescent label solutions: Alexa Fluor 488 10,000 mw dextran conjugate; Rhodamine B isothiocyanate; and Nuclear Yellow. Dye solutions were pressure-injected into separate sites in the superficial optic tectum. Following a 6-day survival, brains were fixed, sectioned, and then photographed. Injection of the different labels at separate, discrete locations in the optic tectum result in retrograde filling of singly labeled clusters of cells in both the ipsilateral and contralateral nucleus isthmi. Generally, ipsilaterally projecting cells are dorsal to the contralaterally projecting cells, but there is a slight overlap between the two sets of cells. Nonetheless, when different retrograde labels are injected into opposite tecta, there is no indication that individual cells project to both tecta. The set of cells that project to the ipsilateral tectum and the set of cells that project to the contralateral tectum form a visuotopic map in a roughly vertical, transverse slab. Our results suggest that nucleus isthmi can be separated into two regions with cells in the dorsolateral portion projecting primarily to the ipsilateral optic tectum and cells in the ventrolateral nucleus isthmi projecting primarily to the contralateral optic tectum.

Representation of the visual field in the anterior thalamus of the leopard frog, Rana pipiens.

We used physiological and anatomical methods to elucidate how the visual field is represented in the part of the dorsal anterior thalamus of the leopard frog that receives direct retinal projections. We recorded extracellularly while presenting visual stimuli, and characterized a physiologically defined region that encompasses the retinal projections as well as an extended zone beyond them. We probed the area systematically to determine if the zone is organized in a visuotopic map: we found that it is not. We found that units in this region respond only to stimuli in the contralateral half of the visual field, which is similar to what is seen in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in mammals. When we backfilled retinal ganglion cells from application of HRP to the anterior thalamus, we found labeled cells only in those parts of the retina corresponding to the contralateral hemifield, confirming our physiological observations.

Nucleus isthmi enhances calcium influx into optic nerve fiber terminals in Rana pipiens.

We examined the role of nucleus isthmi in enhancing intracellular calcium concentrations in retinotectal fibers in the frog optic tectum in vitro. The intracellular calcium levels were measured using the fluorescent calcium-sensitive dye, Calcium Green-1 3000 mw dextran conjugate (CG-1), which was injected into one optic nerve. Electrical stimulation of the labeled optic nerve alone increased tectal CG-1 fluorescence whereas electrical stimulation of nucleus isthmi alone had no effect on CG-1 fluorescence. Electrical stimulation of the nucleus isthmi ipsilateral to the labeled tectum, followed by electrical stimulation to the optic nerve can enhance calcium uptake more than a double pulse stimulation of the optic nerve alone. Maximum enhancement of the calcium signal by nucleus isthmi occurs when optic nerve stimulation follows the ipsilateral nucleus isthmi stimulation by 10 ms. These results suggest that nucleus isthmi input can facilitate retinotectal neurotransmission, and the mechanism could be used to allow the frog to attend to a single prey stimulus in an environment of several prey stimuli.

Light and shadow: visual recognition of the stationary environment by leopard frogs.

We determined how leopard frogs respond to non-moving aspects of the environment. We have discovered that these frogs are attracted to dark, stationary, opaque objects. This attraction depends on the relative reflectance of the object, i.e., the darker the block, the more attractive it is, and the attraction is found under both bright and dim ambient light levels. Larger blocks are more attractive than smaller blocks, but frogs are still attracted to blocks much smaller than themselves. Previous studies have shown that frogs are also attracted to sources of light. Using a choice experiment, we show that the probability a frog will choose a dark object versus a light source depends on the intensity of the light source relative to the intensity of the ambient light. The frog only moves toward a light source when it is at least 20 times brighter than the brightest object in the environment. These findings help to clarify the frog's "phototactic" nature.

Leopard frog priorities in choosing between prey at different locations.

Frogs are able to respond to a prey stimulus throughout their 360° ground-level visual field as well as in the superior visual field. We compared the likelihood of frogs choosing between a more nasally located, ground-level prey versus a more temporally located ground-level prey, when the prey at the nasal location is further away from the frog. Two crickets were presented simultaneously at 9 pairs of angles that included both crickets in the binocular visual field, both crickets in the monocular visual field, or one cricket in the binocular field and one in the monocular field. Frogs chose the more nasally located prey at least 71% of the time when the more temporal prey was in the monocular field; and 64% of the time when both prey were in the binocular field. Frogs tended to choose the more nasally located prey, even though it takes the frog longer to reach the prey. In addition, when given a choice between a prey located at ground level versus a prey located in the superior field, frogs tend to choose the prey at ground-level. These results suggest that there is a neural mechanism that biases frogs' responses to prey stimuli.

Superimposed maps of the monocular visual fields in the caudolateral optic tectum in the frog, Rana pipiens.

The superficial layers of the frog optic tectum receive a projection from the contralateral eye that forms a point-to-point map of the visual field. The monocular part of the visual field of the contralateral eye is represented in the caudolateral region of the tectum while the binocular part of the visual field is represented in the rostromedial tectum. Within the representation of the binocular field (rostromedial tectum), the maps of visual space from each eye are aligned. The tectal representation of the binocular visual field of the ipsilateral eye is mediated through a crossed projection from the midbrain nucleus isthmi. This isthmotectal projection also terminates in the caudolateral region of the optic tectum, yet there has been no indication that it forms a functional connection. By extracellular recording in intermediate layer 7 of the caudolateral tectum, we have discovered electrical activity driven by visual stimulation in the monocular visual field of the ipsilateral eye. The units driven from the ipsilateral eye burst upon initial presentation of the stimulus. At individual layer 7 recording sites in the caudolateral tectum, the multiunit receptive field evoked from the ipsilateral eye is located at the mirror image spatial location to the multiunit receptive field driven by the contralateral eye. Thus, as revealed electrophysiologically, there are superimposed topographic maps of the monocular visual fields in the caudolateral tectum. The ipsilateral eye monocular visual field representation can be abolished by electrolytic ablation of contralateral nucleus isthmi.

The serotonergic somatosensory projection to the tectum of normal and eyeless salamanders.

The spinotectal somatosensory projection was compared in normal, genetically eyeless, and embryonically manipulated salamanders. In normal animals, serotonin fluorescence was restricted to the intermediate tectalneuropil. This same region showed both high levels of serotonin uptake and somatosensory single unit electrical activity. In mutant eyeless salamanders and in normal animals enucleated early in development, serotonin fluorescence, serotonin uptake, and somatosensory activity were present in the superficial tectal neuropil. One-eyed animals, either genetically normal axolotls with one eye enucleated embryonically or genetically eyeless animals in which a normal eye had been transplanted, showed normal intermediate serotonin fluroescence and somatosensory physiology in the visually innervated half-tectum. In the visually uninnervated half-tectum, they showed superficial serotonin fluorescence and somatosensory physiology. In normal animals, 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT), a specific poison for serotonergic fibers, eliminated physiological responses in the contralateral somatosensory tectal region. The 5,7-DHT poisoning also abolished U.V.-induced serotonin fluorescence in the intermediate tectal neuropil. These results are discussed in terms of (1) evidence for serotonin as a central neurotransmitter for somatosensory information in the tectum, (2) the effects of eyelessness on tectal organization, and (3) related results in other animals.

The representation of the ipsilateral eye in nucleus isthmi of the leopard frog, Rana pipiens.

The retina of the leopard frog projects topographically to the superficial neuropil of the entire contralateral tectum. In the rostromedial neuropil of the tectum, there is a map of the binocular region of the visual field seen from the ipsilateral eye that is in register with the map of the binocular region of the visual field seen from the contralateral eye. The ipsilateral eye projects indirectly to the tectum through nucleus isthmi (n. isthmi), a midbrain tegmental structure. N. isthmi receives input from the ipsilateral optic tectum and sends projections bilaterally that cover both tectal lobes. Previous workers have not been able to find visual activity from the ipsilateral eye in the caudolateral optic tectum, representing the monocular visual field of the contralateral eye. We show electrophysiologically that across the entire extent of n. isthmi there are two superimposed maps, one map representing the entire visual field of the contralateral eye, the other map representing the binocular visual field of the ipsilateral eye. We also studied the behavioral consequences of localized lesions to n. isthmi and compared them to the behavioral consequences of localized lesions to the optic tectum representing equivalent areas of the visual field. Lesions to the optic tectum produce scotomas in the corresponding portion of the visual field. Lesions to n. isthmi, even medial n. isthmi representing the superior visual field, lead to scotomas in the temporal-most portion of the contralateral ground level visual field. Thus, the representation of visual space in n. isthmi is not a simple copy of the tectal representation of visual space.

Recognition of apertures in overhead transparent barriers by leopard frogs.

Anurans have independent systems for detecting moving stimuli and stationary opaque objects. We have discovered that leopard frogs will also orient to, and spontaneously and accurately jump through, circular apertures in overhead transparent covers. When given a choice between one large aperture of 3.8 cm diameter, and three apertures of smaller but equal diameter (2.5 cm diameter, 1.9 cm diameter, or 1.3 cm diameter) they choose the larger diameter aperture at a frequency (64, 87 and 97%, respectively) that is statistically greater than chance. In only 1 of 255 attempts was there a jump to the overhead cover that was not directed at an aperture. Atectal frogs are still able to detect and jump accurately through transparent apertures. Frogs cannot distinguish between two apertures of equal diameter if one aperture is covered with clear plastic with high light transmissibility (92% of transmissibility of air). However, if the plastic covering of the aperture has a residue which reduces light through the cover from 92 to 87% of the transmissibility of air, frogs will jump to the uncovered aperture at a frequency that is statistically greater than chance. Our results show that leopard frogs have an extremely well developed ability to detect overhead apertures just as they can vertical obstacles. They are able to jump towards such openings with a small margin of error independent of the tectal visual system.