Improving access to cancer guidelines: feedback from health care professionals.

PURPOSE: We examined access to locally developed and other available clinical practice guidelines (cpgs) for the management of cancer and evaluated how to improve uptake. METHODS: A 12-question online survey was administered to 772 members of 12 multidisciplinary tumour teams in a Canadian provincial oncology program. The teams are composed of physicians, surgeons, nurses, allied health professionals, and researchers involved in the provision of cancer care across the province. Many of these individuals construct or provide input into the provincial cpgs. The questionnaires were administered online and were completed voluntarily. RESULTS: Responses were received from 232 individuals, a response rate of 30.1%. Most respondents (75.1%) indicated they actively referenced cpgs for cancer treatment. Of the 177 respondents who identified barriers to cpg access, 24.9% said that the cause was being too busy; 24.3% and 22.6% cited the user-unfriendliness of the Web site and a lack of awareness about the cpgs. When asked about innovative changes that could be made to improve access, the creation of cpg summary documents was identified as the most effective change (46.3%). The creation of summary documents was ranked highest by physicians, surgeons, and nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines are important tools for standardizing treatment protocols and improving outcomes in health care systems, but support for their use is variable among health care professionals. We have identified barriers to-and potential mitigating strategies for-more widespread access to cpgs by the various health professions involved in cancer care. Local creation of succinct and easily accessible cpgs was identified as the single most effective way to enhance access by health care professionals.

Advance care planning: identifying system-specific barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (acp) is an important process in health care today. How to prospectively identify potential local barriers and facilitators to uptake of acp across a complex, multi-sector, publicly funded health care system and how to develop specific mitigating strategies have not been well characterized. METHODS: We surveyed a convenience sample of clinical and administrative health care opinion leaders across the province of Alberta to characterize system-specific barriers and facilitators to uptake of acp. The survey was based on published literature about the barriers to and facilitators of acp and on the Michie Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: Of 88 surveys, 51 (58%) were returned. The survey identified system-specific barriers that could challenge uptake of acp. The factors were categorized into four main domains. Three examples of individual system-specific barriers were "insufficient public engagement and misunderstanding," "conflict among different provincial health service initiatives," and "lack of infrastructure." Local system-specific barriers and facilitators were subsequently explored through a semi-structured informal discussion group involving key informants. The group identified approaches to mitigate specific barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of acp is a priority for many health care systems, but bringing about change in multi-sector health care systems is complex. Identifying system-specific barriers and facilitators to the uptake of innovation are important elements of successful knowledge translation. We developed and successfully used a simple and inexpensive process to identify local system-specific barriers and enablers to uptake of acp, and to identify specific mitigating strategies.

Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Now more than ever, cancer patients want health information. Little has been published to characterize the information needs and preferred sources of that information for patients who have completed cancer treatment. METHODS: We used a nationally validated instrument to prospectively survey patients attending a cancer clinic for a post-treatment follow-up visit. All patients who came to the designated clinics between December 2011 and June 2012 were approached (N = 648), and information was collected only from those who agreed to proceed. RESULTS: The 411 patients who completed the instrument included individuals with a wide range of primary malignancies. Their doctor or health professional was overwhelmingly the most trusted source of cancer information, followed by the Internet, family, and friends. The least trusted sources of information included radio, newspaper, and television. Patients most preferred to receive personalized written information from their health care provider. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors are keenly interested in receiving information about cancer, despite having undergone or finished active therapy. The data indicate that, for patients, their health care provider is the most trusted source of cancer information. Cancer providers should ask patients about the information they want and should direct them to trusted sources.

The malignant wound assessment tool: a validation study using a Delphi approach.

Malignant wounds, caused by the direct invasion of cancer into the skin, occur in cancer patients with primary skin tumours and as cutaneous metastasis in approximately 10% of patients with metastatic internal malignancies. Malignant wounds have a profound impact on patients, family members and health care providers. The assessment of the patient with malignant wounds can be complex and there is no widely accepted, consistent approach. Valid, descriptive survey research methods were used to develop the Malignant Wound Assessment Tool (MWAT). The authors developed two versions of the MWAT: a brief clinical version (MWAT-C) and a more detailed research version (MWAT-R). Domains include clinical wound features, physical effects and emotional and social impacts of the wound. The two tools underwent content and construct validity testing using a Delphi process. An international panel of professionals with clinical or research expertise related to malignant wounds was formed. Panelists participated in two rounds of review for each tool. Development and face validity testing of the MWAT-C and MWAT-R tools through the Delphi process have resulted in tools ready for clinical application and will support clinical and research activities to improve care for patients with this devastating condition.

Prospective study of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with malignant gliomas.

PURPOSE: We studied the natural history of postoperative enhancement on magnetic resonance (MR) scans in patients with malignant glioma to determine the following: (1) when a postoperative MR scan most accurately shows residual enhancing tumor; and (2) whether repeated doses of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) were well tolerated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with malignant glioma underwent tumor resection; four (24%) had nonenhancing tumors preoperatively. Serial MR scans were performed on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The evolution of enhancement and subacute hemorrhage were described and measured. A uniform schedule of postoperative dexamethasone administration was used in all but four patients (24%) (each required higher doses to maintain neurologic function). RESULTS: Nontumoral, marginal (i.e., postsurgical) enhancement, potentially mimicking residual tumor, developed in eight patients (53%), including tumors that were nonenhancing preoperatively, and was maximal from days 5 to 14. Tumor enhancement was optimally visualized on postoperative days 3 to 5. Nine of 10 patients (90%) with gross residual enhancing tumor showed an increase of enhancing tumor size during the study. Methemoglobin was detected at some time in all patients (100%) and was usually minor, but in six (35%) it interfered with residual tumor assessment. The 97 doses of Gd-DTPA, administered in 17 patients, were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: When accurate assessment of residual enhancing tumor is needed in patients with malignant glioma, an MR scan performed on postoperative days 3 to 5 should minimize the confounding effects of postsurgical enhancement and methemoglobin. The repeated administration of Gd-DTPA over several weeks is well tolerated.

Trigeminal sensory neuropathy associated with connective tissue diseases.

We reviewed the clinical and laboratory features of 81 patients who had trigeminal sensory neuropathy (TSN) and a connective tissue disease (CTD). The neuropathy developed before the symptoms of CTD in 6/81 patients (7%), and in 38/81 patients (47%) TSN and CTD were diagnosed concurrently. The most frequently associated CTDs were undifferentiated connective tissue disease (38/81, 47%), mixed connective tissue disease (21/81, 26%), and scleroderma (15/81, 19%). Of 66 patients followed for more than 1 year (median, 5 years; range, 1 to 26 years), 8/66 patients (12%) had mild improvement and 2/66 (3%) had marked improvement of numbness; no patient had complete return of sensation. The facial numbness was frequently associated with moderate to severe facial pain that was usually resistant to pharmacologic therapy. None of the patients developed clinical or laboratory evidence of systemic vasculitis. The etiology of this cranial sensory neuropathy remains obscure.

The role of radiation therapy following resection of single brain metastasis from melanoma.

From 1972 to 1987, 35 patients underwent resection of a single brain metastasis from melanoma; 19 received postoperative radiation therapy (RT) (group A), and 16 did not (group B). Group A had a longer interval to CNS relapse compared with group B, but survival was similar. However, 4/17 (24%) from group A and 11/13 (85%) from group B died of neurologic causes. We conclude that patients with single brain metastasis from melanoma have improved control of CNS disease when postoperative RT is administered, and survival depends upon control of systemic disease.

Malignant supratentorial glioma in the elderly: is radiotherapy useful?

OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) if radiotherapy (RT) improves survival or neurologic function in elderly patients with malignant supratentorial glioma (MSG) and (2) which prognostic factors predict survival. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of MSG is increasing because both the number of elderly patients and the age-adjusted incidence are increasing. Because age is a powerful negative prognostic factor in MSG, it is not clear if RT is useful in the elderly. DESIGN/METHODS: We retrospectively studied 103 patients from the Southern Alberta Cancer Registry diagnosed January 1, 1978, to December 31, 1993, aged 70 yrs, with MSG in whom sufficient clinical and follow-up information was available. Multiple treatment and patient factors were compared with survival and neurologic function score. Diagnosis was confirmed in 15 (14.6%) by biopsy, in 66 (64.1%) by resection, and in 22 (21.4%) by clinical course and typical radiographic appearance only. RESULTS: All patients died and median survival was 3.9 months. Better neurologic function at diagnosis and administration of RT were independently associated with significantly longer survivals (p = 0.001 and < 0.001; log rank test). However, RT was only associated with longer survival in patients aged less than 80 years. Neurologic status only rarely improved following RT. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for elderly patients with MSG is poor. RT is unlikely to benefit patients who are aged 80 years or older. RT has a short-lived benefit for patients who are functionally disabled.

An approach to cough in cancer patients.

Cough is a distressing and disabling symptom in cancer patients. Based on an understanding of the physiology of the cough reflex and the pathophysiology of cough in cancer patients, a systematic approach to the management of this symptom is presented.

Sharp, shooting neuropathic pain in the rectum or genitals: pudendal neuralgia.

In 18 mo, the author encountered six patients with severe sharp, shooting genital or rectal pain. All patients had cancer, diabetes, or both, and all patients responded dramatically to adjuvant analgesics with or without opioid analgesics. The author concludes that the presence of pudendal neuralgia should prompt a search for an underlying cause, and that this severe neuropathic pain syndrome is effectively managed with adjuvant analgesics.

Reproducing a cancer patient's pain on physical examination: bedside provocative maneuvers.

While various aspects of the physical examination in pain patients have been validated, the value of screening maneuvers that reproduce a cancer patient's pain on physical examination has been less well defined. The purpose of this prospective case series is to better characterize the role of bedside provocative maneuvers as part of the comprehensive evaluation of cancer pain patients. Fifty consecutive patients referred to an ambulatory cancer pain clinic were evaluated; they described a total of 89 discrete pains. All or much of the pain that brought each patient to medical attention was reproduced by a provocative maneuver in 47 (94%) patients; 79 of 89 (89%) pains were elicited at the bedside. Pains that were not reproducible with any provocative maneuver included paroxysmal spells of pain, neuropathic pain, and steady headache. On the basis of the history, physical examination, and both positive and negative provocative maneuvers, all pains were characterizable as somatic, visceral, neuropathic, or mixed, and a pathophysiological basis for the pain was inferred in 85 of 89 (95%) pains. On the basis of this preliminary report, we conclude that provocative bedside maneuvers are usually able to reproduce a cancer patient's pain. They help to better characterize the pain and identify the pain sensitive structure, and should be a routine part of the comprehensive assessment of cancer pain patients. Further research is needed to validate the diagnostic role of standardized pain-provoking maneuvers in a variety of clinical situations.

Neuropathic pain in cancer patients: mechanisms, syndromes, and clinical controversies.

The identification of a neuropathic pain syndrome in a cancer patient requires a focused clinical evaluation based on knowledge of common neuropathic pain syndromes. If a tumor is directly involved in the etiology of the pain, oncologic treatment is an initial consideration and may include surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. There is no single accepted algorithm for the analgesic treatment of neuropathic pain and a systematic approach utilizing therapeutic trials of specific agents at gradually increasing doses is warranted. A trial of opioids, perhaps in combination with an NSAID, is warranted. If the pain is relatively unresponsive to an opioid, a trial with an adjuvant analgesic is reasonable. For example, a tricyclic antidepressant might be selected early for patients with continuous dysesthesia, and early treatment with an anticonvulsant might be used if the pain is predominantly lancinating or paroxysmal. Other adjuvant analgesics can be selected if there is insufficient response to these agents. A trial of sympathetic blockade, pharmacologic, anesthetic or surgical, should be considered in patients with evidence of causalgia or reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Physiatric modalities such as massage, heat, or cold; counterstimulation or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and orthopedic interventions, such as braces and splints may be useful. Epidural injections or neurostimulation of the spinal cord or brain can be considered in selected cases where appropriate expertise is available. Treatment of neuropathic pain remains a challenge for both clinicians and patients. The complexity of syndromes and underlying etiologic mechanisms warrants further clinical trials to determine the best treatment modalities for individual pain syndromes.

Analgesic effect of oral ketamine in chronic neuropathic pain of spinal origin: a case report.

Ketamine is an injectable anesthetic induction agent that has been reported to have analgesic activity in pain from a variety of mechanisms, but predominantly in neuralgic and dysesthetic neuropathic pain. In this case report we illustrate the effectiveness of ketamine in a patient with neuropathic pain resulting from cauda equina trauma. Among the issues addressed are the role of pretreatment with haloperidol to prevent ketamine-induced psychomimetic effects, the potential for fewer side effects and a need for lower doses when ketamine is administered orally, and the need for further study regarding appropriate monitoring parameters during the titration phase. Oral ketamine can be effective in treatment refractory chronic neuropathic pain of spinal origin.

Methadone: outpatient titration and monitoring strategies in cancer patients.

Methadone can be an effective drug for cancer pain but it can also be difficult to use safely. It has been recommended that rotation to methadone from other opioids be undertaken in a hospital setting. The purpose of the study was to characterize the safety, toxicities, and outcomes of outpatient rotation to methadone for severe cancer pain in a heavily pretreated cohort of cancer patients. Data were collected through a retrospective review of consecutive patients from a tertiary level cancer pain clinic. Twenty-nine patients were rotated to methadone, 13 (45%) due to opioid toxicity and 16 (55%) because of either cost or difficulty swallowing their prior opioid. Eleven of 29 patients (38%) failed methadone due to rapidly progressive cancer, dose-limiting side effects, or other reasons, but the other patients were successfully rotated to methadone. Pain usually improved following rotation to methadone, but drowsiness from methadone was common. On average, it took 32 days to successfully rotate to methadone in the outpatient setting. Cancer patients with advanced disease and severe pain can be safely and effectively rotated to methadone in the outpatient setting. It takes considerably longer to stabilize these patients than patients on lower doses of opioid or those titrated in the inpatient setting. A careful monitoring system is needed to screen for evidence of toxicity.

Cancer pain emergencies: a protocol for management.

Cancer is often associated with chronic pain, which can be managed by established algorithms. Cancer is also occasionally associated with sustained episodes of excruciating pain (cancer pain emergencies) that require rapid application of powerful analgesic strategies in a manner that is distinct from chronic pain management techniques. To clarify the utility of rapid opioid dose escalation in this setting, we reviewed the management of ten cancer pain emergencies in nine patients. After initial assessment, all patients were managed according to a protocol whereby intravenous boluses of opioid are administered with rapid upward titration until an effective analgesic dose is found. Using this technique, all patients had relief of their excruciating pain after a mean of 89 min (range, 4-215 min). No patient demonstrated evidence of significant toxicity. We conclude that repeated intravenous boluses of an opioid, doubling the dose every 30 min until analgesia is achieved, is effective and safe management of cancer pain emergencies. Validation of this protocol is required.

Targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for chronic pain management. Preclinical animal studies, recent clinical experience and future research directions.

A 1967-1999 MEDLINE search of published reports evaluating the role of the glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in pain identified 378 animal studies and 132 human studies. There is convincing evidence in these studies that the NMDA receptor mediates prolonged nociceptive behaviors in animal models and various chronic pain symptoms in the clinical population. Administration of older compounds, such as ketamine, dextromethorphan, and amantadine, which are now known to act as NMDA receptor antagonists, have recently been shown to alleviate chronic pain. For years, the pharmaceutical industry has been attempting to produce novel compounds that modulate NMDA receptor activity; however, the adverse effects associated with this class of drugs have prevented their widespread clinical use. Collaborative studies between basic researchers, clinical scientists, and clinicians are needed to delineate characteristics of NMDA receptor antagonism that predict optimal analgesic activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with chronic pain.

How long do prepared epidural solutions remain sterile?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prepared epidural solutions remain sterile when refrigerated prior to use. The sterility of all epidural solutions prepared by an outpatient pharmacy of a tertiary level cancer facility was tested both at the time of preparation and after 14 days of refrigeration. Over a seven-month interval, we found no incidence of epidural solution colonization in 84 submitted samples prepared for four patients. All four patients had good relief of pain with ambulatory epidural infusion, and none developed clinical evidence of infection. We conclude that selected ambulatory patients with severe cancer pain, who are managed in the home environment with permanent epidural catheters, can use preservative-free epidural solutions that have been prepared with the sterile technique and stored in a standard domestic refrigerator for up to 14 days.

Chronic nausea and morphine-6-glucuronide.

Morphine-6-glucuronide is an active metabolite of morphine that has analgesic properties and is measurable in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients treated with this opioid. Decreased clearance of the compound has been observed in patients with renal insufficiency, and this has been associated with an increase in the ratio of morphine-6-glucuronide to morphine. Clinical effects from accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide have not been described with the exception of case reports in which patients with renal failure were noted to develop opioid toxicity with high plasma levels of the metabolite and low levels of the parent drug. We describe a patient who experienced chronic nausea and an episode of confusion while treated with a small, stable dose of oral morphine in the setting of mild renal insufficiency. Relatively high levels of morphine-6-glucuronide were measured and all symptoms resolved promptly as the concentration of this metabolite declined. This case provides suggestive evidence that morphine-6-glucuronide can produce clinically significant effects in patients with mild renal insufficiency.

Cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators in terminal care.

The use of cardiac pacemakers and arrhythmia control devices is increasingly common. The presence of a previously placed pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in a terminally ill patient may result in medical and ethical issues for the patient, family, and healthcare provider. Two cases are presented to illustrate the complex issues that may arise in the terminally ill with a pacemaker or an ICD. Based on these cases and a review of published data, it is likely that the disabling of a previously placed pacemaker will neither hasten nor prolong the natural history of the underlying illness in most instances. There are uncommon but potentially severe adverse effects of disabling the pacemaker; therefore, pacemakers should generally be left intact in terminally ill patients. It is more difficult to generalize as to whether deactivation of an ICD is appropriate; in this case death may be hastened and the decision concerning an ICD will depend on the specific clinical scenario. Patient and family education regarding palliative care treatment goals and the function of pacemakers and other implanted arrhythmia control devices can help to alleviate anxiety surrounding the impact of this technology at the end of life.

Breakthrough pain: definition and management.

Breakthrough pains are highly prevalent but poorly characterized phenomena that may be experienced by the cancer patient. The term encompasses a diverse group of transient pains that vary in their relationship to the fixed analgesic dose, temporal characteristics, precipitating events, predictability, pathophysiology, and etiology. Successful management is usually possible using a combination of primary oncologic interventions, optimization of the fixed analgesic regimen, and one or more of a variety of analgesic modalities, the mainstay of which is pharmacotherapy with a so-called "rescue-dose."