Novel antifungals and treatment approaches to tackle resistance and improve outcomes of invasive fungal disease.

SUMMARYFungal infections are on the rise, driven by a growing population at risk and climate change. Currently available antifungals include only five classes, and their utility and efficacy in antifungal treatment are limited by one or more of innate or acquired resistance in some fungi, poor penetration into "sequestered" sites, and agent-specific side effect which require frequent patient reassessment and monitoring. Agents with novel mechanisms, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles including good oral bioavailability, and fungicidal mechanism(s) are urgently needed. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of novel antifungal agents, with both improved known mechanisms of actions and new antifungal classes, currently in clinical development for treating invasive yeast, mold (filamentous fungi), Pneumocystis jirovecii infections, and dimorphic fungi (endemic mycoses). We further focus on inhaled antifungals and the role of immunotherapy in tackling fungal infections, and the specific PK/pharmacodynamic profiles, tissue distributions as well as drug-drug interactions of novel antifungals. Finally, we review antifungal resistance mechanisms, the role of use of antifungal pesticides in agriculture as drivers of drug resistance, and detail detection methods for antifungal resistance.

Profiling Bacteria in the Lungs of Patients with Severe Influenza Versus COVID-19 with or without Aspergillosis.

RATIONALE: The influence of the lung bacterial microbiome, including potential pathogens, in patients with influenza- or COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA or CAPA) is yet to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To explore the composition of the lung bacterial microbiome and its association with viral and fungal infection, immunity and outcome in severe influenza versus COVID-19 with or without aspergillosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in mechanically ventilated influenza and COVID-19 patients with or without invasive aspergillosis in whom bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for bacterial culture (with or without PCR) was obtained within two weeks after ICU admission. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene sequencing data and viral and bacterial load of BAL samples from a subset of these patients, and of patients requiring non-invasive ventilation, were analyzed. We integrated 16S rRNA gene sequencing data with existing immune parameter datasets. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Potential bacterial pathogens were detected in 20% (28/142) of influenza and 37% (104/281) of COVID-19 patients, while aspergillosis was detected in 38% (54/142) of influenza and 31% (86/281) of COVID-19 patients. A significant association between bacterial pathogens in BAL and 90-day mortality was found only in influenza patients, particularly IAPA patients. COVID-19 but not influenza patients showed increased pro-inflammatory pulmonary cytokine responses to bacterial pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Aspergillosis is more frequently detected in lungs of severe influenza patients than bacterial pathogens. Detection of bacterial pathogens associates with worse outcome in influenza patients, particularly in those with IAPA, but not in COVID-19 patients. The immunological dynamics of tripartite viral-fungal-bacterial interactions deserve further investigation. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: Clinical Presentation and Treatment.

Among all clinical manifestations of pulmonary aspergillosis, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is the most acute presentation. IPA is caused by Aspergillus hyphae invading the pulmonary tissue, causing either tracheobronchitis and/or bronchopneumonia. The degree of fungal invasion into the respiratory tissue can be seen as a spectrum, going from colonization to deep tissue penetration with angio-invasion, and largely depends on the host's immune status. Patients with prolonged, severe neutropenia and patients with graft-versus-host disease are at particularly high risk. However, IPA also occurs in other groups of immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised patients, like solid organ transplant recipients or critically ill patients with severe viral disease. While a diagnosis of proven IPA is challenging and often warranted by safety and feasibility, physicians must rely on a combination of clinical, radiological, and mycological features to assess the likelihood for the presence of IPA. Triazoles are the first-choice regimen, and the choice of the drug should be made on an individual basis. Adjunctive therapy such as immunomodulatory treatment should also be taken into account. Despite an improving and evolving diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium, the burden and mortality of IPA still remains high. This review aims to give a comprehensive and didactic overview of the current knowledge and best practices regarding the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of acute IPA.

Elevated CA 15.3 in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between baseline elevated CA 15.3 (>30 kU/L) and the prevalence of primary or secondary metastatic disease in breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study on patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and baseline CA 15.3> 30 kU/L, diagnosed between 2000-2015. Information on tumor characteristics, pre-treatment CA 15.3, staging results, treatment approach, disease recurrence and death were collected from individual medical files. For every tumor subtype, the optimal cut-off value of CA 15.3 for determining primary metastatic disease is determined. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-four patients with baseline CA15.3 > 30 kU/L were included of which 38% were diagnosed with primary metastatic disease while 15% subsequently developed secondary metastatic disease, with a median follow-up of 74 months. LuminalHER2 tumors had the highest proportion of primary metastatic disease (48%), Triple Negative tumors had the highest proportion of secondary metastatic disease (24%) (p=0.008). A higher CA 15.3 value corresponds to higher risk of both primary and secondary metastatic disease (p<0.001). For the determination of primary metastatic disease, optimal cut-off values for CA 15.3 range between 44 kU/L (Triple Negative) and 59 kU/L (Luminal B). CONCLUSION: In patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and baseline elevated CA 15.3>30 kU/L, 38% presents with primary metastatic disease and 15% develops secondary metastatic disease, with a median follow-up of 74 months. Our results can help clinicians to identify patients at risk of primary or secondary metastatic disease via information on tumor subtype and baseline CA 15.3.