External validation of the "walking estimated limitation calculated by history" (WELCH) questionnaire in patients with claudication.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the recently proposed "Walking Estimated Limitation Calculated by History" (WELCH) questionnaire. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 450 new patients referred to our laboratory for treadmill testing (constant load 3.2 km/h and 10% slope for 15 minutes and then incremental increases). Results are presented as mean ± SD or median [25th-75th percentiles] or number (percentage). An ankle brachial index <0.90 defined the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD). Typical "vascular-type claudication" is a lower-limb pain or discomfort that is absent at rest, appears at exercise, forces stopping, and disappears within 10 minutes of exercise stopping. The Spearman r coefficient of correlation between maximal walking time (MWT) on treadmill and WELCH scores was calculated for patients with (PAD+) or without (PAD-) PAD, and reporting typical vascular-type claudication (VTC+) or not (VTC-). RESULTS: The WELCH score was obtained in all included patients. The number (%) of patients with a WELCH score <25 was 37 (54%), 198 (65%), 14 (44%), and 18 (38%), and the Spearman correlation coefficient between WELCH score and treadmill MWT was 0.588, 0.609, 0.581, and 0.591 in the VTC-/PAD+, VTC+/PAD+, VTC-/PAD-, and VTC+/PAD- groups respectively (all p < .001). In PAD+/VTC+ patients, the WELCH positive predictive value for the inability to walk for 5 minutes on the treadmill was 79%. CONCLUSION: The WELCH score correlates moderately with treadmill-walking capacity in patients with or without PAD, and with or without typical VTC. It appears to be a simple to complete and easily scored instrument to help clinicians standardise the subjective estimation of walking capacity in their patients.

Comparison of reported symptoms to those produced by treadmill testing in patients with claudication suspected of arterial origin.

AIM: We aimed at comparing lower limb symptoms reported by history to those observed during a standard treadmill test. METHODS: We retrospectively studied symptomatic patients referred over a three years period for suspected arterial claudication and used the Edinburgh claudication questionnaire before exercise and symptoms observed on a treadmill. We confronted, right and left, proximal (lower-back thigh or buttocks) and distal (leg or foot) lower-limb symptoms before and during treadmill exercise. Results are reported as mean ± standard deviation for percentage and 95% confidence interval and Kappa statistics are performed. RESULTS: Of 795 patients with claudication, aged 63 ± 12 years, treadmill test resulted in 715 reporting lower-limb symptoms on treadmill. Cohen's Kappa for the site-specific analysis of symptoms by history vs. symptoms on treadmill was 0.509 ± 0.21 (P < 0.01), showing a moderate agreement. Nevertheless, symptoms on treadmill reproduced, at least partly, symptoms by history in 675 (84.9% 95CI: 82.3-87.2) of patients, although symptoms on treadmill were strictly of the same localizations as symptoms by history in only 378 (47.6% 95CI: 44.1-51.0) of all studied patients. Last, 279 patients (35.1% of all patients) reported non limb symptoms on treadmill. CONCLUSION: Although on a site by site basis the concordance of symptoms by history to symptoms by treadmill is moderate, most patients reproduced their usual symptoms on treadmill. Age does not seem to impair the concordance. Last, beyond the sole measurement of maximal walking capacity, treadmill frequently unmasks non-limb limiting symptoms that may require clinical attention.