Distributed Medical Education (DME) in psychiatry: perspectives on facilitators, obstacles, and factors affecting psychiatrists' willingness to engage in teaching activities.

BACKGROUND: Distributed Medical Education (DME), a decentralized model focused on smaller cities and communities, has been implemented worldwide to bridge the gap in psychiatric education. Faculty engagement in teaching activities such as clinical teaching, supervision, and examinations is a crucial aspect of DME sites. Implementing or expanding DME sites requires careful consideration to identify enablers that contribute to success and barriers that need to be addressed. This study aims to examine enablers, barriers, and factors influencing psychiatrists' willingness to start or continue participating in teaching activities within Dalhousie University's Faculty of Medicine DME sites in two provinces in Atlantic Canada. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of an environmental scan of Dalhousie Faculty of Medicine's DME programs in Nova Scotia (NS) and New Brunswick (NB), Canada. In February 2023, psychiatrists from seven administrative health zones in these provinces anonymously participated in an online survey. The survey, created with OPINIO, collected data on sociodemographic factors, practice-related characteristics, medical education, and barriers to teaching activities. Five key outcomes were assessed, which included psychiatrists' willingness to engage in (i) clinical training and supervision, (ii) lectures or skills-based teaching, (iii) skills-based examinations, (iv) training and supervision of Canadian-trained psychiatrists, and (v) training and supervision of internationally trained psychiatrists. The study employed various statistical analyses, including descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, and logistic regression, to identify potential predictors associated with each outcome variable. RESULTS: The study involved 60 psychiatrists, primarily male (69%), practicing in NS (53.3%), with international medical education (69%), mainly working in outpatient services (41%). Notably, 60.3% lacked formal medical education training, yet they did not perceive the lack of training as a significant barrier, but lack of protected time as the main one. Despite this, there was a strong willingness to engage in teaching activities, with an average positive response rate of 81.98%. The lack of protected time for teaching/training was a major barrier reported by study participants. Availability to take the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Competency by Design training was the main factor associated with psychiatrists' willingness to participate in the five teaching activities investigated in this study: willingness to participate in clinical training and supervision of psychiatry residents (p = .01); provision of lectures or skills-based teaching for psychiatry residents (p < .01); skills-based examinations of psychiatry residents (p < .001); training/supervision of Canadian-trained psychiatrists (p < .01); and training and supervision of internationally trained psychiatrists (p < .01). CONCLUSION: The study reveals a nuanced picture regarding psychiatrists' engagement in teaching activities at DME sites. Despite a significant association between interest in formal medical education training and willingness to participate in teaching activities, clinicians do not consider the lack of formal training as a barrier. Addressing this complexity requires thoughtful strategies, potentially involving resource allocation, policy modifications, and adjustments to incentive structures by relevant institutions.

Viewing faculty development through an organizational lens: Sharing lessons learned.

INTRODUCTION: Faculty Development (FD) plays a key role in supporting education, especially during times of change. The effectiveness of FD often depends upon organizational factors, indicating a need for a deeper appreciation of the role of institutional context. How do organizational factors constrain or enhance the capacity of faculty developers to fulfil their mandates? METHODS: Using survey research methodology, data from a survey of FD leaders at Canadian medical schools were analyzed using Bolman and Deal's four frames: Symbolic, Political, Structural, and Human Resource (HR). RESULTS: In the Symbolic frame, FD leaders reported lack of identity as a FD unit, which was seen as a constraining factor. Within the Political frame, developing visibility was seen as an enhancing factor, though it did not always ensure being valued. In the Structural frame, expanding scope of practice was seen as an enhancing factor, though it could also be a constraining factor if not accompanied by increased resources. In the HR frame, a sense of instability due to changing leadership and uncertainty about human resources was seen as a constraining factor. CONCLUSION: While broadening the mandate of FD can generally be considered as positive, it is imperative that it is appropriately resourced and accompanied by recognition of FD as a valued contributor to the educational mission.

Educating Residents About Cannabis: Results of a Needs Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Cannabis use by people receiving mental health services is increasingly common, yet many psychiatrists have limited knowledge about the pharmacology of cannabis or its clinical effects. Though clearly relevant to residency training, there is little information on unmet needs and current teaching practices to guide educators who wish to develop a cannabis curriculum. To address this, the authors interviewed key informants and surveyed Canadian psychiatry program directors and residents about cannabis education seeking to determine appropriate content and approaches to inform curriculum development. METHODS: The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 7 experts in addictions and psychiatry education. Findings were then used to develop a needs assessment survey about cannabinoid teaching in residency education. Residents and program directors from psychiatry training programs in Canada were invited to complete the online survey. RESULTS: Key informants believed residents are not adequately prepared to manage substance use disorders and recommended additional training be dedicated to cannabinoid education, including cannabis use disorder. Seven program directors and 27 residents completing the survey made recommendations for curriculum content and design. Pharmacology, neurobiology, and managing cannabis use disorders were identified as the most important topics for inclusion. A majority of respondents rated 5 of 8 proposed learning objectives as not supported by existing curriculum and supported an integration of key topics across training years. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents identified an urgent need for programs to offer an integrated cannabis curriculum. As cannabis use increases internationally, these findings may be useful to inform curriculum development in other countries.

Understanding, teaching and assessing the elements of the CanMEDS Professional Role: canadian program directors' views.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are required to maintain and sustain professional roles during their careers, making the Professional Role an important component of postgraduate education. Despite this, this role remains difficult to define, teach and assess. OBJECTIVE: To (a) understand what program directors felt were key elements of the CanMEDS Professional Role and (b) identify the teaching and assessment methods they used. METHODS: A two-step sequential mixed method design using a survey and semi-structured interviews with Canadian program directors. RESULTS: Forty-six program directors (48% response rate) completed the questionnaire and 10 participated in interviews. Participants rated integrity and honesty as the most important elements of the Role (96%) but most difficult to teach. There was a lack of congruence between elements perceived to be most important and most frequently taught. Role modeling was the most common way of informally teaching professionalism (98%). Assessments were most often through direct feedback from faculty (98%) and feedback from other health professionals and residents (61%). Portfolios (24%) were the least used form of assessment, but they allowed residents to reflect and stimulated self-assessment. CONCLUSION: Program directors believe elements of the Role are difficult to teach and assess. Providing faculty with skills for teaching/assessing the Role and evaluating effectiveness in changing attitudes/behaviors should be a priority in postgraduate programs.

Remediation practices in Canadian psychiatry clerkships.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of information regarding interventions for undergraduate students at Canadian medical schools who require remediation during their psychiatric training. The need for a theoretical framework to guide remediation has been identified. In this study, we sought to characterize remediation taking place in undergraduate psychiatry education, particularly during clerkship. A secondary goal was to ascertain whether those responsible for remediation were aware of the stages of change (transtheoretical) model, and whether they formally incorporated this framework (or another) into their remediation processes. METHODS: A short six-question survey on remediation practices was e-mailed to educators responsible for undergraduate psychiatry education at all 17 Canadian medical schools as identified through the Canadian Organization of Undergraduate Psychiatry Educators (COUPE). RESULTS: The response rate was 67 %. Respondents' overall impressions of their school's remediation process were that it was "highly effective" (25 %), or "somewhat effective" (67 %); 8 % reported being unsure of its effectiveness. While 75 % of survey respondents were aware of the stages of change model, only 17 % reported using this framework: no alternate theoretical frameworks were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The most common form of evaluation was multiple-choice question (MCQ) exams, and the most common form of remediation was exam rewrites. There is little information regarding the long-term outcomes of remediation, and further research would be useful in formulating recommendations regarding best practices.

Exploring Current Practices, Needs, and Barriers for Expanding Distributed Medical Education and Scholarship in Psychiatry: Protocol for an Environmental Scan Using a Formal Information Search Approach and Explanatory Design.

BACKGROUND: Distributed medical education (DME) offers manifold benefits, such as increased training capacity, enhanced clinical learning, and enhanced rural physician recruitment. Engaged faculty are pivotal to DME's success, necessitating efforts from the academic department to promote integration into scholarly and research activities. Environmental scanning has been used to gather, analyze, and apply information for strategic planning purposes. It helps organizations identify current practices, assess needs and barriers, and respond to emerging risks and opportunities. There are process models and conceptual frameworks developed for environmental scanning in the business and educational sectors. However, the literature lacks methodological direction on how to go about designing and implementing this strategy to guide research and practice in DME, especially in the psychiatry field. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a protocol for an environmental scanning that aims to understand current practices and identify needs and barriers that must be addressed to facilitate the integration of psychiatrists from the Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine's distributed education sites in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick into the Department of Psychiatry, contributing for the expansion of DME in both provinces and informing strategic planning and decision-making within the organization. METHODS: This protocol adopts an innovative approach combining a formal information search and an explanatory design that includes quantitative and qualitative data. About 120 psychiatrists from 8 administrative health zones of both provinces will be invited to complete an anonymous web-based survey with questions about demographics, participants' experience and interest in undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education, research and scholarly activities, quality improvement, and knowledge translation. Focus group sessions will be conducted with a purposive sample of psychiatrists to collect qualitative data on their perspectives on the expansion of DME. RESULTS: Results are expected within 6 months of data collection and will inform policy options for expanding Dalhousie University's psychiatry residency and fellowship programs using the infrastructure and human resources at distributed learning sites, leveraging opportunities regionally, especially in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: This paper proposes a comprehensive environmental scan procedure adapted from existing approaches. It does this by collecting important characteristics that affect psychiatrists' desire to be involved with research and scholarly activities, which is crucial for the DME expansion. Furthermore, its concordance with the literature facilitates interpretation and comparison. The protocol's new method also fills DME information gaps, allowing one to identify insights and patterns that may shape psychiatric education. This environmental scan's results will answer essential questions about how training programs could involve therapists outside the academic core and make the most of training experiences in semiurban and rural areas. This could help other psychiatry and medical units outside tertiary care establish residency and fellowship programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46835.

Changing concepts of neuroanatomy teaching in medical education.

BACKGROUND: Anatomy teaching is often described as foundational in the education of physicians, but in recent years there has been increasing pressure on teachers of neuroanatomy to justify its place in the curriculum. SUMMARY: This article examines theoretical assumptions that have traditionally influenced the neuroanatomy curriculum and explains how evolution of thought in the field of medical education has led to a shift in how the pedagogy of neuroanatomy is conceptualized. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread adoption of competency-based education, the emphasis on outcome-based objectives, patient- and learner-centered approaches, and a renewed interest in humanistic aspects of medical education have all contributed to a changing educational milieu. These changes have led to a number of curricular innovations. However, questions remain as to what should be taught to medical learners, and how best to teach it.

Assessing Clinical Faculty Understanding of Statistical Terms Used to Measure Treatment Effects and Their Application to Teaching.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding of statistical terms used to measure treatment effect is important for evidence-informed medical teaching and practice. We explored knowledge of these terms among clinical faculty who instruct and mentor a continuum of medical learners to inform medical faculty learning needs. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study that used a questionnaire to measure a health professional's understanding of measures of treatment effect and a focus group to explore perspectives on learning, applying, and teaching these terms. We analyzed questionnaire data using descriptive statistics and focus group data using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed responses from clinical faculty who were physicians and completed all sections of the questionnaire (n = 137). Overall, approximately 55% were highly confident in their understanding of statistical terms; self-reported understanding was highest for number needed to treat (77%). Only 26% of respondents correctly responded to all comprehension questions; however, 80% correctly responded to at least one of these questions. There was a significant association among self-reported understanding and ability to correctly calculate terms. A focus group with clinical/medical faculty (n = 4) revealed themes of mentorship, support and resources, and beliefs about the value of statistical literacy. DISCUSSION: We found that half of clinical faculty members are highly confident in their understanding of relative and absolute terms. Despite the limitations of self-assessment data, our study provides some evidence that self-assessment can be reliable. Recognizing that faculty development is not mandatory for clinical faculty in many centers, and the notion that faculty may benefit from mentorship in critical appraisal topics, it may be appropriate to first engage and support influential clinical faculty rather than using a broad strategy to achieve universal statistical literacy. Second, senior leadership in medical education should support continuous learning by providing paid, protected time for faculty to incorporate evidence in their teaching.

Decision-making capacity and alcohol abuse: clinical and ethical considerations in personal care choices.

Requests for competency assessment of elderly patients are among the more common referrals that medical and surgical units make to consultation-liaison psychiatrists. Special considerations arise when impairment in cognition, judgment and function arise in the context of substance abuse. At what point during the admission should the evaluation be made? What if the person does well on the cognitive exam but has shown repeated evidence of self-neglect and need for medical care? What role should the medical profession play in mandating that patients give up harmful addictions? In this paper, we describe a case that illustrates these problems, and discuss some of the clinical and ethical considerations involved in the assessment of personal care competence of patients with alcohol abuse, and provide guidelines for these assessments.

Group interventions for patients with cancer and HIV disease: Part II. Effects on immune, endocrine, and disease outcomes at different phases of illness.

There has been great interest in the potential impact of group interventions on medical outcomes. This article reviews the effects of professionally-led groups on immune activity, neuroendocrine function, and survival among patients with cancer or HIV disease. We examine findings concerning different types of group services at different phases of illness. Results are mixed, but the most prominent changes in immune and endocrine activity were associated with structured group interventions for patients with early-stage disease. These findings offer provocative illustrations of relevant mind-body interactions, but their clinical importance has yet to be demonstrated empirically. Group interventions have not been tied consistently to improved survival rates for patients with advanced cancer; few studies as yet have focused on survival outcomes among patients with early-stage cancer or HIV disease.

Group interventions for patients with cancer and HIV disease: Part III. Moderating variables and mechanisms of action.

Growing evidence supports the value of group interventions for individuals who are at risk for or have developed cancer or HIV disease. However, information is more limited concerning how these services can be delivered in an optimal manner, and what processes contribute to their benefits. Parts I and II of this review examined the efficacy of different interventions for individuals at different phases of illness, ranging from primary prevention to late-stage disease, in both psychosocial and biological domains. The current paper examines some of the factors other than phase of illness that might influence group treatment effects (e.g., intervention parameters, participant characteristics), and explores mechanisms of action.

Group interventions for patients with cancer and HIV disease: part IV. Clinical and policy recommendations.

Group interventions have assumed a growing role in primary prevention and supportive care for cancer and HIV disease. Earlier sections of this Special Report examined empirical findings for these interventions and provided recommendations for future research. The current section offers brief recommendations for service providers, policymakers, and stakeholders. Group services now occupy an increasingly prominent place in primary prevention programs and medical settings. In previous sections of this Special Report (Sherman, Leszcz et al., 2004; Sherman, Mosier et al., 2004a, 2004b) we examined the efficacy of different group interventions at different phases of cancer or HIV disease, considered characteristics of the intervention and the participants that might influence outcomes, and discussed mechanisms of action. Methodological challenges and priorities for future research were highlighted. In this, the final section, we offer brief recommendations for service providers, policymakers, and other stakeholders. We consider some of the barriers that constrain use of empirically-based group interventions and note how these programs might be implemented more widely and effectively.

Group interventions for patients with cancer and HIV disease: Part I: Effects on psychosocial and functional outcomes at different phases of illness.

Group interventions for individuals facing cancer or HIV disease have drawn considerable attention among researchers and clinicians over the past 20 years. There is growing evidence that group services may be helpful, but which interventions are most effective for participants at which phases in the trajectory of disease has been less clear. Moreover, professionals working in different intervention settings (e.g., primary prevention vs. clinical care) and different disease sites (cancer vs. HIV disease) often have little awareness of relevant advances in other fields. Efforts to integrate findings in the literature may accelerate research and advance the standard of clinical care. The current article, the first in a series of four special reports, critically evaluates the efficacy of group interventions led by professional or trained facilitators for individuals confronted by cancer or HIV, across the spectrum of illness from elevated risk through advanced disease. We examine psychosocial and functional outcomes for different interventions directed toward different patient subgroups, trace common themes, highlight limitations, and offer recommendations for further research.