Surgical treatment of descending necrotising mediastinitis caused by odontogenic infection: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Analysing the results of patients with odontogenic descending necrotising mediastinitis (DNM) treated predominantly by transcervical approach. BACKGROUND: Odontogenic DNM is a rare but serious complication of dental disease and dental procedures. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 20 patients who underwent surgery for odontogenic DNM. RESULTS: The mean age was 33.95±12.24 years, and 18 patients (90 %) were men. Type I and diffuse form of DNM were identified in 8 (40 %) and 12 (60 %) patients, respectively. The mean time between the onset of symptoms and surgery was 7.16±4.23 days. The transcervical approach was used in 16 patients, combined cervicotomy and subxiphoid incision in three patients, and cervicotomy and posterolateral thoracotomy was used in one patient. Four patients were reoperated. The mean mediastinal drainage duration and postoperative length of stay (LOS) were 17.05±10.27 days and 20.70±10.87 days, respectively. Fourteen (70 %) patients received mechanical ventilation with a mean duration of 8.86±9.55 days. Comorbidities were present in five (26 %) patients; there were complications in 17 (85 %) patients. In-hospital mortality reached 5 % (1 patient). Thirty-five teeth were extracted. Lower mandibular molars represented 21 (62 %) of extracted teeth. Submandibular and submental spaces were the most affected by the presence of deep neck infection (five and four cases, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study supports the role of transcervical mediastinal drainage as an alternative approach in the surgical treatment of odontogenic DNM (Tab. 4, Fig. 2, Ref. 30).

Role of endotracheal stenting in tracheal reconstruction surgery-retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review a single institution experience with tracheal stenosis treatment and to define a role of endotracheal stenting in tracheal reconstruction surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the period between January 1991 and January 2003, 163 patients underwent tracheal reconstruction. There were 114 males and 49 females in age range from 0.5 to 79 years (mean 43.2 years). Indications for reconstruction were: posttracheostomic (PostTS) and postintubation (PostINT) stenoses in 111 cases, tumor-stenosis in 24 cases, tracheo-esophageal fistulas (T-Efist) in 17 cases, traumatic laesions in six and functional stenosis in five cases. For these indications, the following procedures were performed: segmental tracheal resection in 87 cases, stenting in 68 cases (by our own modification of Montgomery T-tube in 65 cases and by other traditional endo-stents in three cases). Primary suture of traumatic tracheal wall was performed in five cases. Three cases involved laser intervention and tumor resections, respectively. RESULTS: Segmental tracheal resection (n = 87) was successful in almost all the cases (96%). T-tube was applied in 65 cases; the indications included: PostTS and PostINT stenoses in 38 cases, tumors in 17 cases, T-E fistulas in seven cases and functional stenosis in three cases. Twenty-seven patients (41.6%) were successfully treated by this modality. In 19 patients (29.2%), the stenting is still continuing, but they are candidates for extraction of the T-tube in near future. In 19 patients (29.2%) with malignant stenoses, the T-tube was applied only as a palliation. All these patients died due to their underlying malignant disease; the follow-up ranged from 2 to 18 months. CONCLUSION: Tracheal stenosis is a serious, life-threatening disease with increasing incidence. In our study, the best results were achieved by segmental tracheal resection. However, the endotracheal stenting is the method of choice, when the segmental resection cannot be performed. The management of tracheal stenosis reconstruction by our own modification of Montgomery T-tube is being presented.

Urgent segmental resection as the primary strategy in management of benign tracheal stenosis. A single center experience in 164 consecutive cases.

The report is a retrospective review of 238 benign tracheal stenoses of various etiologies treated between 1995 and 2008. To show that urgent segmental resection has complication rates similar to elective resection and, therefore, preoperative dilation is not necessary, we analysed records of patients who underwent either standard segmental resections with anterolateral mediastinal tracheal mobilization, single-suture anastomosis and neck flexion; or insertion of T-tube with oval-shaped horizontal arm. Primary segmental resection was performed in 164 patients (68.9%), including 14 cases with concomitant tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF). T-tube as an initial treatment suited 74 (31.1%) patients. We encountered two partial and one complete anastomotic disruptions following subglottic resections treated by T-tube insertion and costal cartilage tracheoplasty or permanent tracheostomy. Restenosis rate in segmental resection was 3.1%. No difference in complication rate between urgent and elective segmental resections was experienced. We treated a small number of patients by endotracheal stent insertion but the results were discouraging. Urgent segmental resection without prior rigid bronchoscopy dilation is our strategy of choice whenever possible. As an alternative to dilation we prefer temporary insertion of modified T-tube. Stand-alone endoluminal dilation and stenting has yet to prove its safety and long-term efficacy.