Surgical versus endoscopic gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a retrospective multicentric comparative study of technical and clinical success.

PURPOSE: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is mainly due to advanced malignant disease. GOO can be treated by surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), endoscopic enteral stenting (EES), or endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) to improve the quality of life. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2022, patients undergoing SGE or EUS-GE for GOO were included at three centers. Technical and clinical success rates, post-procedure adverse events (AEs), length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day all-cause mortality, and recurrence of GOO were retrospectively analyzed and compared between SGE and EUS-GE. Predictive factors for technical and clinical failure after SGE and EUS-GE were identified. RESULTS: Of the 97 patients included, 56 (57.7%) had an EUS-GE and 41 (42.3%) had an SGE for GOO, with 62 (63.9%) GOO due to malignancy and 35 (36.1%) to benign disease. The median follow-up time was 13,4 months (range 1 days-106 months), with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.962). Technical (p = 0.133) and clinical (p = 0.229) success rates, severe morbidity (p = 0.708), 30-day all-cause mortality (p = 0.277) and GOO recurrence (p = 1) were similar. EUS-GE had shorter median procedure duration (p < 0.001), lower post-procedure ileus rate (p < 0.001), and shorter median LOS (p < 0.001) than SGE. In univariate analysis, no risk factors for technical or clinical failure in SGE were identified and abdominal pain reported before the procedure was a risk factor for technical failure in the EUS-GE group. No risk factor for clinical failure was identified for EUS-GE. In the subgroup of GOO due to benign disease, SGE was associated with better technical success (p = 0.035) with no difference in clinical success rate compared to EUS-GE (p = 1). CONCLUSION: EUS-GE provides similar long-lasting symptom relief as SGE for GOO whether for benign or malignant disease. SGE may still be indicated in centers with limited experience with EUS-GE or may be reserved for patients in whom endoscopic technique fails.

Health care management adequacy among French persons with severe profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: The care organization of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) varies by country according to the health care system. This study used a large sample of French individuals with severe PIMD/polyhandicap to assess: 1) the adequacy of care setting over a 5-year period and 2) health care consumption. METHODS: The longitudinal study used data from the French EVALuation PoLyHandicap (EVAL-PLH) cohort of persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap who were receiving managed in specialized care centres and residential facilities. Two assessments were performed: wave 1 (T1) in 2015-2016 and wave 2 (T2) in 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old; and severe PIMD. The adequacy of the care setting was based on the following: i) objective indicators, i.e., adequacy for age and adequacy for health status severity; ii) subjective indicators, i.e., self-perception of the referring physician about medical care adequacy and educational care adequacy. Health care consumption was assessed based on medical and paramedical care. RESULTS: Among the 492 persons assessed at the 2 times, 50% of individuals at T1 and 46% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting based on age and severity. Regarding global subjective inadequacy, the combination of medical adequacy and educational adequacy, 7% of individuals at T1 and 13% of individuals at T2 were in an inadequate care setting. At T2, a majority of individuals were undermonitored by medical care providers (general practitioners, physical medicine rehabilitation physicians, neurologists, orthopaedists, etc.). Important gaps were found between performed and prescribed sessions of various paramedical care (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, psychomotor therapy, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed key elements of inadequate care management for persons with severe PIMD/polyhandicap in France. Based on these important findings, healthcare workers, familial caregivers, patients experts, and health decision-makers should develop appropriate care organizations to optimize the global care management of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02400528, registered 27/03/2015.

Transfusion requirements and complication rate in ß-thalassemia intermedia due to heterozygous ß-globin gene mutation and triplicated α-globin genes.

INTRODUCTION: The heterozygous condition for ß-thalassemia mutation associated with an extra functional α-globin gene can produce a Thalassemia Intermedia (TI) phenotype. This genotype is the second in frequency in the French Thalassemia Registry NaThalY that prospectively collects laboratory and clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present report analyses transfusion needs, iron overload (ferritin, hepatic and cardiac iron concentrations), and complication rates in 45 patients included in NaThalY and presenting a heterozygous ß0 or ß+ -thalassemia mutation associated with a triplication at HBA locus. This cohort was compared to a cohort of patients with TI due to mutations in the beta-globin gene only and included in the French registry. RESULTS: Patients with an extra functional α-globin gene showed a less severe anemia, lower transfusion needs and lower complication rates than those with TI related to the ß-globin gene only. Nevertheless, some of them displayed complications such as cholelithiasis or extramedullary hematopoiesis. In addition, one third of the cohort needed transfusions and another third was under iron chelation. CONCLUSION: The genotype associating a heterozygous ß0 or ß+ -thalassemia mutation with a triplication at HBA locus should be accurately diagnosed as it could lead to symptomatic anemia and to potential iron overload and iron-related complications even in patients with no transfusion need.

Parents' experiences of parenting a child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in France: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Parents of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) play a major and often lifelong role in the care and support of their child. A better understanding of parents' perspectives regarding their experiences of parenting their child with PIMD is essential to support them more effectively. Although this topic has been explored extensively in Anglo-Saxon and Northern European countries, little is known about the experience of these parents in a highly institutionalized context such as that in France. OBJECTIVE: We explored parents' experiences of the activities they performed to care for their child with PIMD (namely, the 'parenting work') in the French context. METHOD: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with 34 parents of persons with PIMD aged 8-35. The resulting data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The analysis highlighted the diversity of activities performed by parents as well as the influence of context on the forms of this parenting work. Five themes were developed: (1) navigating the challenges of obtaining medical recognition; (2) negotiating a concealed domain and becoming an expert; (3) unfolding medical and medicosocial care management; (4) navigating the challenges of daily living and (5) shaping one's child's possibilities. CONCLUSION: This study offers a better understanding of the challenges, levers and expectations of parents of children with PIMD in France. Contextual factors such as the lack of knowledge of PIMD among health professionals, access to knowledge and know-how associated with care management, the administrative complexity of access to care and equipment, institutional issues (e.g., professional turnover) and societal ableism (e.g., access to infrastructures, interpersonal discrimination) shape the work parents perform to support their child's needs. It is necessary to consider contextual aspects to better support these parents and their children. Suggestions for applications are provided in the discussion. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: One of the researchers, a parent of a child with PIMD, supported the research design and provided feedback on the study's procedures and manuscript.

Copeptin assays in children for the differential diagnosis of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome and reference levels in hospitalized children.

OBJECTIVES: Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS) is a common presentation in children but the differential diagnosis rests on burdensome water deprivation tests. The aims of this study were to determine a copeptin threshold to distinguish patients with central diabetes insipidus from those with primary polydipsia and to estimate the normal range of copeptin concentrations in children. DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective descriptive study. PATIENTS: Two hundred and seventy-eight children aged 2 months to 18 years who consulted for PPS (N = 40) or other reasons (control group, N = 238) at La Timone University Hospital in Marseille, France, between April 2015 and September 2019 and had a copeptin assay. MEASUREMENTS: Ultrasensitive copeptin assays on blood samples. RESULTS: Among the children with PPS, the mean copeptin concentrations were 1.72, 55.2 and 15.7 pmol/l in those with central diabetes insipidus (N = 21), nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (N = 3), and primary polydipsia (N = 16), respectively. Copeptin levels lower than 3.53 pmol/l were diagnostic of central diabetes insipidus with 100% sensitivity and 87.4% specificity (p < .001). The 5th-95th copeptin percentile range in the control group was 2.53-21.03 pmol/L. Copeptin levels were significantly higher in boys than in girls but there was no association with age, pubertal stage, body mass index, or the reason for consulting. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate copeptin assays may be valuable in the differential diagnosis of PPS in children. Larger prospective studies are required to establish their accuracy in everyday clinical practice.

Benefits of AirSeal System in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the AirSeal insufflation system with the standard insufflation system for postoperative abdominal pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign pathology. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Teaching Hospital La Conception, Marseille, France, February 2018 to July 2020. PATIENTS: A total of 80 patients scheduled for a laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign pathology (40 per group). INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy using the AirSeal insufflation system with a pneumoperitoneum between 8 and 10 mm Hg compared with the standard insufflation system with a pneumoperitoneum between 12 and 15 mm Hg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was abdominal pain at 6 hours after the end of surgery, assessed by a Simple Numerical Scale from 0 to 10. The secondary end points were intraoperative (operating time and difficulty of the surgery felt by the operator), early postoperative (intensity of abdominal and scapular pain at H0 [end of surgery], H2 [two hours after the end of surgery, H12 [twelve hour after the end of surgery], H24 [twenty four hours after the end of surgery], H48 [fourty eight hours after the end of surgery]), and late postoperative (late postoperative complication, estimated time to return to normal life, and overall patient satisfaction assessed by the SF-12 general health survey). The median values for abdominal pain were not different between the 2 groups at 6 hours (AirSeal group median, 0; interquartile range, 2 vs standard laparoscopy group median, 1; interquartile range, 2; p = .41). The abdominal and scapular pain values were similar in both groups at all postoperative times. There were no differences between the groups regarding secondary end points. CONCLUSION: Use of the AirSeal insufflation system with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication did not reduce postoperative abdominal and scapular pain.

Health status of individuals with polyhandicap across a 5-year follow-up period.

The present longitudinal study examined a large sample of individuals with PIMD/Polyhandicap to: (i) describe the evolution over time of the health status in terms of severity, (ii) identify the potential predictors of health status change. This study used the data of the French national EVAL-PLH cohort. Inclusion criteria were: individuals with PIMD/Polyhandicap; age > 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion younger than 3 years old. The definition of the change in health status over the 5-year period was derived from the Polyhandicap Severity Scale. Among the 875 individuals included in 2015-2016, 492 (56.2%) individuals were assessed in 2020-2021. According to the definition, 68.8% (n = 309), 64.7% (n = 310), and 80.2% (n = 368) of the individuals presented with a worsened or stable severity status based on the global score, the abilities score, and the comorbidities score, respectively. Compared with the individuals with a non-worsened health status (global score), the individuals with a stable or worsened health status were more likely to receive care in specialized rehabilitation centres, more likely to have an antenatal or progressive aetiology, and more likely to have a higher dependency level. The current study provides a robust perspective of the worsened health among persons with PIMD/Polyhandicap over time.

Impact of caring for patients with polyhandicap on institutional health care workers' quality of life: a cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation.

Background: Profound intellectual multiple disabilities or polyhandicap (PLH) is defined as a combination of profound mental retardation and serious motor deficits resulting in extreme dependence. Support for these patients is multidisciplinary, complex, and time-consuming. Thus, institutional health care workers (HCWs) face specific working conditions: frequent physical tasks, distressed families, and restricted feedback. Objectives: We aimed to identify determinants of quality of life (QoL) of HCWs and to study longitudinal evolution. Methods: The study used data from the French cohort EVAL-PLH. The participants were institutional HCWs of persons with PLH (age ≥ 3 years at the time of inclusion; age at onset of cerebral lesion <3 years old). Two populations were used: (1) cross sectional study: the sample 1 includes the HCWs assessed at T2 (2020-2021); (2) longitudinal study: the sample 2 includes the HCWs assessed at both T1 (2015-2016) and T2 (2020-2021). The data collected included: sociodemographics, health status, professional variables, and psycho-comportemental aspects. QoL was assessed using WHOQOL-BREF which provides 4 scores. Results: In comparison with French norms, the physical and social scores of QoL were significantly lower while the psychological score was significantly higher for (i) the 223 HCWs (participation rate 62%) assessed at T2 and (ii) the 61 HCWs assessed at T1 and T2. The main factors modulating QoL were age, marital status, self-perceived financial difficulties, personal chronic disease, anxiety-mood disorders, nature of coping strategies, and burnout. Conclusion: This study confirms the mixed (negative and positive) impact of caring persons with PLH on the institutional HCWs' QOL. Main determinants of the HCW's QOL were: older age, single status, perceived financial difficulties, altered health status, burn out and coping strategies.Clinical trial registration number: NCT02400528.

Pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization for moderate and severe endometriosis. A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous international studies showed that endometriosis could have a link with obstetrical complications, as an increased risk of preterm birth, gestational diabetes mellitus, and cesarean section. However, the results are difficult to interpret because biases are common, such as heterogeneity in the severity of the endometriosis cases included. That's why some complications as risk of miscarriage and post-partum hemorrhage are still debated. Our objective was to study pregnancy outcome after In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in women suffering from rAFS stage III and IV endometriosis. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study between 2009 and 2019. We compared pregnancy outcomes after IVF in two groups of women matched by age, body mass index and smoking in two hospital centers. Group A was constituted by singleton pregnancies following ART for moderate and severe endometriosis (rAFS stage III and IV endometriosis). Group B was composed of singleton pregnancies in women with no endometriosis following ART for another reproductive disease. All women achieved pregnancy after 22 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 240 pregnant women were included: 80 singleton IVF pregnancies (group A) were compared with 160 singleton IVF pregnancies (group B). We observed an increased risk of placenta previa (12.5% Vs 1.9%; p = 0,001), and cesarean section (49.4% (n = 39) Vs 29.6% (n = 47) p = 0,004). Rate of postpartum hemorrhage was not significantly different in endometriosis group (11.2% Vs 7.5% p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Despite conflicting results in literature due to a lot of confounding variables, the impact of endometriosis on pregnancy is still debated in women suffering from rAFS III and IV endometriosis. In our study, we observed statistically higher rates of placenta previa and cesarean section but not an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Further larger series are needed to confirm our findings and a possible link with other obstetrical complications. However, we think that an ART pregnancy in a context of severe endometriosis should be considered at risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes.

Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.

Non-operative management (NOM) has become the major treatment of blunt liver trauma (BLT) with a NOM failure rate of 3-15% due to liver-related complications. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors and a risk-stratified score of NOM failure. From 2013 to 2021, all patients with BLT in three trauma centers were included; clinical, biological, radiological and outcome data were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive factors and a risk-stratified score associated with NOM failure were identified. Four hundred and ninety-four patients with BLT were included. Among them, 80 (16.2%) had isolated BLT. Fifty-nine patients (11.9%) underwent emergent operative management (OM) on the day of admission and 435 (88.1%) had a NOM. NOM failure rate was 11.5%. Patients with a NOM failure more frequently had a hemoperitoneum (p < 0.001), liver bleeding (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001) and angioembolization (p < 0.001) compared to patient with a successful NOM. In multivariate analysis, the presence of hemoperitoneum (OR = 5.71; 95 CI [1.29-25.45]), angioembolization (OR = 8.73; 95 CI [2.04-38.44] and severe liver injury (AAST IV or V) (OR = 8.97; 95 CI [3.36-23.99]) were independent predictive factors of NOM failure. When these three factors were associated, NOM failure rate was 83.3%. The AAST grade, the presence of hemoperitoneum and the realization of liver angioembolization on the day of admission are three independent predictive factors of NOM failure. Our risk-score based on these three factors stratify the risk of NOM failure in BLT and could be used for a more appropriate level of medical survey adapted to each patient. Level of evidence: prospective observational cohort study, Level III.

The French EVAL-PLH cohort of persons with polyhandicap.

Polyhandicap is characterized by a combination of profound intellectual disability and serious motor deficit, resulting in the extreme restriction of autonomy and communication. The aim of the EVAL-PLH (EVALuation PoLyHandicap) study is to identify the impact of socioeconomic, environmental, and epidemiological determinants on the health status of the persons with polyhandicap and the daily lives of their caregivers. EVAL-PLH is a prospective cohort study. The study involved persons with severe polyhandicap (who were cared for at reeducation centers, residential facilities, and one specialized pediatric/neurological department of a university hospital), their familial caregivers and the institutional caregivers. Data collection included sociodemographics, heath status, and psychocomportemental information. Data have been collected at 2 points (2015-2016 and 2020-2021). The French EVAL-PLH cohort is the first cohort study focusing on persons with polyhandicap, their families, and the health care workers caring for them. The sustainability of the device is essential to assist patients, families, clinicians, and health decision-making authorities in the optimization of care management.

National incidence rate and related mortality for acute respiratory distress syndrome in France.

INTRODUCTION: Despite many efforts to improve mechanical ventilation strategies and the use of rescue strategies, ARDS-related mortality remains high. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence and 90-day mortality of ARDS patients admitted to all French ICUs following the introduction of the Berlin definition of ARDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data source for this nationwide cohort study was the French national hospital database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI)), which systematically collects administrative and medical information related to all patients hospitalised and hospital stays. Patient-level data were obtained from the PMSI database for all patients admitted to an ICU from the 1st of January 2017, through the 31st of December 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: ICU patients ≥ 18 years old with at least one International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10) diagnosis code of J80 (ARDS), either as a primary diagnosis or a secondary diagnosis, during their ICU stay. RESULTS: A total of 12,846 ICU adult patients with ARDS were included. The crude incidence of ARDS was 24.6 per 100,000 person-years, varying with age from 6.7 per 100,000 person-years for those 18 through 40 years of age to 51.9 per 100,000 person-years for those 68 through 76 years of age. The in-hospital mortality rate was 51.1%. Day-90 mortality (day-1 being the ICU admission) was 51.2% and increased with age from 29.0% for patients 18 through 40 years of age to 69.3% for patients 77 years of age or older (p < 0.001). Only 53.9% of the survivors were transferred home directly after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and mortality of ARDS in adults in France are higher than that generally reported in other countries.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among homeless people living rough, in shelters and squats: A large population-based study in France.

BACKGROUND: Overcrowded housing, as well as inadequate sanitary conditions, contribute to making homeless people particularly vulnerable to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to assess the seroprevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among people experiencing homelessness on a large city-wide scale in Marseille, France, taking into account different types of accommodation. METHODS: A consortium of outreach teams in 48 different locations including streets, slums, squats, emergency or transitional shelters and drop-in centres participated in the inclusion process. All participants consented to have a validated rapid antibody assay for immunoglobulins M (IgM) and G (IgG) and to answer a questionnaire on medical health conditions, comorbidities, and previous COVID-19 symptoms. Information on their housing conditions since the COVID-19 crisis was also collected from the participants. RESULTS: From June 01 to August 05, 2020, 1,156 homeless participants were enrolled in the study and tested. The overall seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies was 5.6% (95%CI 2.3-7.0), ranging from 2.2% in people living on the streets to 8.1% in people living in emergency shelters (P = 0.009). Around one third of the seropositive participants reported COVID-19 symptoms. Compared to the general population in Marseille (3.6%), the homeless population living in the same urban area experienced a significantly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (|z| = 3.65 > 1.96). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need for regular screening among the homeless to prevent clustering in overcrowded or inadequate accommodations. It is also necessary to provide essential resources to keep homeless people healthy, the vast majority of whom have cumulative risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection.