Serum concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolites O-desmethylvenlafaxine and N-desmethylvenlafaxine in heterozygous carriers of the CYP2D6*3, *4 or *5 allele.

OBJECTIVE: Increased systemic exposure of the antidepressant venlafaxine and increased risk of side effects has previously been observed in patients with defective CYP2D6 function [poor metabolisers (PMs)]. The aim of this study was to evaluate venlafaxine pharmacokinetics in carriers of one functional and one defective CYP2D6 allele [heterozygous extensive metabolisers (HEMs)]. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from a therapeutic drug-monitoring database. All CYP-genotyped patients with steady-state serum concentration measurements of venlafaxine and metabolites were included in the study. Patients were divided in groups: *1/*1 [homozygous extensive metabolisers (EMs)], *1/*3, *4 or *5 (HEMs) and *4/*4 (PMs). Dose-adjusted serum concentrations of venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, N-desmethylvenlafaxine, and the metabolic ratio (O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine) were compared between the different genotype groups. RESULTS: The sum of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine serum concentrations was not significantly different between genotype groups. Metabolic ratio was 50% lower in HEMs (n = 18) than in EMs (n = 20) (p < 0.05). Serum concentration of N-desmethylvenlafaxine was 5.5-fold higher in HEMs (p < 0.01) and 22-fold higher in PMs (p < 0.001) than in EMs. CONCLUSION: The study showed a shift in the metabolic pathway resulting in substantially higher levels of N-desmethylvenlafaxine in HEMs than in EMs. The metabolic pattern of venlafaxine in HEMs was similar to previous observations in PMs and possibly represents an increased risk of venlafaxine-related side effects in HEM patients.

The complexity of active metabolites in therapeutic drug monitoring of psychotropic drugs.

In therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) practice of psychotropic agents, it is common to summarize plasma concentrations of parent drugs and metabolites when these are considered equipotent. However, there is no clear definition of the term equipotent and one should be aware that metabolites referred to as equipotent in the literature could display several-fold differences in affinities toward target proteins. The fact that the parent drug and metabolite may have different abilities to penetrate the blood-brain-barrier further complicates the picture. Potential differences in brain distribution imply that various metabolite/drug ratios representing the same total concentration in plasma reflect different active concentrations in the brain. Plasma metabolite/drug ratios could differ extensively according to metabolic phenotype and administration route. An example is risperidone where the plasma metabolite/drug ratio is 30-fold lower in cytochrome P450 2D6 poor metabolizers compared to ultrarapid metabolizers, and four-fold lower after intramuscular compared to oral administration. As risperidone is more lipophilic and less effluxed by P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain-barrier than the active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone, one might speculate that patients with high plasma metabolite/drug ratios obtain lower active concentrations in the brain. However, the relative drug-metabolite brain distribution needs to be quantified in humans to clarify to what degree drug and metabolite plasma levels reflect active brain concentrations. The present review illustrates the complexity of active metabolites in TDM with focus on amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin, imipramine, fluoxetine, venlafaxine and risperidone, all psychotropic drugs where target plasma concentration ranges are based on the sum of parent drug and metabolite. In addition, perspectives on the possibility of using distribution- and activity-weighted plasma concentrations are provided.

Serum concentrations of risperidone and 9-OH risperidone following intramuscular injection of long-acting risperidone compared with oral risperidone medication.

OBJECTIVE: To compare serum concentrations of risperidone, 9-hydroxy (OH) risperidone and risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone, as well as the 9-OH risperidone/risperidone ratio in patients receiving depot and oral risperidone. METHOD: Serum concentrations from 78 patients receiving three different doses of risperidone depot were measured and compared with serum concentrations from 82 patients taking three different doses of oral risperidone. RESULTS: Patients receiving risperidone depot had significantly lower serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone than patients taking oral risperidone. More interestingly, the 9-OH risperidone/risperidone ratio was also significantly lower in patients receiving risperidone depot than in patients taking oral risperidone. CONCLUSION: Serum concentrations of risperidone plus 9-OH risperidone may be a rather poor indication of the antipsychotic efficacy of risperidone unless their ratio is also considered.