Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Wildl Res ; 55(2): 153, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32214937

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and swine influenza virus (SIV) in selected wild boar populations in Germany (n = 1,221). Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition tests were used for serological monitoring. The serosurvey revealed seroprevalence rates of 64.28%, 11.26%, 7.87%, 7.84%, 3.82% and 1.59% for PPV, ADV, PRCV, SIV, PRRSV and TGEV, respectively. The seroprevalence rates differed between populations and age classes with the highest number of antibody-positive wild boars in older animals (>1 year old). No antibodies to TGEV were found in Baden-Wuerttemberg and in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (investigation period 1997/1998). In addition, sera collected in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in 1997/1998 were negative for SIV. Even though the seroprevalence rates established for these viruses, except for PPV, were relatively low, wild boars may act as a reservoir for pathogens and a source of infection for domestic pigs and humans. Based on the epidemiological situation, no risk of a spread of these viruses should emanate from wild boars, neither for wildlife nor for livestock. However, effective and science-based disease monitoring programmes should continuously be carried out in wild boar populations.

2.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 112(12): 448-56, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16425630

RESUMEN

Avian influenza A viruses (AIV) are the causative agents of the presently most important poultry disease. Ten countries in Asia and several other countries in Eastern Europe suffer high losses from the lethal effects of these viruses of the H5N1 subtype. AIV of other subtypes cause in additional countries severe losses. The threat to health and well-being of the avifauna, domestic poultry and possibly mammals including humans are worldwide of major concern. The European Union reacted with a complete import ban on untreated meat, eggs, poultry products as well as free-living and pet birds. Extensive surveillance of free-living birds and domestic poultry that is maintained in free-range and close to open waters were initiated in an attempt to gather information on the current status of infection with these viruses and to target appropriate countermeasures for the protection of domestic poultry (in-house keeping) and to safeguard food production for humans. Since the monitoring of free-living birds is labour-intensive, costly, and time-consuming, only birds should be included in the monitoring programme that harboured in the past most if not all influenza A viruses. The birds of the order Anatiformes, family Anatidae, subfamilies Anserinae and Anatinae, provided 65.9 % of all avian AIV isolates. The cosmopolitan Common Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) is the dominant species with the highest rate of isolations among all bird species. Second in frequency is the North-American Blue-winged Teal (Spatula discors). Consequently, free-living anatiform birds of the genera Anas and Spatula should comprise the main focus for the collection of cloacal and pharyngeal swabs. With the likely exception of the most recent H5N1 viruses, signs of disease were not recorded in AIV infected anatiform birds. AIV isolations were definitely less frequently obtained from birds of the orders Phasianiformes (including domestic chickens and turkeys), Charadriiformes (plovers and lapwings), Lariformes (gulls), Columbiformes (pigeons) and Psittaciformes (psittacines) and need less attention in sampling efforts. This review presents also data on taxonomy and most suitable means for isolation and typing of haemagglutinating viruses. The different frequencies of the detection of 16 haemagglutinin (HA) subtypes and 9 subtypes of neuraminidase (NA) surface antigens are composed on the basis of extensive literature retrievals. Both antigens occure in isolates at different frequencies. Only 103 of all 144 possible HA x NA combinations were described so far. The AIV that contain the HA subtypes H3, H4, H6 are most frequently isolated whereas the AIV of the subtypes H5 and H7 were less frequently encountered. All other HAs are rather rare. AIV that possess the NA of the subtypes N2, N1, N8 and N3 are frequent and all other NAs are rarely detected.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/veterinaria , Virus de la Influenza A/clasificación , Gripe Aviar/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Animales , Aves , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A/patogenicidad , Gripe Aviar/transmisión , Aves de Corral , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/transmisión , Prevalencia , Vigilancia de Guardia/veterinaria , Especificidad de la Especie , Zoonosis
3.
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 108(2): 51-4, 2001 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11367881

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate two commercially available ELISAs for routine diagnosis of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) in wild boar. For this, 222 tissue samples from wild boar were tested in the ELISAs and the results were compared to those obtained using standard methods. First, frozen spleen sections were examined by direct immunofluorescence, and organ suspensions were prepared and tested for CSFV antigen samples were simultaneously examined with the Chekit-ELISA (Dr. Bommeli AG) and the Herd-Chek-ELISA (IDEXX). From the 222 organ suspensions examined in cell culture 102 were positive for CSFV, while no virus could be isolated from the remaining 120 samples. Taking virus isolation as a standard, the Chekit-ELISAs showed a sensitivity of 97%, and the Herd-Chek-ELISA of 72.5%. Both ELISAs revealed high specificities ranging between 99 and 100%. No correlation was found between false negative results obtained in one or in both of the ELISAs with the positive findings in the immunofluorescence test and in the PLA, nor with the clinical reports. Due to the fact that a big number of samples can be processed in a short time with accurate results, the Chekit-ELISA may be considered useful for routine testing of wild boar samples for CSFV.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Clásica/aislamiento & purificación , Peste Porcina Clásica/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Peste Porcina Clásica/inmunología , Peste Porcina Clásica/virología , Virus de la Fiebre Porcina Clásica/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente Directa/veterinaria , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Bazo/virología , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA