Clinical significance of unexplained persistent sinus tachycardia in women with structurally normal heart during the peripartum period.

BACKGROUND: Persistent sinus tachycardia (ST) is frequently encountered during pregnancy and peripartum period and its etiology often remains elusive. We sought to examine the possible association between unexplained persistent ST and obstetric outcomes. METHODS: A case control study was conducted using chart review of women admitted in labor to one of 7 hospitals of Northwell Health between January 2015 to June 2021. After excluding women with structurally abnormal hearts, we identified patients with persistent ST during the peripartum period, defined as a heart rate of more than 100 bpm for more than 48 h. A control group was created by randomly subsampling those who did not meet the inclusion criteria for sinus tachycardia. Obstetric outcomes were measured as mother's length of stay (LOS), pre-term labor (PTL), admission to the neonatal ICU (NICU), and whether she received cesarean-section (CS). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with persistent ST were identified, out of 141,769 women admitted for labor throughout the Northwell Health system. 23 patients with ST attributable to infection or hypovolemia from anemia requiring transfusion and 55 with unclear etiology were identified. After adjusting for age and parity, pregnant mothers with ST were 2.35 times more likely to have a CS than those without (95% CI: 1.46-3.81, p = 0.0005) and had 1.38 times the LOS (1.21- 1.56, p < 0.0001). Among mothers with ST, those with unexplained ST were 2.14 times more likely to have a CS (1.22-3.75, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Among pregnant patients, patients with ST have higher rates of CS.This association is unclear, however potential mechanisms include catecholamine surge, indolent infection, hormonal fluctuations, and medications. More studies are needed to explore the mechanism of ST in pregnant woman to determine the clinical significance and appropriate management.

Prevalence and clinical significance of arrhythmias during labour in women with structurally normal hearts.

OBJECTIVES: Examine the association between arrhythmias and adverse maternal outcomes in women with structurally normal hearts. METHODS: This was a case-control study of women admitted in labour to one of eight hospitals of Northwell Health from January 2015 to June 2021. After excluding women with structurally abnormal hearts, we identified women with an arrhythmic event and randomly subsampled the rest of the cohort to create a control group of 1025 patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association between arrhythmias and the incidence of caesarean section (CS), preterm labour (PTL), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and longer length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 1 41 769 women admitted in labour with a structurally normal heart, 137 had at least one arrhythmic event (0.097%). Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and frequent premature ventricular complexes or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VA) were present in 65 (0.046%), 22 (0.016%) and 46 (0.032%) women, respectively. Arrhythmia was previously diagnosed in 58.0% SVT cases but only in 9.7% AF and 8.1% VA cases. After adjusting for age, parity and comorbidities, the presence of any arrhythmia was an independent predictor of CS (OR 1.7 95% CI 1.2 to 2.5), PTL (OR 1.8, CI 1.1 to 3.0) and LOS (mean ratio 1.6, CI 1.4 to 1.8). This association was driven by presence of SVT and AF, whereas VAs were not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Arrhythmias, specifically SVT and AF, during labour in women with structurally normal heart are independently associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes.

Clinical performance of a next-generation sequencing assay (ThyroSeq v2) in the evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing with the Thyroseq v2 next generation sequencing panel ("Thyroseq") is used to estimate the risk of cancer in indeterminate thyroid nodules. METHODS: We analyzed 156 indeterminate thyroid nodules evaluated with Thyroseq, across 3 institutions. Thyroseq data and surgical pathology were matched via pathologic re-review. A result was considered Thyroseq positive if molecular alterations were annotated on the report with malignancy probability >30%. Performance characteristics were estimated using Bayes theorem. RESULTS: The Thyroseq-negative call rate was 65% (102/156). On surgical pathology, 16% (10/63) of nodules were malignant. The positive predictive value of a Thyroseq-positive result was 22% (8/37; if 2 noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features are counted as malignant, 27%, 10/37). There was 1 false-negative result (negative predictive value 96%, 22/23). The most common mutation was NRAS (19/37) with a positive predictive value of 7% (1/15). The positive predictive value of all RAS mutations (HRAS, KRAS, NRAS) was 9% (2/22). The second most common mutation, BRAF V600E, had positive predictive value of 100% (3/3). CONCLUSION: We report an external analysis of Thyroseq performance in the evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules. These data indicate that Thyroseq is likely to offer high negative predictive value but low positive predictive value. Many genetic alterations appear to be nonspecific for malignancy, and positive results should be interpreted with caution. These findings have implications for the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules profiled with Thyroseq.