A randomised trial of anti-GM-CSF otilimab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia (OSCAR).

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and dysregulated myeloid cell responses are implicated in the pathophysiology and severity of COVID-19. METHODS: In this randomised, sequential, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, adults aged 18-79 years (Part 1) or ≥70 years (Part 2) with severe COVID-19, respiratory failure and systemic inflammation (elevated C-reactive protein/ferritin) received a single intravenous infusion of otilimab 90 mg (human anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody) plus standard care (NCT04376684). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28. RESULTS: In Part 1 (n=806 randomised 1:1 otilimab:placebo), 71% of otilimab-treated patients were alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28 versus 67% who received placebo; the model-adjusted difference of 5.3% was not statistically significant (95% CI -0.8-11.4%, p=0.09). A nominally significant model-adjusted difference of 19.1% (95% CI 5.2-33.1%, p=0.009) was observed in the predefined 70-79 years subgroup, but this was not confirmed in Part 2 (n=350 randomised) where the model-adjusted difference was 0.9% (95% CI -9.3-11.2%, p=0.86). Compared with placebo, otilimab resulted in lower serum concentrations of key inflammatory markers, including the putative pharmacodynamic biomarker CC chemokine ligand 17, indicative of GM-CSF pathway blockade. Adverse events were comparable between groups and consistent with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28. However, despite the lack of clinical benefit, a reduction in inflammatory markers was observed with otilimab, in addition to an acceptable safety profile.

Study to Explore the Association of the Renin-Angiotensin System and Right Ventricular Function in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with pulmonary vasoconstriction in mechanically ventilated patients. Enhancing the activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a key enzyme of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), using recombinant human ACE2 (rhACE2) could alleviate RAS-mediated vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling. METHODS: This prospective observational study investigated the association between concentrations of RAS peptides (Ang II or Ang(1-7)) and markers of RV function, as assessed by echocardiography (ratio of RV to left ventricular end-diastolic area, interventricular septal motion, and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP)). RESULTS: Fifty-seven mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled. Incidence rates of acute cor pulmonale (ACP) and pulmonary circulatory dysfunction (PCD) were consistent with previous studies. In the 45 evaluable participants, no notable or consistent changes in RAS peptides concentration were observed over the observation period, and there was no correlation between Ang II concentration and either PASP or RV size. The model of the predicted posterior distributions for the pre- and post-dose values of Ang II demonstrated no change in the likelihood of PCD after hypothetical dosing with rhACE2, thus meeting the futility criteria. Similar results were observed with the other RAS peptides evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-defined success criteria for an association between PCD and the plasma RAS peptides were not met in the mechanically ventilated unselected patients.

An open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single doses of GSK2586881 in participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 activity may be impaired in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); therefore, administration of exogenous angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2) may be beneficial. This Phase IIa, multi-center, open-label, exploratory, single-dose, dose-escalation study (NCT03177603) assessed the potential vasodilatory effects of single doses of GSK2586881 (a recombinant human ACE2) on acute cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in hemodynamically stable adults with documented PAH who were receiving background PAH therapy. Successive cohorts of participants were administered a single intravenous dose of GSK2586881 of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mg/kg. Dose escalation occurred after four or more participants per cohort were dosed and a review of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and hemodynamic data up to 24 h postdose was undertaken. The primary endpoint was a change in cardiopulmonary hemodynamics (pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, and mean pulmonary artery pressure) from baseline. Secondary/exploratory objectives included safety and tolerability, effect on renin-angiotensin system peptides, and pharmacokinetics. GSK2586881 demonstrated no consistent or sustained effect on acute cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in participants with PAH receiving background PAH therapy (N = 23). All doses of GSK2586881 were well tolerated. GSK2586881 was quantifiable in plasma for up to 4 h poststart of infusion in all participants and caused a consistent and sustained reduction in angiotensin II and a corresponding increase in angiotensin (1-7) and angiotensin (1-5). While there does not appear to be a consistent acute vasodilatory response to single doses of GSK2586881 in participants with PAH, the potential benefits in terms of chronic vascular remodeling remain to be determined.

Effects of Recombinant Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 on Response to Acute Hypoxia and Exercise: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a key enzyme of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Enhancing ACE2 activity using GSK2586881, a recombinant form of human ACE2, could be beneficial in diseases such as ARDS but may blunt the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) response and potentially impact systemic and tissue oxygenation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GSK2586881 0.8 mg/kg on HPV response in healthy adult volunteers during exercise under hypoxic conditions. METHODS: In this phase I, randomised, double-blind (sponsor open) study, GSK2586881 or placebo was administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose in a two-period crossover design. Treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 3-14 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) measured by echocardiography. Secondary endpoints included RAS peptides and oxygen saturation. RESULTS: Seventeen adults aged 18-40 years were randomised to treatment. There were no clinically relevant differences (defined as a reduction of ≥ 5 mmHg) in change from baseline in PASP between GSK2586881 and placebo. GSK2586881 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events, no worsening of hypoxaemia and no evidence of immunogenicity. The study was terminated early after review of the data, which showed that the predefined success criteria had not been met. Following GSK2586881 administration, levels of the RAS peptide angiotensin II decreased while angiotensin (1-7) increased, as expected, indicating that GSK2586881 was pharmacologically active. CONCLUSIONS: A single IV dose of GSK2586881 0.8 mg/kg was well tolerated but did not impact the acute HPV response in healthy volunteers.

Adaptive study design to assess effect of TRPV4 inhibition in patients with chronic cough.

OBJECTIVE: Airway sensory nerves involved in the cough reflex are activated by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) agonism of P2X purinoceptor 3 (P2X3) receptors. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel activation causes ATP release from airway cells, and it is hypothesised that a TRPV4-ATP-P2X3 axis contributes to chronic cough. An adaptive study was run to determine if TRPV4 inhibition, using the selective TRPV4 channel blocker GSK2798745, was effective in reducing cough. METHODS: A two-period randomised, double blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study was designed with interim analyses for futility and sample size adjustment. Refractory chronic cough patients received either GSK2798745 or placebo once daily for 7 days with a washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected for analysis of GSK2798745 at end of study. The primary end-point was total cough counts assessed objectively during day-time hours (10 h) following 7 days of dosing. RESULTS: Interim analysis was performed after 12 participants completed both treatment periods. This showed a 32% increase in cough counts on Day 7 for GSK2798745 compared to placebo; the pre-defined negative criteria for the study were met and the study was stopped. At this point 17 participants had been enrolled (mean 61 years; 88% female), and 15 had completed the study. Final study results for posterior median cough counts showed a 34% (90% credible interval: -3%, +85%) numerical increase for GSK2798745 compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of an anti-tussive effect of GSK2798745. The study design allowed the decision on lack of efficacy to be made with minimal participant exposure to the investigational drug.