Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol ; 38(6): 826-36, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20183666

RESUMEN

Major depressive disorder is common in adolescence and is associated with significant morbidity and family burden. Little is known about service use by depressed adolescents. The purpose of this article is to report the patterns of services use and costs for participants in the Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study sample during the 3 months before randomization. Costs were assigned across three categories of payors: families, private insurance, and the public sector. We examined whether costs from payors varied by baseline covariates, such as age, gender, insurance status, and family income. The majority (71%) of depressed youth sought services during the 3-month period. Slightly more than one-fifth had contact with a behavioral health specialist. The average participant had just under $300 (SD = $437.67, range = $0-$3,747.71) in treatment-related costs, with most of these costs borne by families and private insurers.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 46(7): 801-10, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17581444

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors associated with eligibility and randomization and consider the efficiency of recruitment methods. METHOD: Adolescents, ages 12 to 17 years, were telephone screened (N = 2,804) followed by in-person evaluation (N = 1,088) for the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study. Separate logistic regression models, controlling for site, examined whether sex, age, race, or source of recruitment was associated with eligibility, providing written consent, or randomization. Efficiency was calculated from the number of completed telephone screens per each enrolled participant. RESULTS: Older adolescents were less likely to be eligible at telephone screening (odds ratio [OR] 0.81). Regardless of race, eligible adolescents who were referred by a professional had higher odds of presenting in-person for consent (OR 1.56). African Americans had statistically lower odds of providing consent (OR 0.67), particularly if recruited by advertisement (OR 0.54). Females were more likely to be diagnosed with major depressive disorder (OR 1.69). No significant differences were found between randomized participants and eligible adolescents who withdrew from the study before randomization. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the importance of using multiple strategies to recruit adolescents for clinical trial participation and enhancing sensitivity to cultural variations, especially when reaching out to depressed African Americans.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Tamizaje Masivo , Selección de Paciente , Adolescente , Niño , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Oportunidad Relativa , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación
3.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 46(5): 573-581, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17450048

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe a manual-based intervention to address clinical crises and retain participants in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). METHOD: The use of adjunct services for attrition prevention (ASAP) is described for adolescents (ages 12-17 years) during the 12-week acute treatment in TADS, from 2000 to 2003. Logistic regression, controlling for site, was used to predict use. RESULTS: Of 439 enrolled participants, 17.8% (n = 78) used ASAP primarily for suicidality or worsening of depression. Of these, 46.2% continued in their assigned treatment through week 12, 47.4% received out-of-protocol treatment but continued participating in assessments, and 10.3% withdrew consent, including 3 who terminated treatment and withdrew consent on the same date. ASAP use did not differ between treatments (p =.97) and typically occurred early in treatment. At the end of the 12 weeks, 37.2% of participants using ASAP remained in their assigned treatment, although 80.8% continued participating in assessments. ASAP was associated with, at baseline, a higher severity of depression (p <.01), substance use (p <.01), and precontemplation level of change (p <.02). CONCLUSIONS: ASAP may be useful to retain adolescent participants and as a safety intervention in placebo-controlled trials. In clinical practice ASAP-like procedures may be useful to encourage adherence in patients engaging in long-term treatment. Clinical trial registration information-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00006286.


Asunto(s)
Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica , Promoción de la Salud , Manuales como Asunto , Cooperación del Paciente , Adolescente , Niño , Conducta Peligrosa , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA