Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 121
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 32(11): 2383-2387, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34041561

RESUMEN

Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) with predominantly subsequent vertebral fracture is a rare but severe disease with an estimated incidence of 0.4 in 100,000. In the past, patients with PLO have been predominantly treated with oral and i.v. bisphosphonates to reduce subsequent fracture risk. Hereby, the use of bisphosphonates in premenopausal women is controversial, as bisphosphonates know to persist in bone for many years and can be exposed and circulate in maternal serum and subsequently pass the placenta barrier and may have a detrimental effect on fetal bone health. Here we report the effects of denosumab on the bone mineral density (BMD) and subsequent fracture risk in PLO. In this case presentation, denosumab was administered postpartum with 3000 IE vitamin D and 1000 mg of calcium daily in a patient with PLO and vertebral fracture of L1 and L4. After 18 months of treatment with denosumab, we could demonstrate a clinical significant increase of BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip of 32.2%, 13.0%, and 11.5% respectively with no further subsequent fractures. As the patient had regular menstrual cycles and considered a further pregnancy, denosumab treatment was terminated and soon a second pregnancy occurred. After the second pregnancy, BMD decreased at the lumbar spine, femur neck, and total hip by -8.8%, -6.9%, and -7.0% respectively compared to the maximum values during treatment with denosumab, but was still significantly higher compared to baseline levels with no further fractures.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteoporosis , Densidad Ósea , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Cuello Femoral , Humanos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 32(2): 251-259, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32829471

RESUMEN

This study in 8 countries across Europe found that about 75% of elderly women seen in primary care who were at high risk of osteoporosis-related fractures were not receiving appropriate medication. Lack of osteoporosis diagnosis appeared to be an important contributing factor. INTRODUCTION: Treatment rates in osteoporosis are documented to be low. We wished to assess the osteoporosis treatment gap in women ≥ 70 years in routine primary care across Europe. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study in 8 European countries collected data from women 70 years or older visiting their general practitioner. The primary outcome was treatment gap: the proportion who were not receiving any osteoporosis medication among those at increased risk of fragility fracture (using history of fracture, 10-year probability of fracture above country-specific Fracture Risk Assessment Tool [FRAX] thresholds, T-score ≤ - 2.5). RESULTS: Median 10-year probability of fracture (without bone mineral density [BMD]) for the 3798 enrolled patients was 7.2% (hip) and 16.6% (major osteoporotic). Overall, 2077 women (55%) met one or more definitions for increased risk of fragility fracture: 1200 had a prior fracture, 1814 exceeded the FRAX threshold, and 318 had a T-score ≤ - 2.5 (only 944 received a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan). In those at increased fracture risk, the median 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture was 11.2% and 22.8%, vs 4.1% and 11.5% in those deemed not at risk. An osteoporosis diagnosis was recorded in 804 patients (21.2%); most (79.7%) of these were at increased fracture risk. The treatment gap was 74.6%, varying from 53% in Ireland to 91% in Germany. Patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis were found to have a lower treatment gap than those without a diagnosis, with an absolute reduction of 63%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large treatment gap in women aged ≥ 70 years at increased risk of fragility fracture in routine primary care across Europe. The gap appears to be related to a low rate of osteoporosis diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Absorciometría de Fotón , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 31(7): 1315-1322, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32090278

RESUMEN

This retrospective study investigated the incidence of fracture in 4420 type 1 diabetes (T1DM) patients. Our findings indicate that patients with T1DM have an increased incidence of fractures. Further studies and preventive measures are urgently needed. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of fracture in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: This study is based on the German Disease Analyzer database and included 4258 adult individuals with a T1DM diagnosis documented between January 2000 and December 2015 in 1203 general practices in Germany. Individual matching of T1DM and non-diabetic patients was performed. The cumulative incidence of new fractures was shown for up to 10 years after the index date using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazard models (dependent variable: incident fracture) were used to estimate the effect of T1DM on fracture incidence, as well as the effect of predefined variables on fracture incidence. RESULTS: After 10 years of follow-up, the cumulative fracture incidence was 18.4% for T1DM patients and 9.9% for non-diabetic patients (p < 0.001). A strong association between T1DM and fractures was found (HR, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.70-2.38) p < 0.001) in both female and male patients. Significant differences between T1DM and non-diabetes patients were found in lower leg/ankle, foot and toe, shoulder/upper arm, and rib(s), sternum and thoracic spine fractures. A significant association between higher age and fracture incidence was observed in T1DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we found that patients with T1DM have a twofold increased fracture rate compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, fractures were associated with increased age and high HbA1c values.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Osteoporos Int ; 31(9): 1801-1806, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32377808

RESUMEN

Our study demonstrated that progestogen-only oral and intrauterine contraceptives are not associated with fracture risk independent from age. PURPOSE: The use of progestogen-only contraception, resulting in a hypoestrogenic state, has been associated with impaired bone acquisition and increased fracture risk. The aim of this large population-based study was to assess the fracture risk in association with the use of progestogen-only contraceptives (progestogen-only pills (POPs) and progestogen-containing IUDs (LNG-IUD)). METHODS: We identified 14,421 women between 16 and 55 years of age with a first-time diagnosis of fracture and matched them with 14,421 random controls using the Disease Analyzer Database. RESULTS: The results of the first adjusted logistic regression model (ever use vs. never use of progestogen-only contraceptives) revealed that there was no significant association between the use of POPs (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.07, p = 0.657) or LNG-IUDs (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.21, p = 0.945) and fracture incidence. Also, in the second regression model, we observed no effect of duration of use of POPs (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.03, p = 0.672) or LNG-IUDs (OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.02, p = 0.177) on fracture occurrence. We also observed no effect in different age groups. CONCLUSION: Our study results indicate that progestogen-only contraception (either POPs or LNG-IUPs) is not associated with fracture risk and may be considered a bone-safe option for adults and adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción , Progestinas , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Premenopausia , Progestinas/efectos adversos
5.
Ann Oncol ; 30(6): 908-920, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31111878

RESUMEN

In the past decades, new cancer treatment approaches for children and adolescents have led to a decrease in recurrence rates and an increase in long-term survival. Recent studies have focused on the evaluation of the late effects on bone of pediatric cancer-related treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Treatment of childhood cancer can impair the attainment of peak bone mass, predisposing to premature onset of low bone mineral density, or causing other bone side-effects, such as bone quality impairment or avascular necrosis of bone. Lower bone mineral density and microarchitectural deterioration can persist during adulthood, thereby increasing fracture risk. Overall, long-term follow-up of childhood cancer survivors is essential to define specific groups at higher risk of long-term bone complications, identify unrecognized long-term adverse effects, and improve patient care. Children and adolescents with a cancer history should be carefully monitored, and patients should be informed of possible late complications of their previous medical treatment. The International Osteoporosis Foundation convened a working group to review the bone complications of pediatric cancer survivors, outlining recommendations for the management of bone health, in order to prevent and treat these complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/patología , Osteoporosis/patología , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Densidad Ósea , Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Niño , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Osteoporosis/etiología
6.
Osteoporos Int ; 30(12): 2391-2400, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31446440

RESUMEN

Estrogens and progestogens influence the bone. The major physiological effect of estrogen is the inhibition of bone resorption whereas progestogens exert activity through binding to specific progesterone receptors. New estrogen-free contraceptive and its possible implication on bone turnover are discussed in this review. Insufficient bone acquisition during development and/or accelerated bone loss after attainment of peak bone mass (PBM) are 2 processes that may predispose to fragility fractures in later life. The relative importance of bone acquisition during growth versus bone loss during adulthood for fracture risk has been explored by examining the variability of areal bone mineral density (BMD) (aBMD) values in relation to age. Bone mass acquired at the end of the growth period appears to be more important than bone loss occurring during adult life. The major physiological effect of estrogen is the inhibition of bone resorption. When estrogen transcription possesses binds to the receptors, various genes are activated, and a variety modified. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) stimulates bone resorption, and estrogen blocks osteoblast synthesis of IL-6. Estrogen may also antagonize the IL-6 receptors. Additionally, estrogen inhibits bone resorption by inducing small but cumulative changes in multiple estrogen-dependent regulatory factors including TNF-α and the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Review on existing data including information about new estrogen-free contraceptives. All progestins exert activity through binding to specific progesterone receptors; hereby, three different groups of progestins exist: pregnanes, gonanes, and estranges. Progestins also comprise specific glucocorticoid, androgen, or mineralocorticoid receptor interactions. Anabolic action of a progestogen may be affected via androgenic, anti-androgenic, or synadrogenic activity. The C 19 nortestosterone class of progestogens is known to bind with more affinity to androgen receptors than the C21 progestins. This article reviews the effect of estrogens and progestogens on bone and presents new data of the currently approved drospirenone-only pill. The use of progestin-only contraceptives leading to an estradiol level between 30 and 50 pg/ml does not seem to lead to an accelerate bone loss.


Asunto(s)
Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/farmacología , Factores de Edad , Androstenos/farmacología , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Desarrollo Óseo/fisiología , Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Resorción Ósea/sangre , Resorción Ósea/fisiopatología , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/farmacología , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/química , Estradiol/sangre , Estrógenos/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Progestinas/farmacología
7.
Osteoporos Int ; 30(9): 1745-1754, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270592

RESUMEN

This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in the five largest European countries (EU5) using the IOF reference cost-effectiveness model. Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice was cost-saving (provided more QALYs at lower costs) compared to no treatment in each of the EU5. PURPOSE: To estimate the real-world cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in the five largest European countries by population size: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK) (collectively EU5). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed sales data on osteoporosis drugs in each of the EU5 to derive a hypothetical intervention that corresponds to the mix of osteoporosis medication prescribed in clinical practice. The costs for this treatment mix were obtained directly from the sales data, and the efficacy of the treatment mix was estimated by weighing the treatment-specific fracture risk reductions from a published meta-analysis. Subsequently, we estimated the cost-effectiveness using costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) of the intervention compared to no treatment in each of the EU5 using the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) reference cost-effectiveness model. The model population comprised postmenopausal women, mean age 72 years with established osteoporosis (T-score ≤ - 2.5) among whom 23.6% had a prevalent vertebral fracture. The model was populated with country-specific data from the literature. RESULTS: Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice was cost-saving (provided more QALYs at lower costs) compared to no treatment in each country. The findings were robust in scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice is cost-saving in each of the EU5. Because of the under-diagnosis and under-treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis, from a health economic perspective, further cost-savings may be reached by expanding treatment to those at increased risk of fracture currently not receiving any treatment.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Econométricos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/economía , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/economía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
Osteoporos Int ; 30(11): 2155-2165, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31388696

RESUMEN

Many patients at increased risk of fractures do not take their medication appropriately, resulting in a substantial decrease in the benefits of drug therapy. Improving medication adherence is urgently needed but remains laborious, given the numerous and multidimensional reasons for non-adherence, suggesting the need for measurement-guided, multifactorial and individualized solutions. INTRODUCTION: Poor adherence to medications is a major challenge in the treatment of osteoporosis. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the consequences, determinants and potential solutions to poor adherence and persistence to osteoporosis medication. METHODS: A working group was organized by the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO) to review consequences, determinants and potential solutions to adherence and to make recommendations for practice and further research. A systematic literature review and a face-to-face experts meeting were undertaken. RESULTS: Medication non-adherence is associated with increased risk of fractures, leading to a substantial decrease in the clinical and economic benefits of drug therapy. Reasons for non-adherence are numerous and multidimensional for each patient, depending on the interplay of multiple factors, suggesting the need for multifactorial and individualized solutions. Few interventions have been shown to improve adherence or persistence to osteoporosis treatment. Promising actions include patient education with counselling, adherence monitoring with feedback and dose simplification including flexible dosing regimen. Recommendations for practice and further research were also provided. To adequately manage adherence, it is important to (1) understand the problem (initiation, implementation and/or persistence), (2) to measure adherence and (3) to identify the reason of non-adherence and fix it. CONCLUSION: These recommendations are intended for clinicians to manage adherence of their patients and to researchers and policy makers to design, facilitate and appropriately use adherence interventions.


Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Procesos de Grupo , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas
9.
Ann Oncol ; 29(1): 186-192, 2018 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29045642

RESUMEN

Background: Patients' compliance and persistence with endocrine treatment has a significant effect on the prognosis in early breast cancer (EBC). The purpose of this analysis was to identify possible reasons for non-persistence, defined as premature cessation of therapy, on the basis of patient and tumor characteristics in individuals receiving adjuvant treatment with letrozole. Patients and methods: The EvAluate-TM study is a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study in which treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole was evaluated in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive EBC in the early therapy phase. Treatment persistence was evaluated at two pre-specified study visits after 6 and 12 months. As a measure of early therapy persistence the time from the start to the end of treatment (TTEOT) was analyzed. Cox regression analyses were carried out to identify patient characteristics and tumor characteristics predicting TTEOT. Results: Out of the total population of 3941 patients with EBC, 540 (13.7%) events involving treatment cessation unrelated to disease progression were observed. This was due to drug-related toxicity in the majority of cases (73.5%). Persistence rates were 92.2%, 86.9%, and 86.3% after 6, 12, and 15 months, respectively. The main factors influencing premature treatment discontinuation were older age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02/year], comorbidities (HR 1.06 per comorbidity), low body mass index, and lower tumor grade (HR 0.85 per grade unit). Conclusion: These results support the view that older, multimorbid patients with low tumor grade and low body mass index are at the greatest risk for treatment discontinuation and might benefit from compliance and support programs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Letrozol/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
Osteoporos Int ; 29(11): 2557-2564, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30032359

RESUMEN

Our data demonstrate that tamoxifen does not reduce fracture risk. Close surveillance is necessary to prevent bone loss in premenopausal women with breast cancer upon treatment initiation. INTRODUCTION: Endocrine treatment of breast cancer may interfere with bone turnover and influence fracture risk. METHODS: Out of a cohort of almost 5 million patients in total, we identified 5520 women between 18 and 90 years of age with breast cancer receiving tamoxifen, matched them with 5520 healthy controls using the Disease Analyzer Database, and investigated the fracture risk. RESULTS: We found a cumulative incidence of fractures of 6.3% in patients aged between 18 and 50 years (n = 3634) treated with tamoxifen versus a cumulative incidence of 3.6% in the control group (p < 0.001). As such, the risk of fracture was 75% higher for patients receiving tamoxifen than that for healthy controls (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.25-2.48). With regard to patients aged between 55 and 90 years (n = 7406), the cumulative incidence of fractures in patients treated with tamoxifen was 10.1% compared to 9.3% in the control group (p = 0.740), i.e., there was no significant difference between the two groups (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.81-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to healthy controls, premenopausal women with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen showed an increased risk of fracture, while postmenopausal women on tamoxifen did not show any risk reduction.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/inducido químicamente , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Posmenopausia , Premenopausia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
11.
Osteoporos Int ; 29(1): 135-142, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28965212

RESUMEN

Almost a quarter of patients with PAO will sustain a subsequent fracture; patients need to be informed about potential risks before deciding for further pregnancies. INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PAO) is a severe type of premenopausal osteoporosis which predominantly occurs in the last trimester of pregnancy or immediately postpartum. Long-term follow-up data including subsequent fracture risk have yet to be reported. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study investigated the subsequent fracture risk of all 107 patients with PAO who were referred to our institution. RESULTS: Overall, 107 presented with at least one fracture. Each patient sustained on average four fractures most commonly at the thoracolumbar spine. During a median of 6 years of follow-up, 26 (24.3%) of patients who had a fracture at baseline reported a subsequent fracture. Overall, 30 PAO patients (28%) reported a further pregnancy. In subsequent pregnancies, 6 (20%) of patients reported a subsequent fracture. Patients with up to 1 vs. > 1 fracture at time of diagnosis showed a 3 (10%) and 25 (27%) subsequent fracture rate, respectively (p = 0.047). There was a significant correlation between the number of fractures at time of diagnosis and subsequent fracture risk (N = 26,p= 0.56, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Almost a quarter of patients with PAO will sustain a subsequent fracture, and this fracture risk correlates with the number of fractures at time of diagnosis. Patients with PAO need to be informed about their potential subsequent fracture risk before deciding for further pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia/fisiología , Osteoporosis/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Anciano , Antropometría/métodos , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Embarazo , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/fisiopatología
12.
Osteoporos Int ; 29(12): 2597-2610, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178158

RESUMEN

Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the treatment of choice for patients with some malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. Advances in transplantation techniques and supportive care measures have substantially increased the number of long-term HSCT survivors. This has led to an increasing patient population suffering from the late effects of HSCT, of which, bone loss and its consequent fragility fractures lead to substantial morbidity. Altered bone health, with consequent fragility fractures, and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are factors affecting long-term quality of life after HSCT. Hypogonadism, HSCT preparative regimens, nutritional factors, and glucocorticoids all contribute to accelerated bone loss and increased fracture risk. Management strategies should include bone mineral density examination, evaluation of clinical risk factors, and general dietary and physical activity measures. Evidence has accumulated permitting recommendations for more attentiveness to evaluation and monitoring of bone health, with appropriate application of osteoporosis pharmacotherapies to patients at increased risk of bone loss and fracture.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(1): 291-297, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27461017

RESUMEN

There has been concerning about women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception because of the prolonged hypoestrogenemic state regarding the potential negative effects on bone health. This study showed that DMPA exposure is associated with increased fracture risk and that fracture risk increases with longer DMPA exposure. INTRODUCTION: DMPA has been associated with impaired bone mineral acquisition during adolescence and accelerated bone loss in later life. We performed this large population-based study to assess the association between use of DMPA or combined oral contraceptives and the incident risk of fracture. METHODS: We identified 4189 women between 20 and 44 years of age with a first-time fracture diagnosis, matched them with 4189 random controls using the Disease Analyzer database and investigated the relation with DMPA exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 11 % of the fracture cases and 7.7 % of the controls had DMPA use recorded. The adjusted OR for developing a fracture in patients with current use of DMPA compared to non-users was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.51-1.86), 2.41 (95 % CI 1.42-4.08), and 1.46 (95 % CI 0.96-2.23) for 1-2, 3-9, and ≥10 prescriptions, respectively. The adjusted OR for developing a fracture in patients with past use of DMPA compared to non-users was 0.96 (95 % CI 0.73-1.26), 1.14 (95 % CI 0.86-1.51), and 1.55 (95 % CI 1.07-2.27) for 1-2, 3-9, and ≥10 prescriptions, respectively. The highest fracture risk was identified in young patients less than 30 years with longer DMPA exposure (≥10 prescriptions; OR 3.04, 95 % CI 1.36-6.81), as well as in patients in the late reproductive years with past use of DMPA (OR 1.72, 95 % CI 1.13-2.63). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that DMPA exposure is associated with increased fracture risk and may have negative effects on bone metabolism, resulting in impaired bone mineral acquisition during adolescence and accelerated bone loss in adult life.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/efectos adversos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/farmacología , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/farmacología , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/farmacología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(8): 2349-2355, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28409216

RESUMEN

In the present retrospective case-control study, we compared 6485 women with fractures and 6485 women without fractures from 135 general practitioner offices in the UK. Women without bone fractures were statistically more likely to have been exposed to oral contraception, depending on their age and therapy duration. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this analysis was to compare the risk of bone fracture in women using hormonal contraception with that in women who have never used hormonal contraception. METHODS: A total of 6485 women (mean age 37.8 years) with an initial diagnosis of fracture between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified in 135 doctors' offices in the UK Disease Analyzer database. In this nested case-control study, each case with a fracture was matched (1:1) to a control without a fracture for age, index year, and follow-up time. In total, 12,970 individuals were available for analysis. The main outcome of the study was the risk of fracture as a function of combined oral contraceptive (OC) therapy. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of OC therapy and its duration on the risk of fracture in the entire population and in four age-specific subgroups. RESULTS: Women without bone fractures were significantly more likely to have used oral contraception (OR 0.81). The usage of oral contraception was associated with a significantly lower risk of bone fracture (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.90). This effect was strongest in the age groups 18-25 and 26-35 and in patients with an OC treatment duration of more than 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The present study revealed that women without bone fractures were significantly more likely to have had exposure to combined oral contraception, especially where the duration of intake was at least 5 years.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/administración & dosificación , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Esquema de Medicación , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
15.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(4): 1393-1399, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28074248

RESUMEN

The etiology and underlying mechanisms of pregnancy-associated osteoporosis (PAO) are still unknown, since no systematic analyses exist. Our results indicate that PAO is a heterogeneous, rare but severe disease including a substantial number of fractures with a significant delay from first symptom to diagnose. INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis (PAO) is a rare but severe type of premenopausal osteoporosis. Most common symptom includes acute lower back pain due to vertebral fracture predominantly occurring in the last trimester of pregnancy or immediately postpartum. The exact underlining mechanisms and risk factors of PAO are still unknown, and up to date, there are no published systematic analyses. METHODS: We identified 102 PAO patients and matched them with 102 healthy controls according to age, region, and gravidity to evaluate risk factors in a large and homogenous population of women. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics and anthropometric data of the two study groups were similar. Eighty-eight percent of the patients with PAO suffered from one or more fractures with a mean of 3.3 fractures per patient. The most common fracture site was the thoracolumbar spine, whereas 29, 37, 48, and 35% of the patients reported fractures at TH11, TH12, L1, and L2, respectively. PAO patients suffered more frequently from excessive dental problems in childhood (p < 0.001). The control group performed significantly more frequently sports both before (p < 0.002) and after puberty (p < 0.01). Compared to the controls, the patients with PAO reported twice as often severe diseases during pregnancy (p < 0.029). Hereby, the frequency of immobilization was twice as often in the PAO group compared to that in the control group (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that PAO is a heterogeneous, rare but severe disease including a substantial number of fractures with a significant delay from first symptom to diagnose. Increased awareness is warranted to immediately start effective treatment.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Adulto , Antropometría/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
16.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(7): 2023-2034, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28451733

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis represents a significant and increasing healthcare burden in Europe, but most patients at increased risk of fracture do not receive medication, resulting in a large treatment gap. Identification of patients who are at particularly high risk will help clinicians target appropriate treatment more precisely and cost-effectively, and should be the focus of future research. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to review data on the identification and treatment of patients with osteoporosis at increased risk of fracture. METHODS: A working group convened by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis met to review current data on the epidemiology and burden of osteoporosis and the patterns of medical management throughout Europe. RESULTS: In Europe in 2010, the cost of managing osteoporosis was estimated at €37 billion and notably the costs of treatment and long-term care of patients with fractures were considerably higher than the costs for pharmacological prevention. Despite the availability of effective treatments, the uptake of osteoporosis therapy is low and declining, in particular for secondary fracture prevention where the risk of a subsequent fracture following a first fracture is high. Consequently, there is a significant treatment gap between those who would benefit from treatment and those who receive it, which urgently needs to be addressed so that the burden of disease can be reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of global fracture prevention strategies is a critical need. Future research should focus on identifying specific risk factors for imminent fractures, periods of high fracture risk, patients who are at increased risk of fracture and therapies that are most suited to such high-risk patients and optimal implementation strategies in primary, secondary and tertiary care.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control
17.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(3): 767-774, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28093634

RESUMEN

Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is low. A screening strategy is proposed based on the response of biochemical markers of bone turnover after 3 months of therapy. If no change is observed, the clinician should reassess the adherence to the treatment and also other potential issues with the drug. INTRODUCTION: Low adherence to oral bisphosphonates is a common problem that jeopardizes the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. No clear screening strategy for the assessment of compliance is widely accepted in these patients. METHODS: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society have convened a working group to propose a screening strategy to detect a lack of adherence to these drugs. The question to answer was whether the bone turnover markers (BTMs) PINP and CTX can be used to identify low adherence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis initiating oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. The findings of the TRIO study specifically address this question and were used as the basis for testing the hypothesis. RESULTS: Based on the findings of the TRIO study, specifically addressing this question, the working group recommends measuring PINP and CTX at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy to check for a decrease above the least significant change (decrease of more than 38% for PINP and 56% for CTX). Detection rate for the measurement of PINP is 84%, for CTX 87% and, if variation in at least one is considered when measuring both, the level of detection is 94.5%. CONCLUSIONS: If a significant decrease is observed, the treatment can continue, but if no decrease occurs, the clinician should reassess to identify problems with the treatment, mainly low adherence.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Biomarcadores/sangre , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Remodelación Ósea/fisiología , Colágeno Tipo I/sangre , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Péptidos/sangre , Procolágeno/sangre
18.
Ann Oncol ; 27(10): 1909-15, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27551051

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the role of patient expectations as potentially modifiable factor of side-effects, quality of life, and adherence to endocrine treatment of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2-year prospective clinical cohort study was conducted in routine primary care with postoperative patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, scheduled to start adjuvant endocrine treatment. Structured patient-reported assessments of side-effects, side-effect expectations, quality of life, and adherence took place during the first week post-surgery and after 3 and 24 months of endocrine treatment. RESULTS: Of 111 enrolled patients, at 3 and 24 months, 107 and 88 patients, respectively, were assessed. After 2 years of endocrine treatment, patients reported high rates of side-effects (arthralgia: 71.3%, weight gain: 53.4%, hot flashes: 46.5%), including symptoms not directly attributable to the medication (breathing problems: 28.1%, dizziness: 25.6%). Pre-treatment expectations significantly predicted patient-reported long-term side-effects and quality of life in multivariate models controlling for relevant medical and psychological variables. Relative risk of side-effects after 2 years of endocrine treatment was higher in patients with high negative expectations at baseline than in those with low negative expectations (RR = 1.833, CI 95%, 1.032-3.256). A significant interaction confirmed this expectation effect to be particularly evident in patients with high side-effects at 3 months. Furthermore, baseline expectations were associated with adherence at 24 months (r = -0.25, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Expectations are a genuine factor of clinical outcome from endocrine treatment for breast cancer. Negative expectations increase the risk of treatment-specific side-effects, nocebo side-effects, and non-adherence. Yet, controlled studies are needed to analyze potential causal relationships. Optimizing individual expectations might be a promising strategy to improve side-effect burden, quality of life, and adherence during longer-term drug intake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02088710.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Receptor alfa de Estrógeno/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Calidad de Vida , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Ann Oncol ; 27(3): 379-90, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26681681

RESUMEN

Bisphosphonates have been studied in randomised trials in early breast cancer to investigate their ability to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and reduce the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis. Treatment benefits have been reported but bisphosphonates do not currently have regulatory approval for either of these potential indications. This consensus paper provides a review of the evidence and offers guidance to breast cancer clinicians on the use of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer. Using the nominal group methodology for consensus, a systematic review of the literature was augmented by a workshop held in October 2014 for breast cancer and bone specialists to present and debate the available pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. This was followed by a questionnaire to all members of the writing committee to identify areas of consensus. The panel recommended that bisphosphonates should be considered as part of routine clinical practice for the prevention of CTIBL in all patients with a T score of <-2.0 or ≥2 clinical risk factors for fracture. Compelling evidence from a meta-analysis of trial data of >18,000 patients supports clinically significant benefits of bisphosphonates on the development of bone metastases and breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women or those receiving ovarian suppression therapy. Therefore, the panel recommends that bisphosphonates (either intravenous zoledronic acid or oral clodronate) are considered as part of the adjuvant breast cancer treatment in this population and the potential benefits and risks discussed with relevant patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ácido Clodrónico/efectos adversos , Ácido Clodrónico/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ácido Zoledrónico
20.
Osteoporos Int ; 27(9): 2739-2744, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27026332

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Thirty-five thousand four hundred eighty-three female osteoporosis patients were compared with 35,483 patients without osteoporosis regarding the incidence of depression. The risk of depression is significantly increased for patients with osteoporosis compared with patients without osteoporosis in primary care practices within Germany. INTRODUCTION: The objectives of the present study were to analyze the incidence of depression in German female patients with osteoporosis and to evaluate the risk factors for depression diagnosis within this patient population. METHODS: This study was a retrospective database analysis conducted in Germany utilizing the Disease Analyzer® Database (IMS Health, Germany). The study population included 70,966 patients between 40 and 80 years of age from 1072 primary care practices. The observation period was between 2004 and 2013. Follow-up duration was 5 years and was completed in April 2015. A total of 35,483 osteoporosis patients were selected after applying exclusion criteria, and 35,483 controls were chosen and then matched (1:1) to osteoporosis patients based on age, sex, health insurance coverage, depression diagnosis in the past, and follow-up duration after index date. The analyses of depression-free survival were carried out using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models (dependent variable: depression) were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Depression diagnoses were presented in 33.0 % of the osteoporosis group and 22.7 % of the control group after the 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Dementia, cancer, heart failure, coronary heart disease, and diabetes were associated with a higher risk of developing depression (p < 0.001). Private health insurance was associated with a lower risk of depression. There was no significant effect of fractures on depression risk. CONCLUSION: The risk of depression is significantly increased for patients with osteoporosis in primary care practices within Germany.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Atención Primaria de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA