RESUMEN
Studies suggest that central venous catheter bloodstream infections (BSIs) increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated catheter-related BSIs in Switzerland and found peripheral venous catheter (PVC) BSI incidence increased during 2021-2022 compared with 2020. These findings should raise awareness of PVC-associated BSIs and prompt inclusion of PVC BSIs in surveillance systems.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , COVID-19 , Cateterismo Periférico , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Humanos , Suiza/epidemiología , Pandemias , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Sepsis/etiología , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/complicacionesRESUMEN
We describe the inter-regional spread of a novel ESBL-producing Escherichia coli subclone (ST131H89) in long-term care facility residents, general population, and environmental water sources in Western Switzerland between 2017 and 2020. The study highlights the importance of molecular surveillance for tracking emerging antibiotic-resistant pathogens in healthcare and community settings.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Proteínas de Escherichia coli , Humanos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Suiza , Escherichia coli/genética , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Antibacterianos , beta-Lactamasas , Epidemiología MolecularRESUMEN
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat estimated to have caused the deaths of 1.27 million people in 2019, which is more than HIV/AIDS and malaria deaths combined. AMR also has significant consequences on the global economy. If not properly addressed, AMR could immensely impact the world's economy, further increasing the poverty burden in low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate the risk of a post-antibiotic society, where the ability to effectively treat common bacterial infections is being severely threatened, it is necessary to establish a continuous supply of new and novel antibacterial medicines. However, there are gaps in the current pipeline that will prove difficult to address, given the time required to develop new agents. To understand the status of upstream antibiotic development and the challenges faced by drug developers in the early development stage, the World Health Organization has regularly assessed the preclinical and clinical antibacterial development pipeline. The review identifies potential new classes of antibiotics or novel mechanisms of action that can better address resistant bacterial strains. This proactive approach is necessary to stay ahead of evolving resistance patterns and to support the availability of effective treatment options. This review examines the trends in preclinical development and attempts to identify gaps and potential opportunities to overcome the numerous hurdles in the early stages of the antibacterial research and development space.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Salud Global , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Animales , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) versus absence of SAP is associated with a decreased risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after low-risk cholecystectomies (LR-CCE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current guidelines do not recommend routine SAP administration prior to LR-CCE. METHODS: This cohort study included adult patients who underwent LR-CCE and were documented by the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system between 1/2009-12/2020 at 66 Swiss hospitals. LR-CCE was specified as elective endoscopic surgery, age <70, no active cholecystitis, ASA score <3, operating time <120 minutes without implantation of foreign material. Exposure was defined as the administration of cefuroxime or cefazoline ± metronidazole within 120 minutes prior to incision versus no SAP administration. Our main outcome was occurrence of SSI until day 30. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for institutional, patient, and perioperative variables. RESULTS: Of 44 682 surveilled adult cholecystectomy patients, 12 521 (8 726 women [69.7%]; median [IQR] age, 49.0 [38.1-58.2] years), fulfilled inclusion criteria. SSI was identified in 143 patients (1.1%). SAP was administered in 9 269 patients (74.0%) and was associated with a lower SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.70; P < 0.001). The number needed to treat to prevent one SSI episode is 100. CONCLUSIONS: The overall LR-CCE SSI rate was 1.1%. SAP was associated with a 50% lower overall SSI rate. Patients undergoing LR-CCE may benefit from routine surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major threat to patients. To date, data on risk factors have been limited, with low internal and external validity. In this multicentre study, risk factors for CRE BSI were determined by comparison with two control groups: patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) BSI, and patients without Enterobacterales infection (uninfected patients). METHODS: A multicentre, case-control-control study was nested in a European prospective cohort study on CRE (EURECA). CRE BSI:CSE BSI matching was 1:1, CRE BSI:Uninfected patients matching was 1:3, based on hospital, ward and length of stay. Conditional logistic regression was applied. RESULTS: From March 2016 to November 2018, 73 CRE BSIs, 73 CSE BSIs and 219 uninfected patients were included from 18 European hospitals. For CRE versus CSE BSI, previous CRE colonization/infection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 7.32; 95% CI 1.65-32.38) increased the risk. For CRE versus uninfected controls, independent risk factors included: older age (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06), patient referral (long-term care facility: IRR 7.19; 95% CI 1.51-34.24; acute care hospital: IRR 5.26; 95% CI 1.61-17.11), previous colonization/infection with other MDR organisms (MDROs) (IRR 9.71; 95% CI 2.33-40.56), haemodialysis (IRR 8.59; 95% CI 1.82-40.53), invasive procedures (IRR 5.66; 95% CI 2.11-15.16), and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (IRR 3.92; 95% CI 1.68-9.13) or third/fourth generation cephalosporin (IRR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06-7.11) exposure within 3â months before enrolment. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of previous CRE colonization/infection was a major risk factor for carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales BSI. Compared with uninfected patients, evidence of previous MDRO colonization/infection and healthcare exposure were important risk factors for CRE BSI. Targeted screening, infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship should focus on these high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections due to Citrobacter species are increasingly observed in hospitalized patients and are often multidrug-resistant. Yet, the magnitude and burden of Citrobacter spp. resistance in the hospital setting have not been reported. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of Citrobacter spp. infections among hospitalized patients, their main resistance patterns and Citrobacter spp. involvement in hospital outbreaks. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature (PROSPERO registration Jan-2023, CRD42023390084). We searched Embase, Medline and grey literature for studies on hospitalized patients diagnosed with Citrobacter spp. infections, and nosocomial outbreaks due to Citrobacter spp. published during the years 2000-2022. We included observational, interventional, surveillance studies and outbreak reports. Outcomes of interest were the frequency of Citrobacter spp. infections among hospitalized patients and 3rd generation cephalosporin and/or carbapenem resistance percentages in these infections. We used random-effects models to generate pooled outcome estimates and evaluated risk of bias and quality of reporting of outbreaks. RESULTS: We screened 1609 deduplicated publications, assessed 148 full-texts, and included 41 studies (15 observational, 13 surveillance and 13 outbreak studies). Citrobacter spp. urinary tract- and bloodstream infections were most frequently reported, with Citrobacter freundii being the main causative species. Hospital-acquired infection occurred in 85% (838/990) of hospitalized patients with Citrobacter infection. After 2010, an increasing number of patients with Citrobacter spp. infections was reported in observational studies. Pooled frequency estimates for Citrobacter spp. infections could not be generated due to lack of data. The pooled prevalence of ESBL and carbapenemase producers among Citrobacter isolates were 22% (95%CI 4-50%, 7 studies) and 18% (95%CI 0-63%, 4 studies), respectively. An increased frequency of reported Citrobacter outbreaks was observed after 2016, with an infection/colonization ratio of 1:3 and a case-fatality ratio of 7% (6/89 patients). Common outbreak sources were sinks, toilets, contaminated food and injection material. Implemented preventive measures included environmental cleaning, isolation of positive patients and reinforcement of hand hygiene. Only seven out of 13 outbreaks (54%) were definitively controlled. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the clinical importance of endemic and epidemic Citrobacter spp. in healthcare settings. As an emerging, multidrugresistant nosocomial pathogen it requires heightened awareness and further dedicated surveillance efforts.
Asunto(s)
Citrobacter , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Citrobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Brotes de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Botulism is a neuro-paralytic syndrome caused by the production of a neurotoxic protein by Clostridium botulinum. It is a rare but potentially fatal poisoning. Symptoms are due to blockage of neurotransmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. Botulism usually occurs following ingestion, inhalation or contact of the toxin with a wound. More recently, cases of iatrogenic botulism have been described, notably following the injection of toxin for therapeutic or cosmetic purposes. In spring 2023, an outbreak of iatrogenic botulism following intragastric injections was reported in Europe. Here, we provide an overview of botulism, followed by a presentation of the only two Swiss cases reported during the epidemic.
Le botulisme est un syndrome neuroparalytique provoqué par une protéine bactérienne neurotoxique, produite par Clostridium botulinum. Il s'agit d'une intoxication rare, mais potentiellement mortelle. Les symptômes sont dus au blocage de la libération de neurotransmetteurs à la jonction neuromusculaire. Le botulisme survient habituellement à la suite de l'ingestion, l'inhalation ou le contact de la toxine avec une plaie. Plus récemment, des cas de botulisme iatrogène ont été décrits, notamment à la suite de l'injection de toxine à des fins thérapeutiques ou esthétiques. Au printemps 2023, une épidémie de botulisme iatrogène secondaire à des injections intragastriques a été rapportée en Europe. Nous présentons ici un rappel sur le botulisme, suivi de la présentation des deux uniques cas suisses recensés durant l'épidémie.
Asunto(s)
Botulismo , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Botulismo/diagnóstico , Botulismo/etiología , Botulismo/epidemiología , Humanos , Suiza/epidemiología , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Clostridium botulinum/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Toxinas Botulínicas/envenenamiento , Toxinas Botulínicas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
There is an urgent global need for new strategies and drugs to control and treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a list of 12 antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens and began to critically analyze the antibacterial clinical pipeline. This review analyzes "traditional" and "nontraditional" antibacterial agents and modulators in clinical development current on 30 June 2021 with activity against the WHO priority pathogens mycobacteria and Clostridioides difficile. Since 2017, 12 new antibacterial drugs have been approved globally, but only vaborbactam belongs to a new antibacterial class. Also innovative is the cephalosporin derivative cefiderocol, which incorporates an iron-chelating siderophore that facilitates Gram-negative bacteria cell entry. Overall, there were 76 antibacterial agents in clinical development (45 traditional and 31 nontraditional), with 28 in phase 1, 32 in phase 2, 12 in phase 3, and 4 under regulatory evaluation. Forty-one out of 76 (54%) targeted WHO priority pathogens, 16 (21%) were against mycobacteria, 15 (20%) were against C. difficile, and 4 (5%) were nontraditional agents with broad-spectrum effects. Nineteen of the 76 antibacterial agents have new pharmacophores, and 4 of these have new modes of actions not previously exploited by marketed antibacterial drugs. Despite there being 76 antibacterial clinical candidates, this analysis indicated that there were still relatively few clinically differentiated antibacterial agents in late-stage clinical development, especially against critical-priority pathogens. We believe that future antibacterial research and development (R&D) should focus on the development of innovative and clinically differentiated candidates that have clear and feasible progression pathways to the market.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , HumanosRESUMEN
Hand hygiene is a simple, low-cost intervention that may lead to substantial population-level effects in suppressing acute respiratory infection epidemics. However, quantification of the efficacy of hand hygiene on respiratory infection in the community is lacking. We searched PubMed for randomised controlled trials on the effect of hand hygiene for reducing acute respiratory infections in the community published before 11 March 2021. We performed a meta-regression analysis using a Bayesian mixed-effects model. A total of 105 publications were identified, out of which six studies reported hand hygiene frequencies. Four studies were performed in household settings and two were in schools. The average number of handwashing events per day ranged from one to eight in the control arms, and four to 17 in the intervention arms. We estimated that a single hand hygiene event is associated with a 3% (80% credible interval (-1% to 7%)) decrease in the daily probability of an acute respiratory infection. Three of these six studies were potentially at high risk of bias because the primary outcome depended on self-reporting of upper respiratory tract symptoms. Well-designed trials with an emphasis on monitoring hand hygiene adherence are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Higiene de las Manos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Teorema de Bayes , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rapid molecular tests could accelerate the control of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) and carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This interventional 12-month cohort study compared a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay performed directly on rectal swabs with culturing methods (control period, 6 months), during routine ICU screening. Contact precautions (CP) were implemented for CPO or non-E. coli ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (nEcESBL-PE) carriers. Using survival analysis, we compared the time intervals from admission to discontinuation of unnecessary preemptive CP among patients at-risk and the time intervals from screening to implementation of CP among newly identified carriers. We also compared diagnostic performances, and nEcESBL-PE/CPO acquisition rates. This study is registered, ISRCTN 23588440. RESULTS: We included 1043 patients. During the intervention and control phases, 92/147 (62.6%) and 47/86 (54.7%) of patients at-risk screened at admission were candidates for early discontinuation of preemptive CP. The LAMP assay had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 44.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.9% for CPO, and 55.6% PPV and 98.2% NPV for nEcESBL-PE. Due to result notification and interpretation challenges, the median time from admission to discontinuation of preemptive CP increased during the interventional period from 80.5 (95% CI 71.5-132.1) to 88.3 (95% CI 57.7-103.7) hours (p = 0.47). Due to the poor PPV, we had to stop using the LAMP assay to implement CP. No difference was observed regarding the incidence of nEcESBL-PE and CPO acquisition. CONCLUSION: A rapid screening strategy with LAMP assays performed directly on rectal swabs had no benefit for infection control in a low-endemicity setting.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Proteínas Bacterianas , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Humanos , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
BackgroundSince the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the disease has frequently been compared with seasonal influenza, but this comparison is based on little empirical data.AimThis study compares in-hospital outcomes for patients with community-acquired COVID-19 and patients with community-acquired influenza in Switzerland.MethodsThis retrospective multi-centre cohort study includes patients > 18 years admitted for COVID-19 or influenza A/B infection determined by RT-PCR. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with COVID-19 or influenza. We used Cox regression (cause-specific and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models) to account for time-dependency and competing events with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounders.ResultsIn 2020, 2,843 patients with COVID-19 from 14 centres were included. Between 2018 and 2020, 1,381 patients with influenza from seven centres were included; 1,722 (61%) of the patients with COVID-19 and 666 (48%) of the patients with influenza were male (p < 0.001). The patients with COVID-19 were younger (median 67 years; interquartile range (IQR): 54-78) than the patients with influenza (median 74 years; IQR: 61-84) (p < 0.001). A larger percentage of patients with COVID-19 (12.8%) than patients with influenza (4.4%) died in hospital (p < 0.001). The final adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio for mortality was 3.01 (95% CI: 2.22-4.09; p < 0.001) for COVID-19 compared with influenza and 2.44 (95% CI: 2.00-3.00, p < 0.001) for ICU admission.ConclusionCommunity-acquired COVID-19 was associated with worse outcomes compared with community-acquired influenza, as the hazards of ICU admission and in-hospital death were about two-fold to three-fold higher.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Estudios de Cohortes , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Knowledge about the duration of digestive carriage of ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae is an essential information, impacting clinical decisions (empiric treatment for known carriers) and infection control measures (preemptive precautions, sequential screening). Ten to 50% carriers are still colonized after one year, but these numbers might be overestimated. Use of genomic typing is required to distinguish endogenous long-term carriage from exogenous recolonization events. Median length of colonization appears to range between 0,5 and 13 months for E-ESBL and 0,7 to 10 months for CPE. We performed a narrative review of the literature on this topic. We finally suggest a few future perspectives.
La durée de colonisation digestive par les Enterobacteriaceae productrices de bêtalactamases à spectre élargi (E-BLSE) ou de carbapénèmases (EPC) a des répercussions sur le traitement empirique des cas connus et sur l'application des mesures de contrôle de l'infection. Toutefois, cette information reposant sur une évidence hétérogène est souvent surestimée, avec 10 à 50 % des porteurs colonisés à 1 an. L'utilisation de tests diagnostiques moléculaires est nécessaire pour distinguer les porteurs chroniques avérés des événements de recontamination. La durée médiane de colonisation parmi les porteurs d'E-BLSE est comprise entre 0,5 et 13 mois et, parmi les porteurs d'EPC, entre 0,7 et 10 mois. Nous proposons une revue narrative de la littérature sur le sujet, ainsi que quelques axes de réflexion future.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Enterobacteriaceae , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted by the industry are expensive, especially trials conducted for registration of new drugs for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Lower-cost investigator-initiated trials have recently been successful in recruiting patients with severe infections caused by MDR bacteria. In this viewpoint, we contrast the aims, methods, and resulting costs of industry-led and investigator-initiated trials and ask whether contemporary registration trial costs are justified. Contract research organizations, delivering and monitoring industry-sponsored trials at a significant cost, have little incentive to make trials more efficient or less expensive. The value of universal monitoring of all trial data is questionable. We propose that clinical trial networks play a more influential role in RCT design and planning, lead adaptive risk-based trial monitoring, and work with the industry to maximize efficient recruitment and lower costs in registration trials for the approval of new antimicrobials.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , InvestigadoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The possibility of bloodstream infections caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GC-R-BSI) leads to a trade-off between empiric inappropriate treatment (IAT) and unnecessary carbapenem use (UCU). Accurately predicting 3GC-R-BSI could reduce IAT and UCU. We externally validate 2 previously derived prediction rules for community-onset (CO) and hospital-onset (HO) suspected bloodstream infections. METHODS: In 33 hospitals in 13 countries we prospectively enrolled 200 patients per hospital in whom blood cultures were obtained and intravenous antibiotics with coverage for Enterobacterales were empirically started. Cases were defined as 3GC-R-BSI or 3GC-R gram-negative infection (3GC-R-GNI) (analysis 2); all other outcomes served as a comparator. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed. Impact on carbapenem use was assessed at several cutoff points. RESULTS: 4650 CO infection episodes were included and the prevalence of 3GC-R-BSI was 2.1% (nâ =â 97). IAT occurred in 69 of 97 (71.1%) 3GC-R-BSI and UCU in 398 of 4553 non-3GC-R-BSI patients (8.7%). Model calibration was good, and the AUC was .79 (95% CI, .75-.83) for 3GC-R-BSI. The prediction rule potentially reduced IAT to 62% (60/97) while keeping UCU comparable at 8.4% or could reduce UCU to 6.3% (287/4553) while keeping IAT equal. IAT and UCU in all 3GC-R-GNIs (analysis 2) improved at similar percentages. 1683 HO infection episodes were included and the prevalence of 3GC-R-BSI was 4.9% (nâ =â 83). Here model calibration was insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: A prediction rule for CO 3GC-R infection was validated in an international cohort and could improve empirical antibiotic use. Validation of the HO rule yielded suboptimal performance.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires coordinated actions by and across different sectors. Increasing attention at the global and national levels has led to different strategies to tackle the challenge. The diversity of possible actions to address AMR is currently not well understood from a One Health perspective. AMR-Intervene, an interdisciplinary social-ecological framework, describes interventions to tackle AMR in terms of six components: (i) core information about the publication; (ii) social system; (iii) bio-ecological system; (iv) triggers and goals; (v) implementation and governance; and (vi) assessment. AMR-Intervene provides a broadly applicable framework, which can inform the design, implementation, assessment and reporting of interventions to tackle AMR and, in turn, enable faster uptake of successful interventions to build societal resilience to AMR.
Asunto(s)
Salud Única , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia BacterianaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the most pressing One Health issues. While interventions and policies with various targets and goals have been implemented, evidence about factors underpinning success and failure of interventions in different sectors is lacking. The objective of this study is to identify characteristics of AMR interventions that increase their capacity to impact AMR. This study focuses on AMR interventions targeting E. coli. METHODS: We used the AMR-Intervene framework to extract descriptions of the social and ecological systems of interventions to determine factors contributing to their success. RESULTS: We identified 52 scientific publications referring to 42 unique E. coli AMR interventions. We mainly identified interventions implemented in high-income countries (36/42), at the national level (16/42), targeting primarily one sector of society (37/42) that was mainly the human sector (25/42). Interventions were primarily funded by governments (38/42). Most intervention targeted a low leverage point in the AMR system, (36/42), and aimed to change the epidemiology of AMR (14/42). Among all included publications, 55% (29/52) described at least one success factor or obstacle (29/52) and 19% (10/52) identified at least one success factor and one obstacle. Most reported success factors related to communication between the actors and stakeholders and the role of media, and stressed the importance of collaboration between disciplines and external partners. Described obstacles covered data quality, access to data and statistical analyses, and the validity of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we identified a lack of diversity regarding interventions. In addition, most published E. coli interventions were poorly described with limited evidence of the factors that contributed to the intervention success or failure. Design and reporting guidelines would help to improve reporting quality and provide a valuable tool for improving the science of AMR interventions.
Asunto(s)
Escherichia coli , Salud Única , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evidence about the impact of the pandemic of COVID-19 on the incidence rates of blood cultures contaminations and bloodstream infections in intensive care units (ICUs) remains scant. The objective of this study was to investigate the nationwide epidemiology of positive blood cultures drawn in ICUs during the first two pandemic waves of COVID-19 in Switzerland. METHODS: We analyzed data on positive blood cultures among ICU patients, prospectively collected through a nationwide surveillance system (ANRESIS), from March 30, 2020, to May 31, 2021, a 14-month timeframe that included a first wave of COVID-19, which affected the French and Italian-speaking regions, an interim period (summer 2020) and a second wave that affected the entire country. We used the number of ICU patient-days provided by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health as denominator to calculate incidence rates of blood culture contaminations and bloodstream infections (ICU-BSI). Incidence rate ratios comparing the interim period with the second wave were determined by segmented Poisson regression models. RESULTS: A total of 1099 blood culture contaminations and 1616 ICU-BSIs were identified in 52 ICUs during the study. Overall, more episodes of blood culture contaminations and ICU-BSI were observed during the pandemic waves, compared to the interim period. The proportions of blood culture contaminations and ICU-BSI were positively associated with the ICU occupancy rate, which was higher during the COVID-19 waves. During the more representative second wave (versus interim period), we observed an increased incidence of blood culture contaminations (IRR 1.57, 95% CI 1.16-2.12) and ICU-BSI (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in blood culture contaminations and ICU-BSIs was observed during the second COVID-19 pandemic wave, especially in months when the ICU burden of COVID-19 patients was high.
Asunto(s)
Cultivo de Sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Vigilancia de la Población , Sepsis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suiza/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at high risk of complications and death following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In these facilities, viral transmission can be facilitated by shortages of human and material resources, which can lead to suboptimal application of infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures. To improve the dissemination of COVID-19 IPC guidelines, we developed a serious game called "Escape COVID-19" using Nicholson's RECIPE for meaningful gamification, as engaging serious games have the potential to induce behavioral change. OBJECTIVE: As the probability of executing an action is strongly linked to the intention of performing it, the objective of this study was to determine whether LTCF employees were willing to change their IPC practices after playing "Escape COVID-19." METHODS: This was a web-based, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial, which took place between November 5 and December 4, 2020. The health authorities of Geneva, Switzerland, asked the managers of all LTCFs under their jurisdiction to forward information regarding the study to all their employees, regardless of professional status. Participants were unaware that they would be randomly allocated to one of two different study paths upon registration. In the control group, participants filled in a first questionnaire designed to gather demographic data and assess baseline knowledge before accessing regular online IPC guidelines. They then answered a second questionnaire, which assessed their willingness to change their IPC practices and identified the reasons underlying their decision. They were then granted access to the serious game. Conversely, the serious game group played "Escape COVID-19" after answering the first questionnaire but before answering the second one. This group accessed the control material after answering the second set of questions. There was no time limit. The primary outcome was the proportion of LTCF employees willing to change their IPC practices. Secondary outcomes included the factors underlying participants' decisions, the domains these changes would affect, changes in the use of protective equipment items, and attrition at each stage of the study. RESULTS: A total of 295 answer sets were analyzed. Willingness to change behavior was higher in the serious game group (82% [119/145] versus 56% [84/150]; P<.001), with an odds ratio of 3.86 (95% CI 2.18-6.81; P<.001) after adjusting for professional category and baseline knowledge, using a mixed effects logistic regression model with LTCF as a random effect. For more than two-thirds (142/203) of the participants, the feeling of playing an important role against the epidemic was the most important factor explaining their willingness to change behavior. Most of the participants unwilling to change their behavior answered that they were already applying all the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The serious game "Escape COVID-19" was more successful than standard IPC material in convincing LTCF employees to adopt COVID-19-safe IPC behavior. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/25595.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Juegos de Video , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Intención , Internet , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
The emergence of cases of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections during recent years has given rise to country-specific surveillance and control strategies. The pandemic we are going through has at least helped to remind the importance of applying basic hygiene practices to prevent and control the spread of numerous other pathogens, including multidrug-resistant bacteria including CA-MRSA. However, once identified, patients who are healthy carriers of CA-MRSA may benefit from decolonization according to an established protocol.
L'émergence de cas d'infections communautaires à Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) résistant à la méticilline, au cours des dernières années, a donné naissance à des stratégies de surveillance et de contrôle propre à chaque pays. Les mesures préventives restent le meilleur moyen de lutter contre la propagation et l'expansion du réservoir communautaire de S. aureus multirésistant. La pandémie que nous traversons aujourd'hui aura peut-être au moins comme avantage d'avoir remis au goût du jour les pratiques d'hygiène de base, permettant d'éviter de nombreuses autres propagations de germes, dont les bactéries multirésistantes. Néanmoins, une fois identifiés, les patients porteurs sains de S. aureus multirésistant peuvent bénéficier d'une décolonisation selon un protocole établi.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carriers of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) who receive cephalosporin-based prophylaxis have twice the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following colorectal surgery as noncarriers. We tested whether ESBL-PE screening and personalized prophylaxis with ertapenem reduces SSI risk among carriers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective nonrandomized, nonblinded, interventional study in 3 hospitals in Israel, Switzerland, and Serbia. Patients were screened for ESBL-PE carriage before elective colorectal surgery. During the baseline phase, departmental guidelines advised prophylaxis with a cephalosporin plus metronidazole. In the intervention phase, guidelines were changed for ESBL-PE carriers to receive ertapenem. The primary outcome was any type of SSI within 30 days. We calculated adjusted risk differences (ARDs) following logistic regression. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis compared 209 ESBL-PE carriers in the baseline phase to 269 in the intervention phase. SSI rates were 21.5% and 17.5%, respectively (ARD, -4.7% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.8% to 2.4%]). Unplanned crossover was high (15%), so to assess efficacy we performed an as-treated analysis comparing 247 patients who received cephalosporin-based prophylaxis with 221 who received ertapenem. SSI rates were 22.7% and 15.8%, respectively (ARD, -7.7% [95% CI, -14.6% to -.8%]), and rates of SSI caused by ESBL-PE were 6.5% and 0.9%, respectively (ARD, -5.6% [95% CI, -8.9% to -2.3%]). There was no significant difference in the rate of deep SSI. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 SSI in ESBL-PE carriers was 13. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for ESBL-PE carriage before colorectal surgery and personalizing prophylaxis for carriers is efficacious in reducing SSI.