Dialysis modality, humoral response to vaccine, and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk: Comparative prospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccinations have a central role in decreasing severe SARS-CoV-2 disease complications. This study investigated the long-term humoral immune response to BNT162b2 vaccine among hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and their relative risk for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included maintenance HD and PD patients who had received at least two BNT162b2 vaccine doses. Levels of antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured 6 and 12 months after the first vaccine dose, and 2-3 weeks after the third and fourth vaccine doses. Patients were divided according to dialysis modality (HD or PD). Humoral response was evaluated at different time points among different vaccine regimens (two vs. three vs. four doses of vaccine). An adjusted multivariate model was used to assess cumulative risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Eighty-seven HD and 36 PD patients were included. Among them, 106 (86%) received at least three vaccine doses. Both HD and PD patients demonstrated marked increases in humoral response 2-3 weeks after the third dose (mean anti-S antibody increased from 452 ± 501 AU/mL to 19,556 ± 14,949 AU/mL, p < 0.001). By 6 months after the third dose, antibody titers had declined significantly (mean anti-S antibody 9841 ± 10,493 AU/mL, p < 0.001). HD patients had higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection than PD patients (OR 4.4 [95% CI 1.4-13.6], p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, the most important predictor for SARS-CoV-2 infection was dialysis modality. CONCLUSION: This study found a high antibody response rate after the third and fourth doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among dialysis patients. Hemodialysis as dialysis modality is an important predictor of COVID-19 infection, despite similar humoral responses to vaccine in peritoneal dialysis.

The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol on the Outcomes of Hemodialysis Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background and objectives: Dyslipidemia is one of the most important modifiable risk factors in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in the general population, but its importance in the hemodialysis (HD) population is uncertain. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes HD patients hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the period 2015-2020 with lipid profile data during ACS. A control group with preserved kidney function was matched. Risk factors for 30-day and 1-year mortality were assessed. Results: Among 349 patients included in the analysis, 246 were HD-dependent ("HD group"). HD group patients had higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease than the control group. At ACS hospitalization, lipid profile and chronic statin treatment were comparable between groups. Odds ratios for 30-day mortality in HD vs. control group was 5.2 (95% CI 1.8-15; p = 0.002) and for 1-year, 3.4 (95% CI 1.9-6.1; p <0.001). LDL and LDL < 70 did not change 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in the HD group (p = 0.995, 0.823, respectively). However, survival after ACS in HD patients correlated positively with nutritional parameters such as serum albumin (r = 0.368, p < 0.001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.185, p < 0.001), and inversely with the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP; r = -0.348, p < 0.001) and neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR; r = -0.181, p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that heart failure was the only significant predictor of 1-year mortality (OR 2.8, p = 0.002). LDL < 70 mg/dL at ACS hospitalization did not predict 1-year mortality in the HD group. Conclusions: Despite comparable lipid profiles and statin treatment before and after ACS hospitalization, mortality rates were significantly higher among HD group. While malnutrition-inflammation markers were associated with survival of dialysis patients after ACS, LDL cholesterol was not. Thus, our study results emphasize that better nutritional status and less inflammation are associated with improved survival among HD patients.

Humoral Response to Pfizer BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Recent breakthrough infection in vaccinated people has led some authorities to recommend a booster dose for patients fully vaccinated 5-8 months ago. We aimed to assess the humoral response of MHD patients following a booster dose with the BNT162b2 vaccine. METHODS: The study included 102 MHD patients vaccinated with 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. A third dose (booster) was recommended to all MHD patients in our center and was given to those who opted to receive it, resulting in a booster group and a control group that did not receive the booster. Previous exposure was excluded by testing for the presence of the anti-nucleocapsid antibody (SARS-CoV-2) or positive PCR. We assessed the humoral response before and after the booster dose. RESULTS: Of 66 patients in the booster group, 65 patients (98.5%) developed a positive antibody response, from 472.7 ± 749.5 to 16,336.8 ± 15,397.3, as compared to a sustained decrease in the control group (695.7 ± 642.7 to 383.6 ± 298.6), p < 0.0001. No significant adverse effects were reported. Prior antibody titers were positively correlated to IgG levels following the booster dose. There was a significant association between malnutrition-inflammation markers and the humoral response. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all MHD patients developed a substantial humoral response following the booster dose, which was significantly higher than levels reported for MHD patients following administration of 2 doses alone. Further studies and observations are needed to determine the exact timing and dosing schedule.

Presence of Sarcopenia before Kidney Transplantation Is Associated with Poor Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with renal failure. It is crucial to select which patients may benefit from renal transplantation and which are at high risk for post-transplant complications. Sarcopenia is associated with poor outcome in various conditions, including in chronic kidney disease patients. The gold standard for measuring sarcopenia is computed tomography (CT) imaging to estimate muscle mass and quality since it is objective, reproducible, and reflects the overall health condition. The data regarding those measurements among kidney transplant recipients are limited, therefore we aimed to describe it in patients before kidney transplantation, assess the parameters associated with sarcopenia, and evaluate the clinical significance of those markers on outcomes following transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 183 kidney transplant recipients who had a CT scan 90 days prior to transplant. Sarcopenia was assessed by measuring the cross-sectional area (CSA) and mean muscle density of the psoas muscle at the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae levels and paravertebral muscles at the 12th thoracic vertebra level. RESULTS: There was a strong linear correlation between muscle size measured as CSA of the psoas muscle at the L3 and L4 vertebral body level and the CSA of the paravertebral muscles at the D12 vertebra level, and a moderate correlation to muscle density at those levels. Age was independently associated with risk of sarcopenia, defined as psoas CSA in the lowest tertile, with every year of age increasing the risk by 5%. CSA at the L3 level had a significant independent association with post kidney transplantation mortality, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.86 per cm2. There was a significantly longer hospitalization period postoperation in kidney recipients in the lower tertile of psoas CSA and density. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia as measured by psoas CSA is associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation and should be included as part of the assessment of kidney transplantation candidates.

Humoral Response and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk following the Third and Fourth Doses of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Dialysis Patients.

The optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule in dialysis patients and the potential need for a fourth vaccine dose are debatable. We prospectively assessed the humoral responses to three and four doses of BNT162b2 among dialysis patients. The study included 106 dialysis patients; 60 (56.6%) and 46 (43.4%) received 3 and 4 vaccine doses, respectively. Anti-spike (anti-S) antibody titers significantly increased after the third vaccine dose, followed by a decline, yet still remained higher than all previous measurements. The fourth vaccine dose led to another profound rise in anti-S titers. The absolute increase following the fourth dose correlated with response to the third dose. Infection risk however was similar between patients vaccinated with three or four doses.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease before Kidney Transplantation Correlates with New Onset Diabetes and Poor Metabolic Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. Metabolic syndrome is common in renal transplant recipients and is associated with increased CVD risk in those patients. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered to be the hepatic manifestation of a multi-system disorder, including CVD and metabolic syndrome. The data about prevalence of NAFLD before kidney transplantation and its consequences following transplantation are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective study of metabolic parameters and sonographic evidence of NAFLD, and an analysis of its metabolic outcomes, was performed in 341 consecutive kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-four (36.4%) kidney recipients had NAFLD before transplantation. The risk of NAFLD before kidney transplantation was independently and significantly related to diabetes (OR = 1.8), male gender (OR = 1.4), older age (every year of age increased the risk by 4%), higher BMI (every increase of 1 kg/m2 increased the risk by 15%), and higher triglycerides level. Mean levels of liver enzymes were similar in patients with and without NAFLD. Recipients with NAFLD before transplantation had a higher prevalence of new onset diabetes, even after adjustment to covariables. In addition, they had a higher increase in liver enzymes, triglycerides, and FIB-4 score, as an indication of liver fibrosis, after transplantation. Furthermore, NAFLD pre-transplantation was independently associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR = 4.4) following kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic evidence of NAFLD before kidney transplantation is associated with significant metabolic outcomes including de novo diabetes and cardiovascular mortality following transplantation and should be included as part of the assessment of kidney transplant candidate.

Reduced humoral response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients without prior exposure to the virus.

COVID-19 is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. There are no efficacy data available regarding these patients with any of the available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We analyzed the humoral response following full vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in 136 kidney transplant recipients, and compared it to 25 controls. In order to exclude prior exposure to the virus, only participants with negative serology to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were included. All controls developed a positive response to spike protein, while only 51 of 136 transplant recipients (37.5%) had positive serology (p < .001). Mean IgG anti-spike level was higher in the controls (31.05 [41.8] vs. 200.5 [65.1] AU/mL, study vs. control, respectively, p < .001). Variables associated with null humoral response were older age (odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.17-2.69]), high-dose corticosteroids in the last 12 months (1.3 [1.09-1.86]), maintenance with triple immunosuppression (1.43 [1.06-2.15]), and regimen that includes mycophenolate (1.47 [1.26-2.27]). There was a similar rate of side effects between controls and recipients, and no correlation was found between the presence of symptoms and seroconversion. Our findings suggest that most kidney transplant recipients remain at high risk for COVID-19 despite vaccination. Further studies regarding possible measures to increase recipient's response to vaccination are required.

Low immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were approved to prevent COVID-19 infection, with reported vaccine efficacy of 95%. Liver transplant (LT) recipients are at risk of lower vaccine immunogenicity and were not included in the registration trials. We assessed vaccine immunogenicity and safety in this special population. METHODS: LT recipients followed at the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and healthy volunteers were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies directed against the Spike-protein (S) and Nucleocapsid-protein (N) 10-20 days after receiving the second Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose. Information regarding vaccine side effects and clinical data was collected from patients and medical records. RESULTS: Eighty LT recipients were enrolled. Mean age was 60 years and 30% were female. Twenty-five healthy volunteer controls were younger (mean age 52.7 years, p = 0.013) and mostly female (68%, p = 0.002). All participants were negative for IgG N-protein serology, indicating immunity did not result from prior COVID-19 infection. All controls were positive for IgG S-protein serology. Immunogenicity among LT recipients was significantly lower with positive serology in only 47.5% (p <0.001). Antibody titer was also significantly lower in this group (mean 95.41 AU/ml vs. 200.5 AU/ml in controls, p <0.001). Predictors for negative response among LT recipients were older age, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and treatment with high dose steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: LT recipients developed substantially lower immunological response to the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccine. Factors influencing serological antibody responses include age, renal function and immunosuppressive medications. The findings require re-evaluation of vaccine regimens in this population. LAY SUMMARY: The Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine elicited substantially inferior immunity in liver transplant recipients. Less than half of the patients developed sufficient levels of antibodies against the virus, and in those who were positive, average antibody levels were 2x less compared to healthy controls. Factors predicting non-response were older age, renal function and immunosuppressive medications.

Kidney transplant recipients vaccinated before transplantation maintain superior humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Majority of transplant recipients did not develop an appreciable humoral response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, in contrast to dialysis patients and healthy individuals. We analyzed the serologic response to BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in a cohort of 19 kidney transplant recipients, vaccinated prior to transplantation, compare to 109 recipients vaccinated after transplantation, and to 39 healthcare workers, by determining the level of anti-spike antibodies after transplantation. All controls and 17 of 19 (90%) of recipients vaccinated before transplant were seropositive, while only 49 of 109 (45%) recipients vaccinated post-transplant had positive serology (P < .001). Median anti-spike IgG in the group of kidney transplant recipients vaccinated after transplantation (10.7 AU/ml, [IQR 0-62.5]) was lower than the patients vaccinated before transplantation (66.2 AU/ml [21.6-138]), which was significantly lower than in the controls (156 AU/ml [99.7-215.5]). Negative humoral response was associated with vaccination post transplantation (odds ratio 22.4), older age (OR = 1.04), and longer time on dialysis (OR = 1.02), while higher lymphocyte count at time of vaccination was protective (OR = .52). Our findings of sustained superior humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients vaccinated prior to transplantation strongly support the recommendations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of transplant candidates, especially those younger than 60 years.

Water avoidance and modification of exit-site care with stoma bag results in reduced exit-site infection rate in peritoneal dialysis patients.

AIM: Infection is one of the drawbacks associated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is related to significant morbidity. After we experienced an increase in exit-site infection (ESI) rate, mostly derived from environmental and water-derived organisms, we hypothesized that preventing exit-site exposure to water and narrowing local antibiotics range will reduce colonization and subsequent infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we aimed to estimate PD-related infections after exit-site policy change in a prospective study cohort of 27 participants compared to a control group of 58 participants. The modification of exit-site care consisted of applying a stoma bag during daily shower to prevent water exposure and conversion of local antibiotic from gentamycin to mupirocin. Primary outcome was catheter-related infection. Secondary outcomes were peritonitis rate and infection-related outcomes. RESULTS: The study group had a significantly lower ESI and ESI from environmental organisms' free probability. Rate of ESI from all causes was 0.054 ± 0.09 vs. 0.031 ± 0.09 episodes per patients' month for the control and study group, respectively (p = 0.049). Rate of environmental organism-related ESI was 0.047 ± 0.07 vs. 0.015 ± 0.08 episodes per patients' months for control and study group, respectively (p = 0.042). A higher risk of ESI from all organisms, and specifically from environmental organisms, was associated with being in the control group and a longer follow-up period. Rate of peritonitis was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The adjusted exit-site care policy significantly lowered ESI incidence. Avoidance of water exposure may have contributed to lessen bacterial colonization.

WoundClot® Hemostatic Gauze Reduces Bleeding Time after Arterial Venous Fistula Decannulation.

INTRODUCTION: Decannulation of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) after each hemodialysis session requires a precise compression on the needle puncture site. The objective of our study was to evaluate the bleeding time (BT) needed to achieve hemostasis using WoundClot, an innovative hemostatic gauze, and to assess whether its long-term use can improve AVF preservation. METHODS: This is a prospective single center study. Initially, the time to hemostasis after AVF decannulation was compared between WoundClot and cotton gauze in 24 prevalent hemodialysis patients. Thereafter, the patients continued to use WoundClot for 12 months and were compared to a control group consisting of 25 patients using regular cotton gauze. Follow-up data included parameters of dialysis adequacy, AVF interventions, and thrombotic events. RESULTS: WoundClot use shortened significantly the time needed for hemostasis. Mean venous BT decreased by 3.99 (±4.6) min and mean arterial BT by 6.38 (±4.8) min when using WoundClot compared to cotton gauze (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, dialysis adequacy expressed by spKt/V was higher in the WoundClot group compared to control (1.73 vs. 1.53, respectively, p = 0.047). Although patients in WoundClot group had a higher baseline BT, arterial and venous pressures did not differ between the groups after a median follow up of 10.8 months. AVF thrombosis rate was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: WoundClot hemostatic gauze significantly reduced the time required for hemostasis after AVF decannulation and may be associated with better AVF preservation. We suggest using WoundClot for arterial BT longer than 15 min and for venous BT longer than 12.5 min.

Exercise-induced albuminuria increases over time in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Exercise induced albuminuria (EiA) is elevated in patients with metabolic dysfunction and diabetes, and may serve as an early biomarker for endothelial dysfunction and "kidney reserve". However, the change in EiA levels over time and its interaction with metabolic dysfunction and glucose metabolism has never been studied. Therefore, we sought to determine EiA levels over time in a cohort of individuals attending a routine annual health survey. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 412 patients attending an annual healthy survey at our Medical Center. We collected urine samples for albumin and creatinine measurements before and immediately after completing an exercise stress test, along with multiple physiologic and metabolic parameters. Participants returned to a second follow up visit after a mean follow up period of 3 years (± 1.7 SD). RESULTS: Patients with diagnosed diabetes and subjects with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% significantly increased their EiA over time (median [IQR] change between visits = 19.5 [- 10.4-56.1] vs. - 1.1 [- 12.7-4.9] (p = 0.049) for diabetics vs non-diabetics respectively). Moreover, a diabetes diagnosis was significantly associated with a high increase in EiA over time (top 10th percentile) even after adjusting for age, BMI, eGFR, METs, self-reported history of heart disease, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; OR = 4.4 (1.01-19.3 95% CI) (p = 0.049). Finally, elevated fasting blood glucose (≥ 100 mg/dl) was the strongest and only significant predictor for a greater increase in EiA over time after adjusting for all five metabolic syndrome components; blood glucose, waist circumference, blood triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and BP criteria; OR = 4.0 (1.6-9.8 95% CI) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and/or elevated fasting blood glucose increase their exercise-induced urinary albumin excretion over time. The ability of EiA to predict major clinical outcomes in patients with and without diabetes needs to be determined in future studies.

Thromboelastography versus bleeding time for risk of bleeding post native kidney biopsy.

Introduction: The risk of bleeding has led to screening of the primary hemostasis before renal biopsy. A bleeding time test (BT) is considered standard practice, but reliance on this test is controversial and its benefits remain questionable. A possible alternative is thromboelastography (TEG). However, data regarding TEG in patients with renal dysfunction is limited.Objectives: To determine TEG abnormalities and their consequences in patients who underwent a native kidney biopsy.Methods: A retrospective study of 417 consecutive percutaneous native renal biopsies performed in our Center. If serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, the patient underwent either a BT test (period A, January 2015-31 December 2016) or TEG (period B, January 2017-August 2018). In patients with prolonged BT, or an abnormal low maximal amplitude (MA) parameter of TEG, or suspected clinical uremic thrombopathy, the use of desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) was considered.Results: Most biopsies (90.6%) were done by the same dedicated radiologist. Fifty-one patients had a BT test, which was normal in all tested patients. Seventy-one patients underwent TEG, and it was abnormal in 34 of them, most patients had combined abnormalities. The only parameter related to abnormal TEG was older age (Odds Ratio 1.21 [95% CI 1.09-2.38] p = 0.04 for abnormal Kinetics; OR 1.37 (1.05-1.96) p = 0.037 for abnormal MA). Twenty-six patients (6.23%) had bleeding complications. Risk of bleeding was significantly related to age (1.4 [1.11-7.48] p = 0.04), systolic blood pressure (1.85 [1.258-9.65] p = 0.02), and serum creatinine (1.21 [1.06-3.134] p = 0.048).Conclusions: TEG abnormalities in patients with renal dysfunction are variable and fail to predict bleeding during kidney biopsy. The decision to administer DDAVP as a preventive measure during these procedures should be based on clinical judgment only.

Kidney transplantation in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): analysis of transplantation outcome and IBD activity.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is a systemic disorder with possible renal involvement, yet data regarding the outcome of kidney transplantation (KT) in those patients, and IBD course post KT, are scarce. In this retrospective analysis, we studied the outcome of 12 IBD kidney recipients (seven Crohn's disease, five ulcerative colitis; primary kidney disease was IgA nephropathy in five, polycystic disease in four), compared to two control groups: matched controls and a cohort of recipients with similar kidney disease. During a follow-up period of 60.1 (11.0-76.6) months (median, interquartile range), estimated 5-year survival was 80.8 vs. 96.8%, with and without IBD, respectively (P = 0.001). Risk of death with a functioning graft was higher with IBD (HR = 1.441, P = 0.048), and with increased age (HR = 1.109, P = 0.05). Late rehospitalization rate was higher in IBD [incidence rate ratio = 1.168, P = 0.030], as well as rate of hospitalization related to infection [1.42, P = 0.037]. All patients that were in remission before KT, remission was maintained. Patients that were transplanted with mild or moderate disease remained stable or improved with Infliximab or Adalimumab treatment. In conclusion, IBD is associated with an increased risk of mortality, hospitalization because of infection and late rehospitalization after KT. Clinical course of IBD is stable after KT.

In sickness and in health: Living HIV positive kidney donation from a wife to her husband, with 7 years' post-transplant follow-up.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was traditionally considered an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation. After the introduction of ART, several studies have demonstrated comparable patient and graft outcomes between HIV-negative and HIV-positive kidney recipients. The US Congress passed the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act in 2013, which permits research in the area of HIV-positive to HIV-positive transplantation. HIV-infected living donation is also permitted under the HOPE Act. However, there is a concern regarding the safety of kidney donation in an HIV-infected person, given the risk of renal disease associated with HIV infection. We report here the case of successful kidney transplantation from HIV-positive living donor to HIV-positive recipient performed in our center on July 2012. To the best of our knowledge, this is the earliest case done in this medical context to be reported in the literature, therefore, potentially carrying several important messages to the transplantation community. In the present case, the living-donor kidney transplant was performed between a married couple infected with same strain of HIV-1, both on effective ART with efficiently suppressed viral replication and satisfactory pre-transplantation immune status.

Long term metabolic and renal outcomes of kidney donors compared to controls with excellent kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Only few studies of living kidney donors have included controls that were similarly healthy, including excellent kidney function. METHODS: In this study, we aimed to estimate long term metabolic and renal outcome in a cohort of 211 living donors compared to two control groups: paired-matched controls, and another control group of 2534 healthy individuals with excellent kidney function. RESULTS: Donors presented with higher estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR): (97.6 ± 15.2 vs 96.1 ± 12.2 vs 94.5 ± 12.4 ml/min/1.73m2) and lower urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) (4.3 ± 5.9 vs 5.9 ± 6.1 vs 6.1 ± 6.9 mg/g) for donors, matched controls and healthy controls, respectively (p <  0.001). In a mean follow up period of 5.5 for donors, donors presented with positive eGFR slopes during the first 3 years post donation, followed by negative slopes, compared to constantly negative slopes presented in the control group (p <  0.05). The variables related to the slope were being a donor, baseline eGFR, Body Mass Index (BMI) and age but not eGFR on the last day of follow-up or increased delta UACR. There was a significant increase in UACR in donors, as well as a higher rate of albuminuria, associated with a longer time since donation, higher pre-donation UACR and higher pre-donation BMI. Healthy controls had a lower BMI at baseline and gained less weight during the follow up period. Donors and controls had similar incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus and hypertension, as well as similar delta systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Donors were more likely to develop new onset metabolic syndrome, even after adjustment for age, gender and BMI. The higher incidence of metabolic syndrome resulted mainly from increased triglycerides and impaired fasting glucose criteria. However, prevalence of major cardiovascular events was not higher in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Donors are at increased risk to develop features of the metabolic syndrome in addition to the expected mild reduction of GFR and increased urine albumin excretion. Future studies are needed to explore whether addressing those issues will impact post donation morbidity and mortality.

Ultrapure Filter does not Confer Short-Term Benefits over Two Reverse Osmosis Systems in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Dialysate purity contributes to the inflammatory response that afflicts hemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and laboratory effects of using ultrapure water produced by a water treatment system including two reverse osmosis (RO) units in series, with a system that also includes an ultrapure filter (UPF). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in 193 hemodialysis patients during two periods: period A (no UPF, 6 months) and period B (same patients, with addition of UPF, 18 months), and a historical cohort of patients treated in the same dialysis unit 2 years earlier, which served as a control group. RESULTS: Mean C-reactive protein, serum albumin and systolic blood pressure worsened in period B compared to period A and in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: A double RO system to produce ultrapure water is not inferior to the use of ultrapure filters.

Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade improves arginine transport and nitric oxide generation through modulation of cationic amino acid transporter-1 in endothelial cells.

Blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MCR) has been shown to improve endothelial function far beyond blood pressure control. In the current studies we have looked at the effect of MCR antagonists on cationic amino acid transporter-1 (CAT-1), a major modulator of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) generation. Using radio-labeled arginine, {[3H] l-arginine} uptake was determined in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) following incubation with either spironolactone or eplerenone with or without silencing of MCR. Western blotting for CAT-1, PKCα and their phosphorylated forms were performed. NO generation was measured by using Griess reaction assay. Both Spironolactone and eplerenone significantly increased endothelial arginine transport, an effect which was further augmented by co-incubation with aldosterone, and blunted by either silencing of MCR or co-administration of amiloride. Following MCR blockade, we identified two bands for CAT-1. The addition of tunicamycin (an inhibitor of protein glycosylation) or MCR silencing resulted in disappearance of the extra band and prevented the increase in arginine transport. Only spironolactone decreased CAT-1 phosphorylation through inhibition of PKCα (CAT-1 inhibitor). Subsequently, incubation with either MCR antagonists significantly augmented NO2/NO3 levels (stable NO metabolites) and this was attenuated by silencing of MCR or tunicamycin. GO 6076 (PKCα inhibitor) intensified the increase of NO metabolites only in eplerenone treated cells. In conclusion spironolactone and eplerenone augment arginine transport and NO generation through modulation of CAT-1 in endothelial cells. Both MCR antagonists activate CAT-1 by inducing its glycosylation while only spironolactone inhibits PKCα.

Elevated ST2 levels are associated with antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Soluble ST2 (sST2) is a novel biomarker of inflammation and fibrosis. Elevated sST2 levels (≥35 ng/mL) are associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). There are sparse data regarding the significance of sST2 levels after heart transplantation (HTx). The study aims were to evaluate trends in soluble ST2 levels after the resolution of HF status with HTx and association between post-HTx sST2 levels and outcomes. Plasma sST2 levels were measured at baseline (median [IQR] of 118 days pre-HTx) and 12 months post-HTx in 62 subjects who were stratified into two groups by post-HTx sST2 levels < or ≥35 ng/mL: "Group 1" or "Group 2," respectively. Plasma sST2 levels were elevated in 58% of patients pre-HTx and in 50% of patients post-HTx. There was no association between elevated sST2 levels before and after HTx, and no significant differences in baseline characteristics between Group 1 and Group 2 patients. Group 2 as compared to Group 1 HTx recipients had significantly higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) for the entire post-transplant follow-up period (32% vs 4%, P = 0.006). There was no association between post-HTx sST2 level status and other post-HTx outcomes including survival. In conclusion, elevated plasma sST2 levels after HTx are associated with increased risk for AMR.

Progression and new onset of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in living kidney donors compared to healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence linking nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Living kidney donors do not have underlying kidney disease, but have reduced GFR as a result of nephrectomy. Whether kidney donation is associated with a higher risk for development or progression of NAFLD is currently unknown. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of metabolic parameters and sonographic evidence of NAFLD were performed in 232 living kidney donors and 162 healthy controls. RESULTS: A total of 25 donors and 44 controls had NAFLD at baseline. During a mean follow-up of 6.8 years, 6 donors (24%) and 17 controls (38.6%) (P = .29) had a remission of NAFLD, related with decreased body mass index (BMI). The progression of NAFLD fibrosis score was similar in both groups. New onset of NAFLD was observed in 14 (6.8%) donors and 13 (11.01%) controls (P = .211), and was related to increased BMI and a higher baseline Fatty Liver Index score. Neither eGFR nor urine albumin excretion in the donors were related to new onset or progression of NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced kidney function secondary to kidney donation is not associated with increased incidence or progression of NAFLD.